Previous month:
September 12, 2021 - September 18, 2021
Next month:
September 26, 2021 - October 2, 2021

MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA AUDIT -- DID SOMEONE GET CONNED?

It appears that those hyper-partisans and grifters surrounding the Trump campaign to overturn the election were disappointed as all of the fantastic claims about the promised results of this audit fizzled out like wet fireworks.

az-puzzle

It appears that the mainstream media is engaging in a bit of “see, I told you so, now move along.”

While the numbers generally appear close to the official record, with several anomalies that cannot be used to decertify or overturn an election – or even generate widespread outrage, the real story is one of obstruction of justice by election officials.

Count-1Remember, these are raw counts with no adjustment for anomalous “unconfirmed and legally accepted” findings.

FACT: RE-COUNTS CAN ACCOUNT FOR SLIGHT DISCREPANCIES IN THE TOTALS -- BUT DO NOT ADDRESS IRREGULARITIES OR ILLEGALLY CAST OR COUNTED BALLOTS.

The devil is in the details and demands resolution...

• None of the various systems related to elections had numbers that would balance and agree with each other. In some cases, these differences were significant.
• There appears to be many 27, 807 ballots cast from individuals who had moved prior to the election.
• Files were missing from the Election Management System (EMS) Server.
• Ballot images 284,412 on the EMS were corrupt or missing.
• Logs appeared to be intentionally rolled over, and all the data in the database related to the 2020 General Election had been fully cleared.
• On the ballot side, batches were not always clearly delineated, duplicated ballots were missing the required serial numbers, originals were duplicated more than once, and the Auditors were never provided Chain-of- Custody documentation for the ballots for the time-period prior to the ballot’s movement into the Auditors’ care. This all increased the complexity and difficulty in properly auditing the results; and added ambiguity into the final conclusions.
• Maricopa County failed to follow basic cyber security best practices and guidelines from CISA  (U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency)
• Software and patch protocols were not followed
• Credential management was flawed: unique usernames and passwords were not allocated
• Lack of baseline for host and network activity for approved programs, communications protocols and communications devices for voting systems

More specifically…

FindindsFor those who wish to download the in-depth reports and presentations, they can be found on the official website of the Arizona State Senate’s Republican Caucus.

Bottom line…

As for the professionalism of the auditors, I believe they did a credible job under difficult and overly restrictive conditions. Conditions were made worse by the active opposition of those officials who governed the election process.

It is still a stalemate, with election officials refusing to turn over additional subpoenaed materials, the voting system vendor refusing to provide passwords, and the election officials joining with the Democrats to legally prevent a canvass of actual voters to verify the anomalies.

Clearly, there is a case for obstruction of justice, impeding an official investigation, and perhaps individual blame for actions taken by election officials or those acting as their agents and at their direction.

One wonders why the election officials and Democrats spent so much time, energy, and money on delaying the audit – or destroying evidence – if the results were generally inconclusive? What are they hiding, and how will the election be supervised in the 2022 mid-term elections? At the very least, every election official should be removed from office and replaced by non-partisan professionals willing to volunteer their services.

This is not the affirmatively "clean bill of health" that the Democrats and their media propagandists are portraying. 

The winning margin is still razor-thin -- and the discrepancies still far exceed the margin of victory.  

We are so screwed.

-- steve


“Nullius in verba.”-- take nobody's word for it!

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


IS THE U.S. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE UN-AMERICAN?

The United States Chamber of Commerce does not give a damn about America…

I used to think that the U.S. Chamber of Commerce looked out for American businesses as it lobbied Congress to bring about conditions favorable to all businesses. Unfortunately, reality intruded, and I realized that the organization only lobbied for the largest businesses, many multi-national globalists. Small business and the United States be damned.

So I was not surprised that the Chamber is trying to trap the GOP into supporting the progressive communist democrats so the businesses the Chamber supports can feed off the massive spending bills put forth by radical Democrats. They do not seem to care that the GOP would severely impact their 2022 and 2024 electoral opportunities by supporting the Democrat’s profligate spending. Spending that will drive America further into inflation.

Their position is one of fiscal irresponsibility and materially damaging to the GOP…

EXCLUSIVE: U.S. Chamber of Commerce pressing House Republicans to save $1.2T infrastructure bill

Liberal, moderate Democrats still divided over fate of two massive Biden spending bills

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is pressuring House Republicans to save President Biden’s $1.2 trillion infrastructure package in the face of rising opposition from far-left Democrats.

A whip list the Chamber is using to build support for the package, obtained exclusively by The Washington Times, indicates it’s targeting 57 potential GOP members who might support a centerpiece of Mr. Biden’s domestic agenda. The Chamber hopes to flip enough Republicans to overcome heavy opposition from the 98-member Congressional Progressive Caucus, who say liberal priorities are being lost as Mr. Biden tries to sell his spending programs on the Hill.

The list of Republicans being courted is both ideologically and geographically diverse. The Chamber is pursuing centrists like Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania and staunch conservatives such as Kelly Armstrong of North Dakota, alike. The business lobby has long backed more government spending on the roads, bridges and other physical infrastructure featured in the $1.2 trillion package.

[OCS: Physical infrastructure is a very small part of the spending package which supports numerous Democrat initiatives that have everything to do with strengthening the Democrats and weakening the GOP. This is a classic Democrat bait-and-switch.]

In courting support for the bill, the Chamber is using a three-tier approach. Republican lawmakers who have already committed to voting for the bill make up the first tier. Eleven GOP lawmakers have so far pledged their support to the Chamber.

Five of those, including Reps. Adam Kinzinger of Illinois and Jamie Herrera Butler of Washington, voted earlier this year to impeach former President Trump for his role in the Jan. 6 riot at the Capitol. 

Others, such as GOP Reps. David McKinley of West Virginia and Don Bacon of Nebraska, have taken stances directly opposed by Mr. Trump even if they did not support impeachment. Mr. McKinley and Mr. Bacon, for instance, backed Democratic efforts earlier this year to investigate the Jan 6. incident.

Apart from those who have outright committed to backing the infrastructure bill, the Chamber has identified 46 additional House Republicans that are “worth trying to flip.”

Of that figure, 24 lawmakers are categorized as being in “tier two.” These lawmakers have privately told the Chamber and its lobbyists they view the [infrastructure] bill favorably but have not come out in support.” Members include GOP Reps. Mike Gallagher of Wisconsin, Peter Meijer of Michigan and Anthony Gonzalez of Ohio, among others.

The 22 Republicans in the third tier, according to the Chamber, are seen as “further away from a yes [vote] but still worth trying to flip.” <Source>

Who are the 11 GOP traitors in the first tier?

  • Fitzpatrick (PA-01)
  • Katko (NY-24)
  • Kinzinger (IL-16)
  • Reed (NY-23)
  • Upton (MI-06)
  • Rogers (KY-05)
  • Garbarino (NY-02)
  • McKinley (WV-01)
  • Bacon (NE-02)
  • Herrerra Buetler (WA-03)
  • Armstrong (ND-AL)

 The Democrats do not need any GOP members to pass their bills.

To the extent that the radical far-left communists are trying to bully the party into building more communist-friendly items into the spending package is a Democrat problem. If any GOP member should vote with the Democrats, they should be immediately be censured by the caucus, stripped of all committee assignments, lose all GOP funding, and primaried in 2022.

voteCan Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell enforce GOP discipline?

Republicans Won’t Vote to Raise Debt Limit Given Democrats’ Partisan Budget Plans: McConnell

Senate Republicans won’t vote to raise the country’s debt limit because of Democrats’ plans to spend trillions of dollars, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and other Republican leaders said on Sept. 22.

The House of Representatives voted this week along party lines to approve a bill that includes suspending the debt limit until after the 2022 midterm elections. The Senate plans to vote on the measure next week.

“We all agree, America must never default. The debt ceiling will need to be raised,” McConnell told reporters in Washington.

But the Democrats’ “reckless” spending plans, including one measure that’s been pegged at $3.5 trillion, and the way in which Democrats have been operating “on a partisan basis,” means that the party will have to figure out how to raise the debt ceiling without Republican votes, according to McConnell.

“The Democrats can deal with us all by themselves, because they have the House, the White House, and the Senate. So this is their responsibility,” said Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.), the National Republican Senatorial Committee chairman.

Democrats have a 220–212 majority in the House and a one-vote majority in the evenly split Senate, thanks to their control of the White House. <Source>

Bottom line…

Companies like Nike and Disney who have no problem bowing to Communist China, benefiting from slave labor, and overlooking egregious human rights abuses such as organ harvesting and concentration camps, are typical U.S. Chamber of Commerce members. They are also in alignment with the progressive communist democrats. They are more about increasing market share, profits, and executive compensation than the survival of our Constitution, our nation, and democracy.

Let us vote for America and punish any GOP member that aisle-hops and supports the progressive communist democrats.

We are so screwed.

-- steve


“Nullius in verba.”-- take nobody's word for it!

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


EVER WONDER WHY THE MEDIA IS ALWAYS SO WRONG?

They cannot distinguish between right and left…

RIGHT-VS-LEFT

They do not vet their experts…

CLIMATE-EXPERTS

They rely on a politically corrupted law enforcement agency that appears to be at the heart of most alleged terrorist threats…

fbi-clouseu

And they mix news with narrative from their own unique perspective…

Head-up-assHow else can you explain the failure of NBC, MSNBC, and other media outlets to miss one of the greatest stories never told – in the face of incontrovertible and overwhelming evidence?

NBC-MSNBC-FAIL

The refusal of the media to cover such an egregious assault on our democracy is an example of corporate-driven media corruption. Consider their direct interference in the election with their coverage of the Hunter Biden laptop scandal that implicated candidate Joe Biden.

The Obama plot featuring Hillary Clinton…

obama-biden-clinton-plot

The Sussmann indictment…

Does the indictment of Perkins Coie attorney Michael Sussmann for lying to the FBI pull the thread that will unravel the Alfa Bank hoax narrative about Trump’s alleged secret channel of communications with the Russian government? And lead to the broader hoax involving the Steele Dossier and the nation’s premier intelligence and law enforcement agencies?

If the internet assumptions about the identities in the Sussman indictment are accurate, will the linkage look like this flowchart?

"Russian Bank-1" — Alfa Bank.
"Law Firm-1" —  Perkins Coie
"[Campaign Lawyer-1" — Marc Elias
"Tech Executive-1" — Rodney Joffe
"Internet Company-1" — Neustar  (“Neustar Enables Trusted Connections Between Companies and People at the Moments That Matter Most.”)
"Investigative Firm-1" — Fusion GPS

Sussman-indictment-flowAnd is this the beginning of a broader hacking probe as looks like Rodney Joffe, Senior Vice President, Security CTO, and Fellow at Neustar, Inc., may have inappropriately accessed private, proprietary, and confidential data using unauthorized access to computer networks.

Bottom line…

Look for the Democrats to throw everything into protection against charges which will materially damage the players and the party for years to come, including attempting to use partisan or conflicted judges to destroy a sitting president.

I wonder if anyone else is paying attention to the fact that the Federal District Court Judge, Christopher Cooper, who heard the initial Sussmann “not guilty” plea is a well-connected Obama-appointed Democrat married to the lawyer representing the disgraced FBI lawyer Lisa Page. 

Peter Strzok’s lover Page oversaw the FBI’s Trump probe and is likely to be called as a material witness at some point. Moreover, Cooper was a “professional acquaintance” with Sussmann at the Department of Justice in the 1990s. Definitely grounds for a voluntary or forced recusal.

Look for the media to concoct fantastical stories. And worst of all, watch for Biden’s handlers to create a staged conflict with Iran, Pakistan, Afghanistan,  or North Korea as a diversion.

We are so screwed.

-- steve


“Nullius in verba.”-- take nobody's word for it!

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


THE DEMOCRATS DO NOT NEED ANY GOP MEMBERS TO SCREW UP THE COUNTRY

Should any GOP member vote for any spending bill, they should be considered traitors to the Party and the United States of America.

Proof the Democrats can do it on their own…

Vote22o to 211 with 1 Republican not voting.

We are so screwed.

-- steve


“Nullius in verba.”-- take nobody's word for it!

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


COMMUNIST CHINA'S NEWEST GLOBAL PANDEMIC: A FINANCIAL CRISIS OF THEIR OWN MAKING

BIDEN-CHINA-QUESTION

Scary – Part One – It’s your money at risk!

Starting with the near-collapse of our financial system in 2008, we have all heard about financial institutions that are so “systemically important” that they have been deemed “too big to fail.”

In response to this catastrophe, the politicians brought about the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act which allegedly requires these mega-institutions to have a wind-down plan (orderly liquidation facility) to avoid government bailouts.

What was not widely advertised was the “bail-in” provision that allows a financial institution to use its client’s funds to save itself. Dodd-Frank, it should be noted, was named after two of the most corrupt individuals in Congress, Representative Barney Frank (D-MA), the Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, and Senator Christopher Dodd, Chairman of the Senate Banking Committee.

Bail In

“Title II, the Orderly Liquidation provision of the Dodd-Frank Act, provides a process to quickly and efficiently liquidate a large, complex financial company that is close to failing.  Title II provides an alternative to bankruptcy, in which the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) is appointed as a receiver to carry out the liquidation and wind-up of the company.  The FDIC is given certain powers as receiver, and a three to five year time frame in which to finish the liquidation process. Title II is aimed at protecting the financial stability of the American economy, forcing shareholders and creditors to bear the losses of the failed financial company, removing management that was responsible for the financial condition of the company, and ensuring that payout to claimants is at least as much as the claimants would have received under a bankruptcy liquidation.” <Source>

If you didn't understand this, YOU, as a depositor or shareholder are a creditor subject to a bail-in! And, even if you do not own stocks or bonds directly, it is likely your mutual fund, pension fund, or insurance company does have shares in these institutions.

Claim Priority

Title II provides a claims process to assert claims against a defaulting financial company, and a series of rules to allow for liquidation of assets and the payment of claim holders according to a list of priority payments. See 12 U.S.C. § 5389, 12 U.S.C. § 5390 (Dodd-Frank Act §§ 210(a)(2), 209(b)). Claims are paid in the following order: (1) administrative costs; (2) the government; (3) wages, salaries, or commissions of employees; (4) contributions to employee benefit plans; (5) any other general or senior liability of the company; (6) any junior obligation; (7) salaries of executives and directors of the company; and (8) obligations to shareholders, members, general partners, and other equity holders. See 12 U.S.C. § 5389 (Dodd-Frank Act § 209(b)). <Source>

Scary – Part Two – The Communist Chinese government faces a significant financial crisis that could collapse their system.

Global stock markets plunge as Chinese real estate giant Evergrande teeters on the brink of collapse with debts of more than $300 BILLION and firm threatens top execs with 'severe punishment'

  • Evergrande's soaring debt has crushed credit rating, share prices and reputation
  • Rumours of chaos prompted bosses to warn of 'severe punishment' for top execs
  • Investors are fearing financial bloodbath in China, triggering global sell-offs 
  • Dow Jones shed 1.7% this morning after London tanked earlier with 1.5% drop

Scary – Part Three – U.S. financial institutions hold significant investments in China, regardless of their rigged legal system and SEC-acknowledged crooked accounting.

See the picture? If the Chinese economy collapses, the United States will take a significant hit as U.S. financial firms – yes, the systemically important” ones covered by Dodd-Frank, begin to unwind their positions. Not only will pensions, insurance claims, bank accounts, and investments be impacted, the effect on the flow of goods and services will also be affected as Chinese vendors to American companies fail, plunging the United States into hyperinflation, among other nasty financial consequences.

Scary – Part Four – The Communist Chinese appear to have a lock on politicians, including President Joe Biden and the lobbyists representing the large financial firms.

The question now becomes, does the Communist Chinese coerce the United States into bailing them out? Possibly, in the same way, the Federal Reserve printed and pumped more money into the banking system at an interest rate, guaranteeing a profit to the banks. The policy was known as “ZIRP,” the “Zero Interest Rate Policy.”

“ZIRP is a method of stimulating growth while keeping interest rates close to zero. Under this policy, the governing central bank can no longer reduce interest rates, rendering conventional monetary policy ineffective. As a result, unconventional monetary policy such as quantitative easing is used to increase the monetary base.” <Source>

Implementing a ZIRP policy is not without substantial bounce-back risks and adverse effects. So one solution may be for the United States to print money that the large financial institutions can loan to Communist Chinese firms to stabilize their economy. Additional trillions added to the U.S. national debt.

The other possibility is that the U.S. will suspend or relax Trump-era tariffs, technically an increased tax on foreign goods imposed on Americans to discourage foreign purchases. This would encourage Americans to purchase more goods from Communist China to the detriment of American business.

Let us not forget that Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell's family's fortune is tied up in Communist Chinese shipping. As we as other high-ranking Democrats have investments linked to Communist China.

Bottom line…

I do not know what will happen as I am not in the Biden camp where the decisions are made.

However, I do know we are, once again, screwed as President Biden is unlikely to know what is happening and some mid-level jumped-up functionary makes a political call. 

-- steve

l


“Nullius in verba.”-- take nobody's word for it!

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


ADAM SCHIFF: LIAR, LEAKER, SEDITIONIST

“Sedition is overt conduct, such as speech and organization, that tends toward rebellion against the established order. Sedition often includes subversion of a constitution and incitement of discontent toward, or insurrection against, established authority.”

Once again, liar, leaker, seditionist Adam Schiff serves as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s leg-humper and lickspittle to introduce destructive legislation to cripple future presidents. And he is blindly seeking support and funding from the sheeple too apathetic, ignorant, or brainwashed to read the actual legislation before agreeing to fund and promote this un-American garbage.

E-mail sent with the subject line “Holding the president accountable no matter who is in office.”

schiff-hdr

Stephen,

Joe Biden’s victory in the 2020 election saved our democracy — but without strong legislative reforms, that lifeline may only be temporary.

[OCS: Our democracy has never been more precarious, our national prestige so low, and our military so emasculated. Guaranteed to worsen under Democratic legislative reforms that appear to have been deliberately designed to destroy our nation from within.]

Donald Trump’s time in the White House took a devastating toll on our democracy. On the rule of law. And on the truth. All because of one man, who abused the powers of the Presidency and inflicted chaos.

[OCS: How many constitutional laws were mangled or broken to change the election results – and, had they been followed, the most likely winner would have been Donald Trump?

Surprisingly, Schiff has the unmitigated gall to talk about abuse of power and chaos given his unconstitutional actions crippling our economy, taking private property without compensation, mandating vaccines, the disaster at the Southern Border, and of course, leaving Americans behind enemy lines in Afghanistan, and killing friendly civilians with a publicity-generated drone strike.]

The twice-impeached former President incited a violent insurrection on the U.S. Capitol, pushed dangerous conspiracy theories, and the Big Lie that he won the 2020 electionin a desperate attempt to hold onto power and prevent a peaceful transfer to the winner.

[OCS: Violent insurrection? This is another lie. Except for a few vandals, it was more like a walk-through of the capitol complex with many lookie-loos seeking selfies and souvenirs. Some being invited into the building by the Capitol Police, staying behind the rope lines, and interacting peaceably with the officers present. The idea that these unarmed yahoos were attempting to take over the government is not only a false narrative but a significant lie.

As for the “big lie,” – why are the Democrats fighting so hard, with hundreds of attorneys, to suppress the forensic audits which would prove their point?

As for the peaceful transfer of power, why do the Democrats forget to mention the transition teams working behind the scenes for months preceding the inauguration?]

The greatest threat to our democracy does not come from a foreign power, but from within, and we can never allow another person like Trump to wreak havoc on our republic.

[OCS: Under the Biden Administration, this has never been truer. The fact that incompetent jumped-up mid-level staffers are manipulating a mentally incapacitated President is proof that it is Biden, not Trump, that is wreaking havoc on our republic.]

So today, I’m introducing a major reform bill to ensure that no future president can do the kind of damage Trump has done — ever again.

My legislation — the Protecting Our Democracy Act — is an ambitious set of reforms that would enshrine our democratic guardrails into law. No longer a suggestion. But a code.

[OCS: We already have a code, it is the U.S. Constitution. Where are the links to his legislation and the legislative analysis by an impartial source? So you can read it for yourself and see how many progressive communist Democrats signed on as co-sponsors.]

This bill is designed to restore our system of checks and balances, create greater accountability and transparency, and protect our elections.

[OCS: This 158-page bill is designed to cripple the constitutional powers of the Presidency by inserting Congress into the process. Essentially allowing the harassment of any candidate running for a second term in office.]

With President Biden in the White House and Democratic majorities in Congress for the first time in a decade, we have a narrow window of opportunity to protect our democracy from presidential abuses of power. We must seize this moment.

[OCS: The Democrats have a razor-thin majority, which they have already abused, and are desperate to grab power with the 2022 election looming.]

<link redacted> Add your name as a citizen co-sponsor of the Protecting Our Democracy Act today.

<link redacted> ADD YOUR NAME

Trump used his position in the Oval Office to enrich himself and his family, protect himself and his enablers from prosecution, attack the free press and his political opponents, encourage foreign interference in our elections, and end all accountability as we know it.

[OCS: No mention of the Biden crime families and the multiple felonies committed by the President and his family. No mention of the fact that the press acts as the propaganda arm of the Democrats. Or the canceling and censorship of factual news by the media moguls and tech tyrants.]

After the Watergate scandal — another dark time in American history — Congress took action, passing a series of landmark laws and reforms to prevent a future president from abusing their office the way Richard Nixon did. Those changes stood the test of time for half a century, but it is time for Congress to act again, and enact new protections for our democratic institutions.

To ensure another wannabe autocrat like Trump cannot push our democracy to the brink.

<link redacted> We desperately need to pass a new set of reforms to stop future presidents from abusing the power of the Presidency, as we witnessed over the last four years. If you’re with me, add your name to show your support for my Protecting Our Democracy Act ASAP.

<link redacted> ADD YOUR NAME

With the White House on our side, we need to do everything in our power to prevent another Trump from undermining our democracy ever again. Thanks so much for your help and for standing by my side.

— Adam

Adam is reintroducing the Protecting Our Democracy Act — a bill designed to prevent abuses of presidential power and stop future presidents from abusing their office the way Trump did.

[OCS: "Died in a previous Congress --  This bill was introduced in the 116th Congress. This bill was introduced on September 23, 2020, in a previous session of Congress, but it did not receive a vote.

Although this bill was not enacted, its provisions could have become law by being included in another bill. It is common for legislative text to be introduced concurrently in multiple bills (called companion bills), re-introduced in subsequent sessions of Congress in new bills, or added to larger bills (sometimes called omnibus bills).]

<link reacted> Despite defeating Trump, this past year has shown how vulnerable our democracy remains from Trump and the GOP’s autocratic impulses. We can’t let up on our work to protect our democracy from future abusive presidents. Sign on to support the Protecting Our Democracy Act today.

<link redacted> ADD YOUR NAME

Paid for and authorized by Schiff for Congress

Schiff for Congress
150 E. Olive Ave.
Suite 208
Burbank, CA 91502
United States

Bottom line…

ADAM-SCHIFF-LOGO-2

If justice prevailed in the political world, Adam Schiff, the Harvard Law  School graduate, would be investigated, prosecuted, and held accountable for his corrupt actions in the conspiracy to impeach President Donald Trump and the second time to impeach Trump the citizen.

We are so screwed.

If you are interested in reading the legislation, it can be downloaded as a PDF here: Protecting Our Democracy Act.

-- steve


“Nullius in verba.”-- take nobody's word for it!

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


ON OUR WAY TO BECOMING A BANANNA REPUBLIC

Not only did the fools rip off Star Trek when designing the Space Force logo…

sfl

They continued the theme on the dress uniform…

E_0WdkQVEA8Sjf4

I wonder if the command pilot wings and uniform decorations are part of the kit, or are they earned in video game combat?

Bottom line…

Since the idiots at the Pentagon destroyed the Strategic Air Command with its unwavering mission discipline and its motto, “Peace is Our Profession,” it’s been a downhill ride. Other than the Navy, it was the only service entity to enforce 360-degree responsibility and accountability.

And let us not forget its prime operational disciplinary rule: “To err is human. To forgive is divine. Neither of which is current SAC policy”.

So unlike today’s rules: “Color Over Competence, “Optics Over Operations,” and “It’s a Systemic Fault.”

We are so screwed

-- steve


“Nullius in verba.”-- take nobody's word for it!

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


A NEW RISK TO WORRY WALL STREET

go-no-go

“Last night we informed prolifewhistleblower.com they have violated GoDaddy’s terms of service and have 24 hours to move to a different provider.”

No matter how big your business might be, if you use third-party internet providers to host your business, your company is at risk…

It appears that America is being governed by progressive communist democrats who have entered into a fascistic public-private alliance to support a woke agenda that cancels or censors dissenting speech.  

It is time to curtail those nebulous “terms of service” twisted by the political winds.

  • The first step is to hold internet service providers, especially those with social media platforms, legally and financially accountable for their actions by eliminating Section 230 of the United States Communications Decency Act that generally provides immunity for website platforms concerning third-party content. That is, it exempts platform owners/operators from liability if they act as a platform, NOT a publisher with editorial control over displayed content.
  • The second step is to prohibit “arbitration clauses” in complaints based on content. That is, removing the financial barrier from an individual or entity to bring legal action on behalf of those similarly situated in a class-action lawsuit.
  • The third step is to bring anti-trust/anti-competitive legal action against those who appear to act in concert, even a loosely-based conspiracy based on a similarity of agendas.
  • And the fourth step is to fight fire with fire by mounting an active media campaign against those who are willing to trample your rights to pursue a toxic political agenda such as socialism – especially one that has resulted in the deaths of millions of innocent individuals.

Those who believe that this somehow interferes with the free flow of commerce, rest assured that the marketplace resolves everything. If you do not like content, don’t participate – find another content platform or provider more to your liking. As for those who say, “build your own platforms,” let us remember that this extensive and expensive infrastructure was not created overnight and was partly subsidized by favorable government contracts, grants, and tax relief.

What you can do…

(1)  Avoid proprietary platforms as much as practical, using transferrable systems that can be hosted at alternative sites with little or no modification.

(2)  Be aware of relationships. Few people know that GoDaddy moved "the bulk of its infrastructure to Amazon Web Services" in 2018 and that Amazon has been known to de-platform content providers based on progressive politics, potential competition to their larger customers, and for other unspecified reasons. For those who do not know the story of Parler, originally billed as a “free speech” platform, the story is instructive, not only about political risks but the efforts to recover from an existential threat to its business.

(3) Back up your content, especially graphics and audio-visual resources.

(4)  Build links you control and keep a link library list that connects resources with textual materials. (i.e. do not include the name of a vendor in your links.)

(5)  Test, if possible, moving your site to another host without going live. Or using a dedicated computer to simulate such a move.

(6)  Maintain vigilance of the political situation lest you be caught unaware of “potential” adverse action.

It’s not only GoDaddy….

EXCLUSIVE -- Amazon to proactively remove more content that violates rules from cloud service -sources

Amazon.com Inc plans to take a more proactive approach to determine what types of content violate its cloud service policies, such as rules against promoting violence, and enforce its removal, according to two sources, a move likely to renew debate about how much power tech companies should have to restrict free speech.

Over the coming months, Amazon will hire a small group of people in its Amazon Web Services (AWS) division to develop expertise and work with outside researchers to monitor for future threats, one of the sources familiar with the matter said.

It could turn Amazon, the leading cloud service provider worldwide with 40% market share according to research firm Gartner, into one of the world’s most powerful arbiters of content allowed on the internet, experts say. <Source: Reuters>

Bottom line…

We are living in politically perilous times.  When words are redefined, up is down, right is left, moral is immoral, and good is evil.

The media moguls and the tech tyrants are schilling for the government, the source of contracts, grants, subsidies, tax abatement, favorable regulations, and lack of prosecution. 

We are so screwed.

-- steve


“Nullius in verba.”-- take nobody's word for it!

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN: POLITICAL CRIME LEADS TO MURDER?

With the Los Angeles Times, it’s about a political narrative, not the news…

lat-hdr

On the front lines of the U.S. homicide epidemic: Milwaukee faces historic violence

[OCS: Open with what appears to be a tragic story – one that is relatively commonplace in the inner cities which progressive communist democrats govern before switching to your political narrative.]

Jeremiah Hughes was mowing a lawn on a Wednesday afternoon when two men barged through an alley gate. They were armed. Shots rang out.

Hughes died in the yard and was taken to the morgue and then to El Bethel Church of God in Christ, where days later he lay in an open, emerald-green casket as muffled cries rose through a hymn on a loudspeaker. He was 24 and had his mother’s name — Gwen — tattooed on his left hand.

Velvet ropes surrounded his casket to prevent people from grabbing for him in their despair.

“My only son,” said his father, Stan Lindsey. “Gone like that.”

Milwaukee is in the grip of the worst violence in its modern history. There were 189 killings here last year, a 93% increase from 2019 and the most ever recorded.

The jump reflects a nationwide trend. In one study, researchers from the nonprofit Council on Criminal Justice looked at 34 cities and found that 29 had more homicides last year than in 2019. The overall rise was 30%, though in most places killings remained below their peaks in the 1990s.

Among the 19 cities with more than half a million people — including Los Angeles, New York and Chicago — none saw a bigger surge than Milwaukee. With 127 killings through the first half of September, the city is nearly on pace to match last year’s record. Hughes was the 78th person killed this year.

[OCS: Rather than point to the individuals involved and their criminal activities, insert a political narrative involving race and police brutality – neither related to the murder of Jeremiah Hughes.]

The uniformity of the nationwide rise has launched multiple theories about what is driving it. Nearly all center on the pandemic — which has caused enormous hardships — and the mass movement against police brutality and racism, which changed policing and the relationship between law enforcement and communities where violence has long been concentrated.

[OCS: Blame it on the system. Don’t mention that the system is governed by progressive communist democrats who are relaxing or curtailing policing and prosecutions, emptying jails and prisons, and letting violent criminals loose in our cities (ostensibly pandering to blacks by reducing the number of incarcerated blacks), and continuing with a pattern and practice of political corruption that leads to fiscal calamity and the continuing decay of our inner cities.]

Did a society on edge, with schools closed, social programs shut down and people cramped up at home, simply become more violent? Were more people carrying guns? Did police retreat in a way that emboldened criminals? Experts say it could take years to unravel those questions, but the toll of the fallen has struck hard in neighborhoods across the country.

[OCS: This is pure bullshit! The causes are known, well-known. And the experts, primarily pointy-headed academicians with their statistics and theories, rarely cite the root cause: political corruption, malfeasance, misfeasance, and nonfeasance.

In what world does demonizing and defunding the police lead to safer cities – except to benefit criminals and the criminal justice infrastructure? Or retrospectively examining the conduct, the honest split-second decisions of officers, and then prosecuting them, leading to life-altering outcomes for going to work and doing their job? Yes, the police retreat – just like any other risk-averse government worker who wants to avoid a significant risk for a relatively minor reward.]

There are no clear answers in the June 16 killing of Hughes. Police have released only basic details from their investigation: The weapon was a “long gun,” the motive “retaliation,” and the two suspects were “acquaintances” of Hughes, who had no criminal record.

[OCS: Yes, there are clear answers. Hughes, the lack of a criminal record notwithstanding, either was a bystander or the intended target and was killed by two individuals. The weapon is of no consequence as it is simply a tool. They could have bludgeoned Hughes with a blunt object, knifed him, etc.]

Lindsey [his father with a different last name] said he believes the intended target was a young man who worked for Hughes on landscaping jobs and had a feud with the suspects. The gunfire missed the employee. Nobody has been arrested in the case.

[OCS: Parents almost always provide cover for their children and seek to find reasons that absolve their children of any responsibility for adverse outcomes.

If the intended target were not present, there would likely have been no shooting – unless the two perpetrators tried to make Hughes responsible for the actions of a third party.

If the intended party were present, there would have been two bodies, or the shooters missed, and the target fled. Something appears wonky about the father’s explanation of events.] 

The violence in Milwaukee follows familiar patterns, according to the city’s Homicide Review Commission.

In a city that is 40% Black, most victims are Black men, as are the perpetrators, who usually kill with handguns.

Most of the homicides last year — 54% — occurred in a roughly 30-block radius on the north side, a predominantly Black area where deep-rooted racism has led to neglect and poverty.

[OCS: The pattern is clear: black-on-black crime in the inner cities.]

What’s different now is that many more people are dying.

[OCS: No! What’s different now is that the story fits the current political narrative of the progressive communist democrats seeking more political power and money without proving that they can use either to benefit their constituents.]

[snip]

The neighborhood was the only option for most Black families, because deeds excluded them from renting in other parts of the city. Redlining by banks, which automatically disqualified people in Black neighborhoods from taking out mortgages, made homeownership a distant fantasy.

[OCS: Banks must enforce sound lending standards to protect their depositors. Issuing loans to poor people with insufficient funds to pay the loan back, intermittent work histories, or who live in declining, decaying areas are not legal or prudent banking.

Where the government has guaranteed the loans,  default rates in these decaying areas remain much the same.

Perhaps, one answer is “broken window, stop-and-frisk policing where taggers go to jail and are assigned to clean-up crews.]

Residents were also denied adequate healthcare and education. When Interstate 43 was constructed through the area in the 1960s, businesses were demolished.

[OCS: Where is the mention of the corrupt alliance between the teachers’ unions and the Democrats mentioned?

Where do they note the unions demand more and more money to turn out functional illiterates who are ill-prepared for the real world?

Here is your “systemic racism.”

Ask why school funds do not follow the children to better schools? Why does the union hate charter schools that hold teachers accountable for their results?

As for healthcare, anyone can walk into an emergency room and seek care. If healthcare were inadequate, how do you explain the ease of obtaining an abortion?]

Despite the racism, Pitts recalls a neighborhood that felt safe — a place where killings were so rare that safety never crossed her mind. As in many cities, drugs in the 1980s quickly changed that.

[OCS: Racism in a black area, governed by Democrats? How can that be with the Democrats in charge of “the system?” As for drugs, ask how our judicial and political system profits off the secondary effects of drug use, and we are back to political corruption.]

[OCS: Yada. Yada. Yada.]

[OCS: I find it amazing that the relatives of both criminals and their victims have much the same story when speaking about their relations to the media. They were family men. Men on the cusp of achievement or turning their lives around. Good people except they are now dead or in custody.]

A few weeks before Jeremiah Hughes was killed, his father told him he was going to help pay for a new pickup. Hughes was eager to expand his landscaping business, and Stan Lindsey wanted to support him in any way he could.

Lindsey enjoyed watching his young boy grow into a hardworking young man with a girlfriend and deep love for his large family. He had seven siblings and step-siblings.

Now, Lindsey stared at his son’s casket as Steven Tipton, the pastor at El Bethel, approached the pulpit and began to speak.

He told the dozens of mourners that he’d officiated several services for homicide victims recently and noted a pattern. Many had started as tiffs on social media or other disputes that once would have been settled with words.

“Then you see bullets fly,” he said.

<Source>


kl-imageKurtis Lee is a national correspondent for the Los Angeles Times. He writes news features, narratives and profiles on an array of topics — race, criminal justice, immigration, income inequality, the 2nd Amendment. He won first place in the 2020 National Headliner Awards for his series of stories about the COVID-19 pandemic on the Navajo Nation. Lee has filed reports from the unrest in Ferguson, Mo., and chronicled Donald Trump’s rise to the presidency. Prior to joining The Times in August 2014, Lee worked at the Denver Post where he covered state and national politics. He’s also reported from the scenes of destructive wildfires and mass shootings and was a member of the Post staff that won the 2013 Pulitzer Prize for breaking news coverage of the Aurora theater shooting. He’s a graduate of Temple University.

Current Example -- Prominent Milwaukee Democrat Faces 5 Felony Charges (September 8, 2021)

cl-imageA Milwaukee Alderwoman running for Wisconsin's US Senate Seat is accused of pocketing tens of thousands of dollars in campaign finances through reimbursements made by the city and using campaign finances for personal uses.

Alderwoman Chantia Lewis, who announced she is running for US Senate as a Democrat on July 21, faces five charges, including:

  • Embezzlement over $10,000
  • Theft by fraud under $2,500
  • Misconduct in public office
  • Two campaign finances charges
    • Intentionally filing a false report or statement
    • Intentionally accept unlawful disbursement

As a result of the charges, Common Council President Cavalier Johnson announced Lewis would be removed from all of her committee assignments"

"In light of the five felony charges brought against Alderwoman Chantia Lewis by Milwaukee County District Attorney John Chisholm, I am, effective immediately, relieving her of all committee assignment duties. Make no mistake that our judicial system presumes that every individual is considered innocent until proven guilty in court. However, until this matter is resolved, I am moving without hesitation to protect the institution of the Milwaukee Common Council, as well as the City of Milwaukee. <Source>

Bottom line…

Once again, the Los Angeles Times is all about a false narrative that deliberately misses the point. Most of our inner-city woes can be traced to the corrupt progressive communist democrats that govern. Ask where the billions of dollars targeted at inner-city improvement and education have gone? Why have certain democrat cities controlled by Democrats turned away significant sources of jobs because the employer was not “unionized?”

We need better leaders to bring about a better outcome – not the same corrupt politicians, parties, and their heirs. Especially the corrupt and radical Democrats.

We are so screwed.

-- steve


“Nullius in verba.”-- take nobody's word for it!

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


VOTER ID AND FRAUD: ANOTHER PARTISAN RULING THAT APPEARS RACIST

HIDDEN-PARTISANSHIP

Once again, we find partisan judges torturing the law to support a hyper-partisan viewpoint that appears racist and un-American.

Consider the basic concept of equal protection under the law. If the law applies to everyone equally without regard to any particular protected characteristic such as race, sex, national origin, etc., it is, on its first appearance, presumed to be true,  constitutional, and just.

If one derives an alternative hypothesis to invalidate a common-sense measure that protects voter integrity using impossible to prove “intent” or a false construct like disparate impact, this appears to indicate a political agenda at play. And possibly partisan judges.

Individuals generally, regardless of their class status (race, color, religion, national origin, ancestry, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability), must produce photo identification to purchase alcohol, fly, open a bank account, enter a federal building, drive, and for other purposes. To suggest one race or class of individuals cannot obtain appropriate identification to vote is prima facie racist. To further weaken the integrity of our electoral system in support of a particular party is criminal and un-American.

 Let us consider a specific attempt to weaken electoral integrity…

Two North Carolina judges on Friday struck down a law that required identification to vote, alleging it “was enacted with the unconstitutional intent to discriminate against African American voters.”

The law was enacted in violation of the Equal Protection Clause in North Carolina’s Constitution, the majority of the panel said. The clause says that nobody shall be denied equal protection of the laws nor shall anybody be subjected to discrimination by the state due to race. <102-page ruling>

Sitting as a three-judge panel, two out of three Superior Court Judges, Vince M. Rozier, Jr. and Michael J. O'Foghludha, both Democrats, ruled that…

The majority of this three-judge panel finds the evidence at trial sufficient to show that the enactment of S.B. 824 was motivated at least in part by an unconstitutional intent to target African American voters. In reaching this conclusion, we do not find that any member of the General Assembly who voted in favor of S.B. 824 harbors any racial animus or hatred towards African American voters, but rather, as with H.B. 589, that the Republican majority “target[ed] voters who, based on race, were unlikely to vote for the majority party.

[OCS: Part of the evidence was supplied by University of Michigan Professor Kevin Quinn, an expert in empirical legal studies and statistical methodology and who served as an expert witness for the plaintiffs. Quinn testified that “Black voters were 39 percent more likely to lack a form of qualifying identification.” This statistical conclusion appears to be racist in and of itself because it suggests similarly situated blacks are incapable of following the instructions to obtain the necessary identification to vote. It is likely the statistics were tortured to support the plaintiff’s position.]

Even if done for partisan ends, that constitute[s] racial discrimination.

The majority of this three-judge panel also finds that the Defendants have failed to prove, based on the evidence at trial, that S.B. 824 would have been enacted in its present form if it did not tend to discriminate against African American voters. Other, less restrictive voter ID laws would have sufficed to achieve the legitimate nonracial purposes of implementing the constitutional amendment requiring voter ID, deterring fraud, or enhancing voter confidence.

[OCS: This is a joke, as less restrictive voter ID laws do not deter fraud nor do they enhance voter confidence. What they do is to make electoral fraud easier and harder to detect.]

For the foregoing reasons, the majority of this three-judge panel holds that S.B. 824 was enacted in violation of the North Carolina Constitution, and we permanently enjoin its enforcement on that basis. <102-page ruling>

[OCS: There is a good chance that this ruling will be appealed to the North Carolina Supreme Court, and the possibly to the United States Supreme Court.]

However, the remaining judge, Superior Court Judge Nathaniel J. Poovey, a Republican, dissented with a rather clear statement of fact…

Poovey, dissenting.

INTRODUCTION

In the November 2018 general election, the people of our State chose to approve an additional measure that contributes to certainty in our State's electoral process—that voters offering to vote must present photographic identification before voting.

Thereafter, our General Assembly, the duly elected representatives of the people of our State, enacted a law to carry out this expression of the will of the people.

That the presentation of photographic identification was chosen by the voters of our State to be a prerequisite act for casting a vote should not be a surprise. Presenting some form of identification is a task we must perform quite frequently in everyday life.

Adding more familiarity to the process of casting a vote increases the level of certainty in the electoral process. And doing so by requiring the presentation of photographic identification ensures each person offering to vote is who they proclaim to be, thereby increasing confidence in the outcome of each election.

Plaintiffs in this case, however, claim the opposite. Rather than strengthen the overall electoral process, Plaintiffs claim the law makes the process for them and other persons in our State inherently and impermissibly different. This is so because, as Plaintiffs claim, the law was enacted with the intent to discriminate against African Americans on account of their race.

The allegations underpinning Plaintiffs’ claim remain unproven by the evidence presented in this case. But as the evidence does show, no registered voter in this State will be precluded from voting by the identification requirements in this law.

CONCLUSION

Senate Bill 824 was a bipartisan bill that was supported along the way by multiple African American legislators and enacted after the people of our State approved a constitutional amendment calling for voter-photo-ID requirements. The totality of the competent evidence presented in this litigation over this act of the General Assembly in 2018 fails to support a finding that the General Assembly acted with racially discriminatory intent.<102-page ruling>

Bottom line…

In the words of Sam Hayes, general counsel for the North Carolina House speaker, “Once again, liberal judges have defied the will of North Carolinians on election integrity. “This fight is far from over. We look forward to appealing this partisan ruling on behalf of the people of North Carolina.”

We continue to find the Democrats, the party of racism and trial lawyers, using the law to subvert the people's will and further their toxic agenda.

We are so screwed.

-- steve


“Nullius in verba.”-- take nobody's word for it!

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS