Previous month:
April 19, 2023
Next month:
April 21, 2023

REMEMBERING JOHN MOORE

Before a routine doctor’s visit at UCLA, I received an innocuously-worded text message asking me to voluntarily fill out a form conveying all rights in my “medical waste” to UCLA.

Consent

This sparked my remembrance of John Moore and the infamous use of his discarded spleen to create a billion-dollar enterprise…

The John Moore cancer cell controversy involves a legal case that took place in the 1980s, which raised ethical and legal issues about the ownership of human biological materials and the rights of patients to control the use of their own tissues.

In brief, John L. Moore was a patient diagnosed with hairy cell leukemia in 1976. He received treatment at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), where doctors removed his spleen and other tissues for medical research. Unbeknownst to Moore, UCLA researchers subsequently developed and patented a cell line (known as the "Mo" cell line) [U.S. Patent No. 4,438,032 -- Mar. 20, 1984] derived from his cells. The cell line was found to have commercial potential, and UCLA licensed it to a biotechnology company to develop new drugs.

Moore later found out about the Mo cell line and filed a lawsuit against UCLA and the researchers, claiming that they had violated his rights to his own tissues and had exploited his cells for financial gain without his consent. The case went to trial, and the court ruled in favor of Moore, finding that he had a property interest in his cells and tissues and that UCLA had violated his rights by not obtaining his informed consent for using his cells in research. However, subsequent appeals by UCLA proved fruitful, and Moore was denied compensation for his involuntary "contribution" to science.

[OCS: “It was further alleged that ‘for years after the surgery, the UCLA researcher would call Moore in for follow-up exams and to obtain samples of bone marrow or blood. Moore eventually discovered that those exams were not for his benefit alone—the Researcher was developing and patenting a cell line called Mo (today worth about $3 billion). Moore sued the researcher and UCLA, claiming they had deceived him and used his body for research without his consent. Moore lost the case, Moore v. Regents of the University of California, and the Supreme Court of California ruled that once tissues have been removed from your body, your claim on them has vanished. The researcher had done nothing illegal, but our sense of fair play says that something is wrong here.’”]

The John Moore case raised a number of important ethical and legal issues related to using human biological materials in medical research. Some of the key issues include:

  1. Ownership of human biological materials: The case raised the question of who owns human biological materials, such as cells and tissues, once they have been removed from the body. The court found that patients have a property interest in their own tissues and that this interest extends to any commercial products that may be developed from those tissues.

  2. Informed consent: The case highlighted the importance of obtaining informed consent from patients before using their tissues for research purposes. The court found that UCLA had failed to obtain Moore's informed consent for using his cells in research, which was a violation of his rights.

  3. Commercialization of human biological materials: The case also raised concerns about the commercialization of human biological materials and the potential for patients to be exploited for financial gain. The court found that UCLA had licensed the Mo cell line for commercial purposes without Moore's knowledge or consent, violating his rights.

  4. Patient autonomy: The case emphasized the importance of respecting patient autonomy and giving patients control over what happens to their own tissues. The court's ruling affirmed that patients have the right to make decisions about the use of their own tissues and to be informed about how those tissues will be used.

The Moore case significantly impacted how medical researchers and institutions now handle human biological materials. The case helped to establish a legal precedent for patients' rights to control the use of their tissues and set the stage for the development of ethical guidelines and informed consent procedures for medical research involving human subjects.

Bottom line…

Although John Moore, 56, passed away in a Seattle, Washington, hospital on October 1. 2001, after undergoing an experimental treatment for his disease, we owe him a debt of gratitude for pursuing a case that helped to define our rights as patients. 

And, no, I did not sign the consent form. 

We are so screwed.

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba.”-- take nobody's word for it!

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


WHAT THE HELL IS HAPPENING TO AMERICA?

Creeping-socialism - Copy

A confluence of political corruption and malign foreign and domestic events have boosted the influence of progressive communist democrats and their media and technology platform gatekeepers and propagandists on the world stage.

Marxist intellectuals in various prestigious universities concluded that traditional Marxist theory based on class warfare was ineffective in creating a workers' revolution in a relatively classless America. Therefore, they shifted their ideological battlefield to the cultural realm, specifically racial and sexual identities, both with large, disaffected populations that could be more easily manipulated with simple appeals to self-fulfillment.

Those academics who sought to undermine and subvert Western culture and values began to promote identity politics along with such concepts as political correctness, multiculturalism, and moral equivalence that could be utilized to create a further sense of alienation and division in the United States, paving the way for an abrupt leftward shift into socialism.

To forestall scrutiny and criticism, they claimed that those who pointed to the dangers of cultural Marxism were delusional right-wing conspiracy theorists who misread the historical tea leaves and produced a distorted view of Marxist theory and history.

The Marxists argue...

  • It is a conspiracy theory: The concept of cultural Marxism is often associated with conspiracy theories that posit a shadowy cabal of Marxist intellectuals working to subvert Western culture. However, there is little evidence to support these claims, and many scholars dismiss them as baseless.

  • It distorts Marxist theory: Marxist theory is primarily concerned with economic and social systems and their impact on power relations. While Marxist thinkers have also analyzed cultural practices and ideologies, the idea of cultural Marxism as a distinct theoretical framework is not widely accepted in academic circles.

  • It ignores the diversity of Marxist thought: Marxism is a diverse and multifaceted tradition encompassing a wide range of theoretical perspectives and political movements. The notion of cultural Marxism tends to flatten this diversity and treat Marxism as a monolithic entity.

  • It oversimplifies complex social phenomena: The idea that cultural practices such as political correctness and multiculturalism are part of a deliberate Marxist plot ignores the difficult historical, social, and cultural factors that have contributed to their development.

  • It distracts from real issues: The focus on cultural Marxism can distract from more pressing social and political problems, such as economic inequality, racial injustice, and environmental degradation. Promoting a simplistic and conspiratorial view of social change can hinder efforts to address these complex challenges.

Of course, their arguments are specious. 

The clear and present danger of cultural Marxism is well known. Almost everyone possesses an innate sense of the difference between good and evil, right and wrong, and moral and immoral. Unfortunately for some, mostly progressive democrats, the truth is inconvenient or interferes with their social life.

Don’t look for the media to tell the truth…

Several pundits have noted that the corporatized collective media does not care about their own credibility or what the American public might think. Its dual function is to promulgate the regime’s viewpoint at any given moment without consideration of its past statements or performance and to suppress dissident views while creating semantic confusion over terms and definitions.

Bottom line…

Of course, it is not hard to argue that Marxism, in its various forms, resulted in death and misery for hundreds of millions of individuals. And the shift of American exceptionalism to totalitarian obedience is not just another conspiracy theory.

But will anyone care before it is too late?

Where is the opposition from the GOP, which often acts as the enabler of the progressive communist democrat agenda?

We are so screwed.

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba.”-- take nobody's word for it!

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS