The progressive communist democrat science mindfuck.

It’s about time to call out the narcissism and self-focus surrounding the agenda of so-called trans individuals who demand, under penalty of law, that we accept and celebrate their delusion that men can be women and women can be men. A scientific impossibility that is crippling our society as it erodes social conventions and norms. This includes the nonsense about the use of made-up words that purport to identify the many different gender identities claimed by the activists.

This is quite a departure from gay rights, where natural attractions between two individuals of the same sex are, well, natural, and that legal rights conferred to statutorily-coupled married individuals should be applied to both groups equally through a statutory “civil union,” a “personal relation arising out of a civil contract between two persons, to which the consent of the parties capable of making that contract is necessary.”

When biologists discuss sex as being “binary,” it denotes that there are only two sexes based on the binary classification between sperm  (small gametes) and ova (large gametes). Differences beyond gametes, including genetic chromosomal differences, hormone levels, and average morphological and behavioral differences, are a combination of social constructs used to define the cultural and social distinctions between males and females.

It is also true that, in a free society, you should be able to believe anything you want as long as you do not assume the moral or legal authority to force someone else to accept your belief, right or wrong. Hence, forced transgenderism is about power and has very little to do with freedom.

What we are seeing is a different manifestation of the power equation used by progressive communist democrats who want to destroy today’s society by corrupting social and cultural norms and substituting a version of a perverted society that grants perpetual authoritarian power over the population—defining freedom not as an inalienable right, but a privilege to be dispensed by the ruling elite as a reward for proper behavior or withheld as punishment for wrong thinking.

Science…

Science can be considered “unscientific or not science” when it deviates from the principles and methodologies that define the scientific method. Science relies on empirical evidence gathered through systematic observation, experimentation, data collection, and analysis rather than based on sparse anecdotal evidence, faith, belief, or feelings. If a claim or theory lacks supporting evidence or cannot be tested empirically, it falls outside the realm of science. Likewise, scientific theories must be falsifiable, meaning there must be a way to potentially prove them wrong through observation or experimentation. Claims that cannot be tested or proven false do not have a scientific basis and remain hypothetical.

Bottom line…

I am tired of the progressive communist democrats using “science” to excuse and implement authoritarian policies that lack scientific plausibility or fail to adhere to the scientific method.

We are so screwed.

-- Steve