New York City’s progressive communist democrats have officially nominated Zohran Mamdani, a radical anti-Semitic Communist Islamicist ideologue, as their candidate for mayor. A self-described democratic socialist with a record of anti-Israel rhetoric and support for terrorist positions, Mamdani doesn’t just want to govern the city; he wants to fundamentally remake it.

And no, the election was not rigged; this wasn’t a backroom decision or a fringe write-in. Mamdani’s nomination was public, popular, and celebrated by his base. Proudly supported by his prominent fellow travelers, Senator Bernie Sanders, Representative Alexandria Ocasio‑Cortez, and the radicals at the Democratic Socialists of America.

Mamdani’s platform reads less like a traditional policy agenda and more like something scrawled on the wall during a protest. It’s a blueprint for dismantling, not reforming, nearly every institution standing between civil society and chaos. His supporters call it justice. Others recognize it as ideological extremism wrapped in utopian buzzwords.

Zohran Mamdani isn’t running to manage the machine. He’s running to gut it. His campaign is a Molotov cocktail with bullet points:

• Free bus fare citywide
• A network of city-owned grocery stores
• Rent freezes and control over private property
• Abolish NYPD
• Abolish prisons
• Abolish medical bills
• Abolish private health insurance
• Ban all guns
• Legalize sex work
• Safe injection sites
• End cash bail
• Decriminalize drug possession
• End sentencing enhancements
• End all cooperation with ICE

This isn’t a platform, it’s a list of demands from the most extreme corners of activist Twitter and TikTok.

To his supporters, many young, online, and disconnected from practical governance, Mamdani represents “real” change. To others, he embodies a movement that believes destruction is the path to justice. He’s not campaigning to manage the city’s complex machine; he’s campaigning to tear it down and build something new, uncertain, untested, and potentially unlivable.

The most astonishing part? There’s no subterfuge. No hidden agenda. Mamdani’s radicalism is openly declared. Yet, he’s been embraced by a segment of the electorate so hungry for change that they seem indifferent to where that change might lead.

Bottom Line

This moment isn’t just about one candidate. It’s about what happens when a political party prioritizes ideological purity over pragmatic leadership. It’s about a generation disillusioned by the status quo, seduced by communist revolutionary promises, and unconcerned with consequences.

By endorsing Mamdani, New York’s progressive communist democrats have crossed a line, from hopeful reform to reckless rebellion. They’ve chosen applause over accountability, activism over administration.

This isn’t merely the rise of an unqualified radical. It’s a warning about where unchecked political extremism leads. If voters don’t realize what they’ve endorsed, they soon might—when promises meet reality, and the cost of their “change” becomes painfully clear.

New York asked for transformation. It may soon get something far more destructive.

We are so screwed.

-- Steve