Welcome to “oppositeville,” where inversions in definitions or meanings are the rule, not the exception…

It’s not uncommon among politicians to say one thing when the opposite is closer to the truth. 

Consider what we have seen and experienced since Biden took office...

• Chaos
• Violence
• Lies
• Bans
• Tantrums

There should be no doubt that the practice of using vague or opposite definitions is a form of political manipulation and deception designed to obscure meaning and a method that allows politicians and others to evade responsibility and accountability for their malign actions.

George Orwell again…

George Orwell, in his 1946 essay “Politics and the English Language,” wrote:

“In our time, political speech and writing are largely the defense of the indefensible.”

"The word Fascism has now no meaning except in so far as it signifies 'something not desirable.' The words democracy, socialism, freedom, patriotic, realistic, justice, have each of them several different meanings which cannot be reconciled with one another. In the case of a word like democracy, not only is there no agreed definition, but the attempt to make one is resisted from all sides. It is almost universally felt that when we call a country democratic we are praising it: consequently the defenders of every kind of regime claim that it is a democracy, and fear that they might have to stop using that word if it were tied down to any one meaning. Words of this kind are often used in a consciously dishonest way. That is, the person who uses them has his own private definition, but allows his hearer to think he means something quite different."

Hence, the progressive communist democrats label Donald Trump a fascist, not because he is fascist, but that he is grossly undesirable when compared to the abominable Joe Biden, an individual so corrupted, incompetent, and demented that he is, by any definition, unfit to serve as the President of the United States.

Consider the official designations of countries that use “democratic,” “republic,” or “People’s” in their official titles—and their actual form of governance …

Of these countries, only France, Germany, India, Italy, the Republic of Ireland, the Republic of Korea (South Korea), the Republic of Poland, the Republic of South Africa, and Brazil come close to a meaning understood by ordinary individuals in the United States. 

These countries have “democratic systems” in which the people elect representatives to govern on their behalf, and they adhere to principles such as the rule of law, separation of powers, and protection of individual rights. This is in contrast to dictatorships, monarchies, and governance by a cabal of elites who serve oligarchs and special interests. It’s worth noting that there are variations in structure, governance, and deviations based on their historical, cultural, and political contexts.

Bottom line…

Progressive communist democrats, like sociopaths, walk away from the mayhem they create without a moment of regret.

There should be no doubt that using vague or opposite definitions is a form of political manipulation and deception designed to obscure meaning. It allows politicians and others to evade responsibility and accountability for their malign actions.

We are so screwed.

-- Steve