As the use of artificial intelligence rises in America, learning from centuries of human data and countless Wikipedia edits, we are left with a critical modern inquiry: “Can artificial intelligence overcome the most stubborn, well-funded form of natural stupidity — that of progressive communist democrat politicians?”

Considering, of course, that natural stupidity in progressive communist democrat politicians is not your average run-of-the-mill human cluelessness. No, this is a special strain, the kind that wears a suit, holds a press conference, and confidently misreads a pie chart upside down. Politicians who start a question with, “I’m not a scientist, but…” and then go on to propose climate legislation based on a Facebook meme.

MATH IS HARD (PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN)

Joe Biden, beloved gaffe machine and absentee president, once said: "If we do everything right, if we do it with absolute certainty, there's still a 30% chance we're going to get it wrong."

AI: Calculates probabilities with precision, identifies margin of error, runs simulations.
Biden: Offers Schrödinger’s Math where you’re both right and wrong simultaneously.

GEOGRAPHY (REP. HANK JOHNSON)

In 2010, Rep. Hank Johnson of Georgia expressed concern that the island of Guam might “tip over and capsize” if too many people were stationed there.

AI: Understands buoyancy, physics, and how islands work.
Johnson: Accidentally describes a Bugs Bunny cartoon.

TECHNOLOGY CONFUSION (SEN. DIANNE FEINSTEIN)

In 2017, Senator Feinstein questioned a tech CEO about "Twitter book" and how it relates to "Snapface."

AI: Can summarize digital ecosystems, machine learning models, and the TOS for 12 platforms at once.
Feinstein: Just wants to know if she can get Instagram on her fax machine.

WORD SALAD WITH A SIDE OF CONFUSION (VP KAMALA HARRIS)

Kamala Harris has delivered some famously circular statements. Like:
"We must work together, to work together, as we work together, because working together is how we work together."

AI: Can generate coherent essays on geopolitical dynamics.
Harris: Turns a sentence into a Möbius strip.

Bottom Line

The answer to, “Can Artificial Intelligence overcome the natural stupidity of politicians, even that of the progressive communist democrats with their polished and poll-tested answers?” is absolutely.

Right after it finishes:

• Decoding the 47-point climate plan written entirely in emojis,

• Figuring out how “taxing the billionaires” funds everything from free college to free Wi-Fi to free emotional support llamas, after a democrat declares, “money is a social construct that demands diversity, equity, and inclusion.”

• And recovering from the trauma of listening to a six-minute congressional inquiry question that never actually included a noun.

Right now, AI’s biggest challenge isn’t processing information; it’s staying functional after hearing the phrase: “This isn’t socialism, it’s compassionate collective resource harmonization.”

Let’s be honest, AI might beat natural political stupidity one day, but it’s gonna need a support group, a bottle of digital whiskey, and three therapy sessions just to recover from one debate with someone who thinks we can fund universal healthcare with artisanal hemp wallets and a Bernie Sanders-themed Etsy store.

We are so screwed.

-- Steve

P.S. Stay curious. Or at least stay away from the “Send All” button.