AUSTRALIA: WHO IS KILLING YOUR KANGAROO?
In an era when global information, even when originated by ordinary individuals, is at our fingertips, the line between free speech and censorship has never been more blurred.
Enter Australia’s Communications Legislation Amendment (Combatting Misinformation and Disinformation) Bill 2024—a piece of legislation intended to curb the spread of falsehoods online but with broad implications for free expression.
At first glance, this bill seems like a reasonable attempt to tackle misinformation that has flooded social media and other platforms.
However, in practice, the bill could end up stifling voices that share literally true statements, simply because these truths contradict the government's preferred narrative. This scenario raises a critical question: What happens when factual information is labeled "misinformation" just because it disrupts the story the authorities want to tell?
When Facts Become Forbidden
Under the broad scope of this bill, government agencies and regulators could decide that certain statements—despite being factually correct—pose a threat to public order or contradict "official" interpretations of events. For example, data that doesn’t fit neatly into government-approved categories or challenges prevailing assumptions could be deemed problematic. This form of censorship is particularly troubling because it strikes at the heart of the open debate necessary for a healthy democracy.
Censorship by Redefinition
One of the dangers inherent in this type of legislation is how easily definitions of "misinformation" and "disinformation" can shift. The terms themselves may begin by targeting only blatant falsehoods but could expand to include opinions or analyses that question mainstream interpretations. A true statement, which in an ordinary context would be part of a robust debate, can suddenly become dangerous in the topsy-turvy world of censorship where speech that is inconvenient or unpopular is silenced.
Truth as Misinformation: An Orwellian Paradox
Take, for example, a scenario where an independent well-educated, well-credentialed, and well-experienced researcher publishes a report with data that contradicts the official government narrative on climate change, public health, or social policy. Even though the data may be backed by evidence and peer-reviewed, it could be flagged as "misinformation" under this law simply because it introduces a viewpoint that runs counter to government-endorsed positions.
What this law risks creating is an environment where censorship disguises itself as protecting the public from harm, when in fact it is protecting the government from scrutiny.
Bottom line: Protecting Speech in a Post-Truth Era
The Communications Legislation Amendment (Combatting Misinformation and Disinformation) Bill 2024 reflects a growing tension between the desire to control harmful narratives and the fundamental right to free speech. We must remain vigilant about how such legislation is applied and be cautious of its potential to suppress truths that simply don’t fit into the government’s version of events.
In this topsy-turvy world, we must ask ourselves: If literally true statements can be labeled misinformation, how can we trust what we are allowed to say? Will the future of free speech be one where truth itself is forbidden?
We are being screwed.
-- Steve
“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words
“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw
“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”
“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS "The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius “A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell “Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar “Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS