Is the Facebook whistleblower another Democrat plant -- a dirty trick designed to give the progressive communist democrats who control Congress the opportunity to legitimize the cancellation or censorship of conservative or contrarian speech?

Why this might be true…

(1)  There is a growing public awareness of the media moguls’ and tech tyrant’s cancellation and censorship of information that was derided as being misinformation and/or a conspiracy theory – only to find out that the information was accurate, truthful, and timely. And, in many cases, worse than originally thought.

A prominent example was the labeling of damaging information contained in the Hunter Biden laptop as Russian disinformation before the 2020 presidential election. A fact we now know may have swayed the election.

(2)  There is a growing public awareness of the Congressional shenanigans and lies used to impeach President Donald Trump unconstitutionally.

Including false and misleading information from a “whistleblower” who falsely implicated President Trump in an imagined illegal Ukraine quid pro quo and protected presidential candidate Joe Biden from a recorded confession of an actual criminal Ukraine quid pro quo.

(3)  There are several connection points with those who were seeking to destroy Donald Trump’s candidacy, and then the presidency, as well as muzzle conservatives and contrarians.

(a)  We find the “Google whistleblower,” Frances Haugen, to be a far-left Trump-hating Democrat activist with a history of donating to Democrats, including the radical communist democrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s congressional campaign and a further contribution to her “Courage to Change” Political Action Committee.

(b)  Not so coincidently represented by "Whistleblower Aid," a group founded by Mark Zaid, who previously represented the national security official who initiated the Trump impeachment process. The legal group may be hiding its true money source by raising legal funding on a GoFundMe page.

(c)  Conditioning the information battlefield by leaking stolen documents to the Wall Street Journal, allegedly working with Mark Zaid and his law partners John Tye, a former Obama State Department official, and Andrew Bakaj, who worked for Democratic senators including Majority Leader Chuck Schumer. Interviews with "whistleblowers" on CBS's 60 Minutes are carefully arranged and crafted as to narrative and presentation. 

A communications strategy that seems well-designed by Bryson Gillette (the previous employer of White House Spokesperson Jen Psaki), a public relations firm associated with former Obama aide Bill Burton and staffed with Democrat operatives who are said to be providing “strategic communications guidance” to Haugen.

(d)  Like the far-left radical Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) who invited “whistleblower” Frances Haugen to testify before his Senate Sub-Committee on Consumer Protection, Product Safety, and Data Security. Haugen claimed that Facebook did not censor enough speech, further claiming she was motivated to take action after a friend became “radicalized” by “misinformation.” Haugen suggests that she and others like her monitor social media networks and inform Congress about Section 230 rule changes.

Mark Zuckerberg's question is important...

Zuckerberg: “If social media were as responsible for polarizing society as some people claim, then why are we seeing polarization increase in the US while it stays flat or declines in many countries with just as heavy use of social media around the world?”

Could the answer be the malignant agenda and influence of the progressive communist democrats? Some claim, like the original "whistleblower," Haugen has only a tangential role in things which she criticizes and mischaracterizes the documents she stole. Seeking "whistleblower" status to protect herself from legal action and to feather her own nest as a liberal darling. 

Bottom line…

If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, the probability is that it is a duck. In this case, another dirty campaign trick by democrat operatives who might be in jail if anyone was held accountable for the previous Trump impeachment hoax.

The involvement of so many Democrat operatives who are assisting and managing Haugen’s public debut as a "whistleblower" suggests that her agenda and arguments are part of a broader Democratic initiative to disrupt the 2022 election, help cover up Democrat activities in the 2020 election, and to provide cover for the criminality of the Obama Administration.

We no longer can trust the Democrats in matters foreign or domestic. Under the progressive communist democrats, America has never fallen so far, so fast. Some suggest that Biden and certain members of Congress may be more beholden to Communist China than to America and its Constitution.

We are so screwed.

-- steve