WTF? Everything seems to be going their way, so why are the Democrats panicking and hysterically pursuing Republicans now that President Biden has been declared president-elect? The inauguration is only days away on January 20th.

All of a sudden, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi calls on Vice President Pence and others to consider removing the President based on the 25th Amendment or is raising the threat of another impeachment for insurrection. Nancy Pelosi talks with Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman General Mark Milley about securing the presidential nuclear codes. Do the Democrats believe Trump now has credible evidence of wrongdoing and may release it once out of the office or use it as a bargaining chip to avoid personal prosecution? Could that evidence relate to Georgia's January run-off election?

Free speech?

Although private companies are not bound by the Constitution’s First Amendment, they used to respect and promote, with some obvious exceptions,  free and open communication. Now, the tech tyrants are promoting progressive propaganda and censoring anti-government messages with impunity and no explanation. Why are the tech tyrants shutting down the President of the United States' communications channels and threatening other conservatives? Why are the tech tyrants blocking President Trump's call for "peace?"  With Apple considering removing Parler from the AppStore and Google removing Parler from the Play Store?

Why are the Democrats and the mainstream media not offering the same type of sympathetic treatment to the “mostly peaceful protesters" as they condoned when a federal courthouse was assaulted for weeks and federal protective officers injured? Why are they not parroting Martin Luther King who said "Riots are the language of the unheard?"  Why are mediapundits not pointing out the falsity and artificial sensationalism of many media accounts of the capitol breach? There are videos of Capitol Police opening up barriers and waving people into the capitol complex. There are many conflicting stories in the media that are different from what was observed and recorded contemporaneously. Did the media stage key shots to fit a specific narrative? Did the Democrats stage the riot to disrupt legitimate challenges to Biden’s electoral coronation? 

Why the desperation and deflection?

Are they worried about the mass release of documents that will reveal what the progressives in Congress and the bureaucracy have been doing since the Obama presidency?

Could it be that the recent release of a report titled "Joint Statement by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), and the National Security Agency (NSA) could empower President Trump to use his executive order against individuals and organizations cited in the report? Especially since the Director of National Intelligence noted that several analysts downplayed certain results because they did not want to give the President more power. What is so urgent?

Why the hypocritical double standard of labeling everyone not progressive in the Capitol area as an insurrectionist or domestic terrorist when they refused to apply such labels to Antifa and Black Lives Matter?  Could it be that the Democrats recognize that the rioters were led by professionally-trained Antifa agitators and far-left shock troops and realize this is a weapon that could be used once again if the Democrats did not adopt a more radical agenda?

Can You trust the FBI?

There seems to be a strange double standard at the FBI which is now asking for the public's help in identifying rioters -- not so much in other cases where federal property has been attacked by far-left radicals. Is this FBI Director Christopher Wray trying to keep his job? 

FBI: No evidence antifa involved in Capitol riot

No evidence has been found that members of the left-wing antifa movement were involved in this week’s storming of the Capitol building, the FBI said Friday, contradicting a narrative pushed by some Trump allies.

“We have no indication of that at this time,” Washington Field Office assistant director Steven D'Antuono said during a briefing when asked about any potential involvement of antifa. The term is used to refer to the loosely connected network of far-left activists who say they are fighting against what they perceive as fascism. <Source>

Notice no mention of the similarly violent far-left Black Lives Matter? 

Utah activist inside U.S. Capitol says woman killed was first to try and enter House chamber

A Utah activist who faces criminal charges in connection with a Provo protest he organized in June claims he attended a pro-Trump rally that turned into a violent attack on the U.S. Capitol in order to see “the truth” about the protests for himself and the organization he represents.

“For me, it’s important from the group and the people around me to see that side of things, to see the truth,” John Sullivan said Wednesday night. “I don’t care, like what side you’re on, you should just see it raw.”

Sullivan, who is the founder of Insurgence USA, a social justice group that calls itself anti-fascist and protests police brutality, was detained by Washington police for about an hour and a half Thursday night, a day after he talked to local and national media about what he witnessed Wednesday.

He was handcuffed the entire time, and said police questioned him about being inside the Capitol and witnessing the shooting death of one of the protesters. He was not arrested.

But some of the 40-minute video he posted to his social media sites contradicts his assertion that he and another woman were “only filming” the actions and not participating as he can be heard in the video encouraging people to join them as they push their way through police barricades.<Source>

 Sullivan was standing right next to the woman who was shot as she attempted to enter the House Chamber through a broken window in a barricaded door.

Afraid to walk the streets? 

Are the Democrats afraid to appear in public after what they have done? Knowing there were 70 million witnesses to their perfidy?

Biden and the tech tyrants beholden to the Communist Chinese…

Why is the media is emphasizing the CCP economic model of "state capitalism," which is a private-public transition on the way to communism? Why are the progressives ignoring their “Biden” problem that could lead to his impeachment for the same reasons President Trump was impeached?

Dominion fires back against Sidney Powell…

As expected, Dominion Voting Systems filed a 124-page $1.3 billion complaint (Case 1:21-cv-00040 Document 1 Filed 01/08/2) for defamation and deceptive trade practices against Sidney Powell, her law firm, and her organization "Defending the Republic, Inc.


1.  This defamation action arises from statements made by Sidney Powell, who— acting in concert with allies and media outlets determined to promote a false preconceived narrative about the 2020 election—caused unprecedented harm. During a Washington, D.C. press conference, a Georgia political rally, and a media blitz, Powell falsely claimed that Dominion had rigged the election, that Dominion was created in Venezuela to rig elections for Hugo Chávez, and that Dominion bribed Georgia officials for a no-bid contract.

2. Powell’s wild accusations are demonstrably false. Far from being created in Venezuela to rig elections for a now-deceased Venezuelan dictator, Dominion was founded in Toronto for the purpose of creating a fully auditable paper-based vote system that would empower people with disabilities to vote independently on verifiable paper ballots. As it grew, Dominion developed technology to solve many of the technical and voter intent issues that came to light as a result of the 2000 Presidential election. Its systems are certified under standards promulgated by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (‘EAC’), reviewed and tested by independent testing laboratories accredited by the EAC, and were designed to be auditable and include a paper ballot backup to verify results. Since its founding, Dominion has been chosen by thousands of election officials throughout the United States to provide the technology to effectively administer transparent and fully auditable elections.

5.  Although Powell assured the public during television and radio appearances that her claims were backed by “evidence,” Powell’s “evidence” included declarations from a motley crew of conspiracy theorists, con artists, armchair “experts,” and anonymous sources who were judicially determined to be ‘wholly unreliable.’ One of Powell’s wholly unreliable sources was a purported ‘military intelligence expert’ who has now admitted that he never actually worked in military intelligence, that the declaration Powell’s clerks wrote for him to sign is “misleading,” and that he ‘was trying to backtrack’ on it.  After he was discredited, Powell pivoted by presenting his declaration as having been written by a different anonymous source.

6.  During some of her media appearances Powell also touted a shocking declaration from an ‘anonymous source’ purporting to be a Venezuelan military officer alleging a decades old conspiracy beginning with now-deceased Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chávez.5 But the explanation in the “anonymous witness’s” declaration for why he purportedly came forward was a near-verbatim recitation from another declaration put forward by Powell, proving that those witnesses did not write their declarations independently and raising serious questions about what role Powell and her team played in drafting the declaration.

Unfortunately, the State of Georgia failed to provide access to ballots and operational equipment that would have dispelled much controversy. And Supreme Court Chief Justice refused to take a case that would have prevented most of the electoral problems by ruling the states must follow the U.S. Constitution and their individual state's laws.

Bottom line…

Things are muddled. Questions are not being asked? Communist China-like “cancel culture” is in full bloom.

We are screwed.

-- steve

“Nullius in verba.”-- take nobody's word for it!

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS