Did the leadership of the progressive socialist democrats, who may have had prior knowledge of the riot, attempt to create an anti-Trump narrative?

On January 6, 2021, Ashli Babbitt, a 14-year Air Force veteran, was shot and killed by a United States Capitol police officer inside the Halls of Congress. She was at the entrance to the Speaker’s  Lobby of the House of Representatives when she attempted to climb through a broken window.

In defense of the officer, he did not know if she was armed or what she may have been carrying in her backpack. However, Babbitt was surrounded by armed police officers and at least two plainclothes government agents who did not attempt to interfere with the crowd's activities. An armed SWAT team was nearby. In addition, Congress was in joint session and formally certifying the results of the 2020 presidential election at the time of the breach.

The Capitol Police are controlled by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi(D-CA) and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), both of whom have characterized the January 6th Capitol riot as an armed insurrection, although no arms were present.

Both have repeated the false statement that Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick was murdered by rioters who bashed in his skull with a fire extinguisher. A knowingly false claim repeated in Trump’s second unconstitutional impeachment. “The insurrectionists killed a Capitol Police officer by striking him in the head with a fire extinguisher,”

Both Pelosi, Schumer, and their various leg-humpers and lickspittles continue to refuse to address the killing of Ashli Babbitt in any meaningful manner.

Procedure for thee, but not for me?

In every recent police encounter between a black suspect and a police officer, there was immediate disclosure of the officer’s name, rank, assignment – along with external allegations regarding the improper use of excessive force. In many cases, the suspect had directly threatened or attacked an officer in the process of resisting a lawful arrest.

In Babbitt's case, she stood next to armed police officers with a fully-armed swat team standing nearby. She did not attack anyone, and the window had already been broken. There was no attempt to take Babbitt into custody before being shot by a black individual described only as a Capitol police officer. Moreover, there is no current evidence that Babbitt posed a physical threat to the officer, who stepped from behind cover to shoot Babbitt without warning or attempting to take Babbitt into custody.

  • Why are the authorities hiding the officer’s identity and details surrounding the shooting?
  • Why are the authorities hiding the officer’s assigned duties and the rules governing the use of deadly force?
  • Why was the officer “secretly” investigated and cleared of all wrongdoing with zero transparency?
  • Why is the mainstream media suddenly incurious about the details or remaining silent on the Babbitt case?
  • Where are the demands for justice? To say Ashli Babbitt’s name? Or shouted threats of “no justice, no peace?”
  • Why are those present in the Capitol complex being viciously prosecuted? Many of whom were placed in solitary confinement without being convicted of a crime. Why were rioters, looters, and arsonists in Portland, Oregon, who attacked federal property and injured federal law enforcement officers released from custody or have their cases dropped?

Why is Ashli Babbitt's Family being forced to sue the police to retrieve public documents and to learn the identity of her killer?

Under the Washington, D.C. code, the Metropolitan Police Department was supposed to produce the requested information or prove that the department is legally exempt from doing so within 15 days after April 21, 2021. As of June 4, 2021, the department has yet to do either.  

Now Aaron Babbitt,  the husband of Ashli Babbit, who is acting as the personal representative of the estate of Ashli Babbitt, is forced to bring another legal action to compel the production of documents that should have been provided to Babbitt’s attorneys.

But most telling…

Why were the radical left’s shock troops, Antifa, mobilized against a June 5, 2021, Sacramento State Capitol rally designated as an event calling for “Justice for Ashli Babbitt?”


I find it supremely ironic that an Antifa protester is holding a sign reading, “She should have followed the law!”. In contrast, members of Antifa have engaged in violence against civilians and law enforcement with no thought for the laws they were breaking. Perhaps secure in the knowledge that their lawless activities were sanctioned and protected by the progressive communist democrats from whom they apparently receive their marching orders.


Bottom line…

It’s time to fight back using the same successful tactics used by the progressive communist democrats to attempt the destruction of America from within. Using Saul “Rules for Radicals” Alinsky's Rule #4, “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules,” to fight progressive injustice and tyranny. 

I have little sympathy for the useful idiots who entered the Capitol complex, most of whom were intent on taking selfies, looking around, and grabbing souvenirs. Some insurrectionists! – None were armed, none wanting to take over the government. Few appeared aware they were breaking serious federal laws. One, because some were seemingly welcomed by Capitol police who were present and non-confrontational. Two, because many were passively walking between roped stanchions in an orderly manner. And three, they saw numerous televised and reported examples of actual rioters being let go with few charges, if any.

What I find disturbing is that a BLM/Antifa supporter wearing Trump-related MAGA gear was at the head of the crowd and standing next to Ashli Babbitt when she was shot – as were armed officers.

What I find disturbing is that many of the so-called insurrectionists are being held, some in solitary confinement, while this known BLM/Antifa agitator was caught on a recording urging the crowd forward and still released.

But most of all, I can imagine that this may have been a staged false flag operation with the foreknowledge of the progressive communist democrat leadership.

Considering the behavior of the top-level Obamacons, the illegal and unconstitutional activities of the leadership of the premier intelligence and law enforcement agencies, the domestic spying, and dirty tricks – it is all within the realm of possibility.

How many times have the progressive communist democrats and mainstream media screamed “conspiracy theory” or shouted “debunked” – only to have the facts proven accurate after the election when they no longer could affect the election, and the evildoers were in control?

We are so screwed.

-- steve

“Nullius in verba.”-- take nobody's word for it!

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS