THE SUMMARY: KAMALA HARRIS COULDN'T OR WOULDN'T ANSWER THE QUESTION: ARE YOU BETTER OFF NOW THAN FOUR YEARS AGO? BUT SHE STILL WON THE DEBATE

In a debate for the future of America, one candidate, the inarticulate, incoherent Kamala Harris, found herself locked in a fierce battle—against her own policies!

With positions so diametrically opposed, it was a one-woman showdown of contradictions. No amount of debate prep could save her from... well, herself. While she could dodge the moderators, there was no escape from the real opponent: her past decisions. Publicly, she argued both sides so convincingly that it was hard to tell who won—though she definitely lost!

With no original thoughts of her own, her “New War Forward” strategy seemed like a chaotic patchwork of past failures. It drew heavily from the ashes of her disastrous 2020 campaign, a few leftover scraps from Joe Biden’s abruptly terminated bid, and a mashup of union talking points sprinkled with a dash of communist ideology for good measure. The result? A platform so confused even she couldn’t decide if she was marching toward the future or back to 2020.

Biased Moderation and Selective Fact-Checking

There is no doubt that Trump was debating three opponents: Kamala Harris and the two ABC moderators.

For those paying attention, ABC’s progressive moderators crafted questions that reflected a Democratic bias and continued to interject selective fact-checks, using cherry-picked data to support a biased viewpoint while ignoring counterarguments or more nuanced facts. The moderators did not fact-check Kamala Harris. ABC even altered reality by giving Harris a shorter podium, so when they did a split screen, Harris and Trump appeared the same size in relation to the podium.

I felt that Trump was spending too much time on defense rather than engaging in policy matters.

Projection and Lying with Impunity

Vice President Kamala Harris continues to misrepresent Project 2025, making misleading claims about Trump embracing its scope and impact and repeating debunked hoaxes, many originating from progressive communist democrats’ dirty tricks-- knowing full well that the progressive media propagandists will shield her by censoring or downplaying her misdeeds. The media propagandists will allow Harris to lie with impunity, avoiding accountability. This dynamic enables Harris to perpetuate falsehoods without consequence, as biased reporting deflects criticism and protects her political image.

Harris frequently engaged in ad hominem attacks, targeting Trump’s character rather than addressing the substantive issues, diverting attention from policy discussions and contributing to a more toxic political environment where personal attacks overshadow meaningful debate.

Harris has become adept at the tactic of projection, often accusing her opposition of the very actions her own administration is responsible for. She deflects criticism and confuses the narrative by attributing her administration’s missteps and controversial policies to her opponents. This strategy not only shifts blame but also muddles public perception, allowing her to distance herself from the consequences of her administration’s actions while painting her opposition as the true culprits.

The progressive communist democrat social media propagandist’s fix…

In a significant conflict of interest, we find Karen Dunn, lead Google attorney in the $31 billion ad monopoly antitrust lawsuit brought by the Biden-Harris Department of Justice against Google, assisting Vice President Kamala Harris with debate preparation.

Trump swallowed the bait...

Every time Trump was distracted by being personally baited, he swallowed the bait and responded. For example, when Harris challenged his crowd sizes and claimed Trump's rallies were boring, and people were leaving early, he went off script. Trump's closing statement should have been his opening statement.

Bottom line…

Harris actually performed better than I anticipated, while Trump is rambling more than I had hoped.

Donald Trump did not do his job to expose Kamala's lies, so Harris gets the win!

Kamala Harris repeated every false and misleading progressive communist democrat canard.

The debate ultimately shielded Kamala Harris’s candidacy, with moderators framing softball questions in her favor and engaging in selective fact-checking.

By sidestepping challenging issues with a lack of follow-up questioning and allowing Harris to avoid meaningful scrutiny, the debate’s structure seemed more like a protective mechanism than a forum for genuine discussion.

Trump faced moderator interjections, while Harris was given space to promote her agenda with minimal challenge. This biased setup undermined the integrity of the debate, leaving voters with an incomplete picture of her record and policy positions.

Fact: Our nation is plagued by inflation and unchecked hordes of illegal aliens, while the world is in flames because of the weak leadership and failed foreign policy of the Biden-Harris administration

The Harris team was so pleased with the debate results that they are considering asking for a second debate. If nothing comes of this, it will look good to the media.

Imagine four years of that whiny voice saying nothing but lies while Obama’s acolytes further destroy our nation from within with their communist ideology.

We are so screwed.

-- Steve