1. By in or around May 2016, the Democratic National Committee (“DNC”) and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (“DCCC”) became aware that their computer systems had been compromised by unauthorized intrusions and hired a security company (“Company 1”) to identify the extent of the intrusions.

[OCS: The DNC refused to allow the FBI to forensically examine the alleged “hacked” server and hired a company that had previous ties to the DNC.]

2. On or about June 14, 2016, the DNC—through Company 1—publicly announced that it had been hacked by Russian government actors.

[OCS: The company’s findings of Russian hacking were questioned by well-credentialed, experienced, and competent, software security experts. Their findings suggested that the server was not remotely hacked, but the information downloaded onto a “thumb drive” by someone with access.

It is believed that the motive had nothing to do with Donald Trump or his campaign, but was done to address the systemic DNC mistreatment of Bernie Sanders in favor of candidate Hillary Clinton. Some suggest that the as yet unsolved murder of DNC staffer Seth Rich may have been connected to the compromised server.]

3. From in or around July 2016 through in or around November 2016, an organization (“Organization 1”), which had previously posted documents stolen by others from U.S. persons, entities, and the U.S. government, released tens of thousands of documents stolen from the DNC and the personal email account of the chairman of the U.S. presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton (“Clinton Campaign”).

[OCS: There is no proof that WikiLeaks is supported by the Russians, received the subject material from the Russians, and that Russia was involved in the hack. All that we have is the word of a single company paid by the DNC -- the same group that paid Fusion GPS for the phony Steele dossier.

"WikiLeaks editor Julian Assange has again denied that emails from the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Hillary Clinton's campaign chairman John Podesta were hacked and leaked to his organisation by the Russian government." <Source>

Another display of political hypocrisy can be found in the fact that “Organization 1” (believed to be WikiLeaks) “is an international non-profit organization that publishes secret information, news leaks, and classified media provided by anonymous sources” – much like the venerable New York Times, Washington Post, etc. who routinely publish private and classified information from anonymous sources with impunity.

It should be noted that there is no mention of the Pakistani foreign nationals who worked in IT for and was protected by the then DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz and whose laptop and other evidence remains unexamined and unreported.]

12. After the July 22, 2016 release of stolen DNC emails by Organization 1, a senior Trump Campaign official was directed to contact STONE about any additional releases and what other damaging information Organization 1 had regarding the Clinton Campaign. STONE thereafter told the Trump Campaign about potential future releases of damaging material by Organization 1.

[OCS: (It is believed that the “senior Trump campaign official is either Paul Manafort or his Deputy Rick Gates)

There is no crime in gathering opposition research. Truth-be-told, look at Hillary Clinton and the DNC hiding funds to engage a foreign national to contact Russian sources for compromising information on Donald Trump, all of which appears to be uncorroborated hearsay – yet was used by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation to improperly and illegally obtain a FISA warrant that appears to justifying domestic spying on an American citizen. A cognizable criminal activity with substantiated evidence, and which remains uninvestigated as part of the Russia disinformation campaign to influence an American presidential election.] 

[Source: Mueller Indictment]