Once again, the progressive communist democrats are engaged in a furious debate over how best to commit national suicide…

Schiff’s Message to American Citizens

Reprobate progressive communist democrat Senators Adam Schiff (D-CA), Chris Murphy (D-CT), Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Alex Padilla (D-CA), and U.S. Representative Lucy McBath (D-GA) held a press conference alongside survivors of mass shootings to introduce the Assault Weapons Ban of 2025. 

“Schiff for Brains” corrupt, liar, leaker, evidence manipulator, Adam Schiff still wants you to be defenseless against a stronger or more numerous enemy…

Fully automatic military-grade weaponry has been effectively banned for civilian use since the Firearm Owners’ Protection Act of 1986, which prohibited the sale of new machine guns to the general public. Since then, legally owned automatic weapons have been tightly regulated, require extensive background checks, and are incredibly rare and expensive. Despite media portrayals, there is essentially no functional difference between semi-automatic pistols and rifles—both fire one round per trigger pull. The primary differences are cosmetic and ergonomic, such as stock design, barrel length, or accessory rails, none of which affect the core firing mechanism.

The police have no legal duty to protect individual citizens who are not in custody, a fact affirmed by multiple court rulings, including the U.S. Supreme Court. While law enforcement plays a critical role in public safety, officers cannot be everywhere at once and often arrive only after a crime has occurred. In life-threatening situations, especially those involving multiple or heavily armed assailants, individuals must rely on themselves for immediate protection. Firearms can provide the necessary means to defend one’s home and loved ones when seconds count and help is minutes away.

It is a proven fact that gun control laws do not stop criminals, the mentally unstable, or terrorists from committing violence, because by their very nature, these individuals do not respect laws. They frequently bypass legal channels altogether, obtaining weapons through black markets, theft, or straw purchases. In many cases, attackers don’t even rely on guns, instead using knives, vehicles, or improvised weapons to intimidate, harm, or kill. Restrictive gun laws primarily impact innocent law-abiding citizens, leaving them defenseless while doing little to deter those intent on causing harm.

Progressive communist democrats consistently push for sweeping gun control measures while turning a blind eye to the rampant violence plaguing inner cities, where they govern, areas where minority-on-minority crime is disproportionately high. Instead of cracking down on gang activity, enforcing existing gun laws, or prosecuting repeat violent offenders, they pursue policies that disarm law-abiding citizens and weaken police authority.

This ideological obsession with gun restrictions often serves more as political theater than a genuine public safety strategy. Meanwhile, the communities they claim to protect are left to suffer under rising crime, as criminals continue to operate with impunity. Rather than face the hard truths about crime, accountability, and cultural decay in these urban centers, progressive leaders choose to scapegoat guns and lawful gun owners, leaving the most vulnerable without real protection.

Schiff’s real game: money and media face-time...

A little background…

The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution stands out as unique among nations for its robust protection of individual gun ownership, rooted in a philosophy that goes beyond personal self-defense. While many countries allow limited firearm possession for sport or protection, the U.S. remains exceptional in explicitly codifying the right to bear arms as a check on government tyranny and a safeguard of liberty.

First and foremost, the Second Amendment affirms the right of individuals to defend themselves—a principle many Americans see as a natural, inalienable right. While other democracies rely heavily on state mechanisms for protection, the U.S. uniquely enshrines individuals’ right to meet threats with force if necessary.

More distinctively, the Second Amendment serves as a deterrent against domestic tyranny. The Founders, having just cast off an oppressive regime, understood the dangers of unchecked government power. They viewed an armed citizenry not as a threat to democracy but as its ultimate guardian. This perspective remains rare in the modern world, where governments often see gun ownership as a privilege rather than a right.

Lastly, the Second Amendment provides a viable deterrence against foreign aggression, with widespread gun ownership in the U.S. making the prospect of invasion far more daunting for any adversary. Unlike any conventional army, a nation with tens of millions of armed citizens presents a decentralized and unpredictable obstacle.

Bottom line…

Though interpretations vary, the Second Amendment remains a uniquely American institution, intertwining personal freedom, civic responsibility, and national security in a way that no other country does.

We are so screwed.

-- Steve