BULLPUCKY: Boehner Commits to 10-Year Balanced Budget
Sir Richard Attenborough summarizes the Socialist line on population control

Obama issues "executive orders" on gun control; while claiming "executive privilege" to hide the Fast and Furious gun-running documents -- and still won't come clean about gun-running to terrorists and the 9/11 Benghazi attack

Why is the mainstream media obsessed with gun control after twenty six people, twenty of them children, were killed at Sandy Hook and overlooking the fact the Obama Administration may be illegally hiding documents on the Administration’s Fast and Furious program which provided guns to Mexican drug cartels who killed hundreds of people, including American citizens?

Why is the Obama Administration sharing military drone technology with a corrupt nation known to be riddled with socialists and communists – and which has mounted an unofficial invasion of the United States for political and economic reasons?

Why is the mainstream media not pursuing the high-profile case of  Mexican beauty queen, Maria Susana Flores Gamez, and others who were killed in a gun battle between the Mexican military and the drugistas? The beauty queen is only the media “hook” as the journalists say; the real question was why a gun allegedly purchased by George Gillett, deputy special agent in charge of the ATF's Phoenix field office, was found at the scene.

Why is the President claiming “Executive Privilege” unless the White House was involved with the operation – an operation said to be part of pursuing a domestic gun control agenda involving multiple weapon purchases?

Why is Eric Holder allowed to continue as the Attorney General, asking the Court to delay a Judicial Watch lawsuit over information never provided under the Freedom of Information Act, when his department is clearly implicated in potential wrongdoing. Sounds like a cover-up to me. Similar to the cover-up of the 9/11 Benghazi affair which may have involved the Administration in providing heavy military weapons to terrorists. Similar to the legal machinations over Obama’s eligibility to serve as the President of the United States.

It appears that we have become a nation governed by lawyers – in the Administration, in the Administration’s regulatory agencies, in Congress, and, of course, in the Judiciary. Where everything is “nuanced” and subject to multiple interpretations by lawyers who cannot agree on anything except their outrageous salaries are well-deserved.

Bottom line …

There should be a verifiable reckoning of why Americans in U.S. government actions. There should be an explanation of why “national defense” or “executive privilege” is being invoked when the media, such as they are, has provided more details than the Administration has provided to Congress.

But, the real question is: Why does the government want to hold law-abiding individuals responsible for future gun-related crimes, when the Administration refuses to answer questions about present-day gun-related crime that involves Administrative agencies controlled by the White House?

-- steve


“Nullius in verba.”-- take nobody's word for it!

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS

Comments