I grew up believing in the United States Constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment…

Amendment XIV -- Section 1.

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Progressive communist democrats use a concocted communist legal theory to turn criminal justice into a literal black versus white issue…

  • What is Critical Race Theory?

Critical race theory (CRT) is a cross-disciplinary intellectual and social movement of civil-rights scholars and activists who seek to examine the intersection of race, society, and law in the United States and to challenge mainstream American liberal approaches to racial justice.

The problem with a judicial system based on moral relativism and not standardized law is that every criminal and criminal activity can be viewed in a context that posits that the oppressed must be treated less harshly than those deemed oppressors. A morally bankrupt construct that sees criminals treated as victims and the true victims are relegated to those unfortunates who appear to be in the wrong place at the wrong time -- collateral damage if you will.

  • CRT’s communist roots…

There is no doubt in my mind that CRT is part of the communist plot to weaken America and foment a Marxist race revolution.

"CRT draws from the work of thinkers such as Antonio Gramsci, Sojourner Truth, Frederick Douglass, and W. E. B. DuBois, as well as the Black Power, Chicano, and radical feminist movements from the 1960s and 1970s."

Borrowing from radical feminism and Black feminism both, CRT shares in the celebration of ‘standpoint epistemology,’ orthe view that a person of minority status has a competence and authority to speak about racism unmatched by those of a different racial status. Owing to the different histories and experiences with oppression, the voice of color can communicate to Whites and others something unique and valuable.

“Even more controversial is the notion of  ‘legal instrumentalism,’ a version of Black empowerment developed as a response to the discretionary power exercised against the Black community (historically and contemporarily) by the police and the courts. Sometimes this takes the form of advocating for Black juries to acquit Black defendants who are not dangers to the community, as in the example of a Black youth convicted on drug charges. At its most extreme, legal instrumentalism translates into the suggestion that Black jurors nullify certain laws if it is deemed that the instrumental goals of the Black community would be better served by not sending a Black defendant to prison. Sometimes Black lawbreaking itself is justified as a form of self-help in the context of an U.S. legal system complicit in centuries of racial oppression.” 
(Encyclopedia of Race, Ethnicity, and Society, pp. 345-346)


Why the Senate should not confirm Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson…

(1)  Cannot acknowledge biological reality to define a woman.

During the second day of confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominee Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) asked her to give a definition of the word “woman.” Jackson, a woman, said she could not give one because “I am not a biologist.” <Source>

(2)  Cannot speak to the nature of the law and the foundation of human rights.

QUESTION: Please explain, in your own words, the theory prevalent among members of the Founding Fathers’ generation that humans possess natural rights that are inherent or inalienable.

RESPONSE: The theory that humans possess inherent or inalienable rights is reflected in the Declaration of Independence, which states: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.”

QUESTION: Do you hold a position on whether individuals possess natural rights, yes or no?

RESPONSE: I do not hold a position on whether individuals possess natural rights. <Source>

This is in addition to her support for Critical Race Theory, the communist front group Black Lives Matter, and her apparent softness on crimes involving child pornography...

Bottom line...

To be effective, both as guidance and as a deterrent, the law should be understandable, applied equally to all individuals who must accept personal responsibility for their actions, and be swiftly applied with certain punishment.

The type of neo-definitive legal interpretation and judicial discretion used by  activist judges is crippling our nation and producing a class-oriented judicial system that advantages elites and minorities over "We the People."

The fact that the Democrat Party no longer supports the fundamental precepts of our republic is beyond troubling, it's treasonous!

We are so screwed.

-- steve

“Nullius in verba.”-- take nobody's word for it!

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS