One Citizen Speaking

Previous month:
August 11, 2024 - August 17, 2024

Next month:
August 25, 2024 - August 31, 2024

DNC NIGHT THREE: OPRAH WINFREY -- ALWAYS BLACK, ALWAYS A VICTIM

At first glance, seeing wealthy individuals advocating for higher taxes, wealth redistribution, or even supporting ideas aligned with Marxism can seem puzzling.

After all, these ideas challenge the capitalist system, which enabled them to amass their fortunes. So, why would anyone who has thrived under capitalism push for policies that could undermine it?

In her own words, we have Oprah Winfrey, the billionaire talk show entrepreneur who jetted in from Hawaii on her $70 million Gulfstream G650 jet…

How does one of the wealthiest women in the world continue to live in such a racist and sexist country? The very country that made her a household name and incredibly wealthy?

I am so honored to have been asked to speak on tonight’s theme about what matters most to me, to you, and all of us Americans: freedom.

[OCS: Freedom? The progressive communist democrats stand for authoritarianism and have shredded our Constitution. It’s not about freedom; it’s about power—perpetual political power].

There are people who want you to see our country as a nation of us against them. People who want to scare you, who want to rule you. People who’d have you believe that books are dangerous and assault rifles are safe, that there’s a right way to worship and a wrong way to love. People who seek first to divide and then to conquer. But here’s the thing: when we stand together, it is impossible to conquer us.

[OCS: This is a classic case of projection, ascribing the actions of the progressive communist democrats to their opposition. Our nation was on the path to racial healing when former President Barack Obama and his cadre of communists reversed everything, stoked racial hatred, and exacerbated the racial divisions in America to support the Democrat coalition of victims.

It is the Democrats who want to scare you with their Antifa, Black Lives Matter, and pro-terrorist shock troops. It’s the Democrats who refuse to punish crime and release violent offenders into our communities while demonizing assault rifles and disarming law-abiding citizens to create a larger victim pool, which will force the public to demand a more authoritarian government response.

The Democrats are the ones that engage in coalition politics, promising each group to redress their grievances in return for political power.]

The women and men battling to keep us from returning to a time of desperation and shame and stone-cold fear are the new freedom fighters. And make no mistake: They are the best of America.

[OCS: The new freedom fighters fight for “freedom,” including less government control over your lives, what you drive, what heats your house, less taxes used to give to their special interest supporters, and to remain unmolested by criminals. Not a description that can be applied to progressive communist democrats.]

I’ve seen racism and sexism and income inequality and division. I’ve not only seen it; at times, I’ve been on the receiving end of it.

[OCS: And like all Americans, Oprah pursued equality of opportunity, and through a combination of smarts, perseverance, connections, and luck, she prospered. Whereas, had she bought into the equal outcomes of the progressive communist democrats, she might still be in Chicago on the government dole or working at a government job.]

And soon and very soon—soon and very soon, we’re going to be teaching our daughters and sons about how this child of an Indian mother and a Jamaican father, two idealistic, energetic immigrants—immigrants—how this child grew up to become the 47th President of the United States. That is the best of America.

[OCS: The Jamaican father, a straight-up communist pursuing failed Marxist economic theories. If anything, Kamala Harris was inculcated with Marxist ideology from an early age, which she displays today with Marxist price controls, wealth redistribution, and seizure of private intellectual property like patents.]

Voting is the best of America. And I have always, since I was eligible to vote, I’ve always voted my values. And that is what is needed in this election, now more than ever. So I’m calling on all you independents and all you undecideds. You know this is true. You know I’m telling you the truth: that values and character matter most of all, in leadership and in life. And more than anything—you know this is true—that decency and respect are on the ballot in 2024.

And just plain common sense. Common sense tells you that Kamala Harris and Tim Walz can give us decency and respect. They’re the ones that give it to us.

[OCS: Anyone with common sense will see that Harris and Walz have no decency and do not deserve our respect. They are liars who will do or say anything to gain or maintain political power. Both are communists, in thought and deed, although they may pretend otherwise.]

And let us choose the sweet promise of tomorrow over the bitter return to yesterday. We won’t go back. We won’t be sent back, pushed back, bullied back, kicked back. We’re not going back.

We’re not going back. We’re not going back.

So, let us choose. Let us choose truth, let us choose honor, and let us choose joy! Because that’s the best of America. But more than anything else, let us choose freedom. Why? Because that’s the best of America. We’re all Americans, and together, let’s all choose Kamala Harris! <Full Text>

[OCS: Yes! We are Americans. Let us choose anyone but Kamala Harris to save our nation from the progressive communist democrats.

Oprah Winfrey's wealth and connections isolate her from the consequences of her recommendations. She lives in a well-protected, well-guarded bubble, isolated from ordinary individuals who are not servants or those seeking favors.

Not facing the rigors of day-to-day life, Oprah can buy anything she wants or go anywhere necessary to preserve her freedom and health, unlike so the majority of Americans who eke out a living only to see the fruits of their labor dissipated in confiscatory taxes that are distributed to non-productive illegal aliens and those who live off the welfare system—like the majority of Muslims who believe that this is Allah’s jizya tax on unbelievers.]

It’s difficult to understand the motivations of those who stand up for a racist and corrupt regime like the progressive communist democrats.

Relevance: The gradual fading of public attention can be devastating for aging public figures, particularly those who once basked in universal acclaim. The lure of the spotlight, which once shone so brightly on them, becomes a powerful motivator to remain relevant. This drive leads some to align with political and social causes, often leveraging their platforms to draw attention to issues that resonate with the public or media. By championing these causes, they can reenter the cultural conversation, ensuring their voices and names remain in the public consciousness. For millionaires and billionaires, accustomed to the admiration of both media and fans, this strategy not only helps them stay visible but also allows them to craft a legacy that transcends their work, keeping them in the spotlight even as their careers wane.
Fear of Regime Backlash or Social Unrest: The concentration of wealth in the hands of a few can lead to significant social tensions and unrest. By advocating for policies that reduce inequality, they may hope to prevent the social and political instability that could ultimately threaten their own wealth and privilege. This perspective is more about self-preservation than the ideologies they support.

Some may feel an acute fear of losing their privileged status in the face of regime backlash or social unrest. As political climates shift and social movements gain momentum, these individuals may worry about being perceived as out of touch or complicit in systemic issues. The fear of being targeted, criticized, or ostracized by the public, especially in an era where social media amplifies dissent, can drive them to align with existing regimes and popular political and social causes. By doing so, they aim to protect their reputations, avoid backlash, and position themselves as allies of change. This strategy helps them navigate the complexities of evolving societal norms and ensures they remain in the public’s favor, safeguarding their relevance and social standing in uncertain times.
Social Pressures and the Influence of Peers: The circles in which wealthy individuals move can also influence their political and economic views. In some cases, supporting progressive policies like wealth redistribution may be driven by a desire to fit in with a particular social group or gain acceptance among peers with similar views. This phenomenon is not unique to the wealthy; it’s an expected human behavior to align one’s views with one’s social group. In elite circles, where the acceptance of Marxism and discussions of inequality and social justice are increasingly prevalent, this alignment can lead to public support for progressive communist democrat ideologies contrary to the individual’s economic interests.
Guilt and the Impostor Syndrome: Impostor syndrome is a psychological phenomenon where individuals, despite their achievements and success, constantly fear being exposed as a “fraud.” They often believe their accomplishments are due to luck, timing, or other external factors rather than their own abilities. This leads to a constant feeling of inadequacy, self-doubt, and anxiety that others will eventually discover they aren’t as competent or capable as they appear. For some, their advocacy for higher taxes and wealth redistribution stems from a sense of guilt that they have been exceptionally lucky or privileged in their journey and that their wealth and success are not solely a product of their hard work.

There was a time…

Before his candidacy, Donald Trump was a friend and ally to many of those who now condemn him in public. Oprah and even the shrill harpies on "The View," including Whoopie Goldberg, welcomed him with open arms: the same Trump, the same views, and the same message for America.

The only thing that has changed is that Trump now stands between the radical progressive communists and their perpetual political power grab.

Bottom line…

It makes perfect sense to the deranged radical progressive communist democrats railing against millionaires and billionaires that a political recommendation from a black billionaire be the ideal voice for the oppressed people of color in a racist America.

If Oprah Winfrey, who is worth an estimated $3 billion, wants to support Marxism and policies like higher taxes and wealth redistribution, let her start by helping the people in her hometown of Chicago.

I can't wait to see the look on Oprah's face when she finds out her pals plan to tax unrealized gains on her property -- including show-related re-run profits yet to be earned.

We are so screwed.

-- Steve

“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS

Permalink | Comments (0)

BULLSHIT DETECTOR: DEMOCRATS EMBRACE ORWELL'S NEWSPEAK

Kamala Harris and her cadre of communist fellow travelers have frequently used the term “return on investment” in their discussions about public policy, particularly regarding their progressive communist democrat agenda.

Harris continues to emphasize that voters should ignore reality and common sense when evaluating public policies, especially those involving tax credits and social programs, explaining that such government-originated programs should be evaluated based on their return on investment (ROI).

In her own words…

Remarks by Vice President Harris in Press Gaggle in Moon Township, Pennsylvania - August 18, 2024

QUESTION: Can you explain how you’re going to pay for those? And can you give us a sense of what other policies you want to unveil going forward?

THE VICE PRESIDENT: Sure. Well, I mean, you just look at it in terms of what we are talking about, for example, around children and the Child Tax Credit and extending the EITC that — it’s — at $6,000 for the first year of a — a child’s life. The return on that investment in terms of what that will do and what it will pay for will be tremendous.

[OCS: Another example of Kamala-speak, a meaningless word salad.]

We’ve seen it when we did it in the first year of our administration: reduced — we reduced child poverty by over 50 percent. So, that’s a lot of the work.

[OCS: The idea of “child poverty” is nonsensical because it is the impoverishment of their parents and guardians that is the issue. And it is the policies of the progressive communist democrats, like open borders, confiscatory taxes, and overbroad market-crippling regulations, that are impoverishing parents.

Explain how the impoverishment of those in the inner cities and Appalachia continues to exist while billions of dollars flow through the hands of Democrats. This is the old Democrat "it's for the Children" pitch.]

And then what we’re doing in terms of the tax credits — we know that there’s a great return on that investment. When we increase homeownership in America, what that means in terms of increasing the tax base — not to mention property tax base — what that does to fund schools. Again, return on investment.

[OCS: The Democrats have exacerbated profligate government spending, with Kamala Harris casting the deciding vote under the guise of “reducing inflation.” Inflation has severely impacted the real estate market, where home ownership is declining as houses and rentals are priced beyond ordinary Americans’ reach.]

I think it’s a mistake for any person who talks about public policy to not critically evaluate how you measure the return on the investment. When you are strengthening neighborhoods, communities, and, in particular, the economy of those communities and investing in a broad-based economy, everybody benefits, and it pays for itself. <Source>

[OCS: Programs like the Child Tax Credit and the Earned Income Tax Credit do not have a conventional ROI and cannot reduce child poverty, increase homeownership, and strengthen communities, all of which Harris claims will ultimately “pay for themselves” by boosting the economy and tax revenues.

It is a fact that there is no free lunch--borrowed money is always repaid, either by the borrower or the lender. And since the government has no money of its own, the taxpayers pick up the entire tab.]

Political ROI: A Different Kind of Investment.

When considering “return on investment” (ROI), the concept typically conjures images of balance sheets, profit margins, and financial gain. In business, ROI is a straightforward calculation: how much money is earned relative to how much is spent. It’s a measure of efficiency, of making the most of every dollar invested. And there is nothing efficient about outcomes created by government policy.

But in the political arena, ROI takes on a different meaning—Here, ROI isn’t measured in dollars but in votes. It’s not about earning money; it’s about securing power.

Votes Over Dollars: A New Currency.

In politics, the ROI often refers to the number of votes “purchased” by spending taxpayers’ money on special interest groups. These groups can range from businesses seeking tax subsidies, grants, and contracts to organizations lobbying for grants or policy changes. The investment is the allocation of public funds or favorable legislation; the return is the support of these groups through votes, campaign donations, and political endorsements.

This political ROI is less about financial returns than building and maintaining influence. It’s about ensuring that certain groups, often with significant sway, remain loyal to a particular politician or party. In this context, taxpayer money becomes a tool for solidifying power.

The Mechanics of Political ROI.

Consider how subsidies are doled out to businesses or how grants are awarded to organizations. These funds may also be investments in the economy or society, but they are primarily investments in political capital. When a politician supports a tax break for a major industry, they’re stimulating economic growth and securing the backing of that industry, which may translate into votes, campaign contributions, or other forms of support.

Similarly, when organizations receive grants, the expectation is often unspoken but clear: these organizations will support the politician who helped them. This support might come in the form of advocacy, mobilizing voters, or simply endorsing the politician during elections.

Moreover, this dynamic can lead to a vicious cycle where only those with the means to lobby effectively—often well-funded businesses and organizations—receive the lion’s share of public funds. This can exacerbate inequality and create an uneven playing field where those with deeper pockets drown out the voices of ordinary citizens.

Bottom line…

Understanding the political meaning of ROI is crucial for anyone interested in the mechanics of power and influence. While the concept may differ from its business counterpart, its impact is just as significant. As voters and taxpayers, it is essential to scrutinize how public funds are being used and to question whether these investments truly serve the public good or simply the interests of a select few politicians.

In the end, the political ROI reminds us that the currency of politics is not always money—it’s votes. And in the pursuit of those votes, the corrupt, self-serving, progressive communist democrats are ruthless, saying or doing anything to gain or maintain power.

We are so screwed.

-- Steve