Chicago Gun Violence: Mayor Rahm Emanuel and Police Superintendent Deflect Attention from Gangs to Guns
OBAMA'S PROGRESSIVE SOCIALIST DEMOCRATS ATTACK NETWORK NEUTRALITY TO DAMAGE AMERICA AND AMERICANS

9-11 MEMORIAL JIHAD CONTROVERSY: WANT TO SEE THE ISLAMIC FIFTH COLUMN AND THEIR USEFUL IDIOTS?

o-constimages

It appears that radical Muslims and their useful idiots have taken exception to a 7-minute video narrated by Brian Williams that will be a party of the presentation at the National September 11 Memorial & Museum.

The film, “The Rise of Al Qaeda,” refers to the terrorists as Islamists who viewed their mission as a jihad. The NBC News anchor Brian Williams, who narrates the film, speaks over images of terrorist training camps and Qaeda attacks spanning decades. Interspersed are explanations of the ideology of the terrorists, from video clips in foreign-accented English translations.<Source: NY Times>

It appears that the brouhaha being fomented by the talking heads concerns the term “jihad” as shorthand for a violent terrorist act. It appears that Radical Muslims want to use the progressive socialist democrats and their pro-Muslim leader, Barack Hussein Obama, to redefine the word “jihad” and to explain that there is two contexts for the word: one, a holy war with infidels, but a much larger usage as a holy war within oneself where you struggle against evil to do the right thing and live a worshipful, holy life. Yeah right!

The memorial serves as an accurate reminder that the United States was wantonly and willfully attacked by radical Muslim Jihadists with the intention of killing the largest number of people – with little or no concern for innocent men, women, and children. The same “jihad” that is taught in Saudi-financed and controlled Whabbist sects around the world.

This is nothing more than the Orwellian pattern of the progressive socialist democrats and those who would do us harm. Where up is down, evil is good, and wrong is right.

If anything, CAIR – the propaganda arm of the Muslim Brotherhood – would love us to embrace Islam in such a manner as to present little or no resistence to the Islamic takeover of the West and the imposition of Sharia law.

The Myth at the Heart of the 9/11 Museum Film Backlash

Can you tell the story of the 9/11 attacks without frequent mention of the words “Islamist” and “jihad?”

To anyone even remotely familiar with the history of the war being waged on the United States and the West by al-Qaeda, such a suggestion is as absurd as it is unthinkable. The 9/11 terrorists were part of a movement that embarked on a campaign aimed at mass murder because of their religious beliefs. Those beliefs are not shared by all Muslims, but to edit them out of the story or to portray them as either incidental to the attacks or an inconvenient detail that must be minimized, if it is to be mentioned at all, does a disservice to the truth as well as to the public-policy aspects of 9/11 memorials. Read more at: The Myth at the Heart of the 9/11 Museum Film Backlash

Bottom line …

No matter what Americans may think about the 9-11 Memorial and Museum, it is being feted by radical Muslims and their followers as a monument to jihad!

Logo-peeing

It is my personal opinion that the Muslim religion is fundamentally corrupt, designed by a war lord for the sole purpose of raising an army, suppressing residence, and conquering the world. It is also my opinion that the President Bush covered up the involvement of the Saudis in 9/11 and that is why both he and Barack Obama refuse to declassify a portion of the 9/11 report dealing with foreign sources, contacts, and support of the terrorists. 

9/11: WHAT DID OUR GOVERNMENT KNOW AND WHEN DID THEY KNOW IT?

It is with some ambivalence that I write this post because I am loath to think ill of those who work hard, 24/7, keeping America safe from the threat of international terrorism. So why is our government refusing to declassify a report that allegedly links the Saudis to 9/11?

And, can the classification of this alleged report be justified on the grounds of national security; or, in the alternative, is it protecting certain politicians and special interests who have received quid pro quo value in exchange for covering up any Saudi complicity in the 9/11 terrorist attack?

 

H.RES.428 -- Urging the president to release information regarding the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks upon the United States.

Expresses the sense of the House of Representatives that:

(1) the President should declassify a 28-page section of the Joint Inquiry into Intelligence Community Activities Before and After the Terrorist Attacks of September 2001, and

(2) the families of the victims and the people of the United States deserve answers about the events and circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001, attacks on the United States. <Source>

bs

It appears that President Bush, without public comment, classified a 28-page section containing  information relating to “specific sources of foreign support” in the 800-page “Joint Inquiry Into Intelligence Community Activities Before and After the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001” report released by Congress. 

To those who want to spread Islam and Sharia Law into the United States …

aabic

Remember your fellow Americans who died on 9/11 when you are faced with progressive socialist democrats and their RINO counterparts in the voting booth.

-- steve


“Nullius in verba.”-- take nobody's word for it!

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS

Comments