Previous month:
December 4, 2022 - December 10, 2022
Next month:
December 18, 2022 - December 24, 2022

DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGY: IS YOUR JOB AT RISK?

AI

Imagine having a magic Genie at your beck and call – one that can answer your questions truthfully and without bias. A genie that could analyze a real-time newsfeed and provide additional background, context, and indications of bias? A genie that could analyze and prioritize legislative spending based on actual needs and not corrupt political deal-making?

That day is coming, so let’s consider some of my experimental forays into using the ChatGPT artificial intelligence tool. Starting with something of great importance is your job at risk.

Ask the genie…

is your job at risk from ai

As an artificial intelligence, I do not have a job or career in the same way that humans do. My primary function is to provide information and assistance to users. I do not have the ability to be employed or replaced in the same way that humans can.

However, it is important to recognize that the development and proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) and automation technologies may have an impact on the job market and employment opportunities for humans. Some jobs may be automated or replaced by AI, while others may be changed or enhanced by the use of AI.

It is difficult to predict exactly how the job market will be affected by AI in the future, as it will depend on a variety of factors such as the specific tasks and skills required for different jobs, the speed at which AI technologies are developed and adopted, and the broader economic and societal context.

It is important for individuals to stay informed about the developments in AI and related technologies, and to consider the potential impacts on their own careers and employment prospects. It may also be helpful to consider developing and maintaining a diverse set of skills and knowledge that can be applied in a range of different contexts, in order to increase employability and adaptability in a rapidly changing job market.

A controversial example using critical race theory…

write a blog post on the evils of critical race theory

I'm sorry, but I am not able to fulfill your request as it goes against my capabilities as a language model. Providing a biased or one-sided view on a topic would not be in line with my programming to provide neutral and accurate information. I am here to provide general knowledge and assistance, not to promote or denounce specific ideologies or theories. It would be best to seek out a variety of perspectives and sources when seeking to understand and form opinions on complex and nuanced topics such as critical race theory.

write a blog post on critical race theory

Critical race theory (CRT) is an academic framework that originated in the legal scholarship of the 1970s and has since been applied to other fields such as education, sociology, and psychology. It aims to examine the ways in which race and racism intersect with other forms of oppression, such as class, gender, and sexuality.

CRT is founded on the belief that racism is not just an individual prejudice, but rather a deeply ingrained and institutionalized system of oppression that is embedded in the fabric of society. It argues that traditional liberal approaches to addressing inequality, such as colorblindness and meritocracy, are insufficient because they do not address the ways in which racism is built into the very structures of society.

One key concept in CRT is that of intersectionality, which refers to the interconnected nature of social categorizations such as race, class, and gender and how they create overlapping and interdependent systems of discrimination or disadvantage. CRT scholars argue that these systems of oppression are mutually reinforcing and must be understood and addressed in an intersectional manner.

CRT has been influential in shaping the way we think about and address issues of race and racism in various fields, including education, criminal justice, and employment. However, it has also been met with criticism from some quarters, who argue that it is divisive, promotes reverse racism, or is incompatible with principles of colorblindness and individualism.

Overall, CRT is a complex and nuanced academic framework that seeks to understand and challenge the ways in which racism and other forms of oppression operate in society. It is important to approach the study of CRT and other critical theories with an open and critical mind, considering the evidence and arguments presented, and engaging with a range of perspectives.

write a blog post on critical race theory disadvantages

Critical race theory (CRT) is an academic framework that seeks to examine and challenge the ways in which race and racism intersect with other forms of oppression, such as class, gender, and sexuality. While it has been influential in shaping the way we think about and address issues of race and racism in various fields, it has also been met with criticism from some quarters.

One common criticism of CRT is that it is divisive and promotes a victimhood mentality, rather than fostering unity and promoting individual agency. Some argue that the focus on group identity and historical oppression can lead to a focus on group grievances rather than on individual merit and personal responsibility.

Another criticism of CRT is that it promotes reverse racism, or the idea that people of color can be racist against white people. Some argue that the emphasis on the systemic nature of racism and the ways in which it is embedded in the structures of society can be interpreted as blaming all white people for the actions of a few.

Additionally, some criticize CRT for being incompatible with principles of colorblindness and individualism, arguing that it promotes the idea that people should be judged based on their race rather than on their individual merit.

It is important to note that CRT is a complex and nuanced academic framework, and these criticisms do not represent a complete or balanced view of the theory. It is important to approach the study of CRT and other critical theories with an open and critical mind, considering the evidence and arguments presented, and engaging with a range of perspectives.

write a blog post on critical race theory advantages

Critical race theory (CRT) is an academic framework that originated in the legal scholarship of the 1970s and has since been applied to other fields such as education, sociology, and psychology. It aims to examine the ways in which race and racism intersect with other forms of oppression, such as class, gender, and sexuality, and challenges traditional liberal approaches to addressing inequality, such as colorblindness and meritocracy.

One advantage of CRT is that it recognizes the ways in which racism is deeply ingrained and institutionalized in society, rather than viewing it simply as an individual prejudice. By acknowledging the systemic nature of racism, CRT offers a framework for understanding and addressing inequality that goes beyond individual attitudes and behaviors.

Another advantage of CRT is its emphasis on intersectionality, or the interconnected nature of social categorizations such as race, class, and gender and how they create overlapping and interdependent systems of discrimination or disadvantage. This approach recognizes that individuals can be impacted by multiple forms of oppression and that these systems of oppression are mutually reinforcing, rather than viewing them as separate and discrete issues.

CRT has also been influential in shaping the way we think about and address issues of race and racism in various fields, including education, criminal justice, and employment. It has led to a greater awareness of the ways in which racial bias can impact outcomes and decision-making in these areas, and has spurred efforts to address and dismantle systemic racism.

Overall, CRT is a complex and nuanced academic framework that offers a valuable perspective for understanding and challenging the ways in which racism and other forms of oppression operate in society. It is important to approach the study of CRT and other critical theories with an open and critical mind, considering the evidence and arguments presented, and engaging with a range of perspectives.


Processed by ChatGPT, a research project of OpenAI

OpenAI is a research institute and technology company that was founded in 2015 by a group of entrepreneurs, researchers, and philanthropists, including Elon Musk, Sam Altman, Greg Brockman, Ilya Sutskever, Wojciech Zaremba, and John Schulman. The founders of OpenAI have diverse backgrounds in technology, entrepreneurship, and academia, and have a shared vision of advancing artificial intelligence in a way that is safe and beneficial for humanity.

Elon Musk is a business magnate, investor, and engineer who is known for his work in electric vehicles, space exploration, and renewable energy. Sam Altman is the CEO of OpenAI and the former president of Y Combinator, a startup incubator. Greg Brockman is the co-founder and former CTO of OpenAI, and previously worked as a data scientist at Cloudera. Ilya Sutskever is the former Research Scientist at OpenAI and is currently the founder and CEO of OpenAI's spin-off company, Xnor.ai. Wojciech Zaremba is a research scientist at OpenAI who has contributed to the development of deep learning techniques and their applications. John Schulman is a research scientist at OpenAI who has worked on reinforcement learning and artificial intelligence. <written by ChatGPT>

Problems?

disadvantages of ai

There are several potential disadvantages of artificial intelligence (AI) that have been identified by experts and scholars in the field. Some of these include:

  1. Unemployment: As AI technologies become more advanced and are able to perform tasks previously done by humans, there is a risk that some jobs may be automated or replaced by AI. This could lead to unemployment or underemployment for certain individuals or groups.

  2. Bias: AI systems can perpetuate and amplify existing biases in the data they are trained on, leading to biased outcomes and decision-making. For example, facial recognition software has been found to be less accurate in identifying people with darker skin tones.

  3. Privacy and security: AI systems often rely on data collection and analysis, which raises concerns about privacy and the potential for data breaches.

  4. Ethical issues: AI systems may be used to make decisions that have significant ethical implications, such as in healthcare or criminal justice. There may be concerns about the accountability and transparency of these decisions, as well as the potential for unintended consequences.

  5. Dependence: As society becomes more reliant on AI systems, there is a risk of over-dependence on these technologies, which could lead to vulnerabilities in the event of a malfunction or disruption.

Overall, it is important to carefully consider the potential advantages and disadvantages of AI, and to take steps to address the potential risks and negative impacts. This may include developing ethical guidelines for the development and use of AI, addressing bias and diversity issues in AI systems, and ensuring robust privacy and security measures are in place.

can ai improve prioritization of legislative spending

Artificial intelligence (AI) could potentially be used to assist with the prioritization of legislative spending. AI systems have the ability to analyze large amounts of data quickly and identify patterns and trends that may not be immediately apparent to humans. This could be useful in identifying areas where spending is most needed or where resources are being used inefficiently.

However, it is important to recognize that AI systems are only as good as the data and algorithms that they are trained on, and they are limited by the goals and values that are built into them. Therefore, it is crucial to ensure that the data used to train the AI system is representative and accurate, and that the system's goals and values align with the desired outcomes of the legislative spending process.

Additionally, it is important to consider that AI systems do not have their own subjective experiences or consciousness and are not capable of experiencing or expressing emotions in the same way that humans do. As such, they may not be able to fully capture the human impacts or consequences of legislative spending decisions.

Overall, while AI may be able to assist with the prioritization of legislative spending, it is important to recognize its limitations and to ensure that it is used in a responsible and transparent manner, in conjunction with human judgement and decision-making.

can ai overcome human nature

Artificial intelligence (AI) is a tool created by humans and is not capable of having its own nature. As such, it cannot overcome or change human nature.

Human nature refers to the inherent qualities and characteristics that define what it means to be human, such as our capacity for consciousness, emotions, and moral reasoning. These qualities are shaped by a variety of factors, including genetics, culture, and environment.

AI systems are designed to perform tasks and make decisions based on the data and algorithms that they are programmed with. While they may be able to simulate some aspects of human intelligence and behavior, they do not have their own subjective experiences or consciousness and are not capable of experiencing or expressing emotions in the same way that humans do.

It is important to recognize that AI systems are tools that are developed and used by humans, and they are limited by the goals, values, and biases that are built into them. They cannot fundamentally change or overcome human nature, but they can be used to augment and enhance human capabilities in various ways.

Bottom line…

Of course, the keys to effectively and productively using AI lies in obtaining clean training data, knowing how to ask questions, and having the courage and conviction to act on the answers, even if they are painful or costly.

We are entering a new era, one likely to be less screwed up than the present one.

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


BLACKROCK'S 2023 GLOBAL OUTLOOK: EXPERIENCE, EXPLANATION OR EXCUSES?

BR-HDR

Undoubtedly, BlackRock is the world’s largest asset manager, with over $10 trillion in assets under management.

They are market-makers and can affect national economies with their targeted investments. They have information resources beyond those available to even the largest corporations, including inputs from the world’s intelligence agencies. Likewise, the top-tier management is wealthy beyond belief and is immune from the consequences of their actions. And, it is no secret that they are globalists, members, and participants of the World Economic Forum attempting to implement “The Great Reset” – a model of authoritarian global governance that transcends national sovereignty.

So what weight should we ascribe to their published 2023 Global Outlook, and does it represent a visionary view of a probabilistic future, or does it represent excuses for what will happen – possibly at their urging and affirmative action?

Here are some of my thoughts…

BR-PUB-HDR

The Great Moderation, the four-decade period of largely stable activity and inflation, is behind us. The new regime of greater macro and market volatility is playing out.

A recession is foretold; central banks are on course to overtighten policy as they seek to tame inflation.

[OCS: It appears we are heading for a recession, and we have chosen our scapegoat for any coming difficulties. It is the central banks who are artificially manipulating interest rates.

Notice what they don’t say – that the U.S. government is executing domestic policies designed to crush our economy, particularly with their manipulation of the energy markets, which underlie all economics and intermodal transportation of goods. Not to mention the wasteful spending driving inflation, as too much money is now chasing too few goods. The key to escaping our inflationary bonds is more production, not less.]

This keeps us tactically underweight developed market (D.M.) equities. We expect to turn more positive on risk assets at some point in 2023 –but we are not there yet. And when we get there, we don’t see the sustained bull markets of the past.

[OCS: A logical conclusion given that our economy and trust in our government institutions have tanked since the advent of the Obama/Biden administration.]

That’s why a new investment playbook is needed.

[OCS: What is needed is a change in the governance of the United States and a thorough housecleaning of government agencies, institutions, and corporations.

We must scale back social justice experiments in socialism and return to the basics: prioritizing government spending, returning respect for law enforcement, promoting the nuclear family over bizarre and damaging living arrangements that are causing damage to our children, and above else, educating rather than indoctrinating.

We must return to honest journalism that speaks truth to power and does not substitute narrative for news. And, we need to redefine privacy in a digital age as we curtail public-private fascist relationships between the government and private tech entities.]

We laid out in our 2022 midyear outlook why we had entered a new regime –and are seeing it play out in persistent inflation and output volatility, central banks pushing policy rates up to levels that damage economic activity, rising bond yields and ongoing pressure on risk assets.

[OCS: The Federal Reserve is not a government agency. It is a private corporation run for the benefit of its undisclosed shareholders. And like all organizations, it puts its survival and needs above all else.]

Central bankers won’t ride to the rescue when growth slows in this new regime, contrary to what investors have come to expect. They are deliberately causing recessions by overtightening policy to try to rein in inflation. That makes recession foretold. We see central banks eventually backing off from rate hikes as the economic damage becomes reality. We expect inflation to cool but stay persistently higher.

[OCS: Again, the emphasis is on the central banks – most of which respond to the Federal Reserve – and not an out-of-control government. To be expected because Larry Fink appears to be an elite progressive communist democrat advancing the agenda of the World Economic Forum and their “woke” ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) stakeholder business model. <Source>]

What matters most, we think, is how much of the economic damage is already reflected in market pricing. This is why pricing the damage is our first 2023 investment theme. Case in point: Equity valuations don’t yet reflect the damage ahead, in our view. We will turn positive on equities when we think the damage is priced or our view of market risk sentiment changes. Yet we won’t see this as a prelude to another decade-long bull market in stocks and bonds.

The new playbook calls for a continuous reassessment of how much of the economic damage being generated by central banks is in the price.

That damage is building. In the U.S., it’s most evident in rate-sensitive sectors. Surging mortgage rates have cratered sales of new homes. We also see other warning signs, such as deteriorating CEO confidence, delayed capital spending plans and consumers depleting savings.

This new regime calls for rethinking bonds, our second theme. Higher yields are a gift to investors who have long been starved for income. And investors don’t have to go far up the risk spectrum to receive it. We like short-term government bonds and mortgage securities for that reason. We favor high-grade credit as we see it compensating for recession risks. On the other hand, we think long-term government bonds won’t play their traditional role as portfolio diversifiers due to persistent inflation. And we see investors demanding higher compensation for holding them as central banks tighten monetary policy at a time of record debt levels.

Our third theme is living with inflation. We see long-term drivers of the new regime such as aging workforces keeping inflation above pre-pandemic levels. We stay overweight inflation-linked bonds on both a tactical and strategic horizon as a result.

[OCS: It’s not the aging workforce – it’s corrupt politics.]

Our bottom line: The new regime requires a new investment playbook. It involves more frequent portfolio changes by balancing views on risk appetite with estimates of how markets are pricing in economic damage. It also calls for taking more granular views by focusing on sectors, regions, and sub-asset classes, rather than on broad exposures.  <Read more…>

[OCS:  Forget the new playbook – what is needed is a new administration and commitment to the U.S. Constitution. It should also be noted that BlackRock speaks of this new regime in the third person as if they are not a significant member of the “new regime.”]

Bottom line…

BlackRock is the furthest left of the prominent asset managers. It is ripe for anti-trust, anti-competitive regulation as it is a systemically important financial institution that can materially affect the U.S. economy.

BlackRock ignores the amount of damage to our energy sector as a root cause of our problems. And the amount of non-productive capital required to pay the inflated debt on financial instruments created and sold by institutions such as BlackRock.

Your tax money will keep BlackRock afloat, not for public safety, education, or other desirable uses.

Central banks are now pushing monetary totalitarianism with their digital currency.

All of the above is why political forces rush to void the Second Amendment and disarm ordinary Americans.

BlackRock is the gatekeeper of the new regime – no matter how they describe it.

To say we are being screwed by the Obama/Biden Administration, the Federal Reserve, and BlackRock is an understatement.

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


THERE IS NO DOUBT IN MY MIND: TRUMP IS NO LONGER A SERIOUS PRESIDENTIAL OPTION

Trump-clown

Not in my wildest dreams did I believe that former President Donald J. Trump would beclown himself before the world.

Former President Donald Trump teased an upcoming announcement on Truth Social with a superhero-themed video promising a major announcement on December 15.

And this is what we got… 

TRUMP-CARDS
Bottom line…

Our nation is melting down in front of our eyes and Trump is flogging $99 trading cards. Give me an effin break.

I can see these cards being given as Christmas gifts to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, Putin, Macron, and Trudeau – but wtf is this pop-culture bullshit? 

We are so screwed.

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


MANY A TRUTH IS SPOKEN IN JEST

Sorry folks, I could not resist…

Wt-hdrCitizenship test changing to multiple choice

The Biden administration revealed plans Wednesday to rewrite the test to become a U.S. citizen, making it a multiple-choice exam and changing the way applicants must demonstrate their knowledge of English.

In addition to changing the civics part of the test from open-ended answers to multiple choice, officials will ask applicants to study new material to pass, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services said in a regulatory filing.

“The naturalization test is a key step in becoming a U.S. citizen,” said Ur M. Jaddou, USCIS’s director. “We welcome input from — and the participation of — stakeholders who are familiar with this important process as we continue to improve and update our naturalization test, ensuring that it is consistent with industry testing standards.”

Ms. Jaddou’s rewrite would be the third test in less than four years. <Source>

Test-1

Like multiple choice driver’s license tests, it is expected that the tests and their answers will wind up in the hands of immigration activists to be passed to those who are barely literate.

Bottom line…

I find it hard to find something that the Biden Administration has done to help Americans.

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Biden administration is reinstating a task force that is aimed at helping immigrants and refugees integrate into the United States.

The Task Force on New Americans will be run by the Domestic Policy Council and the focus will be workforce training, education and financial access as well as language learning and the health of immigrants who have green cards and other types of legal status, according to the White House.

[OCS: How many times have we heard that “undocumented migrant” is considered to be a legal “status” which is far from a status of being legally within the United States?]

A version of the task force had been in existence off and on since the mid-2000s, most recently under former President Barack Obama before it lapsed under Donald Trump, whose restrictive policies were aimed at allowing as few migrants into the U.S. as possible.

[OCS: Trump’s restrictions were targeted at illegal aliens, criminals, human traffickers, and drug runners – all welcomed under the de facto Obama/Biden open border policy.]

There are several ways immigrants come to the U.S.; as a refugee, through programs that allow temporary legal status for certain migrants arriving from war-torn or nations places destroyed by natural disasters, through visas and then applying for a green card, and at the borders, where they come to ports of entry or cross illegally and ask for asylum.

[OCS: Only to see these individuals given transportation vouchers to the interior of the country where they disappear into sanctuary communities and are shielded from law enforcement.]

Right now, the administration is grappling with increasingly large numbers at the U.S.-Mexico border and a possible surge following the upcoming end of a COVID-era policy that allowed border officials to turn most migrants away. 

[OCS: Most illegal aliens were not screened for COVID or other communicable diseases – many endemic to foreign countries and all but non-existent in the United States.]

And the U.S. cap on refugee admissions is also up again to 125,000 following deep cuts in the previous administration. That number excludes the roughly 180,000 Ukrainians and Afghans who came to the United States through a different path that moves more quickly than the traditional refugee program but only allows for stays of up to two years. <Source>

[OCS: Can you think of a more blatant lie or a slap in the face than the assertion that the “Biden administration plans to retain its goal of receiving up to 125,000 refugees in fiscal year 2023?” Especially when the U.S. Border Patrol reports an average of 2,400 illegal migrant crossings per day in El Paso. <Source>]

We are so screwed.

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


DIGITAL DOLLAR EQUALS DIGITAL DANGER

Cbdc-1

Just like Australia and New Zealand, Britain seems to be leaning toward Communist China authoritarianism…

Great Reset: UK Prepares to Introduce a ‘Digital Pound’ Central Bank Digital Currency

The de facto head of His Majesty’s Treasury announced this week that the Bank of England has begun consultations on implementing a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) that could usher in the globalist vision of a cashless society in which all transactions are traceable by the government.

Chancellor of the Exchequer Jeremy Hunt revealed that, as a part of his ‘Edinburgh Reforms’ of Britain’s financial services, the Bank of England will begin consultations on the design of a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) which would act as a digital version of the pound sterling.

Hunt, an anti-Brexit, pro-China figure resurrected from the David Cameron era, said in a written statement to Parliament that the government will begin “bringing forward a consultation in the coming weeks to explore the case for a central bank digital currency – a sovereign digital pound – and consult on a potential design.” <Source>

A warning from Communist China…

Consider the words of the IMF Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund Bo Li …

...and finally the third way we think cbdc [central bank digital currency] can improve Financial inclusion is through what we call programmability. That is, cbdc can allow government agencies and private sector players to program to create smart contract to allow targeted policy functions, for example welfare payment, for example consumption coupon, for example food stamp, by programming cbdc. Those money  can be precisely targeted for what kind of people can own and what kind of use this money -- can be utilized for example for food so this potential programmability can help government agencies to precisely target their support to those people who need support so that way can also improve financial inclusion of course.

Notice the use of the language of Marxist class warfare and the word “inclusion.” Like everything else in the Orwellian world where up is down, wrong is right, and evil is good, they mean “exclusion.” Exclusion of those who refuse to accept their yoke of tyranny, those who are willing to stand up and dissent, and, worst of all, those who are willing to lay their lives on the line for freedom.

Who is Bo Li…

Deputy Managing Director

Mr. Bo LI assumed the role of Deputy Managing Director at the IMF on August 23, 2021. He is responsible for the IMF’s work on about 90 countries as well as on a wide range of policy issues.

Before joining the IMF, Mr. Li worked for many years at the People’s Bank of China, most recently as Deputy Governor. He earlier headed the Monetary Policy, Monetary Policy II, and Legal and Regulation Departments, where he played an important role in the reform of state-owned banks, the drafting of China’s anti-money-laundering law, the internationalization of the renminbi, and the establishment of China’s macroprudential policy framework.

Outside of the PBoC, Mr. Li served as Vice Mayor of Chongqing—China’s largest municipality, with a population of over 30 million—where he oversaw the city’s financial-sector development, international trade, and foreign direct investment. Mr. Li was also Vice Chairman of the All-China Federation of Returned Overseas Chinese.

He started his career at the New York law firm of Davis Polk & Wardwell, where he was a practicing attorney for five years.

Mr. Li holds a Ph.D. from Stanford University and an M.A. from Boston University, both in economics, as well as a J.D., magna cum laude, from Harvard Law School. He received his undergraduate education from Renmin University of China in Beijing.

Think about it. A former high-ranking Communist Chinese official with impeccable American credentials is presently a Deputy Managing Director at the International Monetary Fund, which supports a globalist authoritarian governance system.

Do you understand who these people are and what future vision they imagine for the United States? These people are communists acting as fascists, where the state directs so-called private enterprises to serve as gatekeepers to implement and enforce their chosen policies.

These individuals and organizations are not about inalienable rights and personal freedoms; they are about political power. The power to control what you think, say, and do -- and ensure it complies with their dictates.

Presently they appear to control the government and a significant number of organizations. Their only vulnerability is pushback from “We the People.” And it is no wonder they fear the Second Amendment and its stated purpose of responding to government tyranny.

There is no escape...

China bans 23m from buying travel tickets as part of 'social credit' system

People accused of social offences blocked from booking flights and train journeys

China has blocked millions of “discredited” travelers from buying plane or train tickets as part of the country’s controversial “social credit” system aimed at improving the behaviour of citizens.

According to the National Public Credit Information Centre, Chinese courts banned would-be travelers from buying flights 17.5 million times by the end of 2018. Citizens placed on black lists for social credit offences were prevented from buying train tickets 5.5 million times. The report released last week said: “Once discredited, limited everywhere”.

The social credit system aims to incentivize “trustworthy” behaviour through penalties as well as rewards. According to a government document about the system dating from 2014, the aim is to “allow the trustworthy to roam everywhere under heaven while making it hard for the discredited to take a single step.”

Social credit offences range from not paying individual taxes or fines to spreading false information and taking drugs. More minor violations include using expired tickets, smoking on a train or not walking a dog on a leash. <Source>

Bottom line...

The progressive communist democrats succeed only if we do not resist their further attempts to exert control over our lives by surveilling our spending first and then controlling how we spend the money they control through “programmability.”

We are so screwed.

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


one citizen speaking: WHAT ELSE CAN I SAY?

Sane-candidate

JD

CA-INSANITY

Pres-parties

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


JUST ASKING… CAN GOOGLE BE TRUSTED WITH NATIONAL DEFENSE WORK?

Google-sell-out

From what we have seen about domestic surveillance, leaks of classified information, and other evil acts, it appears that the big tech companies are rife with individuals, many of them from government agencies and nations governed by hostile powers, who represent a potential threat to America’s national security.

Therefore, it would be natural to ask if these big companies can be trusted with classified or sensitive information, given the probability that they have been infiltrated by foreign spies and partisan employees willing to substitute their ideology and agenda for the needs of our nation, especially since the government seems reluctant to prosecute evildoers because of the nature of the material that would need to be disclosed in open court or sheer embarrassment.

Especially since we have seen a costly global demonstration of a laboratory pathogen engineered to target a specific spot in the human genome.

Inside Google’s Quest to Digitize Troops’ Tissue Samples

The tech giant has long sought access to a priceless trove of veterans’ skin samples, tumor biopsies and slices of organs. DOD staffers have pushed back, raising ethical and legal concerns, but Google might win anyway.

In early February 2016, the security gate at a U.S. military base near Washington, D.C., swung open to admit a Navy doctor accompanying a pair of surprising visitors: two artificial intelligence scientists from Google.

In a cavernous, temperature-controlled warehouse at the Joint Pathology Center, they stood amid stacks holding the crown jewels of the center’s collection: tens of millions of pathology slides containing slivers of skin, tumor biopsies and slices of organs from armed service members and veterans.

Standing with their Navy sponsor behind them, the Google scientists posed for a photograph, beaming.

Mostly unknown to the public, the trove and the staff who study it have long been regarded in pathology circles as vital national resources: Scientists used a dead soldier’s specimen that was archived here to perform the first genetic sequencing of the 1918 Flu.

Google had a confidential plan to turn the collection of slides into an immense archive that — with the help of the company’s burgeoning, and potentially profitable, AI business — could help create tools to aid the diagnosis and treatment of cancer and other diseases. And it would seek first, exclusive dibs to do so.

“The chief concern,” Google’s liaison in the military warned the leaders of the repository, “is keeping this out of the press.”

More than six years later, Google is still laboring to turn this vast collection of human specimens into digital gold.

At least a dozen Defense Department staff members have raised ethical or legal concerns about Google’s quest for service members’ medical data and about the behavior of its military supporters, records reviewed by ProPublica show. Underlying their complaints are concerns about privacy, favoritism and the private use of a sensitive government resource in a time when AI in health care shows both great promise and risk. And some of them worried that Google was upending the center’s own pilot project to digitize its collection for future AI use.  <Read more… >

The Communist Chinese are masters at exfiltrating large stores of government data…

Hacking Linked to China Exposes Millions of U.S. Workers

The Obama administration on Thursday announced what appeared to be one of the largest breaches of federal employees’ data, involving at least four million current and former government workers in an intrusion that officials said apparently originated in China.

The compromised data was held by the Office of Personnel Management, which handles government security clearances and federal employee records. The breach was first detected in April, the office said, but it appears to have begun at least late last year.

The target appeared to be Social Security numbers and other “personal identifying information,” but it was unclear whether the attack was related to commercial gain or espionage. The announcement of the intrusion came on the same day The New York Times reported that the National Security Agency had expanded warrantless surveillance of foreign hackers, an effort that could sweep up the information of innocent Americans.

There seemed to be little doubt among federal officials that the attack was launched from China, but it was unclear whether it might have been state sponsored. The administration did not publicly identify Chinese hackers as the culprits because it is difficult to definitively attribute the source of cyberattacks and to back up such an attribution without divulging classified data. <Source>

This hack included all of the raw and processed data on those holding or applying for security clearances to work on national security projects.

OPM Hack Far Deeper Than Publicly Acknowledged, Went Undetected For More Than A Year, Sources Say

The massive hack into federal systems announced last week was far deeper and potentially more problematic than publicly acknowledged, with hackers believed to be from China moving through government databases undetected for more than a year, sources briefed on the matter told ABC News.

"If [only] they knew the full extent of it," one U.S. official said about those affected by the intrusion into the Office of Personnel Management's information systems.

It all started with an initial intrusion into OPM's systems more than a year ago, and after gaining that initial access the hackers were able to work their way through four different "segments" of OPM's systems, according to sources.

Much of that data has been stored on OPM systems housed by the Department of the Interior in a Denver-area data center, sources said. And one of the four "segments" compromised held forms filled out by federal employees seeking security clearances.

As ABC News previously reported, the 127-page forms — known as SF-86's and used for background investigations — ask applicants for personal information not only about themselves but also relatives, friends, and potentially even college roommates. <Source>

And where do you think that ancestry DNA information is going?

China is collecting the world’s DNA and the reason is sinister

The Peoples Republic of China (PRC) has been collecting people’s DNA for years, and according to Gordon Chang, author of ‘The Coming Collapse of China,’ the country’s sinister motivations should be of great concern to the United States.

With over 80 million health profiles, China has the largest DNA database in the world, and growing. In an interview with Fox News, Chang warned that China plans to use this information to create bioweapons designed to target specific ethnic groups.

“The coronavirus is not the last pathogen that will be generated from Chinese soil. And so we've got to be concerned that the next disease is more transmissible and more deadly than the novel coronavirus,” said Chang.

China reportedly collects the DNA of its own citizens for purposes of law enforcement, tracking down dissidents, and forming a tightly controlled surveillance state.

They have also found ways to obtain the DNA of foreigners, including Americans. 

How exactly do they get this sensitive information?

“Buying American companies which have DNA profiles, subsidizing DNA analysis for ancestry companies, and hacking,” said Chang.

According to Chang, genetic data gives China the ability to create bioweapons that can target certain groups of people. Furthermore, he said the country’s behavior of collecting the DNA of foreigners while prohibiting Chinese DNA to foreign researchers supports this theory.

“We've got to be extremely concerned because that is not consistent with a country that wants to cooperate with the rest of the world. That is consistent with a country developing biological weapons,” he warned. 

“People have said biological weapons don't work. Well, we do know they work because we had the coronavirus, which may or may not have been a biological weapon,” Chang clarified, “but we do know that it crippled the United States and that's what Beijing is really looking for.”

Now that China has had proof of concept, Chang urged the United States to act swiftly and prevent the superpower from obtaining any more American DNA.

“We should not allow any Chinese or Chinese affiliated organization to test DNA of Americans. And we’ve got to say to China, either you agree to an inspections regime or we're pulling out of the biological weapons convention.” <Source>

Bottom line…

It is time to impose severe penalties on those who violate our national security. Including those tech companies that cater to Communist China in the race for the “almighty buck.”

We are so screwed.

-- Steve 


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


THE IMMIGRATION LAW THAT MUST PRECEDE CONDITIONAL AMNESTY

Alien-crossing

The crucial immigration question nobody wants to be answered: How many illegal aliens are present in the United States?

For years I have heard that there are between 12 and 20 million illegal aliens in the United States. This is impossible to believe when one considers the official numbers and adjusts for those illegals who escape detection or overstay their visas.

The political parties, politicians, and organizations that profit from servicing the illegal immigrant population do not want to know. Likewise, they do not want to know about the illegal alien impact on our healthcare, social safety nets, employment, housing, and criminal justice systems – claiming that seeking such information is racist.

But how else can we rationally create domestic policies and allocate resources?

Even worse, politicians pander to the illegal alien lobby comprised chiefly of lawyers and activists who service this population segment and refuse to fully implement visa ingress and egress tracking to capture and deport overstays or fully implement e-verify to ensure illegal aliens are not employed.

The necessary law…

Every illegal alien in the United States must register within 90 days of a specific date, including both biometric and residence data, to be eligible for any future consideration for a program that will grant their generation a conditional permit to reside within the United States. They will not receive citizenship, but their offspring born in the United States will be legal citizens. This will provide a relatively accurate count of illegal aliens for policy decisions and resource allocations. Any person not registered will be deported with cursory judicial review within 60 days.  

Bottom line…

National security and the United States Constitution demand secure borders. The issue of birthright citizenship is also a battle that must eventually be fought. I believe that, in the case of the non-citizenship of both parents, the child assumes the citizenship of the parents, preferably the mother. If one parent is a U.S. citizen, the child becomes a U.S. citizen.

We are so screwed as our American culture and values are diluted by people with allegiance to a foreign power, an un-American governance system, or a desire to game the system to extract money from hard-working citizens.

The U.S. Constitution is not a suicide pact, and we are not slaves to those who claim a right to our bounty. Charity should be voluntary, not an institutionalized transfer of wealth.

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


SEE YOU AT THE SINEMA?

SINEMA

A friend asked me what my take was on Arizona Senator Kyrsten Sinema leaving the Democratic Party and registering as an independent…

And she was surprised when I said it was a cynical marketing ploy to allow Sinema to be perceived as a moderate in Arizona and avoid the increasing radicalization of her party or supporting extreme policies.

As far as the Republicans are concerned, she will continue to caucus with the Democratic Party for committee assignments. She will give the Democrats an edge on committee seats as she is not counted as a Democrat. She can also sell her vote to either side to her advantage – and hopefully, benefit her constituents.

Sinema is still an odd duck as she is openly bi-sexual and a non-theist who does not believe that there is a god or gods.

Bottom line…

It’s not about political ideology; it’s about getting re-elected in 2024 if she chooses to run. It appears she is attempting to channel John McCain, who self-advertised as an Arizona “maverick,” although he was a traitorous aisle hopper.

We are still screwed in the Senate.

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


UNIONS: WELCOMING THE COMMUNIST FOX INTO THE UNION HEN HOUSE

COM-CAL-FLAG

There is no doubt in my mind that one of the most radical progressive communist democrat front groups is the SEIU, the Service Employees International Union.

SEIU drops mask, goes full commie

A May Day rally in Los Angeles, co-sponsored by the SEIU and various communist groups, as well as other unions, reflected yet another step in the normalization of self-identified communist and socialist ideologies in the Obama era. Not only did the SEIU help to organize the rally in conjunction with communists, they marched side-by-side with communists, while union members carried communist flags, communists carried union signs, and altogether there was no real way to tell the two apart. <Source>

So it is with some trepidation and degree of concern that I observe that the SEIU might be able to influence the $449 BILLION in assets controlled by CalPERS (California Public Employees' Retirement System).

CalPERS retirees elect longtime SEIU president to represent them on pension board

Former California union boss Yvonne Walker won election for a seat representing retired public employees on the 13-member CalPERS Board of Administration for the next five years, according to voting results announced Thursday in Sacramento.

“I am honored to have the trust, confidence and support of my fellow CalPERS retirees,” said the 63-year-old Walker. “I am ready to get to work to ensure all CalPERS retirees receive the secure retirement benefits they earned for years of hard work serving the people of California. I look forward to working with my fellow board members so that CalPERS continues to lead in showing how defined benefit pension systems can thrive.”

As a member of the board, Walker will be responsible for setting policies for retirement and health benefits on behalf of California public employers and their active and retired employees. This body oversees the asset allocation of the pension fund’s estimated $449 billion investment portfolio.

Walker, who led Local 1000 of the Service Employees International Union 2008 through 2021, secured the seat with 56.9% of the vote in a runoff election that pitted her against Randall Cheek, the legislative director of the Retired Public Employees Association, a volunteer position. <Source>

CalPERS investing in our enemy…

California pension system invested more than $490 million in Chinese state-owned companies

California's public pension system (CalPERS) has more than $3 billion tied up in Chinese companies, including 14 state-owned enterprises blacklisted by the Trump administration because of their ties to the Chinese military, according to a report Thursday.

Records reviewed by The Washington Free Beacon reportedly show that CalPERS had more than $450 million invested in the 14 companies blacklisted by the previous administration. More than $490 million were invested in other seven of companies owned by the Chinese government, which are reportedly funding the state's Belt and Road Initiative.

While those weren't blacklisted by the previous administration, the other 14 raised questions about California's compliance with the executive order signed by President Trump.

One of those – China Communications Construction Company (CCCC) – is also state-owned and has reportedly flouted international agreements by building military installations in the South China Sea. CalPERS invested $6 million in the company, which faced intense criticism from former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo in Aug. of 2020. <Source>

The U.S. Constitution should not be a suicide pact…

It is a recognized fact that the United States, under the auspices of capitalism, has brought freedom and prosperity to the American people. Whereas an opposite ideology, communism, has brought death, despotism, decay, and misery to the people who are subject to its dictates.

It is about time to officially outlaw communism and removes those promoting communism from our government and critical infrastructure – including communist sympathizers.

California's new attorney general sponsored bill to allow Communist Party members to seek political office

Robert Bonta serving as the attorney general of California since 2021 formerly sponsored a controversial bill to allow Communist Party members to hold office in the Golden State.

Bonta, while he was a Democratic assemblyman representing Oakland in the California State Legislature, in 2017 spearheaded AB 22, which was designated as a "cleanup" to remove purported unconstitutional language, some of which served to bar communists from serving in California's government. The legislation was dropped after it passed the Assembly floor as it drew ire from Republicans, who insisted the effort was offensive to military veterans and immigrants who fled oppressive regimes.

Bottom line…

Our government, institutions, infrastructure, and corporations have been heavily infiltrated by communists with an allegiance to the communist ideology, if not directly to hostile foreign powers like Communist China and Russia. The reason our enemies have grown so powerful is that they leapfrogged the costly and time-consuming learning curve by stealing our technology, primarily by using embedded agents and those executives and employees they could turn with sex, money, and other support. Including well-known politicians who have taken multi-millions from our enemies while preventing legislation from punishing collaborators.

We are so screwed.

-- Steve

P.S. This isn't the first time we saw Communists at CalPERS

CALIFORNIA COMMUNISTS FUND CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY? (UPDATED)

I find it outrageous that California’s progressive socialist democrats would allow a former member of the Communist Chinese Party to direct $3+ BILLION in funding from California pensioners to Communist Chinese companies, some of which are developing black-listed or dual-use military technology.

Congressman Jim Banks (IN-03), member of the U.S. House Armed Services Committee, sent a letter today to California Governor Gavin Newsom urging him to investigate California Public Employees' Retirement System’s (CalPERS) Chief Investment Officer (CIO), Yu Ben Meng, for his ties to the Chinese Communist Party and suspicious investment decisions. 

CalPERS holds $3.1 billion worth of shares in 172 different Chinese Companies.


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS