Previous month:
September 2016
Next month:
November 2016

IT APPEARS THAT SILICON VALLEY HAS TURNED ITS BACK ON A FREE AND OPEN INTERNET AND HAVE EMBRACED THE CORPORATISM AND IDEOLOGY OF THE LEFT - PART II

Yesterday I wrote a blog post on internet freedom, today I illustrate the depth of collusion between the largest search provider and the Clinton campaign.

IT APPEARS THAT SILICON VALLEY HAS TURNED ITS BACK ON A FREE AND OPEN INTERNET AND HAVE EMBRACED THE CORPORATISM AND IDEOLOGY OF THE LEFT

With the outright exception for child pornography, few things should be censored on the internet, especially political speech. But, unfortunately, as pioneering content creators and carriers grew bigger, the urge to cozy up to the Washington establishment became a priority. One, to stave off regulatory battles favoring older common carriers; and two, to preserve tax breaks and other privileges that seem to flow to billion dollar corporations with political connections. Hence, we see members of the Silicon Valley elite expand beyond their usual haunts and exploring the halls of Congress or being hosted at White House events. All to the benefit of the progressive socialist democrats and their life-long dream to control the levers of public communication and discourse in America. Censoring, much in the same way the IRS denied right-wing organizations their rightful tax exempt status to curtail their free political speech, anything which cast aspersions on the progressive socialist democrats, their toxic ideology, and more importantly, the tools and techniques that they employ to embed themselves in American life like a fifth column, to destroy America from within. All with the purpose of bringing about unicorns, self-licking lollypops, and a totally fair society, with equal “justice” for all – except the elite rulers, academics, and special interests.  Source: IT APPEARS THAT SILICON VALLEY HAS TURNED ITS BACK ON A FREE AND OPEN INTERNET AND HAVE EMBRACED THE CORPORATISM AND IDEOLOGY OF THE LEFT - One Citizen Speaking

While you may personally decry the hacking of personal email accounts, allegedly by the Russians, and the subsequent publication of these emails by WikiLeaks, the information is now in the public domain and has revealed a stunning depth of corruption within both the Obama Administration and the Clinton campaign machine. 

googlex

There was a time when Google’s mantra was “Don’t be evil.” Now I am not so sure …

Leaked Email Reveals Google Chairman Wanted To Be Clinton Campaign’s ‘Head Outside Advisor’

Eric Schmidt, executive chairman of Google’s parent company Alphabet, wanted to be “head outside advisor” to the Hillary Clinton campaign, according to Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta in an email released by WikiLeaks.

WikiLeaks has continued to reveal Schmidt’s cozy relationship with the Clinton campaign. In a previously leaked email, a memo showed that Schmidt was working directly with the Clinton campaign on setting up various backend features to their website.

In an April 2014 email from Podesta to Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook discussing the launch of Hillary’s campaign, Podesta described how much Schmidt wanted to work with the campaign.

“I met with Eric Schmidt tonight. As David reported, he’s ready to fund, advise recruit talent, etc. He was more deferential on structure than I expected. Wasn’t pushing to run through one of his existing firms. Clearly wants to be head outside advisor, but didn’t seem like he wanted to push others out,” Podesta wrote. He added, “Clearly wants to get going. He’s still in DC tomorrow and would like to meet with you if you are in DC in the afternoon. I think it’s worth doing. You around? If you are, and want to meet with him, maybe the four of us can get on the phone in the am.” Cheryl Mills was copied on the email and let Podesta know that Mook wouldn’t be able to make the call that day because he was in Australia. Mook said that she was correct but would love to talk to Schmidt eventually.

Podesta wrote back: “The thing [Schmidt] really pressed me hard on was geography. Very committed to the idea that this be done in a city where young coders would want to be, preferably outer borough NYC. Thought No Cal was priced out of the market and too into itself. Thought DC lacked talent in this arena.”  The Clinton campaign ended up putting their headquarters in Brooklyn, an outer borough.

In another email released Sunday by WikiLeaks, Tina Flourney, Bill Clinton’s personal chief of staff, said in February 2015 that Schmidt asked to meet with President Clinton and that they would do so on that Friday. Flourney later wrote in the email chain, “it is about the business he proposes to do with the campaign. He says he’s met with [Hillary Clinton].” Podesta responded, “Yup. I’ve talked to him too. Robby is in touch with his team. I see no harm in [Bill Clinton] seeing him.” Flourney replied, “FYI. They are donating the Google plane for the Africa trip.” 

Source:  Leaked Email: Google Chairman Wants To Be Clinton's Advisor | The Daily Caller 

Bottom line …

In an age of political corruption where the slightest whiff of scandal is magnified by a hyper-partisan media, just searching on the wrong term or looking at the wrong page could become campaign fodder for the muckrakers and opposition researchers. Not to mention the deletion or misindexing negative information on the candidate of your choice. When you control the keys to the electronic kingdom, the opportunities for both good and evil abound.

That is not to say that Google has done anything wrong, but the opportunity exists – especially when working with the Clinton crime machine. There are few safeguards for material that appears on the internet and the entire subject of site indexing and the presentation of search results is shrouded in proprietary mystery.

In the final analysis, you cannot trust the Clintons, with their history of political corruption and selling out the nation to foreign entities. As they say, “lie down with dogs and you will get up with fleas.” We must break this cycle of corruption by electing Donald Trump – he is the only one who can stop the Clinton crime machine from taking over the government and implementing its corrupt Marxist ideology while draining the treasury on behalf of their friends who funded their despicable campaign.

We are so screwed.

-- steve


“Nullius in verba.”-- take nobody's word for it!

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell



UNHAPPY HALLOWEEN 2016 -- KEEP THE CORRUPT, LYING WITCH OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE

htw

There is nothing more to be said.

-- steve


“Nullius in verba.”-- take nobody's word for it!

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell



IT APPEARS THAT SILICON VALLEY HAS TURNED ITS BACK ON A FREE AND OPEN INTERNET AND HAVE EMBRACED THE CORPORATISM AND IDEOLOGY OF THE LEFT

With the outright exception for child pornography, few things should be censored on the internet, especially political speech. But, unfortunately, as pioneering content creators and carriers grew bigger, the urge to cozy up to the Washington establishment became a priority. One, to stave off regulatory battles favoring older common carriers; and two, to preserve tax breaks and other privileges that seem to flow to billion dollar corporations with political connections. Hence, we see members of the Silicon Valley elite expand beyond their usual haunts and exploring the halls of Congress or being hosted at White House events. All to the benefit of the progressive socialist democrats and their life-long dream to control the levers of public communication and discourse in America. Censoring, much in the same way the IRS denied right-wing organizations their rightful tax exempt status to curtail their free political speech, anything which cast aspersions on the progressive socialist democrats, their toxic ideology, and more importantly, the tools and techniques that they employ to embed themselves in American life like a fifth column, to destroy America from within. All with the purpose of bringing about unicorns, self-licking lollypops, and a totally fair society, with equal “justice” for all – except the elite rulers, academics, and special interests.

How else can you explain the censorship of Pagers University’s conservative and constitutional videos which YouTube placed in “restricted” status usually reserved for sexually explicit materials although the ideas discussed could be found in any high school civics class?

Look at the titles being censored by using “restricted access” …

  • The Dark Art of Political Intimidation
  • Are The Police Racist?
  • Why Don't Feminists Fight for Muslim Women?
  • Why Did America Fight the Korean War?
  • Who's More Pro-Choice: Europe or America?
    What ISIS Wants
  • Why Are There Still Palestinian Refugees?
  • Islamic Terror: What Muslim Americans Can Do
  • Did Bush Lie About Iraq?
  • Who NOT to Vote For
  • Don't Judge Blacks Differently
  • Israel: The World's Most Moral Army
  • Radical Islam: The Most Dangerous Ideology
  • The Most Important Question About Abortion
  • Why Do People Become Islamic Extremists?
  • What is the University Diversity Scam?
  • He Wants You
  • Israel's Legal Founding
  • Pakistan: Can Sharia and Freedom Coexist?

Controversial? Maybe only to those who do not want the opposing side from a conservative organization that glorifies the United States Constitution to be in wide distribution among the young. I can also see with the pro-Muslim Obama Administration and their henchmen would want to suppress the open discussion of good versus evil, right versus wrong, and moral versus immoral. With corporate toadies trying to curry political favor by taking such actions as favors the party in power, in this case, the progressive socialist democrats. Whether or not this is the choice of a few well-placed individuals or a matter of corporate policy is not clear. But the corporations certainly know of the issue, so one can only assume that it is a matter of corporate policy.

The Kim Strassel (Wall Street Journal) video: one can well imagine why this video, innocuous as it is, might offend the lawless Obama Administration and their corporate toadies …

ks-t

da

Partial transcript …

This is the United States of America. You are totally free to express your political views. No one is going to tell you what you can say or how you can say it, right? But what if you thought you’d be audited by the IRS or have your business boycotted or even lose your job? Would you speak freely then?

This isn’t a hypothetical question. It’s happening to Americans right now. It’s what I call “The Intimidation Game.”

The object of this very real “game” is to make political opponents pay a high price for expressing their opinions. It was a standard technique in the Jim Crow South in the 1950’s. It was used by racist southern Democrats to shut up black civil rights groups like the NAACP. And now these tactics have been revived and improved upon by today’s Democratic Party and their allies on the Progressive Left. They want to shut up conservatives; just like racists once wanted to shut up blacks and their liberal supporters. 

They do it in three ways. First, they harass; Second, they investigate and prosecute; and third, they blackmail.

Tactic number one: Harass.

They sic federal and state agencies and bureaucrats on their political enemies. Remember the IRS targeting scandal that began in 2010? That’s when the IRS systematically denied or delayed non-profit status to more than 400 citizen-activist groups, almost all conservative. These groups, representing tens of thousands of Americans, clearly met the IRS’s tax-exempt standards. But the IRS delay and denial made it impossible for these groups to raise or spend money during the 2012 presidential election. Had they been able to, would the election have turned out differently? We’ll never know. Some of these groups are still waiting for their nonprofit approval.

Read more or see the video yourself … PragerU

Bottom line …

The progressive social democrats have a goal: international socialism/communism, a playbook authored by radical activist Saul Alinsky titled: “Rules for Radicals,” and they deeply believe that the end justifies the means, fair or foul. It is about time that someone provided the American public with the toolset needed to foster critical thinking about the subjects we encounter everyday, especially from the progressive mainstream media. With knowledge comes power is still a truism as is “forewarned is forearmed.” You can’t begin to deal with a problem if you cannot name it or define it in terms that impact your country, your neighborhood, or your life.

I am not asking you to do anything except be aware of the actions of those who believe in a free and open internet – even after they have made it big. Call out those who have made it big and now want to close their platforms to anything that is not profitable, draws a larger audience, or interferes with the company’s political clout.

We are so screwed.

-- steve


“Nullius in verba.”-- take nobody's word for it!

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell



WHY? WHY DID DONALD TRUMP SELECT A KNOWN SOROS ASSOCIATE TO RUN HIS NATIONAL CAMPAIGN FINANCES?

With the latest round of financial reports filed with the Federal Elections Commission, one can only wonder why Donald Trump’s finances are on the meager side – in spite of his boast that he would self-fund his campaign with “whatever it takes?”  Even more curious is Trump’s choice of a known George Soros associate to head up his national campaign.

DTSM

There is no doubt that Trump has run an unconventional campaign. The question is did he shortchange himself?

-- steve


“Nullius in verba.”-- take nobody's word for it!

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell



HEAD-FAKE: IS JAMES COMEY'S GAME ONE OF DIVERSION OR DISTRACTION?

What is going on here?

JCHF

From his press conference allegedly exonerating Hillary Clinton’s email scandal by saying she acted recklessly and that the matter did not warrant a criminal referral to his latest missive disclosing more emails have been found in another case investigation, one wonders if Comey’s motives are personal (to save his reputation for a highly unusual and suspect investigation), professional (to avoid resigning over what might appear to be election tampering), or simply to restore the public’s confidence in what appears to be a highly politicized FBI?

Is this latest disclosure a headfake to distract and divert attention from a major WikiLeaks disclosure of the quid-pro-quo relationship between the Clinton Foundation, a consulting company, and the former Secretary of State – complete with employees with massive conflicts of interest created by working for one or more entities while still employed by the State Department?

Or is Comey trying to stave-off another Congressional investigation of his investigation; especially after the public learned that a known Clinton associate/fixer/bagman recruited and massively funded the wife of a high-level official in the FBI?

From media reports, it appears that close Hillary aide and confidant may have had thousands of emails on the system she shared with her disgraced husband AFTER swearing under oath that she had turned over all electronic devices and was not retaining emails or government property. Will the FBI do the right thing regardless of the election results? Will Obama pardon everybody involved? 

Something stinks. It appears that, if it is President Clinton, the cover-up will be complete. If it is President Trump, the cover-up will be complete.

We are so screwed.

-- steve


“Nullius in verba.”-- take nobody's word for it!

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell



WITH A CORRUPT JUSTICE DEPARTMENT, A POLITICALLY-COMPROMISED FBI, WHY SHOULD AMERICANS TRUST ACTIVIST JUDGES TO DO THE RIGHT THING.

bb2

Attorney General Loretta Lynch, FBI Director James Comey, and Supreme Court Justice John Roberts all appear to have violated the trust of the American people with the deeds and words. So why should Americans agree to allow judges to exceed the normal jurisdictional bounds of their venue to issue “anywhere” warrants in regard to computers? How many times has the FBI lied or misrepresented the underlying facts of a search warrant application, using non-existent or coerced or paid confidential information without being accountable for their actions? It is a horrible feeling when you just cannot trust the nation’s premier law enforcement agency and federal prosecutors to do the right thing as they succumb to political pressure. Can we even trust our Members of Congress who have behaved horribly to the American people as they pursued their own self-aggrandizement, self-dealing, and personal agenda?

We all know that there are corrupt activist judges in the federal system, especially in the uber-liberal 9th Circuit (Circus) Court of Appeals. So what is to stop the feds from venue-shopping to pick weak-minded, uninformed, or activist judges that issue sweeping investigational warrants on the basis of a single IP-address?

How bad is this proposed rule change with few safeguards?

With Rule 41, Little-Known Committee Proposes to Grant New Hacking Powers to the Government

The government hacking into phones and seizing computers remotely? It’s not the plot of a dystopian blockbuster summer movie. It’s a proposal from an obscure committee that proposes changes to court procedures—and if we do nothing, it will go into effect in December.

The proposal comes from the advisory committee on criminal rules for the Judicial Conference of the United States. The amendment [PDF] would update Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, creating a sweeping expansion of law enforcement’s ability to engage in hacking and surveillance. The Supreme Court just passed the proposal to Congress, which has until December 1 to disavow the change or it becomes the rule governing every federal court across the country.  This is part of a statutory process through which federal courts may create new procedural rules, after giving public notice and allowing time for comment, under a “rules enabling act.”1

The Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure set the ground rules for federal criminal prosecutions. The rules cover everything from correcting clerical errors in a judgment to which holidays a court will be closed on—all the day-to-day procedural details that come with running a judicial system.

The key word here is “procedural.”  By law, the rules and proposals are supposed to be procedural and must not change substantive rights.

But the amendment to Rule 41 isn’t procedural at all. It creates new avenues for government hacking that were never approved by Congress.

The proposal would grant a judge the ability to issue a warrant to remotely access, search, seize, or copy data when “the district where the media or information is located has been concealed through technological means” or when the media are on protected computers that have been “damaged without authorization and are located in five or more districts.” It would grant this authority to any judge in any district where activities related to the crime may have occurred.

To understand all the implications of this rule change, let’s break this into two segments.

The first part of this change would grant authority to practically any judge to issue a search warrant to remotely access, seize, or copy data relevant to a crime when a computer was using privacy-protective tools to safeguard one's location. Many different commonly used tools might fall into this category. For example, people who use Tor, folks running a Tor node, or people using a VPN would certainly be implicated. It might also extend to people who deny access to location data for smartphone apps because they don’t feel like sharing their location with ad networks. It could even include individuals who change the country setting in an online service, like folks who change the country settings of their Twitter profile in order to read uncensored Tweets.

There are countless reasons people may want to use technology to shield their privacy. From journalists communicating with sources to victims of domestic violence seeking information on legal services, people worldwide depend on privacy tools for both safety and security. Millions of people who have nothing in particular to hide may also choose to use privacy tools just because they’re concerned about government surveillance of the Internet, or because they don’t like leaving a data trail around haphazardly.

If this rule change is not stopped, anyone who is using any technological means to safeguard their location privacy could find themselves suddenly in the jurisdiction of a prosecutor-friendly or technically-naïve judge, anywhere in the country.

The second part of the proposal is just as concerning. It would grant authorization to a judge to issue a search warrant for hacking, seizing, or otherwise infiltrating computers that may be part of a botnet. This means victims of malware could find themselves doubly infiltrated: their computers infected with malware and used to contribute to a botnet, and then government agents given free rein to remotely access their computers as part of the investigation. Even with the best of intentions, a government agent could well cause as much or even more harm to a computer through remote access than the malware that originally infected the computer. Malicious actors may even be able to hijack the malware the government uses to infiltrate botnets, because the government often doesn't design its malware securely. Government access to the computers of botnet victims also raises serious privacy concerns, as a wide range of sensitive, unrelated personal data could well be accessed during the investigation. This is a dangerous expansion of powers, and not something to be granted without any public debate on the topic.  Source: With Rule 41, Little-Known Committee Proposes to Grant New Hacking Powers to the Government | Electronic Frontier Foundation

These “procedural” amendments will take effect on December 1 of this year unless Congress passes legislation that would reject, amend or postpone the changes.

Bottom Line …

What could possibly go wrong when a highly-politicized government decides to attack its political enemies, much as we saw in the corruption and misuse of the Internal Revenue Service to affect the fundraising capabilities of right-wing organizations to ensure an Obama election victory? What could go wrong when the Director of the FBI openly lies to the American people, adding non-existent elements of a statute to avoid the criminal violation of the Espionage Act, obstruction of justice, and a criminal enterprise? What could possibly go wrong when the Attorney General of the United States openly meets with the husband, himself a potential co-conspirator, of a subject under investigation and then brushes off the meeting as a social affair – yeah right, one held privately on an aircraft surrounded by FBI agents who demanded journalists take no pictures.

The progressive socialist democrats have all but subverted our constitution, the rule of law and civil society means nothing to them, so why the hell would we surrender our constitutional rights to a corrupt and increasingly tyrannical government?

We are so screwed.

-- steve


“Nullius in verba.”-- take nobody's word for it!

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell



FBI DIRECTOR COMEY THROWS THE PUBLIC A BONE: POSSIBLE FURTHER ACTION ON HILLARY'S EMAIL SERVER (BUT DON'T HOLD YOUR BREATH)

comey-clouseau

With the politicization of the premier law enforcement agency in the world, not to mention the politicization of other institutions such as the Department of Justice, Internal Revenue Service, Department of Homeland Security, and the Environmental Protection Agency, Americans have less faith in governmental institutions than ever before.

I used to respect FBI Director James Comey as a man of integrity and a straight arrow when it came to the non-partisan investigation of criminal activities. Unfortunately, that is no longer true as Mr. Comey not only ran a sham investigation that belied years of standard investigative procedures, but he stood before the world and misinterpreted the law; and perhaps even worse, made a decision that was not legitimately his to make. Now, with disgruntled current and former FBI agents, prosecutors, and Members of Congress, Comey appears to be throwing a bone to the public.

It appears that FBI Director James Comey, whose actions could not withstand the political sniff test and whose reputation for non-partisan political has been irreparably damaged, has begun the attempt to rehabilitate the FBI’s shattered reputation with a letter that says essentially nothing – but can be spun both ways by political partisans … [my comments in bracketed blue italics]

F-HDR
BODY

[Notice that this is sent to all important committees and chairman, including ranking members (democrats -- not shown)  who may be involved with the further examination of the Director and the events surrounding his astonishing interpretation of the law; not to mention that he did not have the power to dismiss the allegations.]

In previous congressional testimony, I referred to the fact that the Federal Bureau of
Investigation (FBI) had completed its investigation of former Secretary Clinton's personal email server.
Due to recent developments, I am writing to supplement my previous testimony.

[Notice that this is supplementary testimony, not a correction or recantation of anything he may have said previously.]

In connection with an unrelated case, the FBI has learned of the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent to the investigation. I am writing to inform you that the investigative team briefed me on this yesterday, and I agreed that the FBI should take appropriate investigative steps designed to allow investigators to review these emails to determine whether they contain classified information, as well as to assess their importance to our investigation.

[The unrelated case may have been Huma Abedin's husband's use of a shared device which may have contained Clinton's emails which are now being scrutinized for classified information. Of course, the same case can be made against Clinton Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills and Huma Abedin, both of whom used the private server and accounts. Both probably have little to worry since Comey may have given them immunity -- and may have authorized in the destruction of laptops containing evidence.

Notice how Comey avoided the issue of “reopening” the case and limited the FBI’s actions to a simple review?”

And notice how Comey is specifically citing “classified information” and nothing about destruction of documents, destruction of documents under subpoena, lying to the FBI, obstruction of justice, or any other matter such as the appearance of the selling of access to an official position for personal gain? There is still the possibility that the email issue will be swept under the DOJ/FBI rug once again.]

Although the FBI cannot yet assess whether or not this material may be significant, and I cannot predict how long it will take us to complete this additional work, I believe it is important to update your Committees about our efforts in light of my previous testimony.

[Considering the amount of time involved, one would know pretty quickly if the documents are material to the case. One thing is certain, that there will be no results until after the election. And, when Barack Obama can pardon the whole criminal crew.]

F-FTR

Essentially, this letter is not worth the paper it is written on or the ether through which it travels. The truth is that there are any number of people in the Department of State that used the private server, mishandled classified documents, not to mention the Clinton lawyers who lacked the security clearances to handle classified information. Many of the corrupt agencies are using private emails and pseudonyms to avoid records requests or disclosure of their nefarious activities. Even the President of the United States emailed Hillary using her private server. But, his communications which were designed to be hidden are privileged – but their do not appear to be any exceptions from the federal records act that catalogues Presidential data. In this, another impeachable offense – but then who is counting when it comes to violating the constitution, the rule of law, and the general practices of a civil society.

I still think that the FBI Director must stand aside and resign his office. As for the FBI, this will be another dark day in their history. Hopefully sanitized by the sunlight of their future actions with regards to blatant political corruption.

Bottom line …

Another entry in the saga of the Clinton Crime Family and their quest for political power and personal wealth. Pretty much the entire argument for electing Donald Trump to avoid additional Clintonism that make Nixonian politics look benign.

We are so screwed.

-- steve

</P.


“Nullius in verba.”-- take nobody's word for it!

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell



THE MORAL HAZARD OF VOTING FOR HILLARY CLINTON

In the absence of consequences and informed judgment, people will make bad choices …

mh

The mainstream media as abrogated their duty as a constitutionally protected entity because they are not educating the public to the hazards of voting for Hillary Clinton. And, there is no insurance – not even Congress – that can protect America from the consequences of a Hillary Clinton presidency.

Moral Hazard One: Yes, she has experience; but has used it unwisely – creating confusion, chaos, and conflict wherever she ventured. One need only look at the unsanctioned war in Libya and transfer of arms to Muslim terrorists to see that her efforts were not only singularly disastrous, but caused Americans to die as she and her staff dithered about whether or not the rescuers should where military or civilian dress while people were left in extremis.

Moral Hazard Two: Yes, she is a known liar and an unindicted felon for violating the espionage act, obstruction of justice, lying to federal investigators, and a host of other offenses that have been covered by by subversion in our regulatory and enforcement agencies: the Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Internal Revenue Service – and she is likely to abuse the authority of her office punish those who disagree with her or her ideology. 

Moral Hazard Three: Hillary Clinton has sold access to her official office and has engaged in deal-making with personal benefits.  How else can you explain the sale of 20% of America’s uranium production capabilities to the Russians and large donations from those very dealmakers. This is not the first time a Clinton has sold out their country as Bill did when he provided advanced technology to China that helped improve their missile targeting systems.

Moral Hazard Four: Hillary Clinton is a congenital liar and you cannot trust what she says. If it were not for WikiLeaks, we would not know that she has a private opinion and a public opinion conditioned by the audience and the circumstances at the time. Without trust, there is no credibility as a leader of the world’s singular super-power or with our allies who are so distrustful of the administration under President Obama that they have turned to our enemies China, Russia, Iran to forge mutual assistance pacts. Especially after seeing the Russians back Assad in Syria after the U.S. demanded he step down.

Moral Hazard Five: It appears that Hillary Clinton has undisclosed health issues that can impair her judgment and reduce the stamina needed to execute the duties of the office.

Moral Hazard Six:  Hillary Clinton has never been one to uphold the constitution unless it coincided with her personal agenda and advanced her core Marxist ideology. It is no wonder that Hillary surrounds herself with lawyers and parses everything until there is little or no meaning in what she says.

Moral Hazard Seven: Hillary Clinton is likely to nominate progressive activists judges to the Supreme Court which could change the face of America for decades and present a situation from which we may never recover. A slide into European-style democratic socialism that sees America disarmed and all decision-making ceded to unelected, unmanaged, and unaccountable bureaucrats, both here and abroad.

Bottom line …

You will notice that I did not list anything cannot be verified by your own research or observing her actions. I truly believe Hillary Clinton is a clear and present danger to the United States and truly represents the continuation of the unconstitutional and lawless activities of President Barack Obama. While Trump is a boor and a ill-informed thug, he presents less of a danger to America than does Hillary Clinton.

We are so screwed.

-- steve


“Nullius in verba.”-- take nobody's word for it!

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell



LOOK CAREFULLY AT THIS MAILING PIECE FOR PROPOSITION 56 TO SEE HOW DECEPTIVE CAMPAIGNS ARE CREATED BY THE SPECIAL INTERESTS …

Let us start with the facts …

  • Proposition 56 is a Tobacco tax increase on one of nature’s more destructive and toxic substances.
  • Progressive socialist democrats don’t really care if you die, they just want to tax you for the privilege and believe they have the right to “nudge” society to their way of thinking using the tenets of behavioral economics and decision-making. Like all taxes, it falls disproportionately on the poor who are struggling with their addiction; and even worse, the money is often squandered in ways having nothing to do with the general welfare of the taxpayer.
  • This hit piece is funded by the tobacco industry and the are demonizing the proposition by using the old and tired “it’s for the children” or, in this case, the children are being cheated.
  • As for breaking the promise to education, one only needs to know that the bulk of the taxpayer’s money goes to personnel and infrastructure, not into the classroom. If anyone has broken the promise to education, it is the educators and their union for graduating yet another class of functional idiots. Dumbing down test scores to avoid accountability and failing to teach critical cote subjects.
  • Oh goody, in these days of the UNaffordable Care Act, let’s demonize the big insurers that  is one of the most highly regulated industries – being forced to accept millions of new clients regardless of the actuarial consequences. Not that the insurers are exempt from criticism.

So take a careful look at this ad, and others of  similar nature – all deceptive by design.

Scan

Bottom line …

Vote NO on California Proposition 56 – not because you want to reward big tobacco and smoking – but because we do not need additional taxes and too starve the governmental beast which uses your tax money on buying votes and political power. Just consider how those big tobacco settlements have provided billions of dollars to the system, only to see them squandered on “outreach” and educational campaigns by organizations who appear to have a dual purpose, one of which is signing up voters for the progressive socialist democrats.

We are so screwed.

-- steve


“Nullius in verba.”-- take nobody's word for it!

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell



EARLY VOTING: A PROGRESSIVE SCAM?

Incumbent politicians, the ones who make the laws, and their respective political parties rarely do anything that will jeopardize their incumbency, party majority, or their party’s agenda. Thus, “we the people” are left behind and soothed with self-serving platitudes such as “making voting more accessible.”

EARLY-VOTING

In return for the possible convenience of an early vote, the politicians profit in a number of ways …

  • They are inoculated against last minute revelations and surprises that can upset their campaigns – in reality, promoting political corruption and the suppression of negative information until after the election. Hence we see that Hilary Clinton’s henchmen and cronies are “slow walking” potentially damaging information through the system or finding ways to destroy or suppress critical information that can be a game changer. Much like, President Obamas insistence that information cannot be revealed due to an “ongoing investigation” by some law enforcement or regulatory agency. I suppose the arms transfers to Mexican drug cartels in the “Fast and Furious” scandal to impose greater gun restrictions based on “allegedly” tracking weapons recovered in crimes to their U.S. origin is still being “investigated.” Or that the IRS scandal to deny conservative organizations their tax exemptions to silence their outreach is still “under investigation.” Or that the illegal and unconstitutional war and arms transfers to radical Islamic terrorists in Benghazi is still “under investigation.”
  • They can stage manage the votes by withholding/hiding ballots in areas where the opposition party predominates to allow votes in favor of their candidate to  appear more numerous than they are in reality. Remember, all of those ballots processed by the United States Post Office are being processed by union personnel who are heavily invested in progressive politics. There may be a temptation to squirrel away  a few trays of ballots, to be discovered later and chalked up to “systemic” errors.
  • Unless there is a clear and decisive winner by an undisputable margin, most of the close races can be fixed, one way or another, by the late counting of early ballots.

If you wonder what Barack Obama and his disgraced buddy, former Attorney General Eric Holder, will be doing after the election, it appears that they have both signed-on to an effort to oust the GOP in most state legislatures and gerrymander the districts to insure a permanent progressive socialist majority in most statehouses. The progressive socialist democrats, the party of lawyers, is planning to challenge any district that does not conform to racial population proportions as being unconstitutional. With these cretins it is all about race, power, and black privilege, that is when they are not sucking up money from wealthy liberal donors or misguided individuals. Personally, I am all for allowing computers to draw the districts regardless of race or any other “special considerations” that would provide carve-outs for certain political parties or certain racial or ethnic incumbencies.

Bottom line …

It appears it is much more important to watch those counting the votes, than watching who is voting. The idea that people need to show picture ID to enter a Federal Building (Is the government racist?) and not to vote is ludicrous. Other than the incarcerated, the infirm, there is nobody that cannot easily get a photo ID free and with very little effort. That is, unless you are an illegal alien – and that distinction is slowly is being erased.

We are so screwed.

-- steve


“Nullius in verba.”-- take nobody's word for it!

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell