The progressive communist democrats continue to call former President Donald Trump a “threat to democracy” when it is evident that the actual threat to democracy is communism and its advocates like Vice President Kamala Harris and Tim Walz.

Consider the following:

• Record and Ideology: Harris cannot run on her record or ideology because of perceived failures, such as the economy, inflation, border security, and crime. Her ideology can be characterized as Marxist and Islamist, which is seen as radical by the majority of Americans.

• Deception and Evasiveness: She lies about her record, plays “Catch Me If You Can,” and evades serious discussion about her policies. She’s accused of running a “Rope-a-Dope” campaign to obscure her true positions, relying on media complicity to help her avoid exposing her beliefs to the public before the election. To paraphrase House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, we have to elect Kamala Harris to see what she is about.

• Economic and Social Failures: Harris is responsible for economic struggles (inflation, high interest rates), rising crime, and poor border management. She has undermined women’s rights, particularly in sports and education, and allowed chaos on the southern border.

• Foreign Policy and National Security: Harris is complicit in creating war and global destabilization, weakening the U.S. military, and being anti-Israel by withholding arms during a war.

• Media Collusion: The media, especially outlets like ABC News, act as state-run “apparatchiks” protecting Harris from scrutiny and aiding in her deception during debates.

• Comparison to Reagan and Trump: Unlike Ronald Reagan and Donald Trump, who are presented as forthright about their positions and accomplishments, Harris has zero accomplishments that she can say benefited the American public. Reagan and Trump are noted for being proud of their records, while Harris is accused of hiding hers.

• Coronation: Kamala Harris’s rise to the top of the Democratic Party was an undemocratic coronation by party elites rather than a victory earned through primary elections. Millions of Democratic voters who invested their time, energy, and money in the primary races were effectively disenfranchised when the party bypassed the traditional process. Instead of letting voters determine the nominee, the establishment selected Harris, prioritizing their radical agenda over the will of the people. This undermines the integrity of the primary system and sends a message that the voices of grassroots voters don’t matter when party insiders have already made their choice.

Democrats are attempting to steal the election through lawfare and procedural manipulation designed to undermine election integrity.

By using the courts to target their political opponents and push for procedural changes that favor their agenda, they aim to corrupt the voting process. Whether through relaxed voting regulations, expanded mail-in voting without proper safeguards, or selective legal challenges, these tactics are seen as a deliberate effort to disenfranchise legitimate voters and sway the outcome. This strategy erodes public trust in the electoral system, raising concerns about the fairness and transparency of the election process.

Bottom line…

In the final analysis, Harris is unqualified and dangerous, with her success attributed to media manipulation rather than merit.

-- Steve