The Progressive Communist Democrat Threat: A Call for Hyper-Vigilance
In the ever-shifting landscape of political affairs, there comes a moment when the tide seems to be turning in a favorable direction.
For many of us, this may feel like a time to breathe a sigh of relief, to relax the intensity of our watchful eyes.
However, now is not the time to grow complacent. On the contrary, the threat from the progressive communist democrats has been magnified a hundred-fold, necessitating an even greater level of vigilance.
The progressive communist democrats, desperate individuals and organizations, are currently grappling with the fear of losing their power, prestige, profits, and possibly their liberty.
These entities with a history of criminal acts, including election interference, are not easily deterred. They will go to great lengths to protect their interests, often resorting to desperate actions that drive desperate men and women. These actions are deliberately designed to undermine the stability and progress of their political opponents.
One critical lesson in dealing with the progressive communist democrats is this: you cannot judge them by their words. Words are easily manipulated and can create a façade of reasonableness, compliance, and cooperation. Instead, we must observe their actions meticulously. It is through their actions that their true intentions are revealed.
An Example...
On July 14, the day after the assassination attempt on Donald Trump, in President Biden’s Address to the Nation.My fellow Americans, I want to speak to you tonight about the need for us to lower the temperature in our politics and to remember, while we may disagree, we are not enemies. We’re neighbors. We’re friends, coworkers, citizens. And, most importantly, we are fellow Americans. And we must stand together.
You know, the political rhetoric in this country has gotten very heated. It’s time to cool it down. And we all have a responsibility to do that. <Source>
On July 15, Remarks by President Biden in an interview with Lester Holt on NBC News, a progressive communist democrat propaganda outlet.
LESTER HOLT: You were in — in Delaware when this happened. What was your first reaction?
PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN: My first reaction was, “My God. This is” — look, there’s so much violence now and the way we talk about it. I mean, the whole notion that there is this — there’s — there’s no place at all for violence in politics in America. None. Zero. And — we’ve reached a point where it’s — it’s become too commonplace, not assassinations, but to talk about it.
For example, you know, the January 6th — you know, the attack on the Capitol, the — I — I — Lester, I got in this race early on in 2020 — for the 2020 race. I wasn’t gonna run again because I’d lost my son. I didn’t — you know? And — until I watched what happened in Charlottesville, Virginia.
Those folks coming out of the woods with torches, carrying swastikas, singing the same Nazi bile that was accompanied by this Ku Klux Klan and a young woman was killed. And — and it was a bystander. And — the president — then president was asked, “What do you think?” He said, “The very fine people on both sides.” Not fine people on both sides. No excuse. Zero.
[OCS: This is a bald-faced lie.]
LESTER HOLT: Well, let’s talk about the conversation this has started. And it’s really about language, what we say out loud and the consequences of those. You called your opponent an existential threat. On a call a week ago you said, “It’s time to put Trump in the bull’s-eye.” There’s some dispute about the — the context, but I think you appreciate that words matter —
PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN: I didn’t say cross-hairs. I was talking about focus on. Look, the truth of the matter was what I guess I was talking about at the time was there was very little focus on Trump’s — agenda.
LESTER HOLT: Yeah, the term was “bull’s-eye.”
PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN: It was — it was a mistake to use the word. I didn’t mean — I didn’t say “cross-hairs.” I meant “bull’s-eye” I meant focus on him. Focus on what he’s doing. Focus on — on his — on his policies. Focus on the number of lies he told in the debate.
Focus on — I mean, there’s — there’s a whole range of things. Look, I’m not the guy that said (CLEARS THROAT) I want to be a dictator on day one. I’m not the guy that refused to accept the outcome of the election. I’m not the guy who said that wouldn’t accept the outcome of this election automatically. You can’t only love your country when you win. And so the focus was on what he’s saying and, I mean, the idea.
[OCS: Taken out of context.]
LESTER HOLT: But have — have you s — taken a step back and done a little soul searching on things that you may have said that could incite — people who are not balanced?
PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN: Well, I — I don’t think — look, how do you talk about the threat to democracy, which is real, when a president says things like he says? Do you just not say anything ’cause it may incite somebody? Look, I — I — I — I have not engaged in that rhetoric.
Now, my — my — my opponent has engaged in that rhetoric. Talks about there’d be a bloodbath if he loses. Talking about how he’s gonna forgive all the — actually, I guess, suspend the sentences of all those who were arrested and sentenced to go to jail because of what happened on — in the Capitol. I’m not out there making fun of — like, re — remember the picture of Donald Trump when Nancy Pelosi’s husband was hit with the hammer, going — talking about — joking about it.
[OCS: Again, a lie taken out of context.]
LESTER HOLT: This doesn’t sound like you’re — you’re — you’re turning down the heat, though. You — you’ve talked about the —
PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN: Oh, no, no, no, no. Look, what I’m turning down — we have to stop the whole notion that there are certain things that are contrary to our — our democracy that we’re for. The idea of saying that you — “I didn’t win the election” when every court in the land — every court in the land, 120 appeals said — and including this conservative Supreme Court said we won, the idea about having — a loyalty pledge from all the folks who are in the Republican MAGA — not all Republicans, the MAGA Republicans saying that, “No, we lost the election,” inflaming the people to say — I — you — I mean —
[OCS: No evidence was allowed to be presented as the standing of individuals and organizations was denied by the court and the cases dismissed. Or cases were dismissed because there was no remedy, like a do-over of the election, available to the court.]
LESTER HOLT: So — so what — what — what can you and what will you do, at — at least things you can control, to lower down the temperature, the rhetoric out there?
PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN: Continue to talk about the things that matter to the American public. It matters whether or not you accept the outcome of elections. It matters whether or not you, for example, talk about how you’re gonna deal with the border instead of talking about people as being vermin and all — I mean, those things matter. That’s the kind of language that is inflammatory.
LESTER HOLT: What do you make of people like Nancy Pelosi, though, who seem to be of the opinion that there is a window for you to make this choice? What aren’t they getting?
PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN: Look — we knew this — this was gonna be a close race from the moment he announced. The idea that (CLEARS THROAT) we are in a situation where if you look at all the polling data, the polling data shows a lot of different things, but there’s no wide gap between us.
It’s essentially a toss-up race. And I think one of the arguments that get made, you have the most successful presidency of any president in modern history, maybe since Franklin Roosevelt. Passed more major legislation no one thought you could get done. Were able to put together a consensus. Were able to unite NATO. Were able to deal in f — foreign policy. Why don’t you just decide to rest on that — on those laurels? And the answer is because the job’s not finished. <Source>
[OCS: Completely delusional as he continues to lie, take things out of context, and repeat debunked matters.]
Watch as the progressive communist democrats try to sow discord between Donald Trump and his Vice Presidential running mate J. D. Vance, using Vance's previous comments unfavorable or attacking Trump. Trump is well aware of Vance's remarks and, as his transactional style, chooses to ignore them.
Why Hyper-Vigilance is Crucial
-
Protecting Progress: Positive changes in the political landscape are fragile. Progressive communist democrats, with their vested interests, will undoubtedly seek to reverse or sabotage these changes. Staying hyper-vigilant ensures we can detect and counteract their efforts before they cause irreparable damage.
-
Accountability: Many of these individuals and organizations have a history of actions that have ignored our Constitution, The Rule of Law, and federal criminal statutes, often operating with impunity. Hyper-vigilance ensures they are held accountable for their past actions, deterring future misconduct.
-
Maintaining Stability: The progressive communist democrats' desperation makes them unpredictable and potentially dangerous. By closely monitoring their activities, we can anticipate and neutralize threats to political stability and public safety.
-
Informing the Public: Vigilance allows us to provide accurate and timely information to the public. An informed populace is better equipped to resist manipulation and make decisions that support the nation we love.
How to Maintain Hyper-Vigilance
-
Continuous Monitoring: Establish systems and networks to constantly monitor the progressive communist democrats' activities. This includes tracking their movements, communications, and alliances.
-
Public Engagement: Engage with the public through transparent communication. Encourage community involvement in monitoring and reporting suspicious activities.
-
Collaboration with Allies: Work closely with allies who share our commitment to vigilance. Share information, resources, and strategies to strengthen collective efforts.
-
Legal and Regulatory Measures: Advocate for and support legal and regulatory measures that increase accountability and limit the progressive communist democrats' ability to disrupt democracy.
-
Education and Awareness: Educate the public about the importance of vigilance and the tactics used by the progressive communist democrats. Awareness is a powerful tool in preventing manipulation and deceit.
Bottom line…
While the current political climate may appear favorable, it is imperative to remain hyper-vigilant against the magnified threat posed by the progressive communist democrats.
Their desperation makes them formidable adversaries, but we can safeguard progress and ensure a stable, accountable political environment through unwavering vigilance and proactive measures.
Let us stay united and resolute in our efforts to observe actions, hold wrongdoers accountable, and protect our democracy from those who seek to destroy it from within.
Otherwise, we are so screwed.
-- Steve
“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words
“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw
“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”
“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS "The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius “A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell “Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar “Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS