Global climate change has recently become one of the most hotly one-sided debated topics.

Whether it’s natural disasters like earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, or regional weather events, it’s clear that the scale of nature eclipses human capacity to control it. Despite this, a widespread push exists to address climate change through policy measures, taxes, and wealth re-distribution schemes. However, this approach overlooks the larger forces beyond human control and is embedded in nature’s vast, complex feedback systems.

The idea that humans can significantly alter nature’s course is an illusion.

For example, earthquakes, super-volcanoes, and hurricanes are powerful forces that have shaped the Earth long before humans appeared. Human intervention in these events is limited to basic measures like avoiding dangerous areas, zoning restrictions, reinforcing building codes, and adapting to our environment. We don’t have the power to prevent these natural events, and in the same way, the push to control the climate on a global scale is little more than a communist wealth re-distribution scheme. Or, as Karl Marx noted, “From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.”

The Creation of the IPCC and Its Oversight

The manifestly corrupt United Nations created the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to provide government policymakers and non-governmental organization stakeholders with scientific assessments about “man-made” climate change, its potential future risks, and implications. However, the IPCC’s mandate came with two significant oversights.

First, it underestimated the power of political corruption. Big money and the interests of those with their hands out significantly influence climate policy. With trillions of dollars at stake in the global climate change industry, powerful and influential players with economic motives are shaping the conversation, distorting the science to fit their corrupt political agenda.

Second, the IPCC’s focus was too narrowly targeted on anthropogenic (man-made) factors and did not sufficiently address the natural climate cycles over geological timescales. Nature’s processes, like plate tectonics, volcanic activity, and long-term shifts in solar radiation, play an overwhelming role in shaping our climate. These cycles have been at work for millions of years and are outside human control. Ignoring these factors in favor of a one-dimensional focus on human activity creates an incomplete and false scientific narrative about the causes of climate change.

The Limitations of Human Intervention.

Much like how we cannot prevent earthquakes or volcanic eruptions, we cannot stop natural climate cycles. The best we can do is adapt — building infrastructure that can withstand severe weather events, strengthening zoning and building codes, and reducing man-made pollution where possible.

However, trying to control nature on a global scale through taxation, regulations, and wealth re-distribution is a corrupt fool’s answer. Instead, we should focus on managing the impacts of climate change through adaptation and resilience-building strategies. These include improving our infrastructure, investing in disaster preparedness, and developing technology that can help us mitigate the effects of natural events.

However, one crucial area where human influence can be beneficial is the suppression of political corruption. As climate change policies and research funding grow, so do the incentives for corruption. Keeping the climate debate scientific and free of ulterior motives is one of the most important steps to ensure that resources are allocated effectively and justly.

The Climate Change Industry and Its Risks.

As billions of dollars flow into climate change-related initiatives, there is a growing concern about the sustainability and integrity of this industry. The push for policies that aim to redistribute wealth under the guise of combating climate change undermines real solutions. Research, which has become heavily funded based on anthropogenic global warming, is becoming increasingly tainted by the corrupt political interests that hold the purse strings.

In this environment, scientists and policymakers are in a precarious position, with their credibility hanging in the balance. As the stakes rise, so does the potential for error, manipulation, and failure to address the root causes of environmental degradation meaningfully.

Where are the Answers?

1. The global climate has constantly changed, so what is a legitimate time frame over which climate change should be measured?

2. What is the critical temperature required for our complex ecosystem to maintain itself and the optimum temperature to optimize growth?

3. How does this optimum temperature affect natural geological and spatial gradients from equatorial to polar regions?

4. How does man directly identify and measure man’s climate signal amid the natural variability of nature and the likely existence of long climate cycles extending beyond man’s existence on Earth?

5. What elements of climate change can man demonstrably affect and measure given that the acknowledged drivers of climate are the Sun’s energy output in all spectral bands, cosmic rays, the Earth’s position relative to the Sun, the Earth’s precessional and rotational dynamics, the Earth’s magnetosphere, plate tectonics, and vulcanology, the deep ocean currents, the internal dynamics of the Earth, and the most significant greenhouse gas of all, water vapor --all macro phenomena that man’s efforts cannot mitigate, no matter how heroic.

6. How can you legitimately classify carbon dioxide, a crucial component necessary for life on this planet, as a pollutant?

Bottom line…

Ultimately, humanity’s best approach to climate change — and natural events in general — is not to try to control the uncontrollable but to adapt to our ever-changing environment. Whether it’s earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, or climate fluctuations, nature’s power is immense and beyond our capacity to control. The real challenge for humans lies in our ability to live in harmony with these forces, building resilient systems that can withstand their effects.

The focus should shift away from misguided attempts to control climate through global taxes and wealth re-distribution and instead look to innovative, local zoning and building code restrictions prioritizing adaptability, scientific rigor, and the elimination of manifest political and scientific corruption.

Only then will we be able to navigate the complexities of our environment without being led astray by communist political agendas?

We are so screwed.

-- Steve