Once again, the progressive communist democrats, anti-Semites, and Hamas propagandists/sympathizers at the New York Times couldn’t wait to smear Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who they believe is standing in the way of a two-state solution.

More specifically, holding on to Judea and Samaria, which the leftists believe is critical for a two-state solution. These dumb bastards watched former President Barack Obama, an anti-white, anti-America, anti-Israel, anti-Semite, sell out the United States to Iran to “neutralize” Israel’s military power – even if it put America’s safety and security at risk.

These dumb bastards watched the Biden Administration, led by a cadre of progressive communist democrat Obamacons like Antony Blinken, blow up a peaceful Middle East after former President Trump’s Abraham Accords.

And now, these dumb bastards are trying to destroy one of the world’s most significant leaders, Benjamin Netanyahu, who puts his country’s survival and well-being above his self-interests – unlike so many corrupt politicians like President Joe Biden, a corrupt, evil, unregistered foreign agent.

What would you expect from “The Newspaper of Record” that minimized the Holocaust deep in its voluminous pages as it did with Stalin’s starvation genocide in Ukraine?


Israel Knew Hamas’s Attack Plan More Than a Year Ago

A blueprint reviewed by The Times laid out the attack in detail. Israeli officials dismissed it as aspirational and ignored specific warnings.

Israeli officials obtained Hamas’s battle plan for the Oct. 7 terrorist attack more than a year before it happened, documents, emails and interviews show. But Israeli military and intelligence officials dismissed the plan as aspirational, considering it too difficult for Hamas to carry out.

The approximately 40-page document, which the Israeli authorities code-named “Jericho Wall,” outlined, point by point, exactly the kind of devastating invasion that led to the deaths of about 1,200 people.

The translated document, which was reviewed by The New York Times, did not set a date for the attack, but described a methodical assault designed to overwhelm the fortifications around the Gaza Strip, take over Israeli cities and storm key military bases, including a division headquarters.

Hamas followed the blueprint with shocking precision. The document called for a barrage of rockets at the outset of the attack, drones to knock out the security cameras and automated machine guns along the border, and gunmen to pour into Israel en masse in paragliders, on motorcycles and on foot — all of which happened on Oct. 7.

The plan also included details about the location and size of Israeli military forces, communication hubs and other sensitive information, raising questions about how Hamas gathered its intelligence and whether there were leaks inside the Israeli security establishment.

The document circulated widely among Israeli military and intelligence leaders, but experts determined that an attack of that scale and ambition was beyond Hamas’s capabilities, according to documents and officials. It is unclear whether Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu or other top political leaders also saw the document. <Source>

[OCS: What the Times fails to mention is that Benjamin Netanyahu was not Israel’s Prime Minister at the time that this document was percolating in the bureaucracy. Netanyahu was not even in the government at the time the document was circulating. Benjamin Netanyahu did not assume office until 29 December 2022.

Yet, the Times does not seek to ask leftists in charge like Prime Minister Naftali Bennett (13 June 2021 - 30 June 2022), Prime Minister Yair Lapid (1 July 2022 - 29 December 2022), and Benny Gantz, the Israeli Minister of Defense (2020–2022) if they saw the document or took decisive action based on its contents.

Obama is the invisible hand up Antony Blinkin’s ass…


Israel exposes Obama-Biden friction

There is a genuine breach within the Democratic party, which also runs through the president’s administration

An unexpected rift that has been brought out by the Israel-Gaza crisis is the passive aggression between Joe Biden and Barack Obama. Former aides to America’s 44th president have made it clear that they disapprove of how America’s 46th has been handling Israel since October 7. If Obama were in charge, they say, the US would be putting conditions on military aid to Israel and calling out Benjamin Netanyahu’s egregious failings. That is precisely the point, Biden’s people reply; only by hugging Israel closely can America exercise leverage over its actions. Without Biden’s embrace, there would be no temporary ceasefire, hostage-prisoner exchange or humanitarian aid getting through to Gaza.

Obama detested Netanyahu; Biden says they have been friends for more than 30 years (since Bibi was a staffer at Israel’s Washington embassy and Biden a youngish senator). “Bibi, I love you. I don’t agree with a damn thing you say,” Biden claims to have told him. Obama would agree with the second sentence but die a thousand deaths before uttering the first. <Source>

[OCS: President Obama went out of his way to disparage and insult Benjamin Netanyahu, perhaps because he was a true world leader whereas Obama was a poseur, a fraud who received a Nobel Peace Prize with zero accomplishments in diplomacy. Or, more likely, Obama’s long association with virulent anti-Semites like his spiritual mentor Jerimiah Wright and friend Louis Farrakhan warped his views early on. Possiblly like Obama’s communist mentor and father figure Frank Marshall Davis? ]

Bottom line…

The progressive communist democrats are bad for America, Americans, Israel, and the Western World.

We are so screwed.

-- Steve

“Nullius in verba.”-- take nobody's word for it!

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS