Previous month:
September 1, 2024 - September 7, 2024
Next month:
September 15, 2024 - September 21, 2024

AUSTRALIA: WHO IS KILLING YOUR KANGAROO?

Australia-risk

In an era when global information, even when originated by ordinary individuals, is at our fingertips, the line between free speech and censorship has never been more blurred.

Enter Australia’s Communications Legislation Amendment (Combatting Misinformation and Disinformation) Bill 2024—a piece of legislation intended to curb the spread of falsehoods online but with broad implications for free expression.

At first glance, this bill seems like a reasonable attempt to tackle misinformation that has flooded social media and other platforms.

However, in practice, the bill could end up stifling voices that share literally true statements, simply because these truths contradict the government's preferred narrative. This scenario raises a critical question: What happens when factual information is labeled "misinformation" just because it disrupts the story the authorities want to tell?

When Facts Become Forbidden

Under the broad scope of this bill, government agencies and regulators could decide that certain statements—despite being factually correct—pose a threat to public order or contradict "official" interpretations of events. For example, data that doesn’t fit neatly into government-approved categories or challenges prevailing assumptions could be deemed problematic. This form of censorship is particularly troubling because it strikes at the heart of the open debate necessary for a healthy democracy.

Censorship by Redefinition

One of the dangers inherent in this type of legislation is how easily definitions of "misinformation" and "disinformation" can shift. The terms themselves may begin by targeting only blatant falsehoods but could expand to include opinions or analyses that question mainstream interpretations. A true statement, which in an ordinary context would be part of a robust debate, can suddenly become dangerous in the topsy-turvy world of censorship where speech that is inconvenient or unpopular is silenced.

Truth as Misinformation: An Orwellian Paradox

Take, for example, a scenario where an independent well-educated, well-credentialed, and well-experienced researcher publishes a report with data that contradicts the official government narrative on climate change, public health, or social policy. Even though the data may be backed by evidence and peer-reviewed, it could be flagged as "misinformation" under this law simply because it introduces a viewpoint that runs counter to government-endorsed positions.

What this law risks creating is an environment where censorship disguises itself as protecting the public from harm, when in fact it is protecting the government from scrutiny.

Bottom line: Protecting Speech in a Post-Truth Era

The Communications Legislation Amendment (Combatting Misinformation and Disinformation) Bill 2024 reflects a growing tension between the desire to control harmful narratives and the fundamental right to free speech. We must remain vigilant about how such legislation is applied and be cautious of its potential to suppress truths that simply don’t fit into the government’s version of events.

In this topsy-turvy world, we must ask ourselves: If literally true statements can be labeled misinformation, how can we trust what we are allowed to say? Will the future of free speech be one where truth itself is forbidden?

We are being screwed.

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


Why Voting Beats Virtue Signaling: The Truth They Don't Want You to Know!

Ballotbox-VOTE
To the normies…

We all know it’s more productive to vote than to spend your energy trying to explain emotional issues to someone who is ideologically incapable of understanding them. Let’s face it: you’re not going to convince Uncle Alfred that climate change is a hoax by shouting over Thanksgiving dinner. Voting, though? That’s the real deal.

Selling yourself, your country, and your community out just to feel good in the moment? Hard pass. If you think virtue signaling helps, it’s like giving your dog a treat for barking at the wind—it feels good but does nothing to change the weather.

Now, you might be wondering, “Where are we?” “Why would they do that?” and the all-time favorite, “Are they fucking serious?” Congrats, you’ve just asked the top three questions in politics. Just throw a dart, and you’ll find a media program, news headline, or social media post that makes you ask at least one of them.

Oh, and political polls? They’re horoscopes written by a partisan with a math degree. Sure, they throw some numbers around, but they’re about as reliable as your cousin’s astrology app predicting you will find true love next week.

To be a competent voter, you need at least two of three things: knowledge, attitude, or brains. Take your pick. But seriously, if you’re lacking two of those, maybe just stay home and, I don’t know, read up on the issues?

Campaign wins? Pure luck most of the time. Two wins in a row? That’s luck, plus uninformed voters. But three wins? That’s when things start looking a little… shall we say… suspicious.

California Communism.

Here in California, where the progressive communist democrats rule the state with an iron hand, we are overwhelmed by deceptive and misleading ballot propositions placed on the ballot by politicians and their special interests, not the public.

To add insult to injury, the uni-party, which controls the corrupt Attorney General’s office, massages and manipulates the propositions with misleading, false, deceptive, and confusing titles to confuse and confound voters into voting against their own interests.

The only remedy is to sue for corrections. Unfortunately, cases are often heard by activist judges who are skilled at delaying their rulings until the last minute—and after progressive media propagandists have saturated the public with deceptive rhetoric.

It is not unusual to find hidden tax increases and loose restrictions that allow for repurposing bond money from one cause to another. Or find that infrastructure is used as collateral for state loans or is manipulated by sale and leaseback agreements. Or a tranch of money in a so-called lockbox has been replaced with a worthless state IOU.

Consider Proposition 5, which guts Proposition 13, a measure that requires the assessment of each taxable property based on its fair market value and limits a property owner’s general levy tax to 1 percent of the assessed value. Of course, the measure doesn’t say it guts Proposition 13; it “allows local bonds for affordable housing and public infrastructure with 55% voter approval.” Sounds relatively innocent for a massive tax increase.

Proposition 33, Rent Control, expands local governments’ authority to enact rent control on residential property. This alters private property rights and makes investing in income property a risky proposition.

Or Proposition 32, which raises minimum wages and destroys entry-level jobs. The idea that a burger-flipper should earn $35,000 or more plus benefits is ludicrous.

Look at Proposition 2, which authorizes $10 billion in general obligation bonds for the repair, upgrade, and construction of facilities at K–12 public schools (including charter schools), community colleges, and career technical education programs, including for improving health and safety conditions and classroom upgrades.

Look closer, and you may find that this is $10 billion or more of state debt, is to be spent on unspecified expenditures in school districts with money flowing to politically connected consultants and union contractors without fair bidding procedures--or siphoned off to pay off teachers’ unions. And the progressive communist democrats are continuing their fight against charter schools on behalf of the corrupt teachers’ unions who believe they own your children and parental rights harm children.

Gay marriage was settled by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2015, yet the Democrats need to get out the gay vote, hence Proposition 3, to recognize a fundamental right to marry, regardless of sex or race.

Proposition 4 funds the money machine that is climate change. Yes, we want clean water, land, and air. We don’t want our progressive communist democrats to kill fossil fuels, including clean-burning natural gas, and destroy the energy lifeblood of our economy.

Proposition 6 purports to end slavery by removing current provisions that allow jails and prisons to impose involuntary servitude to punish crime. It will enable prisoners to unionize and demand pay hikes from taxpayers for cleaning their cells and maintaining the grounds.

Proposition 35 is a tax increase on healthcare, permanently increasing the existing tax on managed healthcare insurance plans.

There are many bad things on the ballot, and it takes an informed Californian to decode and discern the truth. Want to see for yourself? Look at the California Official General Election Voter Information Guide.

Bottom line…

At the end of the day, real change happens when people get out and vote.

It’s not about feeling good momentarily by posting the perfect tweet or crafting an argument that’ll never change anyone’s mind. It’s about showing up, making your voice heard, and refusing to let anyone—or any flawed political poll—steer your future.

So next time you’re tempted to dive into a social media shouting match or stare blankly at another pollster’s prediction, remember: voting is the one action that’s exponentially more important than all the noise. It’s like showing up to the gym of democracy—you don’t get stronger by just talking about it. You’ve got to lift; in this case, lifting means showing up at the ballot box.

And who knows, maybe someday we’ll stop asking, “Are they fucking serious?” and start asking, “How do we fix this?” But until then, vote like your democracy depends on it—because it probably does.

Remember, folks: vote as early as possible to avoid election day glitches, and don’t sell yourself and your country short.

Steve

GODBLESSAMERICA


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


Tyreek Hill: The Dangers of Media-Manufactured Racism

Police

There are those individuals and their lawyers who will go to any lengths to mischaracterize police encounters to advance their own personal and professional agenda.

The facts: Tyreek Hill, the 30-year-old wide receiver for the NFL’s Miami Dolphins, was en route to the stadium when he was allegedly stopped by a Miami-Dade motorcycle officer for a routine traffic stop. Hill was driving a 2018 Black McLaren with heavily tinted windows. Police bodycam footage shows the officer yanking Hill out of his vehicle and taking him to the ground after he refused to comply with police orders.

What has Tyreek Hill said about the incident?

Hill said Wednesday that he wishes he “could go back and do things a bit differently” during his encounter with police.

“Yes, I will say, I could’ve been better. I could’ve let down my window in that instance,” Hill said in a news conference. “... I don’t want attention, I don’t want to be cameras out, phones on you in that moment. But at the end of the day, I’m human. I’ve got to follow rules. I’ve got to do what everyone else would do.

“Now, does that give them the right to literally beat the dog out of me? Absolutely not. But at the end of the day, I wish I could go back and do things a bit differently.”

This came one day after Hill and his legal team called for one of the officers involved in the matter, Danny Torres, to be fired.

“We are of the opinion that the officer’s use of force was excessive, escalating, and reckless,” Hill and his lawyers said Tuesday night in a statement. “We are demanding that the officer be terminated effective immediately.

Hill reiterated later Wednesday that he believes Torres should be “gone.” <Source>


Tyree Hill Mocking the Police With “Arrest” on the Playing Field After 80-yard Touchdown.

Tyreecelebrating-touchdown

Whatever the reason for the traffic stop, Tyreek Hill was at fault and created the situation.

  • Heavily tinted windows pose a significant risk to officer safety during traffic stops by obscuring the view inside the vehicle. This lack of visibility prevents officers from assessing potential threats, such as the presence of weapons or suspicious movements. The inability to clearly see the occupants increases uncertainty and heightens the danger, forcing officers to approach more cautiously, potentially escalating tensions during routine stops.

  • Noncompliance with police orders or displaying an argumentative attitude during a traffic stop can significantly escalate the situation, increasing the risk of misunderstanding and potential use of force. Officers are trained to prioritize safety, and any perceived resistance or refusal to follow instructions can heighten their sense of threat. This can lead to more aggressive responses and complicate what might otherwise be a routine stop. Staying calm, cooperative, and following instructions would have de-escalated the situation dramatically and ensured the interaction remained safe for both the driver and the officer.

The media was quick to characterize the encounter as a racist police-on-black-man event.

The Dangers of Media-Manufactured Racism

In today’s hyper-connected world, the media wields immense power over how people think, act, and perceive societal issues. One of the most dangerous byproducts of this influence is the manufacturing of racism—where the media amplifies, distorts, and sometimes creates narratives of racial conflict. These narratives are often tailored for sensationalism, stirring emotions, and boosting ratings rather than fostering genuine understanding or solutions.

  • Creating Division for Profit: At its core, the media thrives on attention. In an era of shrinking attention spans and constant competition for clicks and views, controversy sells. Stories of conflict, especially racial tensions, are guaranteed to captivate audiences. Headlines become more provocative, and stories are framed in ways that amplify the idea of “us vs. them,” encouraging division rather than unity.

    In pursuit of profit, news outlets often cherry-pick stories and manipulate facts to fit a particular narrative. This sensationalism obscures the full complexity of racial issues, focusing on isolated incidents or inflating minor conflicts, which can make it seem like society is on the brink of racial collapse. By doing so, media outlets contribute to a sense of fear and mistrust, reinforcing racial stereotypes and deepening divisions between communities.

  • Ignoring Context for Sensationalism: One of the most insidious aspects of media-manufactured racism is the selective presentation of facts. Events are taken out of context or are disproportionately covered to fit an overarching narrative of widespread racism. Stories that would otherwise be local news are catapulted to national attention, creating a false sense of widespread racial hostility.

  • Weaponizing Identity Politics: Media-driven racism doesn’t just manifest in news stories; it infiltrates sports, entertainment, social media, and political discourse. Many media outlets have learned to weaponize identity politics to pit racial groups against one another. By elevating certain voices and suppressing others, they construct narratives that villainize entire communities or portray them as perpetual victims. This binary view of race relations benefits no one.

  • Exploiting Racism for Personal or Professional Publicity: In addition to the media’s role, there is a growing trend where individuals, including influencers, activists, and even some public figures, exploit racial issues for personal or professional publicity. These individuals understand that aligning themselves with trending social justice causes can increase their visibility, attract followers, and boost their brand, whether committed to the cause or not.

    Social media has made it easy for people to amplify their personal brands by joining movements or engaging in “call-out culture,” often with little understanding of the issues. For some, the allure of publicity outweighs the responsibility to engage thoughtfully. By turning complex racial matters into opportunities for self-promotion, these individuals risk trivializing serious issues.

Professional opportunists such as attorneys, agents, and media consultants also seize this moment. Some executives and public relations teams have used racial tensions as a marketing tool in corporate spaces.

Bottom line…

This was not racism, as the exact same thing happened to PGA Tour golfer Scottie Scheffler, and Scheffler happens to be white. It was even more unwarranted in Scheffler's case and the officer deserved the consequences of his actions.

While some police officers can be overly aggressive at times and deserving of discipline, this should be judged in the context of events from the officer's perspective.

In the end, combating media-manufactured racism is about reclaiming the conversation around race from those who profit from division. Only through thoughtful engagement, a commitment to justice, and a focus on truth can we hope to continue building a better nation.

In my opinion, Tyreek Hill should be sanctioned by the NFL and his team for his disrespectful celebratory mockery of the police.

We are so screwed.

-- Steve

Flag-bl


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


Team Harris: Can You Really Say You Won the Debate?

KHFOS

In today's social media-driven world, debates aren't just about winning on stage—they’re about surviving the aftermath online.

Can you truly claim victory when your side is too hesitant to post clips because fact-checkers and community noters are waiting to call you out?

What does it say when a post or comment gets "ratioed" into oblivion—drowned in negative responses and criticism—rather than sparking positive engagement?

Winning isn't just about the arguments you make but how well those arguments hold up under scrutiny.

If the fear of community backlash stops you from sharing, can you really say you won?

The one unanswered question that says it all...

When David Muir asked Kamala Harris: "Do you believe that Americans are better off than they were four years ago?" She did not answer the question and started speaking about her childhood.

Bottom line…

Trump faced three opponents, the two ABC moderators and the dissembling candidate who lied with impunity and was not fact-checked even once as she repeated lie after lie. Yes, Trump was distracted, especially when his rallies were mentioned.

But in the end, Trump is still Trump, and nobody knows what Komrade Kamala actually believes.

Steve

Reference: 21 False Claims & Hoaxes by Kamala Harris that ABC’s Debate Moderators Did Not Fact Check


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


A 9/11 MESSAGE TO OUR ENEMIES, BOTH FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC

E pluribus unum

Capture9-9-2011-11.15.20 PM

Out of many, one!

 

Whatever political differences Americans may have, whatever color, race, ethnicity, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, or political party – we will stand up to terrorism with one will, with one voice, and we will rain hell down upon you – no matter how long it takes to bring you to justice.

flag

And to the Saudi Royal Family, there will come a day when your involvement and complicity in 9/11 will become known – and you will face justice before both man and God.

From Investor’s Business Daily …

Unanswered: What Was Saudis' Role?

9/11: A new report revealing the hijackers met in Florida with a well-connected Saudi family who fled to Riyadh just days before the attacks raises fresh concerns about the Saudis' role in the plot.

The Saudi hijackers who entered the country from San Diego also met with Saudi handlers. So now we know al-Qaida had Saudi help from coast to coast. According to the Miami Herald, investigators believe the wealthy family at a minimum knew of their guests' evil plans, and possibly aided them.

Just two weeks before 9/11, and after meetings and calls with ringleader Mohamed Atta and other hijackers, the Saudi nationals abandoned three cars, including a new Chrysler PT Cruiser, in the garage and driveway of their Sarasota home. In their haste to leave the country, they also left behind opulent furniture. A safe, however, was cleaned out. They also took a computer.

Their Sarasota home was owned by Esam Ghazzawi, a Saudi financier. He'd been on an FBI watch list for terror-fundraising. The FBI, however, never briefed the 9/11 Commission about his and the other Saudi occupants' connections to the hijackers. Congress also was left in the dark about the house search.

It's one of many mysteries surrounding the Saudis and 9/11. Other questions still unanswered after 10 years:

Why was the section of Congress' Joint Inquiry into 9/11 dealing with "sources of foreign support for some of the Sept. 11 hijackers" kept secret from the public on the orders of President Bush?

Almost 27 full pages were blanked out — an amount equal to the entire U.S. Constitution. The section, which remains sealed, reportedly quotes from a CIA memo that concludes there's "incontrovertible evidence" that Saudi government officials supported the hijackers. Why the cover-up?

• And why were the first two hijackers who entered the country received by a Saudi government agent who secured and paid for their housing and arranged flight lessons? Was he acting on his own, or on official orders? Was he, as some investigators suspect, part of an advance team sent by the Saudi consulate to meet the hijackers as they arrived in Los Angeles?

• Was it coincidence or something more that the Saudi agent's salary was increased while settling the hijackers in San Diego? Or that he was able to tap into a $130,000 "welfare" account funded by the kingdom's ambassador to the U.S.? Was money funneled through official Saudi channels to the hijackers?

Was another Saudi agent from New Jersey, who handled the hijackers on the East Coast, also tasked by the Saudi government?

Who ordered the massive post-9/11 evacuation of Saudi VIPs — including two dozen bin Ladens, at least one of whom had an open terror file at the FBI — without proper investigations? Why was such a request granted, given the Saudi nationality of 15 hijackers?

Did Saudi envoy Prince Bandar make the request while he and Bush shared cigars on the Truman Balcony of the White House on Sept. 13, 2001? Did Bush's father or James Baker, who on Sept. 10 had attended a Carlyle Group conference in Washington with bin Laden's brother, intervene? What about Bandar's old racquetball partner Secretary of State Colin Powell, whose wife once received a Jaguar as a Bandar gift?

• Similarly, why was the Saudi minister of mosques allowed to escape interrogation after feigning a heart attack when FBI agents learned he'd left his Washington hotel to check into the same budget hotel near Dulles airport as the hijackers the night before they attacked the Pentagon?

Why was an arrest warrant for the hijackers' confidante, Anwar Awlaki — who'd worked for the Saudi Embassy as a lecturer and hajj tour guide — suddenly pulled back the day before he re-entered the U.S. on a Saudi airliner? Why was this dangerous al-Qaida recruiter allowed to leave the country for good?

Why was the Pentagon attack staged out of a mosque built by the Saudi Embassy? The fax number to the D.C. mosque, where Awlaki preached and the hijackers worshiped, turned up in a key 9/11 planner's German flat.

If there are simple answers to these questions, let's hear them. Enough censorship by Washington. The American people deserve to know the full extent of Saudi Arabia's role in helping the hijackers. <Source>

Bottom line …

The truth will eventually come out – even if high-level United States officials aided and abetted a cover-up.

Meanwhile, let us honor the innocent dead and the brave first responders who ran into doomed buildings, those that rescued the living from the Pentagon – and the passengers and crew of United Airlines Flight 93 who deliberately crashed the aircraft to thwart the terrorist attack.

Let us remember the survivors whose incalculable loss can never be remedied.

And let us pledge to turn the next state sponsor of terror into a sea of glass.

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE: KAMALA HARRIS VS. KAMALA HARRIS

Debate-graphic-tonight-version

THE SUMMARY: KAMALA HARRIS COULDN'T OR WOULDN'T ANSWER THE QUESTION: ARE YOU BETTER OFF NOW THAN FOUR YEARS AGO? BUT SHE STILL WON THE DEBATE

In a debate for the future of America, one candidate, the inarticulate, incoherent Kamala Harris, found herself locked in a fierce battle—against her own policies!

With positions so diametrically opposed, it was a one-woman showdown of contradictions. No amount of debate prep could save her from... well, herself. While she could dodge the moderators, there was no escape from the real opponent: her past decisions. Publicly, she argued both sides so convincingly that it was hard to tell who won—though she definitely lost!

With no original thoughts of her own, her “New War Forward” strategy seemed like a chaotic patchwork of past failures. It drew heavily from the ashes of her disastrous 2020 campaign, a few leftover scraps from Joe Biden’s abruptly terminated bid, and a mashup of union talking points sprinkled with a dash of communist ideology for good measure. The result? A platform so confused even she couldn’t decide if she was marching toward the future or back to 2020.

Biased Moderation and Selective Fact-Checking

Muir

There is no doubt that Trump was debating three opponents: Kamala Harris and the two ABC moderators.

For those paying attention, ABC’s progressive moderators crafted questions that reflected a Democratic bias and continued to interject selective fact-checks, using cherry-picked data to support a biased viewpoint while ignoring counterarguments or more nuanced facts. The moderators did not fact-check Kamala Harris. ABC even altered reality by giving Harris a shorter podium, so when they did a split screen, Harris and Trump appeared the same size in relation to the podium.

I felt that Trump was spending too much time on defense rather than engaging in policy matters.

Projection and Lying with Impunity

Vice President Kamala Harris continues to misrepresent Project 2025, making misleading claims about Trump embracing its scope and impact and repeating debunked hoaxes, many originating from progressive communist democrats’ dirty tricks-- knowing full well that the progressive media propagandists will shield her by censoring or downplaying her misdeeds. The media propagandists will allow Harris to lie with impunity, avoiding accountability. This dynamic enables Harris to perpetuate falsehoods without consequence, as biased reporting deflects criticism and protects her political image.

Harris frequently engaged in ad hominem attacks, targeting Trump’s character rather than addressing the substantive issues, diverting attention from policy discussions and contributing to a more toxic political environment where personal attacks overshadow meaningful debate.

Harris has become adept at the tactic of projection, often accusing her opposition of the very actions her own administration is responsible for. She deflects criticism and confuses the narrative by attributing her administration’s missteps and controversial policies to her opponents. This strategy not only shifts blame but also muddles public perception, allowing her to distance herself from the consequences of her administration’s actions while painting her opposition as the true culprits.

The progressive communist democrat social media propagandist’s fix…

In a significant conflict of interest, we find Karen Dunn, lead Google attorney in the $31 billion ad monopoly antitrust lawsuit brought by the Biden-Harris Department of Justice against Google, assisting Vice President Kamala Harris with debate preparation.

Trump swallowed the bait...

Every time Trump was distracted by being personally baited, he swallowed the bait and responded. For example, when Harris challenged his crowd sizes and claimed Trump's rallies were boring, and people were leaving early, he went off script. Trump's closing statement should have been his opening statement.

Bottom line…

Harris actually performed better than I anticipated, while Trump is rambling more than I had hoped.

Donald Trump did not do his job to expose Kamala's lies, so Harris gets the win!

Kamala Harris repeated every false and misleading progressive communist democrat canard.

The debate ultimately shielded Kamala Harris’s candidacy, with moderators framing softball questions in her favor and engaging in selective fact-checking.

By sidestepping challenging issues with a lack of follow-up questioning and allowing Harris to avoid meaningful scrutiny, the debate’s structure seemed more like a protective mechanism than a forum for genuine discussion.

Trump faced moderator interjections, while Harris was given space to promote her agenda with minimal challenge. This biased setup undermined the integrity of the debate, leaving voters with an incomplete picture of her record and policy positions.

Fact: Our nation is plagued by inflation and unchecked hordes of illegal aliens, while the world is in flames because of the weak leadership and failed foreign policy of the Biden-Harris administration

The Harris team was so pleased with the debate results that they are considering asking for a second debate. If nothing comes of this, it will look good to the media.

Imagine four years of that whiny voice saying nothing but lies while Obama’s acolytes further destroy our nation from within with their communist ideology.

We are so screwed.

-- Steve

KHFOS


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


BEFORE THE TRUMP-HARRIS DEBATE BEGINS

Even before the Trump-Harris debate, there is a gnashing of teeth and wailing cries of unfairness from the progressive communist democrats who support turning America into France. But no matter how things turn out, the last thing you will ever hear is a request for a “do-over” second debate.

WALZ--TOMORROW

A debate loss might not matter to Harris supporters…

For Kamala’s supporters, it really doesn’t matter how Harris performs. A perceived loss will not significantly sway them, as partisan loyalty outweighs debate performance. The fact that she appears less knowledgeable, competent, assertive, or persuasive than Donald Trump is irrelevant to many of these low-information voters who the progressive communist democrat media propagandists have brainwashed over the past twelve years.

However, how well Harris responds to Trump might influence swing voters or independents. A poor Harris debate performance might cause them to shift their support toward Trump or not vote.

Kamala Harris: A Threat to Democracy with Radical, Communist-Influenced Policies

While Vice President Kamala Harris has positioned herself as a prominent figure in shaping U.S. policies for the past three and a half years, her political stances and record raise concerns about her commitment to the democratic values that have long defined our nation. Harris’s alignment with far-left, radical policies, many of which are rooted in communist ideologies, poses a genuine threat to the American way of life.

From advocating for expanded government control over healthcare and the economy to promoting wealth redistribution and amnesty for up to 20 million illegal aliens, Harris’s agenda leans toward centralized power at the expense of individual freedom. These policies resemble the hallmarks of communist systems, where the government exerts control over critical aspects of society, often at the cost of personal liberties. Her positions on issues like policing and taxation suggest a broader agenda aimed at dismantling free-market capitalism and traditional democratic safeguards in favor of collectivist ideals.

Under Harris’s influence, there’s a growing fear that the United States would see policies that erode the checks and balances of democracy, restrict free speech, and pave the way for increased government intrusion in citizens’ lives. While packaged as progressive reforms, these policies represent a dangerous departure from the principles of liberty and individual rights that have made America a beacon of democracy.

Bottom line…

Kamala’s greatest crime was leaving the nation’s security at risk with a mentally disabled president for the sole purpose of advancing the progressive communist democrat agenda.

Americans must remain vigilant and recognize when political movements, regardless of how they are framed, begin to threaten the foundations of democracy. Kamala Harris’s radical agenda should be critically examined for its potential to undermine those values and be roundly rejected.

While Republicans may not be the answer to all your problems, they are not the progressive communist democrats who caused them.

We are so screwed.

Steve

KAMALA-CONSTUTION KHFOS HARRIS-MINDING THE STORE




“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


KAMALA HARRIS DEBATE PREPARATION

Khlax

It's a sad tale, but oh so true...

Picture this: The stage is set. The lights are bright, assistants are buzzing around like capitalist drones, and on one side stands our communist hopeful, Komrade Kamala, a self-proclaimed revolutionary ready to dismantle capitalism, one mumbled, incoherent slogan at a time.

But wait. Kamala’s got a problem, and it’s not her questionable grasp on economics. For years, she’s been backed up—full to the brim with political bullshit. Her speeches have been as bloated as her promises, stuffed with rhetoric so nonsensical that even her comrades are left squinting, nodding along in confused solidarity.

Kamala knows she can’t face her sharp, articulate opponent like this. Her system is clogged, and her words are heavy with the weight of decades of overused talking points. "Medicare for All!" "Redistribute the wealth!" It’s all stuck, like some sort of ideological constipation.

Enter the hero of our story: political laxatives.

That’s right, folks. Kamala pops a handful of the strongest bowel-clearing tablets this side of the Berlin Wall, hoping to purge all the political crap that’s built up from years of chanting "Power to the People!" while having absolutely no idea how people actually keep the lights on. She’s about to drop the truth bombs—literally.

Fast forward to debate day. Kamala’s sweating bullets, not because of the impending intellectual showdown but because the laxatives are doing their thing. She’s got more "movement" happening than the Workers’ Revolution of 1917. Suddenly, all those tired phrases about "free everything for everyone" are preparing to evacuate faster than billionaires at a tax rally.

Her opponent kicks off with sharp, surgical arguments, dismantling communism like its IKEA furniture. Meanwhile, Kamala is gripping the podium harder than she’s ever clutched her daddy’s Marxist Economics textbook. Her knees are shaking, and her stomach is staging its own insurrection. The real revolution is happening, and it’s inside her colon.

Finally, it’s her turn to speak. She opens her mouth, but instead of her usual jumbled nonsense, all she can manage is:

“Uh, can I get a quick bathroom break?”

And just like that, folks, the most crucial debate of her political career turns into a frantic dash for the nearest exit. The great ideological cleanse has begun—both in her mind and, well, elsewhere.

Maybe next time, Komrade Kamala will consider purging the bullshit from her brain before reaching for the over-the-counter solution.

Yes, the power of political laxatives...

And thus, we arrive at the undeniable truth: Political laxatives may just be the next big thing in public service. Imagine a world where politicians take a hearty dose before every debate—out go the vague, empty promises, and in comes a refreshing honesty, void of all the bloat and filler. With each dose, the political system becomes… well, less full of it. Gone would be the days of endless rambling speeches, replacing them with clear, concise ideas that don't leave the public straining to understand what’s actually being said.

Bottom line...

Many a truth is said in jest. We are so screwed.

In all seriousness, I do not want to go forward into a communist hell-hole with Kamala Harris and Tim Walz--I want to go back to the prosperous future with Donald Trump.

- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


KAMALA HARRIS: THE HIGH PRIESTESS OF VOODOO ECONOMICS

HARRIS-ECONOMIC-DISASTER

Kamala Harris’s economic policies represent a dangerous and deceptive path for America.

Despite presiding over a broken fiscal system for over three years—while her administration’s scandals and corruption run rampant—she now promises reform, questioning why she didn’t act sooner. The answer is clear: her policies benefit the powerful and well-connected, not the American people.

Harris’s push for a progressive tax system is steeped in Marxist ideology and driven by deceit. She claims the wealthy and corporations should “contribute their fair share,” but this is a smokescreen. Politicians like Harris, who demand higher taxes on the rich, are the same ones who craft tax laws that favor special interests. Wealthy individuals exploit extensive legal loopholes to evade taxes, while corporations shift their tax burdens to consumers. Thus, the tax burden is ultimately passed onto the average American, who often remains unaware of the hidden costs embedded in everyday utilities and goods.

Moreover, the government’s ability to print money creates a hidden tax through inflation, eroding the value of what you earn. Harris’s administration squanders resources on vote-buying schemes under the guise of infrastructure and social programs, which primarily benefit unions, developers, and large corporations. Green projects and other initiatives are simply elaborate schemes to funnel money into the pockets of the wealthy and well-connected, ensuring continued support for the ruling party.

The hypocrisy of Harris’s promises is glaring. She claims she will close loopholes and address income inequality, yet her policies, such as increasing the minimum wage, destroy entry-level jobs and drive automation. Her assurance that those earning under $400,000 will not see increased taxes fails to recognize the detrimental impact on small business owners and dual-income families—the very backbone of innovation and economic strength. Her agenda will weaken the middle class, not strengthen it.

In reality, Harris’s economic proposals are nothing more than a racket—a means for politicians to extract money from citizens while creating the illusion of progress. The so-called investments in social programs and infrastructure are little more than vehicles for buying political support and ensuring the regime's continued power.

Bottom line…

Ultimately, Harris’s economic policies are a recipe for disaster, designed to perpetuate a cycle of corruption and inefficiency. If we continue down this path, the damage to the American economy and middle class will be profound and lasting.

To say we, and our nation, would be well and truly screwed is an understatement.

Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS