Previous month:
March 2018
Next month:
May 2018

FBI: THE NEW REALITY

It appears that the top leadership of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, once the nation’s premier investigative and law enforcement agency, is rife with self-protective cronyism and corruption …

The NEW FBI REALITY …

FBI-THE-NEW-REALITY

With all of their posturing and posing before the cameras, why has no member of Congress asked a few simple questions …

Why is it that President Trump is being investigated with “obstruction of justice” when Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein wrote the memo that justified his firing?

When President Trump fired James B. Comey as F.B.I. director on Tuesday, the White House made public a memorandum from Rod J. Rosenstein, the deputy attorney general, recommending the dismissal. <Source: New York Times>

  • Is Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein guilty of a conspiracy to obstruct justice in the firing of James Comey?
  • Is Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, the person who appointed Special Counsel Robert Mueller, malfeasant when it comes to limiting the scope of Mueller’s power knowing that it was he that wrote the memo recommending the dismissal of FBI Director James Comey?
  • Or, Is Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein guilty of conspiring with Special Counsel Robert Mueller and other as yet unnamed parties with attempting to overthrow or delegitimize the President of the United States?
  • How is it that Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, then acting as an Obama-appointed United States Attorney, in concert with then Assistant FBI Director Andrew McCabe, appeared to have delayed or covered-up factual evidence of the Russian attempt to bribe public officials in the matter of Uranium One before the Administration’s agreement to allow the sale of twenty-percent of America’s uranium production capacity to a company controlled by the Russians?
  • And, the tangential matters of at least a $131.3 million donation to the Clinton Foundation by one of the deal’s participants (laundered and unreported by the foundation) and $750,000 to former President Clinton, the husband of the current Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton? It should not come as a surprise that the donors were shielded from disclosure by the foundation. 
  • What possessed Acting Attorney General Rod Rosenstein to appoint former FBI Director Robert Mueller (after Attorney General Jeff Sessions recused himself from the Russia investigation) full well knowing that the matters to be investigated posed a direct and cognizable conflict of interest in the matter of the top leadership of the FBI and actual Russian conclusion? Not to mention Mueller’s previous history of botched investigations?
  • How did Rod Rosenstein, knowing the origin of the Steele Dossier permit Special Counsel Mueller to continue to use this unsubstantiated and tainted evidence to continue the Mueller probe?

Bottom line …

It appears that President Trump has been boxed in by the DOJ, FBI, the Democrat Party, and the media because any action against the corrupt leadership of the DOJ and FBI may very well affect the 2018 mid-term elections and give the Democrats a majority in the House, and possibly the Senate – where they can continue to destroy President Trump and his Administration. Possibly America’s first coup (if you don’t believe the Kennedy assassination story and wonder why the government still has to keep documents secret after all these years).

We are totally screwed if the Democrats regain power. Like the Hillary Clinton option – it is not a vote for Donald Trump, but a vote against the progressive socialist democrats and their communist fellow travelers.

It is time to kick the GOP in the ass – to demand they become pro-active against the threat of losing our nation, its culture, and its exceptionalism. Truly dark days ahead under the Democrats.

-- steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


CAREN TURNER: PRIDE OF THE PRIVILEGED PROGRESSIVE DEMOCRATS

police

Here is an example of the outrageous behavior of another “entitled” progressive socialist democrat who happens to be a “voluntary” commission member of the Port Authority and New Jersey. Caren Turner is also described in news reports as a “veteran Democratic political operative and lobbyist. Ironically, Turner was the chair of the Port Authority’s ethics committee.

Unbelievable abuse of police officers … 

“Two officers pulled over a Toyota Corolla that police records indicate had tinted windows at its front seats — barred in the state — and a license plate frame that partially obstructed the Nevada tags on the car. It turned out the vehicle registration had expired and the driver couldn't show proof of insurance. So, following procedure, police called for an impound. The car's four occupants called for a ride.”

If the dash-cam video does not appear in the email version of the post, it can be found here.

Even though she is not involved in the incident other than to pick-up the occupants of a vehicle driven by an unrelated adult that was stopped for illegally tinted-windows and an expired registration, the obnoxious lady pulls out all stops …

  • “Concerned citizen.”
  • “Friend of the Mayor.”
  • “I am one of the commissioners.”
  • “Turner flashed her gold Port Authority badge and claimed ‘I am a commissioner of the Port Authority and I'm heading up over 4,000 police officers so if there's a problem ..." 
  • “Don’t call me miss, call me commissioner.”
  • “I am an attorney.”
  • “I will be in with the commissioner of police of Tenafly.”
  • “When the officer told her she was free to leave the scene, Turner said, ‘You may shut the f*** up.’”

Turner’s daughter was simply a back-seat passenger who called her mother after the stop. The police officer told her to ask the adult driver about the stop if she wished further information. But, she continued to press the matter.

It should come as no surprise that she resigned her position after the video went viral and the Port Authority was about to bring her before the board. Like all self-serving Democrat weasels who get caught, Turner offered up this statement …

"Last month, my daughter and three of her friends were in a car that was pulled over by a Tenafly police officer for non-moving violations, including having tinted windows. The officers subsequently decided to impound the vehicle, leaving the four young adults on the side of a busy highway.

"Concerned, I hurried to the scene to assist them. As a parent, I was upset and uncomfortable with the unfolding events. I let my emotions get the better of me and regret my tone toward the police officers and use of off-color language. For this, I apologize.

"However, at no point did I violate the Port Authority's Code of Ethics or ask for special treatment for anyone involved, nor did I suggest, in any way, that I would use my position at the Port Authority to affect the outcome of the violations issued to the driver. My resignation from the Port Authority is a recognition that this unfortunate incident could and should have been avoided.

"As a long-time Tenafly resident, I have always taken an active role in the community, including working with law enforcement officials, and I encourage the Tenafly Police Department to review best practices with respect to tone and de-escalation, so that incidents like this do not recur."

I would also encourage the Tenafly Police Department to review best practices with respect to tone and de-escalation … It is too bad that she was not charged with interfering with a police officer and required to explain her actions to a judge and jury.

Bottom line …

Shameful behavior! But, it could have been worse, she or one of the occupants could have been a minority and there is a great probability that the officers would be fired or disciplined after someone pulled the race card and the progressive mainstream media was involved. Apparently the occupants of the vehicle were all white, and one attended MIT and another Yale.

-- steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


DANGER: POLITICAL POLLS CAN BE HAZARDOUS TO YOUR FINANCES

FAKE_POLITICAL_POLL

A relatively small portion of the population is familiar with the term social engineering in the context of information security …

Social Engineering

The use of deception to manipulate individuals into divulging confidential or personal information that may be used for fraudulent purposes.

Once again, people who would never answer questions about their race, sex, age, income, and other personal information think nothing of providing this information when presented with a political poll from their chosen political party or favorite candidate.

Unfortunately, some of these polls are being run by scammers and fakesters for the sole purpose of adding you to a mailing list and gathering personal information which can then be sold to third-party marketers and advertisers. Or in extreme cases used for identity fraud to open fictitious accounts in your name, file bogus tax returns with refunds, or other nefarious purposes.

And, in some cases, these are not political polls at all – they are cleverly disguised advertising for a special interest group or a particular candidate. An example of this type of bogus poll is one that features negative information about an opposition candidate or repetitively reinforces a candidate’s positive attributes. One such poll asked the respondent to watch a series of commercials and provide feedback – a legitimate attempt to decide which commercials that resonate with the largest possible audience or simply a trick to keep you engaged while watching positive campaign programming?

But the most dangerous poll of all is one that follows polling questions with a solicitation offer to join an elite club based on your ‘excellent’ answers – and then obtains your credit card information (account name, account number, expiration date, and safety code) and then explains that they are required by law to obtain your social security number to meet federal election reporting requirements. While donors may have to provide occupation information and indicate if they are organizational entities, the FEC (Federal Election Commission) never requires individuals to divulge or file social security numbers as part of the donation process.

Bottom line …

It is time to wake up and realize that all pollsters, like most politicians, are not honest. And some are professional evildoers intent on assuming your identity or draining your bank account.

Forewarned is forearmed.

-- steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


RUSSIAN COLLUSION: THE DEMOCRATS DID IT!

house

The preface of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence’s Report on Russian Active Measures dated March 22, 2018, reads as follows …

“In 2015, Russia began engaging in a covert influence campaign aimed at the U.S. presidential election. The Russian government, at the direction of President Vladimir Putin, sought to sow discord in American society and undermine our faith in the democratic process. Now, more than a year after the election, the American people rightfully want to know what the Russians did; how they did it; with whose support, if anyone's; and what can be done to counter any election tampering by foreign adversaries in the future.”

Unfortunately, while the Russians may have played a minor role in disrupting the U.S. presidential election, evidence revealed to date suggests that the Democrat Party and its agents and operatives did more to disrupt the U.S. Presidential election and damage the reputation of long-admired government institutions than the Russians. And, that President Obama and the Obama Administration were criminally complicit in conspiring to disrupt the U.S. presidential election, and when Donald J. Trump was elected to the Presidency of the United States, to delegitimize the President of the United States and those associated with his nascent administration.

This situation has reached the stage of a constitutional crisis, the likes of which America has never experienced. It is not a conspiracy theory created by wing-nuts who derive their power and profits from selling such drivel. It is not a series of facts woven together into a blanket of unbelievable allegations. “We the people” can plainly see, perhaps for the first time, how the Democrats subverted democracy, aided and abetted by the progressive elements of the mainstream media.

And, deeply entrenched in this conspiracy narrative, one finds presidential candidate Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee all pointing the finger toward Donald Trump and claiming collusion with the Russians. If anything, it was the Obama Administration, Hillary Clinton and their respective cadre of acolytes that perpetrated this fraud, this crime against Americans, America, and our Constitution.

Let us consider some of the significant issues …

Before Donald Trump was elected to office, we find that the top leadership of the Obama Administration involved in covering up proven criminal activities of Russian operatives and the involvement of key Democrat politicians in the transfer of twenty-percent of America’s uranium production to a Russian state-controlled firm. As part of this Russian activity, we can find evidence that the Clinton Foundation received over 100 million dollars from the participants in this transaction as well as Bill Clinton receiving $750,000 in speaking fees from a Russian entity.

There is little or no doubt in my mind that Hillary Clinton deliberately set up a private email server to shield her activities from the government, the media, and the American public. There is little or no doubt in my mind that Hillary Clinton violated the Espionage Act for handling classified information as well as destroying government documents and obstructing justice. Yet, rather than investigate the obvious criminal activities of the Obama Administration, the leadership of the nation’s intelligence agencies and top law enforcement agency decided to ignore or excuse crimes committed on their watch to pursue a case against Donald Trump. A case that centers around a questionable document jointly paid for by the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee. A case that shows payments laundered through a law firm to a firm connected with Russian operatives. A case that shows an active attempt to ensnare and entrap key Trump associates in a set-up by a known Russian operative whose entry visa was approved by the Obama Administration.

How many other people have noticed that one of the key charges against the Trump team is based on the alleged Russian hacking of an email server belonging to the DNC? Why you might ask, did the DNC refuse to allow the FBI – friendly as they were to the Obama Administration and Hillary Clinton – to forensically evaluate the server? Perhaps it is because a noted group of well-credentialed intelligence analysts with superb technical skills noted that the server could not have been hacked over the internet, but the evidence shows that the information was transferred to an attached memory device, probably by an insider.

How many people have noticed that high-ranking members of the intelligence community, law enforcement, and the Department of Justice refused to investigate the facts or fudged their conclusions and actions? One need only look at the involvement of some of these people in grievous miscarriages of justice to question their competence and conflicts of interest in any investigation.

Bottom line …

Has anyone else noticed that among all of the leaks of classified and non-classified government information, one document remains hidden? The one document that could embarrass the President of the United States and severely damage his credibility? I am speaking of Donald Trump’s personal and corporate income taxes. Perhaps this is the reason that Trump refuses to appoint a special prosecutor – or order Attorney Jeff Sessions to appoint a special prosecutor – to example all of the issues surrounding The Obama Administration and the Clinton crew.

Ask yourself, where was the grand jury? Where were the subpoenas? Why is nobody looking at the Clinton attorneys who destroyed government documents, destroyed evidence under subpoena, and obstructed justice?

The fix is in … but, I can’t explain why nobody is interested in knowing the truth.

We are so screwed.

-- steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


GOING HOGG WILD – CO-OPTING THE SLOGAN ASSOCIATED WITH THE HOLOCAUST

A few observations on David Hogg …

demogogue

(1)  Because you were a participant, observer, or victim of a horrific crime involving a weapon does not make you a subject-matter expert on crime, gun-related violence, or gun control.

(2)  Because you are backed by well-financed activists and agitators, does not mean that your word carries any more weight than any other attention-seeking hyper-partisan hysteric.

(3)  Because you fail to hold the government, both federal (FBI) and local (police department) accountable, perhaps because your father is a former FBI agent, is disingenuous and inexcusable.

(4)  I find it morally repressible that you associate your movement with a slogan that clearly refers to the Jews in Israel in response to the human-caused catastrophe known as the holocaust.

(5)  And, I find you an attention-seeking media whore, crisis actor, and all around repugnant fool.

An example of exploitation …

9781984801838

#NeverAgain -- A NEW GENERATION DRAWS THE LINE
by
DAVID HOGG and LAUREN HOGG

Kindle | $6.99 – Amazon
Paper   | $9.00 – Amazon

Published by Random House Trade Paperbacks
Jun 05, 2018 | 176 Pages | 4-3/8 x 6-1/4| ISBN 978-19-8480183-8

From the publisher …

ABOUT #NEVERAGAIN

From two students of Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School comes a declaration for our times, and an in-depth look at the making of the #NeverAgain movement that arose after the Parkland, Florida, shooting.

[OCS: I wonder if he will duly credit the organizing effort of the well-funded and highly-organized activists and agitators who enabled Hogg to represent an astro-turf movement while simultaneously shouting down fellow students with opposing viewpoints?]

On February 14, 2018, seventeen-year-old David Hogg and his fourteen-year-old sister, Lauren, went to school at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, like any normal Wednesday. That day, of course, the world changed. By the next morning, with seventeen classmates and faculty dead, they had joined the leadership of a movement to save their own lives, and the lives of all other young people in America. It’s a leadership position they did not seek, and did not want–but events gave them no choice.

[One might say they were overcome by the circumstances and further exploited by the very same adults whose maxim is “never let a crisis go to waste.”]

The morning after the massacre, David Hogg told CNN: “We’re children. You guys are the adults. You need to take some action and play a role. Work together. Get over your politics and get something done.”

[OCS: Had Hogg been taught how to employ critical thinking, he would have found that you cannot control criminals, crazies, and terrorists who do not respect nor obey the law. Or, at the very least, that it was the government who failed the students – the FBI after credible actionable information and the local policemen who refused to engage the shooter. What would Hogg do if a vehicle was used to kill a number of students gathered in a cluster after school? Ban vehicles in the vicinity of a school? Does this little weasel realize that fools like himself are only building larger victim pools by disarming law-abiding citizens?]

This book is a manifesto for the movement begun that day, one that has already changed America–with voices of a new generation that are speaking truth to power, and are determined to succeed where their elders have failed.

[Manifesto? I doubt Hogg could have defined the word before being coached by the progressive socialist democrats with their anti-gun rhetoric and ill-informed propaganda. Yes, the previous generation failed. Failed to enforce existing laws. Failed to teach their children individualism, resiliency, and how to think for themselves. And created a generation of weak-kneed snowflakes that need safe spaces and crying rooms. Not to mention excusing Blacks and other minorities from being punished for their disruptive and/or criminal activities to keep the incarceration statistics from revealing the deeper truth: certain minorities commit more crime than non-minorities. This viewpoint does not make me a racist, it makes me a realist.]

With moral force and clarity, a new generation has made it clear that problems previously deemed unsolvable due to powerful lobbies and political cowardice will be theirs to solve.

[Hogg lacks moral force and clarity if he cannot even recognize that the real problem is a lack of understanding of human nature and political corruption. The very people who support “his movement” are those that are the most corrupt and dangerous. You cannot solve problems of human nature with laws, statutes, rules and regulations. If criminals, crazies, and terrorists lack guns, they will use something else. Ask the London Mayor who now wants to impose “knife control” in his city.]

Born just after Columbine and raised amid seemingly endless war and routine active shooter drills, this generation now says, Enough.

[They say it – but want to enforce it at the point of a gun in an intolerant, totalitarian communist society. And, Hogg is too preoccupied with the tactics of socialism to realize the strategic goals of totalitarianism. One being the elimination of the Second Amendment and the right of the people to resist government tyranny and engage in self-defense.]

This book is their statement of purpose, and the story of their lives. It is the essential guide to the #NeverAgain movement. [Bullpucky!]

Bottom line …

I don’t plan to buy this book because it will not even make good toilet paper after the leftists destroy our society.

We are so screwed.

-- steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


RADICAL LEFT WANTS TO BAN "HONEST SCIENCE"

For those of you who may be unfamiliar with the scientific method, it is a simple methodology. A researcher forms a hypothesis (“a supposition or proposed explanation made on the basis of limited evidence as a starting point for further investigation”), creates an experiment or model, collects data, analyzes the data, forms conclusions, and then publishes the work so it may be replicated, validated, or falsified. To the extent that the work is published in a peer-reviewed publication, one needs to understand that peer review is an editorial process designed to weed out inappropriate content, clarify meanings, and eliminate obvious errors. Neither the reviewers nor the journal replicate the  experiment, examine the data, or vouch for the accuracy and sufficiency of the results.

Unfortunately, we find that while many institutions and scientists have a legitimate claim to hard-to-obtain and costly research data, that does not mean that independent researchers should not have access (under a non-disclosure agreement) to allow for the replication, validation, or falsification of the study and its conclusion. In many instances, the methodology of gathering and/or statistically manipulating the data can have material and significant effect on the outcome of an experiment and the conclusions presented.

Since using science to justify the implementation of public policy, especially public policy that results in limitations on individual freedom, increased taxes, and has no provisions for accountability, it is important that the underlying science be vetted by not only qualified scientists, but amateurs who have often contributed to science without formal training or training in unconnected disciplines.

So why is the Environmental Protection Agency Administrator, Scott Pruitt, being merciless attacked by those who are upset that the EPA has proposed a new rule that declares that public policy must be based on open scientific research. Or according to Pruitt, “The era of secret science at EPA is coming to an end. The ability to test, authenticate, and reproduce scientific findings is vital for the integrity of the rule-making process. Americans deserve to assess the legitimacy of the science underpinning EPA decisions that may impact their lives.”

From the EPA’s press release …

EPA Administrator Pruitt Proposes Rule To Strengthen Science Used In EPA Regulations

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Scott Pruitt signed a proposed rule to strengthen the science used in regulations issued by EPA. The rule will ensure that the regulatory science underlying Agency actions is fully transparent, and that underlying scientific information is publicly available in a manner sufficient for independent validation.

This proposed rule is in line with the scientific community’s moves toward increased data sharing to address the “replication crisis”—a growing recognition that a significant proportion of published research may not be reproducible.  The proposal is consistent with data access requirements for major scientific journals like Science, Nature, and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences as well as recommendations from the Bipartisan Policy Center’s Science for Policy Project and the Administrative Conference of the United States’ Science in the Administrative Process Project.

<Source: EPA Administrator Pruitt Proposes Rule To Strengthen Science Used In EPA Regulations | U.S. EPA News Releases | US EPA>

An example of the radical left’s disingenuous, dishonest, and disgusting anti-science spin courtesy of the Los Angeles Times …

Continue reading "RADICAL LEFT WANTS TO BAN "HONEST SCIENCE"" »


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


'They Were Never Going to Let Me Be President' -- Hillary Clinton

233-chin_thrust

Nothing angers me more that a blind and stupid hyper-partisan progressive political reporter who ignores the evidence before their very eyes and goes on to write about a loathsome crooked liar in sympathetic terms …

‘They Were Never Going to Let Me Be President’
Covering Hillary Clinton’s campaign from before it started to the very last moment.
By Amy Chozick (New York Times – April 20, 2018)

Things were already looking bad when, several people told me, Chelsea Clinton popped the Champagne. It was just after 9 p.m. on election night and she was having her hair and makeup done in the family’s suite at the Peninsula hotel. She stopped to pour what someone said was Veuve Clicquot into everyone’s glasses, figuring that in a couple of hours Donald Trump’s run of early victories in red states (West Virginia, Oklahoma, Alabama) would end and the map would turn back in her mom’s favor.

Three hours later, the Rust Belt was awash in red, and somebody had to tell Hillary Clinton.

Supporters of Hillary Clinton watching results at the campaign’s election night event at the Jacob Javits Center in New York. Credit Todd Heisler/The New York Times

Robby Mook, the drained and deflated campaign manager, told his boss she was going to lose. She didn’t seem all that surprised.

“I knew it. I knew this would happen to me,” she said, now within a couple of inches of Mr. Mook’s ashen face. “They were never going to let me be president.”

OCS: Part of the problem was that Hillary believed that she should be coronated rather than democratically elected. That this was her turn at office. Part of the problem was that Hillary is truly unlikeable, unable to have a conversation without the person being selected and scripted. He disdain for law enforcement, military, and servants was palpable. Part of the problem was that Hillary was about pretending to champion women while defending her sexual predator rapist husband and destroying his accusers. Part of the problem was that Hillary was a crooked and conniving individual who conspired to interfere with the Bernie Sanders campaign and to mount a historic dirty trick on the opposition. Let us not forget that Hillary chose to use a private email server to avoid public disclosure and committed numerous felonies in the process; not to mention selling her office to those Russia-connected operatives who would enrich the Clinton Foundation and Bill Clinton personally. And, let us not forget that Hillary’s people believed data and models trumped campaign expertise and simply did not campaign in the key states that would have put her into the Presidency.

Thus we can only conclude that “they are the citizens who did not like what they saw in Hillary Clinton and preferred Bernie Sanders or Donald Trump. Trump, if for no reason other than he was not an unpleasant, crooked, lying, crony Marxist like Hillary Clinton.]

In July 2013, Jill Abramson, the former executive editor of The New York Times, put me on the “Hillary beat” ahead of the 2016 election. It was 649 days before Mrs. Clinton would announce she was running for president again, 1,226 days before she would lose to Mr. Trump.

Every major life decision in my 20s and 30s — when to get married, where to buy an apartment, whether to freeze my eggs until after the election — had revolved around a single looming question: What about Hillary Clinton?

[OCS: And the author wants people to believe that she is a well-respected, impartial reporter of the facts rather than the hyper-partisan hack she has proven herself to be?]

I figured that if anyone knew whom Mrs. Clinton was referring to with that insidious “they” that, like some invisible army of adversaries (real and imagined), wielded its collective power and caused her to lose the most winnable presidential election in modern history, it was me.

[Yea, verily – for I am an objective truth-teller that can separate the perception from the reality. NOT!]

They were the vast-right wing conspiracy. They were the patriarchy that could never let an ambitious former first lady finally shatter “that highest, hardest glass ceiling.” They were the people of Wisconsin and James Comey. They were white suburban women who would rather vote for a man who bragged about sexual assault than a woman who seemed an affront to who they were.

[OCS: Soviet-style class warfare. Dividing America by race and sex to get traction. It’s the way of progressive socialist democrats. As for James Comey, if it wasn’t for his machinations and misreading of the law, she would be conducting her interviews from her prison cell. And, no matter what Donald Trump may or may not have done, it pales in comparison to her rapist husband and his pedophile friends on the Lolita Express. Or the Kennedys, or Chris Dodd and others.]

And yes, they were political reporters (“big egos and no brains,” she called us) hounding her about her emails and transfixed by the spectacle of the first reality TV show candidate.

[OCS: If one were an honest broker, one might note that the entirety of politics was reality television – especially those staged congressional hearings where members roll-in, get their face time with inane questions, and roll-out to meet the media to explain what they really meant to say before the put their foot in their mouth.]

It’s dizzying to realize that without even knowing it, you’ve ended up on the wrong side of history. Months after the election, every time I heard the words “Russia” and “collude,” this realization swirled in my head, enveloping everything.

[OCS: This is not the time to mention history – because never before has the Democrat Party put up such an unlikeable and corrupt candidate for the nation’s highest office. The words “Russia” and “collude” are all part of the disinformation campaign designed to distract the American public from the fact that Hillary Clinton violated the Espionage Act as well as participated in giving 20% of America’s uranium production to the Russians.]


Now we have an administration with hardly an everyday American in it. We are all living through the chaos of the Trump presidency, and Robert Mueller continues to dig into the possibility of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. Hillary Clinton has settled into a surreal life of speaking at women’s conferences. I’ve started to see the “they” she spoke about on election night differently.

[OCS: Politicians are never everyday Americans. As for the chaos of the Trump presidency, perhaps it can be linked to Obama holdovers who are agitating and leaking to put forth a false narrative? Mueller has spend more than one year and millions of dollars trying to hang Trump, but has found nothing except peripheral matters that have no connection to the campaign and deal with people who are not Trump. Meanwhile, Mueller is not honest enough to investigate the Clinton-Russia links including her payment of a Russia-connected source (Fusion GPS) and Russian operatives who provided specious dirt on Trump and the Trump campaign.]

They were Facebook algorithms and data breaches. They were Fake News drummed up by Vladimir Putin’s digital army. They were shadowy hackers who stole her campaign chairman’s emails hoping to weaken our democracy with Mr. Podesta’s risotto recipe. And they were The Times and me and all the other journalists who covered those stolen emails.

[OCS: It is more likely than not that the emails were not hacked but released by a Sanders sympathizer. Which brings up the destruction of government property and emails by the Clinton lawyers; and the improper storage of government emails on Huma Abedin’s computer. Podesta’s own staff compromised his email – and you do not hear anyone suggesting that the information was not true and accurate.]

Of course, these outside forces wouldn’t have mattered or weighed so heavily on me, on the country, had Hillary Clinton, her campaign and her longtime aides — the same box of broken toys who’d enabled all of her worst instincts since the 1990s — not let the election get so close in the first place. The Russians, after all, didn’t hack into her calendar and delete the Wisconsin rallies.

[OCS: This is the money shot – Clinton herself and her arrogance did her in.]

I never told anyone this, but one time when I’d been visiting the Brooklyn campaign headquarters I found an iPhone in the women’s restroom. I wasn’t sure, but it seemed to belong to Mr. Podesta’s assistant because when I picked it up, a flood of calendar alerts for him popped up. I placed it on the sink counter, went into the stall, came out and washed my hands. I left the phone sitting there, worried that if I turned it in, even touched it again, aides would think I had snooped. This seemed a violation that would at best get my invitation to the headquarters rescinded and at worst get me booted off the beat for unethical behavior.

[OCS: Unethical behavior – by a New York Times’ reporter – unbelievable!]

I can’t explain why, in the heat of breaking news, I thought covering John Podesta’s hacked emails was any different.

<Source: They Were Never Going to Let Me Be President’ - The New York Times>

Bottom line …

The Democrats, in all their corruption, gave us Donald Trump as the President of the United States. And, from what I can see, with the exception of Obamacare and the profligate budget, he is doing a wonderful job. At least he has not destroyed two countries (Libya and Lebanon) with his political foolishness as did Clinton. He has not mounted an allegedly unconstitutional and illegal arms deal that resulted in the deaths of four Americans and the wounding of an unspecified number of participants – all who were forced to sign non-disclosure agreements.

We are screwed – but not as much under Trump as we would have been under Hillary Clinton and her cadre of sycophants and reporters.

-- steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


JUSTICE: DEMOCRAT CAMPAIGN WORKERS DEMANDING A "LIVING WAGE"

In the name of “fairness,” it appears that the Democrat Party, famous for exploiting their own campaign workers with low wages and long hours will be facing the wrath of union organizers. The recently formed Campaign Workers Guild is claiming to have “organized” at least a dozen Democrat campaigns as well as one political consulting firm. After all, all the big players are making big bucks and very little other than pizzas and lemonade flow downward.

I wonder if the leadership recognizes the rhetoric in the “mission statement” …

THE CAMPAIGN WORKERS GUILD

Every worker deserves fair wages, a sustainable career with reasonable hours, and respect from management.

The Democratic Party, in particular, is a champion of labor rights, except where its own laborers are concerned. Campaign workers routinely work more than twice the standard workweek for less than minimum wage and no healthcare benefits. We sacrifice our health, financial security, and leisure time to support candidates and movements that we hope will make our society more prosperous, equitable, and inclusive. It’s time for our employers to live up to the values they publicly espouse.

Until now, no organization has devoted itself to protecting and strengthening the rights of campaign workers –  so we’re standing together and making our own.

We, as campaign staff, believe that campaigns cannot fully fight for workers’ rights while they’re exploiting their own campaign staff. Pro-labor candidates must hire unionized organizers; if they don’t, they’re not pro-labor. Working from one election cycle to the next should not mean working from paycheck to paycheck. It shouldn’t mean having to put up with unsafe housing and abusive bosses. And it should never mean staying silent about sexual harassment or racism out of fear of being blacklisted.  

We aim to empower organizers, improve working conditions on campaigns, and promote healthy career longevity. Every time an organizer burns out and leaves the field, the movement is drained of valuable skills, experience, and connections. By protecting and strengthening campaign workers’ rights, we can build stronger, more successful campaigns. We also must ensure that this work is accessible to all, not just those with the privilege of being able to rely on their families for financial support or a place to crash between campaigns. Only when our work is fairly compensated, our experience properly valued, and our rights adequately protected will our mission be complete. Until then, we as organizers must organize ourselves. <Source>

Bottom line …

At least one campaign has agreed to: “a base wage of $21 an hour with paid sick time and health benefits that now include dental and vision coverage. Harassment guidelines are spelled out. Members pay $30 a month in dues.” Wonderful $360 per year in dues plus employers contributions for health and pension – what a wonderful concept for the union leadership.

I cannot wait until the Guild demands that other unions honor their agreements and stand in solidarity in putting pressure on campaigns to sign the collective bargaining agreements. I wonder if union-shop printers will refuse to print campaign literature for miscreants who do not sign the agreement? I wonder if unionized campaign workers will throw insults – and maybe rocks – at non-union scabs who dare work for the candidate of their choice without having their pocket picked?

I cannot wait until the campaign expands to cover long-suffering volunteers or demands a $15 per hour living wage which would raise the cost of campaigns significantly. I can just imagine, with some glee, a union organizer holding a candidate and his campaign hostage until he signs a collective bargaining agreement – complete with mandatory union membership, automatic collection of dues, and giving the best jobs to those with seniority instead of those who are efficient and effective. The nascent union is even using The Action Network, the formidable organizing platform to execute their recruitment campaign.

Hoisted on their own Petard. It is likely that this union will be crushed by a bigger, more well-financed operation like the socialist/communist SEIU.

Since the union does not appear to have a logo, might I suggest this one …

donkey-screwed

-- steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


TRUMP/CLINTON/RUSSIA: WHO COLLUDED WITH WHOM?

I have been asked by some of my readers, how I track fast-changing events. And, sometimes you just have to draw a diagram to keep the players straight ...

TRUMP-RUSSIA-COLLUSION

Bottom line ...

This is how it appears to me now.

It looks like a classic Hillary Clinton disinformation campaign that somehow succeeded beyond their wildest dreams. Unfortunately, considering the involvement of non-partisan institutions, the issue has morphed from simple campaign operations to what appears to be an attempt by the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee to fix a campaign (defeat Sanders & Trump) -- and when that failed -- to delegitimize the President of the United States.

The ploy to make it about Trump-Russia collusion appears to have backfired as we are seeing a definite criminal conspiracy involving President Obama, high-ranking members of his administration, and agents of Russia involved in the Uranium One scandal, the donations to the Clinton Foundation, speaking engagements to pay Bill Clinton personally, and of course, the use of a Russia-connected firm, Fusion GPS, to use Russian operatives to dish unverifiable dirt on now President Trump.

Part of the problem with Robert Mueller is that he has not interviewed the Russian operative who infamously met with Trump associates including Don, Jr., Jared Kushner, and others -- and allegedly reported to Fusion GPS before and after the meeting. This is direct Russian involvement and who signed-off on the entry permit of this operative should have been of great interest to Mueller and his team.

Unfortunately, it appears that Mueller, as well as other team members, have significant conflicts of interest due to their involvement in non-Trump-related matters involving the Democrat party.

Until this matter is resolved to the satisfaction of the American public, we can no longer trust the progressive socialist Democrats in either domestic or foreign affairs.

-- steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


TRUMP ATTORNEY MICHAEL COHEN IS IRRELEVANT

A number of readers have asked about my impression of Trump’s attorney Michael Cohen and if he presents a real danger to the Presidency.

trump-cohen

The answer is we do not know what we do not know.

But from appearances sake, based on public records and his published utterances, we can conclude that, like so many people surrounding Donald Trump, attorney Michael Cohen, is less than “first-rate.”

Essentially he graduated from a no-name law school and started out as a personal injury “slip-and-fall lawyer.” An alleged “tough-guy and fixer” working his way up the food chain among a background of taxi-cab medallion owners, shady friends, and questionable colleagues – many of whom have been disbarred or convicted of criminal activities. Many Russian, but mostly Ukrainian. Some said to have ties with the Ukrainian underworld.

Many believe that Cohen relinquished his job as the Executive Vice-President of the Trump Organization and special counsel to Donald Trump to become Trump’s personal attorney for the sole purposes of pulling a “Hillary Clinton” – hiding behind the attorney-client privilege to protect the principal client.

Like Trump, Cohen is not ideological, and his party affiliations switched back-and-forth between progressive socialist Democrat and Republican depending on the time and the advantage to his business affairs.

sater-card

And, like the Moscow-born Felix Henry Sater (AKA Felix Mikhailovich Sheferovsky), who served as a senior advisor to Donald Trump and appears to be connected with a number of Russian and Ukrainian projects involving Donald Trump, Cohen appears to be an opportunist settling for whatever profitable crumbs drop from the master’s table. Both apparently swearing lifetime allegiance to Trump.

Bottom line …

Let us not forget that Donald Trump’s father was a less than sterling character and possessed many of the traits and beliefs now emulated by his son, Donald J. Trump. So while Trump may be unconventional and uncouth, that does not necessarily make him a bad president. And, he might just be the man we need to shake up politics in America. One need only look at what he has done in Syria, Iran, and North Korea – things that Barack Obama was either unwilling or unable to do – and are net positives for America. His only significant flaws, in my eyes, are signing the profligate spending bill and failing to repeal and replace Obamacare.

Of course, Trump is infinitely better than the alternative – Hillary Clinton or the other anointed price, Jeb Bush.

But, I would tend to believe that the raid on Cohen’s office and home by the US Attorney's Office in Manhattan may be more about his real estate deals and his activities involving Russians and Ukrainians than Donald Trump and any suggestion of election coordination, collusion, or conspiracy with the Russians.

Cohen is a footnote in the sands of history and unlikely to be part of the silent coup that is infecting American politics.

We are so screwed.

-- steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS