We are living in Orwellian crazy times where black is white, up is down, right is wrong, and evil is good...

Prosecuting an innocent man because he told the truth about the corruption in the intelligence community that supported Obama’s self-destructive Iran deal and who was about to restructure and reform the intelligence community as the President Trump's National Security Advisor…

Former Judge John Gleeson appears to be a corrupt douchebag when he argues that the dropping of the Michael Flynn case by the Department of Justice amounts to gross prosecutorial misconduct.”

Did the former judge, who is not even a legitimate party to the Michael Flynn prosecution, also comment on “prosecutorial misconduct” when former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was not prosecuted for violations of the Espionage Act,  knowingly mishandling classified documents, perjury, destruction of documents and government property, and evading archiving rules designed to promote government transparency even though the evidence for a conviction was solid, overwhelming, and there was a deliberate misinterpretation of the law?

Former Judge John Gleeson, a Clinton appointee who served as the United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, was appointed to file an unprecedented brief with the trial court arguing against the Department of Justice’s dismissal of the bogus case against Lt. General Michael Flynn. A case rife with prosecutorial and judicial misconduct, including criminal acts perpetrated by the prosecutors who altered documents filed with the court as well as engaging in other reprehensible conduct.

There are only three parties to a criminal prosecution: the prosecutor (DOJ), the Defendant (Flynn), and the Judge (U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan). For the Judge to appoint an unaffiliated third-party in order to revive the prosecution’s case is unconscionable and unprecedented. For those wanting to read Gleeson’s brief, it can be found here.

Excerpts from” United States of America v. Michael T. Flynn
Case 1:17-cr-00232-EGS Document 223-2 Filed 06/10/20

“Flynn now asserts that he falsely affirmed his guilt under oath to the Court on multiple occasions and that his declaration in support of his motion to withdraw his plea is truthful. That assertion is implausible, but in any event, it would simply mean that Flynn lied when he pleaded guilty and affirmed the Statement of Facts. Those statements effectively halted the prosecution, and, if false, would have led to a wrongful conviction and required the Court needlessly to expend judicial resources taking his pleas. Under either scenario, Flynn’s false statements blocked the inquiry and obstructed the administration of justice.”


“For the foregoing reasons, the court-appointed amicus curiae respectfully submits that the Government’s motion to dismiss should be denied and no Order to Show Cause why Flynn should not be held in criminal contempt should issue.”

One Citizen Speaking:

This case ignores the fact that defendants often plead guilty to lesser charges to avoid a probable harsher sentence or who lack the money to mount a defense against the government’s unlimited resources.

This case ignores the fundamental facts that Michael Flynn did not commit a crime, was framed by a cadre of DOJ/FBI officials who re-wrote interview notes and allowed an innocent man to be knowingly prosecuted, bankrupted, and mentally tortured -- even though the case was scheduled to be closed without finding any wrongdoing.

This case ignores documents hidden from the court that prove that the “plea” was coerced by the DOJ’s threat to prosecute and convict Flynn’s son on charges rarely prosecuted in Washington D.C.

This case ignores that the DOJ did not provide required exculpatory evidence to the defense as required by law.

This case ignores that the Judge failed to manage the case in an honest and ethical manner, ignoring the many instances of prosecutorial misconduct and engaging in judicially inappropriate behavior..

This is a gross miscarriage of justice and the judge should be impeached and removed from office, or at least disbarred for knowingly aiding and abetting a criminal enterprise perpetrated by the DOJ/FBI.

Why are progressive socialist democrats taking a knee before Black Lives Matter when they are clearly a racist, anti-Semitic, and pro-communist political coalition?

Black Lives Matter is not a civil rights organization. It is nothing more than a progressive socialist democrat political action group that scares politicians. And they are both racist, viewing everything through the prism of race, as well as being grossly anti-Semitic. That cities and states governed by progressive socialist democrats would openly flout the Constitution and refuse to provide adequate protection to the lives and property of their residents is un-American and criminal. The fact that the communist Mayor of New York is using taxpayer funds to paint streets with Black Lives Matter, a political slogan, instead of ALL Lives Matter is unconstitutional.

According to progressive constitutional scholar Alan Dershowitz…

It is a real tragedy that Black Lives Matter — which has done so much good in raising awareness of police abuses — has now moved away from its central mission and has declared war against the nation-state of the Jewish people. In a recently issued “platform,” more than 60 groups that form the core of the Black Lives Matter movement went out of their way to single out one foreign nation to accuse of genocide and apartheid.

No, it wasn’t the Syrian government, which has killed tens of thousands of innocent people with barrel bombs, chemicals, and gas. Nor was it Saudi Arabia, which openly practices gender and religious apartheid. It wasn’t Iran, which hangs gays and murders dissidents. It wasn’t China, which has occupied Tibet for more than half a century. And it wasn’t Turkey, which has imprisoned journalists, judges, and academics. Finally, it wasn’t any of the many countries, such as Venezuela or Mexico, where police abuses against innocent people run rampant and largely unchecked. Nor was it the Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip, where the police are a law unto themselves who act as judge, jury, and executioner of those whose politics or religious practices they disapprove.

It was only Israel, the nation-state of the Jewish people, and the only democracy in the Middle East. The platform accuses the US of being “complicit in the genocide taking place against the Palestinian people” by providing aid to “an apartheid state.”

Criticizing Israel is not anti-Semitic. Like other democracies, including our own, it has faults. Criticizing Israel’s settlement and occupation policies is fair game. But singling Israel out and falsely accusing it of “genocide” can be explained in no other way than blatant hatred of Jews and their state. <Source>

Not only do ALL lives matter, but you do not get a pass for your racism, even when your organization pretends to promote civil rights. Explain to me why Black Lives Matter is pursuing direct street actions against the police when they refuse to hold democrats and black elected officials accountable for the thousands of black lives lost in the democrat-governed inner cities? Explain why Black Lives Matter does not denounce the violent anarchist group Antifa and the rioters, arsonists, and looters who use Black Lives Matter as a diversion while they destroy communities? Why are the politicians openly feting a violent, gun-wielding, drug-abusing, felon and ex-con as a shining example of an American – overlooking the heroic deeds of our military and first-responders? Why does the movement seem to favor, and be supported almost exclusively, by the progressive socialist democrats and their captive mainstream media?

Why is a professor being harassed by UCLA, the media, and others for refusing to waive exams for Black students?

Where is the free speech and academic freedom that was so touted by the University of California? Why are the administrators of a multi-billion dollar educational goliath refusing to stand-up to overt bullying by those who live their lives on social media which they confuse and conflate for the real world?

UCLA Professor Under Police Protection Following Threats

UCLA suspended professor for refusing to cancel finals for minorities after George Floyd killing

A college professor is living under police protection after rebuffing a request to exempt minority students from taking final exams in the wake of George Floyd's death.

University of California Los Angeles accounting professor Gordon Klein faced threats of violence after he declined a student's request that he delay a final exam in light of national unrest.

The university suspended the professor for three weeks beginning on June 25 and launched a discrimination investigation into the incident.

In the face of public pressure, UCLA administrators bowed to student demands and removed Klein from his class.

On Monday, Anderson School of Management dean Antonio Bernardo sent an email to students announcing an investigation into Klein's "troubling" behavior. The dean apologized to students for the "added stress" a substitution of an instructor may cause.

"UCLA and UCLA Anderson are committed to creating a learning, working, and living environment that is free from discrimination, harassment, or retaliation," the spokesman said.

[OCS: Discrimination – you mean like giving one class of students a specific benefit based solely on race?]

"Professor Klein is right. Treating students on the basis of equality is morally, ethically, and legally sound," Wood said. "The fact that his complaining student has gotten traction with her complaint is disturbing."

While Klein remains under police protection, his students have won concessions from the university. <Source>

Want to see what Anderson School of Management dean Antonio Bernardo places above honest, ethical, equal behavior. free speech, and academic freedom? $565,096 compensation in 2018! (2019 numbers are not yet available.)


Bottom line…

Snowflakes and the media-manipulated useful idiots appear to be surrounding decent Americans? When will Americans stand up and scream “Enough is Enough!”? When will decent, but misguided, people note that the Democrat Party, the party of racism, segregation, Jim Crow, the KKK, and anti-civil-rights legislation, has turned into the Communist Party USA and does not wish us well?

You cannot reason with racism and "they" can't tell you what will replace destroyed institutions except for progressive socialist democrats and their authoritarian quest for perpetual power. 

We are so screwed.

-- steve

“Nullius in verba.”-- take nobody's word for it!

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS