After watching a portion of the beginning of President Joe Biden’s pre-impeachment inquiry, I have come to some inescapable conclusions.

1. Even if Joe Biden is found guilty of selling influence to foreign powers and possibly the sale of classified information, he is unlikely to be fully prosecuted under the law. First, and most importantly, because too many influential individuals on both sides of the aisle are guilty of the same behavior and risk mutually assured destruction should the feckless Republicans proceed against the Democrats. Second, President Biden’s mental incapacity, including his ability to distinguish between truth and fiction, and physical frailness precludes an adequate trial defense. Moreover, influential, top-level players in the intelligence and law enforcement agencies, including the CIA, NSA, DOJ, and FBI, are likely to subvert any investigation that would reveal their complicity in criminal behavior and unconstitutional denial of American citizen’s inalienable and constitutionally protected rights.

2. Likewise, the corporatized media and tech oligarchs have been incentivized to censor information unfavorable to the regime and to cancel dissident voices.

   Corporate media like CNN, MSNBC, NBC, CBS, and ABC, which were once eager to amplify Democrats’ sham impeachments of former President Donald Trump, did the bidding of the Biden administration on Thursday when they refused to air footage of Republicans’ impeachment hearing. <Source>

3. It is unlikely that former President Obama, on whose watch Vice President Biden and Hillary Clinton performed nefarious acts, will be held responsible as both parties pander to minorities. Truth be told, Obama, the communist commander-in-chief, is grossly responsible for one of the saddest periods in U.S. History, only preempted by major wars, starting with the Civil War.

4. I also note that the Ranking Committee Member Jamie Raskin (D-MD) is a well-credentialed Harvard-trained lawyer and a constitutional law professor. And, in my opinion, Jamie “the red” Raskin is a hypocrite, fraud, liar, and radical progressive communist democrat whose behavior as part of the anti-Trump movement was unconscionable. He should be precluded from this panel based on prior bad acts and lies.

Setting the stage…

I believe the stage has been set at the United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability’s first hearing, “The Basis for an Impeachment Inquiry of President Joseph R. Biden, Jr.”

Consider the testimony of well-regarded Jonathan Turley, Shapiro Chair for Public Interest Law at the George Washington University Law School…

It is important to emphasize what this hearing is not. It is not a hearing on articles of impeachment. The House has launched an impeachment inquiry, and I am appearing to discuss the history and purpose of such inquiries.

I have previously stated that, while I believe that an impeachment inquiry is warranted, I do not believe that the evidence currently meets the standard of a high crime and misdemeanor needed for an article of impeachment. The purpose of my testimony today is to discuss how past inquiries pursued evidence of potentially impeachable conduct.

My testimony also reflects the fact that I do believe that, after months of investigation, the House has passed the threshold for an inquiry into whether President Joe Biden was directly involved or benefited from the corrupt practices of his son, Hunter, and others.

Since my testimony focuses on the historical and legal aspects of this inquiry, I will leave much of the discussion of the evidence to my fellow witnesses and to the Committee members themselves.

However, I believe that the record has developed to the point that the House needs to answer troubling questions surrounding the President. As discussed below, polls indicate that most of the country shares those concerns while expressing doubts over the Biden Administration investigating potential criminal conduct. <Source: Turley Statement>

The fact that President Biden ignored federal immigration laws and voluntarily instructed other administration officials to allow a hoard of illegal aliens into this country, in violation of our nation's sovereignty, is enough to stand alone as an impeachable offense that has materially damaged our nation. This is a matter that was adjudicated by the Supreme Court, whose ruling he ignored. Simply put, he did not "faithfully execute the Office of President." 

The fact that Biden used Executive Orders to usurp the law-making duties of Congress and refused to enforce existing laws should be the first article of impeachment.  We are over the threshold of impeachment.

Testimony of forensic accountant Bruce G. Dubinsky, CPA…

The critical question facing the American people today is whether behind the smokescreen clouding the Biden family and associates’ businesses was there, or is there a fire? And if there was or is a fire, how big is that fire?

Why were members of the Biden family and close business associates receiving millions of dollars of payments from foreign entities and individuals? What services, if any, were being provided? What was the substance of the alleged services being provided? Was the money being paid a fair amount commensurate with those services? Were political favors being traded and disguised as services? These are the questions that, as a forensic accountant, I routinely am tasked to answer when I am hired to investigate allegations of fraud and corruption.

There is a great deal of evidence that has been collected to date by this Committee and others, trying to answer these questions. However, much more information is still needed in order to be able to answer these questions and make a final determination as to whether or not the Biden family and its associates’ businesses were involved in any improper or illicit activities, and whether those activities, if any, were connected to President Joe Biden or then Vice President Biden.

In my experience, fraudsters purposefully create a labyrinth of Limited Liability Companies (LLC’s) to create an opaque network of entities that are then used to hide improper conduct. In many instances, these complex business arrangements are typically centered around conducting illicit activities and involve moving money around the globe in a manner designed to avoid detection of the underlying illegal activity, as well as the movement of the money tied to that illegal activity. <Source: Dubinsky Statement>

Bottom line…

Let us remember that impeachment is a political process and has nothing to do with a criminal code that did not exist at the time the Constitution was written. It is enough to reach the threshold by violating the public's trust and materially damaging the nation.

Grab some popcorn as both sides grandstand and maneuver for political advantage. Just don’t expect those in power to be entirely held accountable for their actions. Least of all, Barack Obama, who might tell you all he knows is what’s in the newspaper.

We are so screwed.

-- Steve