Previous month:
April 2009
Next month:
June 2009

May 19, 2009: ANOTHER DAY OF INFAMY

Even though the normal Constitutional checks and balances of government have been subverted; the executive branch and the legislative branch of government (being controlled by a single party), both democrat institutions are afraid to put global warming to a vote. 

It is anticipated that President Barack Obama will attempt to bypass the voters and the legislature by implementing global warming programs by executive fiat using executive orders and agency directives.

What you need to know:

In spite of the claims to the contrary, the science of global climate change is not at a stage where the output of computer models can be accepted as fact – and used as the basis for public policies which serve to enlarge government, massively raise taxes and curtail our individual freedoms.

There is no proof that CO2 is responsible for global warming and should be regarded not a pollutant, but a necessity of life whose increasing values can be most beneficial to our ecosystem.

That this evil confluence of events is being spearheaded by corrupt and complacent politicians who are influenced by the massive contributions to their personal, professional and political benefit. Paid by lobbyists acting on behalf of the special interests who will financially benefit from global warming initiatives. Supported by those who do not wish America well and want to seek greater political power. And propagandized by a complicit democrat-oriented media  which seemingly has abandoned their journalistic efforts and taken sides with those who lie for a living.

And for those who claim to want energy independence and clean energy, ask why they are not promoting nuclear power and making it a national initiative. Beneficial for our economy and as further insulation from foreign sovereigns who wish America harm.

Schwarzenegger sold out California, and now seeks to duplicate that dubious success by assisting the democrats in selling out America …

It is likely that President Obama is going to announce new automobile mileage standards which will result in underpowered and unsafe vehicles co-existing on the same roads with heavy trucks, SUVs and, of course, Hummers. It is likely that President Obama will be flanked by a smiling Republican turncoat, Arnold Schwarzenegger who has proposed California’s onerous emissions standards as the EPA’s national model. 

Consider what has happened to California in the past six years of Schwarzenegger’s so-called leadership.

Democrat spending remains unchecked with much of the money going to unionized institutions, expanded social welfare programs that support illegal aliens and, of course, the special interests such as the Wall Street Wizards, developers, contractors and government vendors of all stripes. If anything was expanding in California, it was the public employee’s unions.

Termed-out politicians and the friends of politicians were all appointed to commissions or boards which paid six-figure salaries for as little as two work days per month – complete with commuting expenses, lodging and a per diem expense allowance for those who lived hundreds of miles from the State Capitol. 

Financial chicanery was used to paper-over growing deficits to hide them from the public, until the billion-dollar deficits were so large as to defy all imagination. When this didn’t work, the legislature, with Schwarzenegger’s assistance, placed deceptive propositions on the May 19th ballot.

  • Proposition 1A, a massive $16 BILLION + tax increase whose provisions extended California’s record tax rates for another two years –- while being touted as a limit on legislative spending. Whoops, forgot about the loophole which permits spending to rise in relationship to increasing tax revenues – not much of a spending cap.
  • Propositions 1B which would raid California’s rainy day fund in favor of the teacher’s unions and as a thank you for the multi-millions spend on campaign contributions and media support in favor of these toxic propositions.
  • Propositions 1C which would securitize – a Wall Street Word – the California’s lottery’s future revenue stream for an immediate payment of approximately $5 BILLION or more.
  • Proposition 1D which would allow the State to raid the Children and Families health programs to help paper-over the deficit.
  • Proposition 1E which would allow the State to raid  mental health funding to add to the general fund kitty.
  • Proposition 1F is a give-away to a Republican legislator whose Judas vote was needed to pass the most massive tax increase in California History and prepare the way for another state office. It apparently freezes legislators' salaries in years of fiscal emergency, but does little or nothing to curb the additional “per diem” expense money which is likely to be increased to compensate for static salaries.

Of course, the bottom line is a legislative lie perpetrated by the Governor and state legislators on both sides of the aisle – that this measure will solve the budget deficit problem. According to the non-partisan truth-tellers in the Legislative Analyst’s Office, the state would still need to raise up to $20 BILLION to really solve the deficit issue. An almost impossible task with an eroding tax base and both people and businesses leaving the state for more hospitable business climates.

On top of California’s craziness is a far-left/Marxist legislature populated by members who claim to be seeking social justice in the form of income redistribution and gay rights. With much of California under water, fiscally speaking, there corrupt and complacent politicians want to import additional poverty, illiteracy and disease from third-world nations, Mexico being the primary source of cheap labor – along with drugs and gangs.

California’s legislators have all but destroyed our Golden State with their nonsense – and what do we have to show for it except a show-boating governor who jets around playing movie star/legislator. All while California’s infrastructure is in desperate need of repair or replacement.

Extending this to the national scene …

There is no doubt in my mind that President Obama is a far better actor, with or without TelePrompTers, than Arnold Schwarzenegger. Both men desperately dangerous to push their own political ideology at the expense of the general public. Both men elected with adulation and accolades. And as Schwarzenegger is revealed to be a massive failure as a leader, so will President Obama in a very short period of time.

Unfortunately, I believe that those who are on the public payroll or on the public dole has reached a critical mass, as to perpetuate a far-left cadre of political elites who will do or say anything to remain in power. And with the abdication of the media; with their unwillingness to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, it seems that the public will be slow to anger as their pockets are plundered and rights eroded by those who care not a whit for America, but only for themselves, their relatives and their enablers – their special interest friends.

There is a solution …

We need to consider the three magic words: recall, revolt and repeal. We need to recall those legislators who have harmed our local, state and federal government. We need to revolt against the political parties, both of whom have sold us out for their thirty-pieces of silver. And we need to repeal the nonsensical and harmful legislation which have crippled this nature.

For those who speak in terms of trans-nationalism, let us first align ourselves with the majority of civilized countries and demand that any child born in our country assume the citizenship of their parents. And speaking of citizenship, cancel all dual citizen passports. If your allegiance is to another sovereign nation, by all means carry their passport and move over to your chosen garden spot in the world. 

We need to downsize the government, starting with the Department of Homeland Defense which concentrates too much power in the hands of an appointed political hack without true experience in intelligence, defense or the management of large organizations. Unlike those who serve as chief executive officers of large companies with a bottom line responsibility of the profit and loss of the enterprises, serving as the governor of a border state does not mean you are a leader or a chief executive. The department is too large to manage effectively, with individual components working at cross-purposes and with massive failures in the areas of managing contracts and emergency responses. A department which seemingly responds to a disaster by  asking about the political impact, how the story can be spun in the media -- all before providing any aid to the citizens in need.

Bottom line …

Schwarzenegger is continuing to screw the State of California and President Obama and his cadre of far-left democrats is busy applying the California model to the nation. We need to respond vigorously and massively in 2010 to remove all members of Congress who are up for re-election, in 2012 to remove the President of the United States and the remaining members of Congress who still have jobs and completing the task in 2014 when we should have a better chance of rebuilding America.

For those in California: VOTE NO ON PROPOSITIONS 1A-1F

For the rest of the citizens who are angry, tell your Congressman to vote against any initiative which weakens our economy, our military and our society.

-- steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


VOTE NO ON CALIF. PROPS 1A -- 1F: PREVENT MAY 19, 2009 FROM BECOMING A DAY OF INFAMY IN CALIFORNIA?

As we prepare for the May 19th, 2009 election, might I remind you that your California Legislature, both democrats and republicans – as well as our Governor, Arnold Schwarzenegger are trying to paper over their own corruptness and complicity in mismanaging the State of California.

Not only were the propositions deceptively written, some of the propositions trigger legislative consequences that are not being discussed.

The primary proposition, Proposition 1A, is nothing more than a massive $16-22 BILLION tax increase described as a limit on legislative spending; and even then, it is dishonest as spending can rise in lockstep with an increase in tax revenues.

The other propositions allow the politicians to steal money contained in dedicated purpose funds, one relating to pre-school education and one relating to mental health funding, to help balance a budget which they already admit cannot be balanced with these funds. A second dip in the taxpayer’s pocket is necessary.

And one proposition allows the legislature to “monetize” lottery revenues by selling bonds backed by lottery income. This is the same scam that was used by the Wall Street Wizards to push mortgage bonds on unsuspecting investors.

Bottom line …

DO YOU WANT TO REWARD THE POLITICAL BASTARDS WHO HAVE GIVEN YOUR MONEY TO THE EMPLOYEE UNIONS, THE DEVELOPERS AND, WORST OF ALL, THEIR PAY-FOR-PLAY SPECIAL INTEREST FRIENDS?

VOTE NO ON CALIFORNIA PROPOSITIONS 1A – 1F AND SEND THEM A MESSAGE: YOU HAVE RUINED OUR STATE AND WE WILL NOT ALLOW IT TO CONTINUE!

ARE YOU READY TO EXTEND YOUR HIGHER TAX RATES ANOTHER TWO YEARS – WITH NO BUDGET SOLUTION IN SIGHT?

VOTE NO!  ON PROPS 1A –1F

With all of the people and business leaving the state, all that will be left are the politicians and their illegal alien supporters who are counting on them to assist in legalizing them and providing additional access to our state treasury!

Reference Links:

Schwarzenegger tries to "muscle" Californians into supporting two years of higher taxes with Propositions 1A-1F -- VOTE NO ON PROPS 1A-1F! |OneCitizenSpeaking

[NO] CALIFORNIA PROPOSITIONS 1A-1F (2009) -- MORE LIES FROM THE UNION ACTIVISTS?| OneCitizenSpeaking

[X] NO -- CALIFORNIA PROPOSITIONS 1A -- 1F (MAY 19,2009 -- NO MORE TAXES, NO MORE SPENDING -- Proof that Schwarzenegger is a FAILURE!|OneCitizenSpeaking

[X] NO -- CALIFORNIA PROPOSITIONS 1A-1F (MAY 19, 2009)|OneCitizenSpeaking


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


IS BIDEN THE RIGHT MAN FOR THE VICE PRESIDENCY?

To think that Joseph Biden is one step away from the Presidency, followed by Nancy Pelosi only indicates the magnitude of the public’s misunderstanding of the democrat party and their toxic ideology.

Biden screws up … again! 

According to Fox News …

“Biden Reveals Location of Secret VP Bunker”

“The vice president, well-known for his verbal gaffes, confirms at a dinner the existence and location of a secret hidden bunker that Cheney is believed to have used after the 9/11 attacks.”

“Vice President Joe Biden, well-known for his verbal gaffes, may have finally outdone himself, divulging potentially classified information meant to save the life of a sitting vice president.”

“According to a report, while recently attending the Gridiron Club dinner in Washington, an annual event where powerful politicians and media elite get a chance to cozy up to one another, Biden told his dinnermates about the existence of a secret bunker under the old U.S. Naval Observatory, which is now the home of the vice president.”

“The bunker is believed to be the secure, undisclosed location former Vice President Dick Cheney remained under protection in secret after the 9/11 attacks.”

“According to the report, Biden ‘said a young naval officer giving him a tour of the residence showed him the hideaway, which is behind a massive steel door secured by an elaborate lock with a narrow connecting hallway lined with shelves filled with communications equipment.’"

“Clift continued: ‘The officer explained that when Cheney was in lock down, this was where his most trusted aides were stationed, an image that Biden conveyed in a way that suggested we shouldn't be surprised that the policies that emerged were off the wall.’"

The difference between Biden and former Vice President Dick Cheney …

With Vice President Cheney, you had an extremely smart and thoughtful man who understood that his first duty was to his nation; to uphold and protect the Constitution of the United States – and secondarily, to support the President of the United States. Cheney did not require more money, more power, more applause or even  common acknowledgement that he was doing a good job in protecting the America from her enemies, both foreign and domestic. Was he perfect: no! Was he a Ronald Reagan: No! He was Dick Cheney, doing his level best to prevent another 9/11 by any means necessary. A man turned into a cartoon by the democrats for political purposes.

With Biden, you have a political whore who cannot get enough money, power or adulation. Someone who can’t really be trusted with state secrets. Personable, ineffective and definitely problematical to those trying to keep our nation safe.

2010, 2012: Change is coming …

As people reflect on the damage done to America by the democrats, from Presidents Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama; legislators like Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, John Murtha, Barney Frank, and Christopher Dodd – they might be willing to give the Republican Party forgiveness for their profligate spending – outdone by Barack Obama who committed more funds that all of the Presidents from Washington to Bush – and return to a saner government with rational leaders. 

It is now time to remove the rose-colored glasses and realize that “The Chosen One” is an empty suit actor with a great speechwriter and a TelePrompTer.

-- steve


Reference Links:

Biden Reveals Location of Secret VP Bunker - Presidential Politics | Political News - FOXNews.com


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


OBAMA ... AND YOU WANT OUR HEALTH RECORDS?

It has been my position for years that the United States lacks a clear and consistent policy with respect to the privacy and security of consumer information. In fact, it is most often the trusted gatekeepers of such information that are corrupt.

My plan is simple …

Any person who accesses and discloses non-public personal information for personal, professional or political gain does to jail for a mandatory period of at least ten years. If the person is a trusted employee of the government or one of its contractors, the penalty is doubled. If the person is a foreign national and the goal is related to espionage, the minimum penalty is twenty-five years; life is the information is related to weapon systems, compromises military actions or places the public at risk for a catastrophic event.  Should American citizens lose their life as a result of the release of information, the death penalty should be an option.

Current stories in the news …

The SANS INSTITUTE notes …

Pentagon Official Charged with Espionage Conspiracy (May 13 & 14, 2009)”

“Pentagon official has been charged with espionage conspiracy for allegedly leaking confidential documents to a Chinese government operative.  James Wilbur Fondren Jr. has been on administrative leave from his job as Deputy Director, Washington Liaison Office, US Pacific Command (PACOM) since February 2008.”

“Fondren was allegedly able to access the sensitive information through his security clearance.  If he is convicted of the charges against him, he could face five years in
prison and a fine of US $250,000.” <Department of Justice News Release>

Former FBI Agent Gets Probation for Unauthorized Data Access (May 14, 2009)

“Former FBI agent Mark Rossini was sentenced to one year of probation for using agency computers to search for information about a Hollywood wiretapping case in which he was not involved.  Rossini admitted that he gave the information to a  woman he was dating who then gave it to an  attorney for Anthony Pellicano, a private investigator who is presently serving a 15-year sentence for wiretapping celebrities' phones for clients.  Rossini pleaded guilty to five counts of criminal computer access late last year.   He also faces fines amounting to US $5,000.” <Source>

The bigger picture …

What would keep an FBI agent from accessing your medical records if they could be used for blackmail, extortion or simply to assist a corrupt attorney and their investigator win a case? Why is this man not getting the same penalty as the person who employed him? Anthony Pelicano was a private citizen, but Mark Rossini was a Federal official in a position of public trust. This is an outrageously light sentence for essentially betraying his country’s trust for personal, commercial gain.

The Obama Administration is proposing a medical database which would be able to track your every move: every medical emergency, every doctor’s office visit, every prescription – and access all of the doctor’s notes and tests. This is big brother being able to control your life and freedoms through access to your personal information.

While we know we can’t trust politicians to keep classified data secret and we can’t keep medical people from selling medical records to the tabloids – what do we know about the safety and security of our personal medical information?

And the scariest part is that all of this information becomes instantly available to insurance agencies – for pricing life insurance, car insurance and even homeowner’s insurance. It also becomes available to the credit card agencies and financial institutions to assist in setting rates.

But worst of all, it could keep you from getting life-saving treatment based on your prior medical history and that of your family. Determining that you have less chance to survive with experimental treatment or super drugs than another citizen who will get your treatment based on a potentially better outcome. Think it can’t happen – check the news about healthcare delivery and rationing in both Canada and England.

But back to my main point: your information is not secure unless legislation requiring absolute privacy for personal medical information, funding the security initiative and quickly and efficiently punishing those who would breach your privacy.

-- steve

Reference Links:

Mayo Clinic backs Microsoft health records storage site, so what?

Mayo Clinic backs new personal health record site - washingtonpost.com

OBAMA STIMULUS: COMPROMISING YOUR HEALTH RECORDS FOR POLITICS AND PROFITS|OneCitizenSpeaking

Danger: The SINGLE most important key to protecting your health records! | One Citizen Speaking

Microsoft HealthVault: Can you trust Microsoft or any other commercial vendor with your health information? One Citizen Speaking


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


CALIFORNIA DRIVERS -- EMERGENCY ACTION NOTICE -- LEGISLATURE WANTS TO GUT SPEED TRAP BILL ...

ACT NOW …
Capture5-16-2009-3.36.24 PM
ASSEMBLY BILL A.B. 564 GUTS THE SPEED TRAP  LAW …

RAISES FINE INCOME AND INSURANCE PREMIUMS
NOT SAFETY

Now is the time to STOP this outrageous attempt to make California Drivers wrong for the purposes of raising municipal revenues – with only a minimal effect, if at all, on safety.

You need to call your elected officials and tell them that this is a bad piece of legislation and serves no one except the free-spending municipalities.

ASSEMBLY BILL A.B. 564 …

“Amends the definition of a "local street or road," under the speed trap law, for the City of Pasadena, to mean a street or road is either included in the latest maps submitted to the federal highway Administration (FHWA) or is not wider than 40 feet, longer than one-half mile, or more than one lane in each direction.”

EXISTING LAW :

“1)Defines a local street or road, under the speed trap exemption, by the latest functional usage and federal-aid system maps submitted to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). When maps have not been submitted, local streets and roads are defined as those not wider than 40 feet, or longer than one-half mile, or with more than one lane in each direction.”

“2)Defines a speed trap as a particular section of highway measured and marked with boundaries to determine the speed of a vehicle by calculating the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance.”

“3)Defines a speed trap as a particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit that is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey (ETS) conducted within five years from the time of an alleged violation and where enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic devices which measure the speed of moving objects.”

“4)Prohibits the use in court of evidence of the speed of a vehicle obtained on any highway segment meeting the definition of speed trap.”

“ 5)Authorizes local jurisdictions to establish speed limits according to the result of an ETS. An ETS gauges prevailing speeds along a given route, takes into account accident records, and highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver.”

“6)Provides for the establishment of prima facie speed limits (i.e., in specified increments) in certain areas where it is deemed necessary (i.e., near schools, in business districts or in residential districts) without the benefit of a traffic survey.”

Somebody is lying …

“FISCAL EFFECT : Unknown”

This is complete and utter nonsense. Common sense will tell you that eliminating restrictions on electronic traffic enforcement devices provides a revenue windfall to municipalities, the courts, driver’s education vendors, the makers of automated enforcement devices – and most of all, the insurance companies which raise your insurance premiums for a rather innocuous infraction.

Bottom line …

The sole purpose of this law is to weaken existing legislation for purposes of revenue generation and not safety. By not requiring traffic surveys and other prudent measures involving setting safe speeds, any municipality could create their own “block by block” speed traps at will and enforce them with electronic means.

For more information, see the special section at www.highwayrobbery.net or read the actual legislation.


        signalAnimStopsRedShortestYel

  siren

This may be your last chance to curb the self-serving actions of a government out of fiscal control and searching about for any means possible for funding their special interest legislation. With the next campaign cycle rapidly approaching, these corrupt and complacent politicians need more campaign money – and the special interests and lobbyists representing municipalities, equipment vendors and insurance companies are willing to shovel it out – if it returns big bucks to them – THE PUBLIC BE DAMNED!

Contact your elected officials NOW!

-- steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


BRILLIANT IDEA: CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM -- BEAT THE BASTARDS AT THEIR OWN GAME!

There is no doubt that each member of Congress deeply affects our entire nation with their votes … and yet they refuse to listen to suggestions, criticism and comments from outside of their district, in the case of Representatives, or their states, in the case of Senators.

Email Congressman [insert name here]

Congressman [insert name here] receives email from all over the country on a wide range of issues. Regrettably, he is only able to respond to emails from his constituents within the [insert district here] District. Please fill out the following address box to send an email to Congressman [insert Congressman’s last name here]. If this is a casework matter (immigration, social security, veterans, etc.), please make sure to include your telephone number in your e-mail message.

Thus many members of Congress, not all, refuse to accept comments from the citizens and taxpayers whose lives are deeply affected by their votes.

Brilliant idea …

As long as members of Congress are unwilling to accept comments from citizens and taxpayers out of their districts and states – perhaps they should also be denied access to funds from those outside of their districts and states. Not only will this make the member of Congress more respectful of their constituency – it will also bring more of a local viewpoint to the forefront.

After all, aren’t these people sent to Congress and paid by the taxpayers of the United States to represent their local constituency and defend the Constitution from its enemies, both foreign and domestic.

Considering the amount of special interest cash influencing elections, it is now time to purge the Congress of those who were corrupt or complacent while the United States was being looted by the politicians, political parties and their special interest friends.

Consider this Airport supported by John Murtha …

Try telling John Murtha that you are displeased with this colossal waste of money using Murtha’s official Congressional e-mail system which is supported at taxpayer expense and you will get this message:

Your zip code indicates that you are outside of the 12th District of Pennsylvania. Regrettably, I am unable to reply to any email from constituents outside of the 12th District of Pennsylvania.”

Murtha is a corrupt politician … and unfortunately, is not the only one selling out the American taxpayer for personal, professional and political gain …

And if you thought Murtha was an innocent victim of a misunderstanding, here is a video taken of Murtha by the Federal Government which demonstrates he could be open to bribes …

“(Part 3 of 6 parts) : January 1, 1980 : FBI Abscam "Sting" Video of Agent's Meeting with U.S. Rep. John Murtha (D-PA; Johnstown), Mel Weinburg (the "sting" man) and Howard Criden (a Philadelphia attorney) - in which Murtha states that he isn't interested in the $50,000 bribe offered in exchange for his legislative efforts to get two Saudi men admitted to the U.S., "at this time." Murtha, however, was willing to go along with the scheme, in exchange for Arab investments in businesses in Murtha's district. But, if their relationship worked out, Murtha clearly indicated, he would be interested in money for himself at a later date. Through the totality of the meeting, it is clear that Murtha is thoroughly engaged in the scheme, knows and discusses what is going on, and the overall exchange of bribes for legislative/official activity on the part of all involved. Murtha, one of Congresses most thoroughly corrupt politicos, barely escaped sanctions from the House ethics committee, though six other members of congress were given the heave ho, prosecuted and convicted.”

One hand washes the other … 

It appears that Murtha is for sale and the reason he has longevity is because of his overwhelming campaign support by the special interests.

The key is to make these politicians more responsive to the American people – all the people. No hiding behind dodges which keep citizens and taxpayers from objecting to the behavior of a member of Congress unless they live within the members district or state.

Anyway, just another idea that might make the United States a better place to live, work, worship and raise a family.

-- steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


Obama pushing U.S. citizens down Alice's rabbit hole...

I feel like Alice falling down the rabbit hole into an Orwellian world where government pronouncements make very little sense and evil has been redefined as good, up as down, right as left.

According to Bloomberg news …

“Obama Says U.S. Long-Term Debt Load ‘Unsustainable’”

“President Barack Obama, calling current deficit spending ‘unsustainable,’ warned of skyrocketing interest rates for consumers if the U.S. continues to finance government by borrowing from other countries.”

“ ‘We can’t keep on just borrowing from China,’ Obama said at a town-hall meeting in Rio Rancho, New Mexico, outside Albuquerque. ‘We have to pay interest on that debt, and that means we are mortgaging our children’s future with more and more debt.’”

“Holders of U.S. debt will eventually ‘get tired’ of buying it, causing interest rates on everything from auto loans to home mortgages to increase, Obama said. ‘It will have a dampening effect on our economy.’”

I must be out of my freaking mind – does President Barack Obama and his merry band of Congressional democrats know that it is they who have created programs which are leading to the largest debt levels in the United States history? More than all of the accumulated debt from George Washington to George W. Bush?

And does not President Obama understand that there are only two ways to reduce that debt:

One, reduce the size of government and its programs; and

Two, grow the size of the overall economy by reducing taxes on those who are creating wealth and jobs.

History has clearly demonstrated that socialism, central planning, the redistribution of wealth and taxing the producers will result in a catastrophic collapse of the United States economy.

Watch not what they say, but what they do …

“Earlier this week, the Obama administration revised its own budget estimates and raised the projected deficit for this year to a record $1.84 trillion, up 5 percent from the February estimate. The revision for the 2010 fiscal year estimated the deficit at $1.26 trillion, up 7.4 percent from the February figure. The White House Office of Management and Budget also projected next year’s budget will end up at $3.59 trillion, compared with the $3.55 trillion it estimated previously.”

Two weeks ago, the president proposed $17 billion in budget cuts, with plans to eliminate or reduce 121 federal programs. Republicans ridiculed the amount, saying that it represented one-half of 1 percent of the entire budget. They noted that Obama is seeking an $81 billion increase in other spending.”

Piling on the debt and placing United States citizens at risk …

In addition to the current debt levels, President Obama has vowed to overhaul healthcare which would cost approximately $2 TRILLION dollars and result in a severe disruption in our current healthcare system. The foreseeable future would be bleak: fewer doctors, rationed healthcare and a state policy based on “best practices” which would deny last-ditch medical treatments to those citizens who were seriously ill and/or dying. All on the basis of statistical studies showing that the medical outcome of experimental procedures and medications is often death.

Doing bad by seemingly doing good …

“Obama prodded Congress to pass restrictions on credit-card issuers, saying consumers need “strong and reliable” protection from unfair practices and hidden fees.”

“Obama called on Congress to send to him by May 25 a bill that would clamp down on what he says are sudden rate increases, unfair penalties and hidden fees. He also wants the measure to strengthen monitoring of credit-card companies.”

Consider for a moment a likely scenario. That which reduces the amount of interest and fee income to private corporations; only to have a corresponding amount be transferred to the government as taxes. On one hand a “feel good” public relations stunt which cripples growth and enlarges the size of the government with the increasing number of unionized workers.

Words, just words …

“ ‘It’s time for reform that’s built on transparency, accountability, and mutual responsibility, values fundamental to the new foundation we seek to build for our economy,’ the president said.”

From the $700 BILLION TARP (Troubled Assets Relief Program) to the release of the pictures of Air Force One flying over the Statue of Liberty, transparency has been lacking. SIGTARP (Special Inspector General, Troubled Assets Relief Fund) has told Congress that the $700 BILLION dollar program was a failure and has been modified into a much larger program of at least 12 separate programs involving up to $3 TRILLION dollars. There is no transparency here. And a clear demonstration that the government cannot account for the taxpayer money it is spending in our name.

It’s your fault – you stupid people …

“The president said Americans have been hooked on their credit cards and share some blame for the current system. ‘We have been complicit in these problems,’ he said. ‘We have to change how we operate. These practices have only grown worse in the midst of this recession.’”

Last I checked, it was the financial industry who sent lobbyists to turn politicians into political whores – grabbing money with both hands to offer up legislation that permitted problematical behavior and to restrain the regulatory agencies from enforcing the laws on the books. 

“The American Bankers Association, which represents card issuers, has warned lawmakers and the Obama administration against taking punitive action or setting requirements that are too stringent. Doing so, the lobby group says, would limit consumer credit and worsen a credit crunch.”

“Obama said that restrictions ‘shouldn’t diminish consumers’ access to credit.’

You can’t have it both ways …

You cannot keep offering credit to those who are fundamentally uncreditworthy based on class, ethnicity, gender or any other social criteria and then excoriate the industry for pricing the risk premium into the interest rate.

Uncollectible credit-card debt rose to 8.82 percent in February, the most in the 20 years that Moody’s Investors Service Inc. has kept records. Lawmakers have said they’re under increasing pressure from constituents to respond to rising interest rates and abrupt changes to consumers’ accounts.”

Has anyone noticed that the availability of cheap capital made possible by government policies has introduced a moral hazard into the equation. In spite of the protestations to the contrary, the credit issuers need not be concerned about the creditworthiness of individual borrowers and card users as they play a numbers game to issue the most cards.

Likewise, they really do not have any incentive to assist troubled borrowers as the jack the interest rate to the stratosphere and pile on the rates – which is counterproductive to an honorable person seeking to pay there just obligations. The industry even lobbied to make bankruptcy even more difficult than before to reinforce their continuing income stream.

And, just when you thought that the credit card issuers could not be any worse than loan sharks or payday lenders, they sold off the debt to investors using the very same toxic derivatives as were used by the mortgage industry. Of course, a closer look at the mortgage industry would have revealed that many financial institutions which originated mortgages also issued credit cards – some being collateralized by the equity in your home.

The government you thought was protecting you was complicit in your ongoing monthly rape at the hands of their “special interest friends” – all spearheaded by elected officials like House Financial Services Chairman Barney Frank (D-MA) and Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd (D-CT).

What hypocrisy?

“Obama held a White House meeting last month with executives from the credit-card industry, including representatives from Bank of America Corp. and American Express Co. Afterward, he told reporters that credit-card issuers should be prohibited from imposing ‘unfair’ rate increases on consumers and should offer the public credit terms that are easier to understand.”

It is apparent that President Obama and his merry band of democrat thieves are upset that someone else is picking your pocket before they get their share through hidden taxes and fees.

“ ‘The days of any time, any increase, anything goes -- rate hike, late fees -- that must end,” Obama said today at Rio Rancho High School. We’re going to require clarity and transparency from now on.’”

I call bullshit. The government openly requires and condones credit disclosures no one can read or understand even though they use common English words. Unilateral agreements that are presented to consumers on a “take it or pay us off” basis.

Bottom line …

If President Obama were an honest broker for government reform, he would note that the largest controllable government costs involve under productive personnel and that the increasing union interference in government affairs is causing severe damage to our economic health. He would also note that the interference of the lawyers, lobbyists and special interests is similarly hurting our economy. And being a purported constitutional scholar, he would notice that much of what the federal government is doing is unconstitutional and a usurpation of states’ rights. Similarly, he should be worried about the loss of constitutional checks and balances as we move further toward a one-party domination of the government and a Supreme Court that often usurps Congressional authority by legislating from the bench.

All I can hope is that the Republicans will somehow find their core values and invite the rest of  America to join us in fixing the nation before it is too late.

-- steve

Reference links …

Obama Says U.S. Long-Term Debt Load ‘Unsustainable’ (Update2) - Bloomberg.com


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


Obama: Doing the right thing for the wrong purpose?

To the rest of the world, it appears that Barack Obama has placed the interests of the United States above the interests of his far-left supporters such as the ACLU.

According to Reuters News Service ...  

"Obama opposes detainee abuse photo release"

"In a reversal, President Barack Obama said on Wednesday he would fight the release of dozens of photographs showing the abuse of terrorism suspects, over concern the images could ignite a backlash against U.S. troops."

This is what the CIA, the military and various other observers have been saying all along. Sometimes asking why the While House was more willing to withhold the photos of the Manhattan flyover than seriously damaging photographs which put Americans in danger.

"The decision was a blow to some liberals in Obama's Democratic Party who see the photos as part of a broader effort to investigate Bush-era officials and cleanse America's image abroad."

Only someone who was a member of the "hate America first" crowd would put forth the position that America is somehow complicit in evildoing and needs to be cleansed, The fact that we have spent the blood of Americans and the taxpayers hard-earned money on improving the world seems to be of little or no concern to these ideologically-driven leftists who dream of a better "socialist" world featuring fairness and equality.

How stupid and naive does one have to be to ignore human nature and the history of mankind. There have always been people who wanted to control people and resources and were willing to use religion, politics or pure force to accomplish the task. Likewise, there were those who were content to sit back and exist on the largess and handouts of the ruling class who wanted to minimize the possibility of increasing dissatisfaction to the point of insurrection and the overthrow of their reign.  Where one associates with people of similar characteristics on a tribal level and eschews contacts with those they find jarringly incongruent with their looks, beliefs, mannerisms or other characteristics. Such is life and only a fool would ignore the realities of the human condition.

Of course, if a person or political entity  could exploit these differences to create various classes of victims and then convince a coalition of the oppressed  that their goals could be fulfilled by placing this person or political entity in power -- you would have the democrat party.

"Just last month the Obama administration had said it would comply with a court order to release the pictures by May 28, saying legal options for appealing the case had been limited."

"But Obama shifted gears after senior military commanders and some members of Congress expressed misgivings about the potential for the photos to generate violence against U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan."

"Obama defended his decision, saying publication of the photographs 'would not add any additional benefit to our understanding of what was carried out in the past by a small number of individuals.'"

Fatal flaw in the President's though process?

One must ask if there is some fatal flaw in President Obama's thought process if he did not see the clear and present danger without additional urging? Or is President Obama so blinded by ideology that he was willing to place Americans in further risk by pandering to his far-left activist constituency? Of course, there is also a question of whether or not President Obama is an empty suit, as I truly believe, and floats with the winds -- and whatever is on the TelePrompTer.

" 'In fact, the most direct consequence of releasing them, I believe, would be to further inflame anti-American opinion and to put our troops in greater danger,' Obama told reporters. 'Moreover, I fear the publication of these photos may only have a chilling effect on future investigations of detainee abuse.'"

"White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said the administration is likely to seek a court order aiming at blocking the release of the photos, which had been expected within weeks."

"Gibbs was peppered with questions about Obama's shift in course. He said Obama, who has seen some of the pictures, told his legal team last week that he did not feel comfortable with releasing them."

The radicals turn on Obama ...

'MAKES A MOCKERY'

"The American Civil Liberties Union, which argued for the photos' release, expressed outrage and said the decision 'makes a mockery' of Obama's campaign promise of transparency."

No matter what the ACLU, an organization founded by Marxists and Communist sympathizers, claims, the fact remains: National security and the protection of American troops trumps transparency. And if they cannot live with that -- they can go straight to hell. 

" 'It's absolutely essential that these photos be released so the public can examine for itself the torture and abuse that was conducted in its name, and so that high-level officials who authorized or permitted that abuse can be held accountable,' ACLU attorney Amrit Singh said."

For an attorney, Singh should be aware that he assumes facts not in evidence and draws conclusions from only a partial subset of the non-classified data available to the public. Of course, the ACLU seems to care less about the truth as long as they can embarrass the Bush Administration and promote their far-left agenda.

"The human rights group Amnesty International said it was disappointed."

" 'Human beings have been tortured and denied basic rights. The American people have been lied to, and government officials who authorized and justified abusive policies have been given a pass,' said the group's executive director, Larry Cox. He said the full story had not been told."

Again, the stunning hypocrisy of this group ... consider, for a moment,  the routine brutality of everyday Muslim justice where flogging, amputation, mutilation, rape and stoning are routine practices -- and what is practiced in their prisons by so-called religious adherents is infinitely worse.

Doing the right thing for the wrong reasons …

“But the shift was welcomed by Sen. Lindsey Graham, a Republican, and Sen. Joe Lieberman, an independent, who said Obama ‘did exactly the right thing.’"

"’The fact that the president reconsidered the decision is a strength not a weakness,’ they said in a statement.”

I call bullshit!

I believe that the real reason Barack Obama changes his mind was not out of concern for America’s reputation or the safety of American lives, but because the incendiary conflagration surrounding the release of these photos would have totally destroyed Obama’s upcoming “talk to the Muslims” campaign stop in Egypt. He would be answering so many questions about torture and America’s allegedly heinous acts that he would be prevented from telling  Israel that they need to, once again, surrender property which will be used by hostile forces to threat Israel's safety and security. No matter how smart Obama may appear to be – he is trumped in spades by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

“Defense Secretary Robert Gates said he had had second thoughts about the decision to release the pictures after hearing the concerns of the top U.S. commanders in Afghanistan and Iraq, U.S. Army Generals David McKiernan and Ray Odierno.”

" ‘Our commanders, both General McKiernan and General Odierno, have expressed very serious reservations about this, and their very great worry that release of these photographs will cost American lives,’ Gates told U.S. lawmakers.”

" ‘That was all it took for me.’"

How convenient it must be for Defense Secretary Gates to claim he actually listened to the concerns of the top commanders in Afghanistan and Iraq. In fact, he had so much respect for General David McKiernan that he sacrificed McKiernan’s career to political expediency.

President Barack Obama fired the top U.S. general in Afghanistan on Monday, replacing him with a former special forces commander in a quest for a more agile, unconventional approach in a war that has gone quickly downhill. With the Taliban resurgent, Obama's switch from Gen. David McKiernan to Lt. Gen. Stanley McChrystal suggests the new commander in chief wants major changes in addition to the additional troops he's ordering into Afghanistan to shore up the war effort.”

“Gates said he asked for McKiernan's resignation ‘with the approval of the president.’ The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Adm. Mike Mullen, and McKiernan's military boss, Gen. David Petraeus, both said they supported the switch.” <Source>

Proof that Obama’s concern is a charade …

“Obama inflamed partisan tensions in Washington in April by releasing memos written by Bush-era Justice Department lawyers that provided the legal justification for harsh interrogation tactics such as waterboarding, which is simulated drowning.”

These memos, while not graphic enough to provoke widespread rioting and attacks against American troops – did give aid and comfort to our nations' enemies, both foreign and domestic. 

Bottom line …

In spite of his claims or the bleating of the mainstream media, President Barack Obama is acting, first, in his own self-interest which apparently leaves concerns about America a distant second. In many ways, a cross between former President Jimmy Carter and former President Bill Clinton.

Be well, be safe and take care of yourself and your family first.

-- steve

Reference Links …

Obama opposes detainee abuse photo release | Politics | Reuters


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


Obama's military? (Updated)

Update:

According to those in the know, the removal of General McKeirnan by General Petraeus was merely an operational move and no disrespect or aspersions were cast towards General McKeirnan; even though his career may be effectively over. His replacement is thought to be a "quietly effective" leader with a substantial record of success whose appointment is a definited step toward resolving the ongoing situation.

Original blog entry ...

There is very little doubt in my mind that something bad may be happening to our military … they are quickly becoming hyper-politicalized and on the verge of being rendered ineffective by their Commander-in-Chief.

According to the Washington Post …

“Gen. David H. Petraeus, the top commander of U.S. forces in the region, has pressed aggressively to broaden the military's mission in Afghanistan and Iraq beyond killing the enemy to protecting the population, overseeing reconstruction projects and rebuilding local governance. Petraeus played a key role in the Obama administration's strategic review of the Afghanistan conflict and was involved in the decision to remove McKiernan, which Petraeus said in a statement he ‘fully supports.’"

What?

The purpose of a United States military forces is two-fold: to vigilantly protect the United States from attack by foreign forces by maintaining a quick and deadly reactionary force of overwhelming strength and when diplomatic negotiation fail to produce a favorable outcome, to force the other side to surrender or to negotiate a favorable settlement. They do this by being an overwhelming force; and when required to act: to kill foreign combatants and break things. Collateral damage is a certainty – especially when foreign combatants hide among a civilian population. The fate of their countrymen is in the hands of our enemies who have chosen to put them in jeopardy.

Traditionally:

  • the military does not act as policemen who insert themselves between combatants for the sake of keeping the peace. Caught in the cross-fire of two or more combatants who hate each other with a religious fervor;
  • the military is not a group of project managers and logistics experts overseeing reconstruction of projects needed to rebuild another nation’s infrastructure;
  • the military is definitely not a political force that is engaged in nation building or rebuilding local governance; and
  • the military does not serve as escorts for United States business interests who have paid lobbyists to coerce politicians into confusing national interest with private commercial interest.

So what the hell is General Petraeus talking about?  Or is he struggling to save his career and reputation by following the Obama path instead of resigning with honor and dignity.

The thought crossed my mind that Obama may view our military as a hostile force to be weakened, much in the same manner as Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton. A force to be turned into a European ready-response team which can be used to provide aid and comfort for those that hate us already – so Obama can bask in the glow of European accolades.

You must ask yourself, do we want to turn our military into United Nations’ peacekeepers, food distributors, infrastructure consultants and governance advisors?

It is one thing for our special forces to befriend a village, to help with the creation or repair of critical infrastructure and to protect those who attempt self-governance, in order to identify insurgents and assure local cooperation with our efforts. But it is quite another thing to think that these roles can be extended to a wider population without a corresponding commitment of money and manpower – and the possibility that all of the goodwill and realized benefits could by wiped out by renewed tribal allegiances or the rise of one crazy religious leader.

The real Afghanistan solution …

Have we learned nothing from the Russians who were far less afraid to use force in the region? The only way to win in Afghanistan is to not play the current game of intervention. Let them grow their opium poppies. Let them govern themselves. Let the Taliban or whatever they call themselves play a part in government. But make no mistake about it: explain that they need to hold their foreign aggression in check – and if anybody threatens the interests of the United States, retribution will be swift and massive – delivered by a military that is second to none.

The sole reason for our ineffectiveness in the region is that our rules of engagement favor the enemy combatants, not our own troops.

Some politicians seem willing to take American casualties rather than face the Sunday talk shows where media reports of collateral damage are widely publicized by the far-left “hate America first” crowd that wants to weaken the United States, economically and militarily, so that European-style “enlightened” socialism can prevail.

One can only wonder if the United States could have actually won World War I or World War II with the current attitudes of our politicians? In fact, there is little difference between our current crop of appeasing politicians and those cheese-eating surrender monkeys known as France.

Far-left activists such as people like George Soros who appears to be using his billions to move America to the left – possibly for his own personal profit and political ideology. What other motives might he have – outside of hatred for the United States of America and its people?

“Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates announced yesterday that he had requested the resignation of the top American general in Afghanistan, Gen. David D. McKiernan, making a rare decision to remove a wartime commander at a time when the Obama administration has voiced increasing alarm about the country's downward spiral.”

Incidents in which U.S. forces caused high numbers of civilian casualties in Afghanistan had emerged as a major source of discomfort for Gates and Mullen during McKiernan's tenure, but officials said that was not the reason for his removal. ‘McKiernan got it, and he's been much better about responding,’ a senior military official said. Gates noted yesterday that civilian deaths in Afghanistan had declined 40 percent since January compared with the same period last year.”

And since the enemy combatants often appear to be civilians – without any uniform or military bearing, how the hell would Gates know which civilians are actually enemy combatants?

As a nation, especially a nation being led by a coalition of far-left activists, we must decide exactly what our national interests are … in concrete terms; and how far we are willing to go to defend these interests. No more pussy-footing around issues and hamstringing the military with rules of engagement that seem designed to produce favorable media coverage rather than lasting political results. We need to save the lives of our troops even if it means going to war with those who hide in their own communities and doom their own neighbors to death by their malevolent presence.

-- steve

Reference links:

Top U.S. Commander in Afghanistan Is Fired|Washington Post


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


OBAMA AND HIS SPEECH TO THE MUSLIM WORLD: HOW COULD HE? HOW DARE HE?

It has been widely reported that many in the Arab-Muslim world want President Barack Obama’s Egypt speech to focus on the so-called Israeli-Arab issue.

By what right does Barack Obama feel obliged to tell other sovereign countries how they must prosecute their own foreign policy; especially in the face of an existential threat?

By what right does Barack Obama feel that he can ignore history and set down negotiation guidelines for parties in conflict.

By what right does Barack Obama feel obliged to act an honest broker between a democratic, productive nation which has been repeatedly attacked by its neighbors and sovereign nations which repress human rights and engage in real torture or worse as penalties for crimes that are defined as human rights elsewhere in an enlightened world?

And for what? A public relations opportunity or an opportunity to demonstrate our “fairness?”

CNSNews.com is reporting …

Islamic and Arab governments are hopeful that President Obama’s much-anticipated address to Muslims will focus on the Israeli-Arab issue, and judging from the administration’s choice of venue and timing, they may not be disappointed.”

“Obama indicated last December that he hoped to deliver such a speech in a key Islamic capital within his first 100 days in office. He missed that goal, but the White House announced Friday that the president would deliver a major speech ‘about America’s relations with the Muslim world’ on June 4, in Egypt.”

“Confirmation of the plan brought a quick appeal by the Arab League – the body representing the Arab states – for Obama to use the address to explain his policy on the Mideast peace process.”

The Mideast Peace Process is a sham …

There is no dealing with terrorist thugs who demand tribute from all nations to keep the proverbial lid on the pot and avoid outright conflict. The Yasser Arafat strategy.

Truth be told, the Palestinians have an autonomous state in Gaza and other areas which are controlled by their own toxic political factions. A state which has failed its people by refusing to build infrastructure, industry and provide their citizens with a decent life. If they wanted a helping hand from Israel, all they needed to do is accept Israel as a nation-state, pursue peace and prosecute those who are disrupters of worse.

Israel has made overtures, given up territory and extended an olive branch … to what end? To be repeatedly attacked by those occupied their new territories.

“In the broader Islamic world, too, there have been calls for Obama to prioritize the Palestinian issue. Muslim ambassadors met recently in Pakistan to discuss the planned speech, and several stressed the need to address the ‘root causes’ of terrorism, with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict high up the list.”

The root causes of terrorism are well-known and on open display. Nation-states, built upon an intolerant religion which demands subservience to its beliefs, refused to officially recognize that Israel has a right to exist. Their goal is to wipe Israel from the map.

“ ‘An urgent and just remedy’ for the Palestinian issue is required, the Organization of the Islamic Conference told Obama earlier this year.”

An urgent and just remedy for the Palestinian issue would require Arab states to give up some of their land for a new nation. A nation existing on a map surely as if drawn by the British overlords in recent history. A nation which would return part of the Transjordan area to those who were forcibly expelled by their fellow Arabs. Mainly because they were disruptive, bellicose and wanted to overthrow certain monarchies. One only need look at Saudi Arabia to see that they have paid tributes to terrorists to avoid conflict at home. Spread a toxic version of Whabism throughout the world to appease the radical religious elements within their borders. Does anybody remember that Osama bin Laden was a Saudi who wanted to overthrow the Kingdom in which he was born?

Two-state solution?

To have a valid two-state solution, you first need two states who will acknowledge each other’s right to exist and accord each other the mutual respect which comes from neighborly cooperation. You need a leadership which is committed to the path of peace, rather than the promotion of terror for personal profit.

Obama does not know the answer …

The self-styled Messiah is lost without pre-written speeches delivered with TelePrompTers. He doesn’t appear to have a clue as how to make two nations, long engaging in battle, sit at the same table – let along develop a peace accord.

“The administration has stressed its support for a ‘two-state solution’ to the long conflict between Israel and Palestinian Arabs but has not laid down in detail how it envisages moving towards that goal.”

Talk, talk, talk …

And in the end, the American taxpayer will shell out additional billions to buy nothing more than lip service and a photo opportunity.

“Former British prime minister Tony Blair, envoy for the Mideast ‘Quartet,’ said last week that ‘a new framework’ for peace efforts, drafted by the U.S., would be unveiled within weeks.”

The Arab Paradox: moving toward peace by threatening war …

“Obama plans to hold separate talks at the White House during May with Israeli, Palestinian and Egyptian leaders. Expectations for those meetings were ratcheted up at the weekend by Jordan’s King Abdullah, who predicted another war within 18 months if peace negotiations were delayed.”

“ ‘If there is procrastination by Israel on the two-state solution or there is no clear American vision for how this is going to play out in 2009, then all the tremendous credibility that Obama has worldwide and in this region will evaporate overnight if nothing comes out in May,” he told The Times of London.”

Just who will precipitate this war? Certainly not Israel who has used force judiciously and in self-defense against those who attacked the state and represented an existential threat.

What credibility? Obama is regarded as a naive fool to be played by those who understand the game and who want to manipulate the United States into sanctioning Israel while funding Arab initiatives.

If Obama wants to be taken seriously, as a leader of the United States and the free world, let him immediately embark on a program of energy independence which features nuclear energy. Then free of the extortion exerted by the oil-producing Muslim states, let him set down a clear path.

One:  produce an accord, signed by all Arab nations recognizing Israel’s right to exist as a sovereign nation-state. The more nations and leaders the sign this accord the more significant the Muslim’s commitment to the peace process and a statement to the world.

Two: let all Muslim nations declare an end to all terrorism and hostilities and produce a resolution to severely punish those who continue their bellicose ways.

Three: let Israel and the Muslim nation’s decide on a time frame to demonstrate this new peace process. Perhaps a period no less that twenty years. Years in which all of the respective parties pledge to help the Palestinians build an infrastructure which will support a vibrant economy, jobs for its citizens and the institutions of governance – relatively free from factions that deny Israel’s right to exist or advocate hostile action.

While twenty years appears to be a relatively long time, it is but a blink of the eye in Middle Eastern history.

Four: demand that Iran be a party to the process and cease direct or indirect hostile activities against any other hostile nation.

Five: demand that Iran cease pursuing nuclear weaponry which will severely destabilize the region and threaten its neighbors, Arab and Israeli alike.

Six: demand fundamental reforms to the Muslim religion – stop the teaching of hate and intolerance of other belief systems.

There is nothing magical about the road to peace other than the willingness of the participants, all the participants, to agree on the process and the need to live in regional harmony.

And there is no reason that the American taxpayer should foot the bill for nothing more than lip service and a photo opportunity. We can assist and guide, but the parties must be willing.

If there is no solution …

Then let there be a war. A decisive war. A war in which the vanquished parties will be forced to live the type of life that would be available during peaceful times. If it means regime changes, leadership changes – so be it. This tribal conflict has gone on for centuries and it is most unlikely that the United States or any other power can end the conflict with a promise and piece of paper.

It is time that the nations of the Middle East solve their own problem. Other than oil, which keeps them in weapons and able to purchase political influence, the United States should have no overriding considerations that would corrupt a negotiated peace.

If anyone has any better ideas, the e-mail link is under my picture.

Be well, be safe and take care of yourself and your family first.

-- steve

Reference links:

CNSNews.com - Arab-Muslim World Wants Obama’s Speech in Egypt to Focus on Israeli-Arab Issue


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS