WHY WOULD ANY AMERICAN CONSIDER HILLARY CLINTON FOR THE PRESIDENCY?
How the hell did America get to the point where race and gender trump honesty, integrity, and competence?
We have a media and a significant portion of the media that is afraid of being labeled “racist” for telling the half-black emperor that he is not wearing clothes. It does not take much more than a review of the current scandals: Fast and Furious, IRS, NSA, Benghazi, and now the Veterans Affairs scandal to see that our current President is both detached and incompetent. Both characteristics independent of his race, color, and ideology. The man is nothing but an empty suit that can deliver a TelePrompTered speech as well as any other telegenic actor. His supporters cry racism whenever he is attacked for his abysmal performance. But the truth remains, Obama is nothing more than a detached, incompetent, and corrupt fool playing the part of the President of the United States. Even worse, any openness
Hillary Clinton has a record of dishonesty, incompetence, corruption, and detachment …
How can any American look at the disgrace Bill Clinton brought to the Office of the Presidency and picture his return to the White House in any capacity?
How can any American fail to note that Bill Clinton was giving expensive speeches in foreign lands to foreign governments while Hillary Clinton served as the Secretary of State? Who is demanding an audit of the millions of dollars flowing through the various Clinton enterprises, rife with cronyism and corruption?
How can any American fail to note that from her earliest days in the Governor’s Mansion in Arkansas to the present day, Hillary Clinton was and is buried in a morass of financial and ethical issues?
And, how can any American forgive Hillary Clinton knowingly lying to the American public and stone-walling inquiries on the 9/11 terrorist attack on Benghazi?
The 2016 Democrat presidential hopeful has a long history of lies, cover-ups, obstructions and character assassinations, all for political greed. And she didn’t start down that path with the 2012 Benghazi terrorist attacks.
Jerry Zeifman, an admitted lifelong Democrat, was Hillary Clinton’s supervisor as she worked on the Watergate investigation. Zeifman fired Clinton from the investigation and refused to give her a letter of recommendation for a new position. Zeifman was the counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee during the Nixon investigation.
Zeifman explained, describing the reason for the firing and refusal to recommend the 27 year-old Hillary Clinton,”Because she was a liar.” He added, “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer.”
“She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality,” Zeifman said, underscoring her complete disregard for ethics.
Zeifman explained that Hillary Clinton conspired to deny Richard Nixon the right to counsel during the investigation, in order to keep Howard Hunt from testifying about “the goods on nefarious activities in the Kennedy Administration.”
In his book, “Hillary’s Pursuit of Power,” he explains that Hillary Clinton “engaged in a variety of self-serving unethical practices in violation of House rules.” Hillary Clinton engaging in self-serving practices regardless of any ethical considerations?
Hillary Clinton constructed the “nuts and sluts,” campaign, a real “war on women” against the victims of her husband, fellow Democrat Bill Clinton’s unwanted sexual advances (see: Paula Jones, Kathleen Willey, and Juanita Broaddrick). <Source>
Managing the media …
Even if the progressive mainstream media were not enthralled with the idea of an historic event, the election of the first woman president, they have proven to be unreliable and partisan in the coverage of both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. Failing to accurately report on significant cronyism, obstruction of justice, and potential illegal acts such as providing military-grade weaponry to our enemies; the media often softens fails to report the news until it reaches scandal proportions, softens the reporting and suggests that there is a partisan brouhaha, or buries the item along with the trivial news.
The Clinton’s are media-savvy. Holding back audience-generating interviews until they find friendly reporters and commentators who will offer-up softball questions and fail to ask the hard follow-up questions.
Where are the demands for the autopsy results for our Libyan Ambassador, Christopher Stevens, whose body was allegedly desecrated by his attackers in a most brutal and sexual manner? It is one thing to withhold the Osama bin Laden kill pictures because it might serve as a rallying cry of Muslim terrorists, but it is quite another to withhold evidence of what happened to our Ambassador for political reasons.
What reporter is asking exactly why that facility was designated as a diplomatic outpost, why no security was provided, why it was being used as a weapons transfer point, why was the Ambassador there on the anniversary of 9/11 (a major danger date in the Muslim world), what was he discussing with the Turkish Ambassador, and if this event rises above and beyond the Iran-Contra scandal?
There is so much that we do not know about Hillary Clinton, who unlike Barack Obama, has few sealed documents off-limits to the American people. But, what we do know should be deeply disturbing to an honest media that cares for the future of the United States. How can they support a person who wants to limit political free speech and control the media?
Bottom line …
When it comes to the safety, security, and economic growth of the United States, there is no way Americans can trust anyone who does not have a record of engagement, competence, honesty, and integrity. All of which rule Hillary Clinton out of any elected or appointed office. She has a stunning record of cronyism and corruption that would make her succession of President Barack Obama a disaster.
In the final analysis, Hillary is smarter, more media savvy, and more politically adept than President Obama. But, one the other hand, she is measurably more corrupt and pro-socialist. Definitely not Presidential material – and I would suggest, not fit for any public office.
-- steve
“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words
“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw
“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”
“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS "The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius “A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell “Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar “Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS