Previous month:
May 5, 2022
Next month:
May 7, 2022

IS THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION TRYING TO GO TO WAR WITH RUSSIA TO DISTRACT AMERICANS AND JUSTIFY SPENDING?

Once again, someone in the Biden administration or the U.S. military leaked inflammatory national security-related information that is unnecessarily provocative to a hostile foreign power and could serve as a raison d'etre for an attack on American forces.

While open-source information clearly shows American surveillance activities, there is no justifiable reason for the administration to link them to the deaths of many prominent Russian generals – unless there is a nefarious sub-plot.

And it involves, once again, America’s Pravda, The New York Times, who published the leaked information.

U.S. Intelligence Is Helping Ukraine Kill Russian Generals, Officials Say

The United States has provided intelligence about Russian units that has allowed Ukrainians to target and kill many of the Russian generals who have died in action in the Ukraine war, according to senior American officials.

Ukrainian officials said they have killed approximately 12 generals on the front lines, a number that has astonished military analysts.

The targeting help is part of a classified effort by the Biden administration to provide real-time battlefield intelligence to Ukraine. That intelligence also includes anticipated Russian troop movements gleaned from recent American assessments of Moscow’s secret battle plan for the fighting in the Donbas region of eastern Ukraine, the officials said. Officials declined to specify how many generals had been killed as a result of U.S. assistance.

The United States has focused on providing the location and other details about the Russian military’s mobile headquarters, which relocate frequently. Ukrainian officials have combined that geographic information with their own intelligence — including intercepted communications that alert the Ukrainian military to the presence of senior Russian officers — to conduct artillery strikes and other attacks that have killed Russian officers.

The intelligence sharing is part of a stepped-up flow in U.S. assistance that includes heavier weapons and tens of billions in aid, demonstrating how quickly the early American restraints on support for Ukraine have shifted as the war enters a new stage that could play out over months.

U.S. intelligence support to the Ukrainians has had a decisive effect on the battlefield, confirming targets identified by the Ukrainian military and pointing it to new targets. The flow of actionable intelligence on the movement of Russian troops that America has given Ukraine has few precedents. Since failing to advance on Kyiv, the capital, in the early part of the war, Russia has tried to regroup, with a more concentrated push in eastern Ukraine that so far has moved slowly and unevenly.

Officials interviewed for this article spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss details of the classified intelligence being shared with Ukraine.

The administration has sought to keep much of the battlefield intelligence secret, out of fear it will be seen as an escalation and provoke President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia into a wider war. American officials would not describe how they have acquired information on Russian troop headquarters, for fear of endangering their methods of collection. But throughout the war, the U.S. intelligence agencies have used a variety of sources, including classified and commercial satellites, to trace Russian troop movements. <Source>

RUSSIA-WARSHIP-SINKS

U.S. intel helped Ukraine sink Russian flagship Moskva, officials say

The flagship of Russia’s Black Sea Fleet sank on April 14 after being struck by two Ukrainian Neptune anti-ship missiles, according to U.S. officials.

Intelligence shared by the U.S. helped Ukraine sink the Russian cruiser Moskva, U.S. officials told NBC News, confirming an American role in perhaps the most embarrassing blow to Vladimir Putin’s troubled invasion of Ukraine.

A guided missile cruiser carrying a crew of 510, the Moskva was the flagship of Russia’s Black Sea Fleet. It sank on April 14 after being struck by two Ukrainian Neptune anti-ship missiles, U.S. officials said. Moscow said the vessel sank after a fire. The Moskva was the largest Russian warship sunk in combat since World War II. American officials said there were significant Russian casualties, but they don’t know how many.

The attack happened after Ukrainian forces asked the Americans about a ship sailing in the Black Sea south of Odesa, U.S. officials told NBC News. The U.S. identified it as the Moskva, officials said, and helped confirm its location, after which the Ukrainians targeted the ship.

American officials have expressed concerns that reporting about U.S. intelligence sharing with Ukraine could anger Putin and provoke an unpredictable response, <Source>

These revelations have all of the classic earmarks of administration leaks. So we must ask what purpose could be served by these leaks about ongoing classified operations that could serve as a casus belli, an act to provoke further conflict and put American forces in danger.

(1)  Is the administration seeking to use the fear of a widening war to distract Americans from worsening inflation or another catastrophic domestic event like the hoards of illegal aliens assaulting our Southern Border before the upcoming midterm elections?

(2)  Is the administration seeking to justify billions of dollars in military aid to buoy-up American defense contractors who lost the gravy train when America surrendered Afghanistan and billions of dollars in advanced military hardware? Including billions of humanitarian and reconstruction aid, which almost always seems to fall into the hands of politically-connected strongmen and oligarchs? Running down the stock of military equipment to enable “green replacements?”

(3)  Is this an attempt by the Biden administration to erase the stain of Afghanistan by demonstrating their “tough resolve” in Ukraine?

(4)  Is the Obama-controlled Biden Administration being blackmailed by the Ukrainians using information relating to impeachable presidential offenses or other crimes committed by past or current administration officials?

(5) Is this a display of incompetence by individuals such as National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan, Susan Rice, Samantha Power, and the other State Department/CIA Obamacons?

(6)  Is this simply another nefarious progressive communist democrat scheme to further weaken the United States economy and military?

(7)  If Russian sanctions are essential as a strategic deterrent against further aggression, why are there significant exemptions for specific individuals and organizations?

(8)  What the hell are Representative Adam Schiff (D-CA) and the House Intelligence Committee doing other than wasting time pursuing, falsely, Donald Trump?

The administration disclaimers start to provide plausible deniability…

  • Adrienne Watson, the National Security Council’s spokesperson: "The United States provides battlefield intelligence to help the Ukrainians defend their country. We do not provide intelligence with the intent to kill Russian generals."
  • John Kirby, the Defense Department’s spokesperson, "We do not provide intelligence on the locations of senior leaders on the battlefield."

It can’t be us because we are pushing back. Yeah, right!

Bottom line…

What exactly is the strategic value of Ukraine to United States interests? Or is this simply another progressive communist democrat scheme to further weaken the United States economy and military?

It appears that the American people are being manipulated by the progressive communist democrats and their GOP cohorts.

And it is time to suspend all security clearances of former officials, especially those with media connections or employment.

We are so screwed.

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba.”-- take nobody's word for it!

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


THE OBAMA-BIDEN REGIME'S WAR ON CONSERVATIVES

Almost everything the media has labeled a conspiracy theory is coming true and appears to be much worse than initially thought.

There is little doubt that a criminal conspiracy to undermine the presidential candidacy and subsequently sabotage the Trump Administration, including creating a staged impeachment to remove him from office, was real. And those deep state actors in the Obama White House, Department of State, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, and Central Intelligence Agency were all compromised in the attempt.

So it is no surprise that these very same people are staging a last-ditch effort to derail or destroy conservatives before the mid-term election, resulting in a GOP House majority that could investigate, disclose, prosecute, and punish any illicit conduct.

The new conspiracy theory…

Step One:  Declare domestic white Americans as violent extremists and a grave threat to the homeland.

(3/17/21 – New York Times) New Report Warns of Rising Threat of Domestic Terrorism

President Biden requested the intelligence community complete the assessment shortly after taking office, and his administration has made fighting domestic terrorism a priority.

A new intelligence report delivered to Congress on Wednesday by the Biden administration warned about the rising threat of militias and white supremacists, adding urgency to calls for more resources to fight the growing problem of homegrown extremism in the United States. <Source>

(6/20/21 – New York Times) Top law enforcement officials say the biggest domestic terror threat comes from white supremacists.

Attorney General Merrick B. Garland and Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro N. Mayorkas told senators on Wednesday that the greatest domestic threat facing the United States came from what they both called “racially or ethnically motivated violent extremists.” <Source>

Step Two:  Control the narrative with an armed law enforcement agency like DHS rather than an unarmed FCC.

Disinformation Governance Board: Biden’s ‘Ministry of Truth’

How can any government be an arbiter of what is true and what is false?

As with many things, propaganda can be used for good or for ill, depending on who dispenses it. During World War II, American propaganda was considered a necessary tool in the pursuit of victory in a moral cause. Germany and Japan had their own propaganda machines to advance an evil agenda.

Now comes the announcement of a new office within the Department of Homeland Security to police “disinformation” and “misinformation.” Some critics are comparing it to the fictitious “Ministry of Truth” in George Orwell’s novel “1984.”

The new office will be headed by Nina Jankowicz who styles herself as Mary Poppins on TikTok (a social media platform owned by the Chinese communist government, a font of disinformation, which should be alarming). Didn’t Ms. Jankowicz spread disinformation about Hunter Biden’s laptop, which she said was a product of Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign? Wasn’t it Ms. Jankowicz who joined fellow Democrats in claiming Trump “colluded” with Russia to help him win the presidency?

The UK Daily Mail reported Ms. Jankowicz “shared misleading tweets about COVID-19 masks, claimed (a) Trump presidency would ‘embolden ISIS’ and praised (a) British spy behind the debunked Russian dossier.”

Why would anyone believe that the U.S. government - or any government - could be an arbiter of what is true and what is false? A brief trip down recent memory lane ought to disabuse people of such faith. <Source>

Why Is the New York Times Ignoring the Disinformation Governance Board?

I just checked — the Times still hasn’t even acknowledged the formation of the DHS’s new Ministry of Truth. If you still regard mainstream journalism as an earnest, if left-leaning, profession that seeks to comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable “without fear or favor, regardless of party, sect, or interests involved,” that discrepancy might be confusing. But it makes sense if you realize that today, America’s elite legacy media essentially function as an activist extension of institutional progressivism. Its job is not to hold the powerful accountable, but to serve as the attack dogs of the most powerful players in American life. It is an enforcement arm of the socio-political hegemony of the elite Left — the Public Relations team for the alliance of academia, Big Tech, the corporate HR bureaucracy, the culture industry, and the Democratic Party.

Step Three: Create a polarizing cause previously associated with violence and mostly white extremists on both sides of the political spectrum.

(5/4/22 – New York Times) Leak Heightens the Perception of a Politicized Supreme Court

The revelation of a Supreme Court draft opinion that would overrule Roe v. Wade has caused many Americans to express doubts about whether the justices are guided by the law rather than by their political beliefs.

In interviews across the country, even some opponents of abortion expressed unease with the way that a majority of the court had coalesced behind the sweeping draft written by Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. that would undo nearly 50 years of legalized access to abortion nationwide. <Source>

(5/5/22 – New York Times) Demonstrators Gathered at Supreme Court Lament, and Celebrate, Leaked Draft

Scores of protesters took to the steps in front of the Supreme Court on Tuesday hours after a draft opinion overturning the landmark Roe v. Wade decision leaked. Armed with megaphones, signs, buttons and at least one letterpress for speedy poster production, groups supporting and opposing abortion rights demonstrated and occasionally confronted one another in front of the barricaded court.

“Pro-choice is a lie, babies don’t choose to die,” a throng of anti-abortion activists chanted.

“Bans off our bodies” and “my body, my choice,” their counterparts replied.

The size of the crowd grew gradually during the day. Senator Elizabeth Warren, Democrat of Massachusetts, delivered a short speech denouncing the “extremist Supreme Court.” <Source>

Step Four: Seed the Violence with a subtle appeal to crazies.

Twitter-work

Twritter-1

From the highest levels of Congress...

Overturning Roe v. Wade: Will Democrats Instigate Another George Floyd Summer?

Remember when Senate majority leader Chuck Schumer made this threat about abortion cases coming before SCOTUS?

I want to tell you, Gorsuch. I want to tell you, Kavanaugh. You have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price! You won't know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.

On Tuesday, Schumer's remarks made it clear that Democrats intend to turn Court decision ending Roe against Republicans. Schumer branded the Court's conservatives as "extremists" and "far right." From Fox News, May 3:

Make no mistake, the blame for this decision falls squarely on Republican senators and the Senate Republicans as a whole, who spent years pushing extremist judges, spent years confirming three far right justices to the Supreme Court, but who claimed somehow this day would never come[.] ... But this day has come and we will fight it all the way. <Source>

Supreme Court justices get increased security after Roe v. Wade leak: "The risk is real"

The Supreme Court is under lockdown with eight-foot fencing around the building, all entry points blocked to vehicles and more officers on patrol. It's a scene reminiscent of what Washington, D.C., looked like after the January 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

CBS News has learned the nine Supreme Court justices have been given extra security since general threats of violence against the justices have increased after a draft majority opinion suggesting the high court would overturn Roe v. Wade was leaked and published by Politico. The justices' home locations have been shared online and they're receiving more targeted personal phone threats.

Justice Samuel Alito, author of the draft majority opinion, canceled a scheduled appearance Thursday in Nashville, and the other justices are also cutting back on public events.

"The risk is real. The U.S. Marshals Service is there to provide protection for judges in the federal judiciary, but it's not enough," Republican Sen. John Cornyn said. <Source>

Step Five: Send out the shock troops led by professionally-trained agitators and provocateurs.

Activated

Pro-Abortion Group Publicizes Conservative Supreme Court Justices’ Home Addresses ahead of Planned Protests

In response to the Monday night leak of a draft Supreme Court opinion that would overturn Roe v. Wade, a leftist group called Ruth Sent Us posted what it claims are the home addresses of the Court’s six conservative justices online in preparation for an organized “walk-by protest” set to take place outside the justices’ homes next week.

Ruth Sent Us plans to dispatch demonstrators to “the homes of the six extremist justices” on Wednesday, May 11, according to the group’s website.

“ANNOUNCING: Walk-by Wednesday, May 11, 2022! At the homes of the six extremist justices, three in Virginia and three in Maryland. If you’d like to join or lead a peaceful protest, let us know,” the website states. <Source>

Step Six: Declare an emergency.

Step Seven:  Take control of speech to keep the American public in the dark about progressive communist democrat activities.

Bottom line…

When will this happen? Probably between now and the time the leaked Supreme Court decision is officially released.

Ask yourself why the regime chose the Department of Homeland Security over the Federal Communications, where broadcast media rules are created? Note that the FCC is unarmed and does not have wide-ranging police powers and a stockpile of ammunition.

Can it be stopped? Don’t look to democrats or their propagandists in the mainstream media. Don’t look to squishy GOP members. Don’t look to Elon Musk, who will not assume day-to-day control over Twitter in time to reform their leftist culture.

Truth be told, the Dobbs decision will do nothing to abortion under existing state laws if released in its present form. If anything, your beef would be with your state legislators and not anyone on the federal ticket.

Count the number of times the words "woman," assault, and violence are mentioned over and over as a subliminal message.  

The progressive communist democrats are lying about what is contained in the leaked decision -- concocting their own version which they debate endlessly. 

VOTE THEM ALL OUT IN 2022!

Please prove me wrong.

We are so screwed.

-- steve


“Nullius in verba.”-- take nobody's word for it!

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS