Previous month:
September 2008
Next month:
November 2008

Problem: Modern politics is all about electability with no mention of character or competence!

After suffering through the California elections which gave us a rather incompetent Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger who has shown more proclivity for special interest fundraising than he has for leadership to cut the profligate spending of the legislature, I am now wary of all political races where the party compromises their principles in return for an electable candidate. This is the “half a loaf is better than none” theory which totally screws the people out of competent leadership for the perpetuation of corrupt party politics.

The Hill.com reports …

“Jesse Jackson Jr. hopes to replace Obama in Senate”

“Illinois political insiders say Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr., who defended Barack Obama after his father famously threatened to castrate him, is the favorite to replace the Democratic nominee in the Senate.” 

“But Jackson Jr.’s path is by no means assured. Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) also wants to replace Sen. Obama (Ill.) in the upper chamber if he is elected president.”

“This gives Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich, who must choose between an African-American political scion and a close ally of the labor movement, a difficult decision.”

A Blag0jevitch decision?

“There are a number of federal investigations into both personal and regime corruption within the Blagojevich Administration. Blagojevich's wife has been a long-term business  partner of the now-convicted political crook and Barack Obama’s buddy, Tony Rezko. According to numerous parties, the Blagojevich Administration can be described as a “pay for play” administration where influence can be freely, and often inexpensively, purchased.” <Source>

Nowhere does anyone discuss competence …

It seems that this appointment is all about money, influence and future electability. With nothing mentioned about competence, leadership or the ability to serve the people’s needs.

Perhaps what should happen is that a special election should be held in which the people, rather than corrupt political parties, select the candidate that will best serve the citizens of Illinois?

“ ‘If Sen. Obama wins -- and I’m optimistic that he will, I indeed would be honored and humbled to succeed him in the U.S. Senate,’ said Jackson in a statement. ‘But, in the end, the decision rests with Gov. Blagojevich and I’m confident that he’ll make an appointment in the best interest of the state as well as the nation.’”

Race and ethnicity vs. money and electability?

“Jackson’s case is strengthened by the fact that Obama is the only African-American member of the Senate. Presumably, Obama would like to see at least one African-American representative in the chamber.”

Jackson also benefits from being co-chairman of Obama’s presidential campaign and a product of the same South Side Chicago political machine from which the Democratic nominee emerged.”

“Illinois political insiders, who declined to discuss the subject on the record for fear of appearing presumptuous before the results of the presidential race are known, say Obama would have a major hand in the decision.”

“But it’s not a slam-dunk for Jackson. Blagojevich must pick a candidate who can hold the seat in 2010, when the temporary two-year appointment would expire.”

“Some Democratic strategists question whether Jackson can win statewide.”

“ ‘Jesse Jackson doesn’t make sense, he’s not electable statewide,’ said a Democratic operative with ties to Illinois. ‘He’s a very left-of-center politician.’”

“Jackson supporters counter that he is no more liberal than Obama and note that he enjoys the support of many Republicans in his district.”

An indictment of Barack Obama’s politics?

Is this an indictment of Barack Obama’s far-left, liberal politics? A political stance which might not stand up to the scrutiny of the entire population of Illinois? I cannot think of any better reason for not electing Barack Obama to the presidency that he possibly couldn’t satisfy the wishes of the entire country – and he has become a serious democrat candidate through a confluence of events in which the “hate Hillary” crowd and the “Hate Bush” crowd gathered to select the last candidate standing. And considering the remaining lame, corrupt or weird candidates – the decision was somewhat like choosing the worst of the best or the best of the worst.

Labor = money and votes …

“Democrats in Schakowsky’s camp argue that she would run more successfully in Southern Illinois and tout her strong ties to the labor community. They also tout her energy and record of accomplishment in Congress. She is one of Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s (D-Calif.) closer friends.”

“Rep. Rahm Emanuel (Ill.), the Democratic Caucus chairman, has also been floated as a possible successor. But Emanuel and his staff have given little indication that he’s interested. Illinois political observers interviewed by The Hill said they believe Emanuel would prefer to climb the rungs of the House leadership.”

“Blagojevich may go outside the Illinois House delegation. One possible candidate would be Tammy Duckworth, director of the Illinois Department of Veterans’ Affairs. Duckworth, who is Asian-American, could serve as a compromise candidate on the race question.”

Transcending race?

I thought that Illinois was about transcending the politics of race with an enthusiastic Obama nomination. But then again, there is race and there is money/politics and race.

“Duckworth, an Iraq War veteran, could have appeal in conservative-leaning Southern Illinois because of her military record. She is also a protégé of Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), one of Obama’s most influential advisors.”

“Another possibility would be Emil Jones Jr., president of the Illinois Senate, whom some Chicago insiders credit with Obama’s rise through the state chamber.”

Illinois is not alone: the Delaware dilemma …

“Two other Democratic governors, Ruth Ann Minner of Delaware and Janet Napolitano, face similar quandaries depending on the outcome of the Nov. 4 election.”

If Obama is elected president and Sen. Joe Biden (D-Del.) accedes to the vice presidency, Miner must appoint someone to fill Biden’s seat. Delaware political insiders say that Biden wants the seat, which he has held since 1972, to go to his son, Beau Biden. The catch is that Beau, the state’s attorney general, is expected to be in Iraq with the Army National Guard, if and when Biden resigns.

“Miner must decide whether to appoint Biden’s son outright or instead pick a caretaker who would keep the seat warm and give it up voluntarily at the end of the two-year temporary appointment.”

“Just as Obama in Illinois, Joe Biden is expected to have a big role in choosing his successor, and he is widely expected to pave the way for Beau, say several Delaware political experts who spoke on condition of anonymity.”

“The person most frequently mentioned as a caretaker appointee is Myron Steele, chief justice of the Delaware Supreme Court. Secretary of State Harriet Smith Windsor is another candidate who is seen as willing to make way for Beau in 2010.”

Special deals …

This is Biden’s legacy, special deals and self-dealing politics involving his sons. You may wish to read my other blog entry: Biden: The WRONG Biden and the WRONG scandal? (Updated) for a look at another Biden son.

The Arizona dilemma ...

“If John McCain, the GOP nominee, wins the White House, Napolitano faces an even trickier decision in Arizona. Unlike most states, Arizona law requires that Napolitano appoint someone from McCain’s party to fill his seat should he leave for the Oval Office.”

“Adding to the mix, Arizona political insiders speculate that Napolitano would like to run for Senate when term limits force her from office in 2010. “

“ ‘If Sen. McCain were to resign, the governor would choose someone of the same party to fill out the remainder of his term,’ said spokeswoman Shilo Mitchell.”

“One Arizona strategist said it is therefore in Napolitano’s interest to appoint a Republican successor who would be vulnerable to defeat in 2010. She could appoint a friendly Republican who might be willing to vacate the seat after two years, such as Kristin Mayes, whom Napolitano tapped for the Arizona Corporation Commission in 2003. Mayes, a lifelong Republican, once worked as Napolitano’s communications director.”

Again, special political deals with very little consideration of the people’s need for competent leadership.

What can YOU do?

It is time that politicians are told by the people that political seats and appointments do not belong to the party or any single politician … they belong to the people who deserve honest, ethical and competent leadership instead of the compromise product of a corrupt party and possibly corrupt politicians who act out of self-interest.

Do not vote for any candidate or current politician who is willing to subvert the safety, security, sovereignty and economic strength of the United States or limit an individual's right of self-defense for their personal philosophy, power, prestige or profits.

-- steve

Quote of the Day: “The bananas were like that when I got here!” --Humpty Dumpty

A reminder from OneCitizenSpeaking.com: a large improvement can result from a small change…

The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. -- Marcus Aurelius

Reference Links:

TheHill.com - Jesse Jackson Jr. hopes to replace Obama in Senate


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


OBAMA BELIEVES CONSTITUTION IS FLAWED

Constitution has major blind spot in this culture …

… and that it reflects the fundamental flaw that continues to this day.

DO WE KNOW BARACK OBAMA AND CAN WE TRUST HIM?

THE SHORT ANSWER TO BOTH QUESTIONS IS …

NO!


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


OBAMA: SPEAKS ABOUT WEALTH REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH AND ECONOMIC JUSTICE IN 2001

Barack the socialist …

It is extremely important to listen to Barack Obama speak about wealth redistribution and economic justice. Listen to Barack Obama speak about redistributive change through the Supreme Court.

We cannot elect this socialist to the Presidency of the United States.

In his own words …

  • Redistribution of Wealth
  • Economic Justice in Society
  • “Any three of us could come up with a rationale for bring about economic justice through the courts.”

BARACK OBAMA IS THE MOST DANGEROUS CANDIDATE FOR THE PRESIDENCY – EVER!

NO WONDER OUR ENEMIES AND EUROPEAN SOCIALISTS LOVE HIM AND WANT TO SEE HIM ELECTED!

When the United Nations openly welcomes the election of Barack Obama, you know that we are definitely providing aid and comfort to our enemies...

"Obama supporters hail from Russia, Canada, France, Britain, Germany, the Netherlands, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Indonesia and elsewhere. One American employee here [at the U.N.] seemed puzzled that he was being asked whether Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) was even a consideration. 'Obama was and is unstoppable,' the official said. 'Please, God, let him win,' he added."

" 'It would be hard to find anybody, I think, at the U.N. who would not believe that Obama would be a considerable improvement over any other alternative,' said William H. Luers, executive director of the United Nations Association. 'It's been a bad eight years, and there is a lot of bad feeling over it.'" <Source>

ASK THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA WHY THEY ARE NOT REPORTING THIS NEWS!


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


CAN ISRAEL TRUST BARACK OBAMA AND SHOULD TRADITIONAL LIBERAL DEMOCRATS OF THE JEWISH FAITH VOTE FOR OBAMA?

Barack Obama has more troubling associations than any other Presidential Candidate in the history of the United States.

Here is another one; one that should be extremely troubling to anyone who believes that Israel has a fundamental right to exist in the Middle East.

Can any United States citizen trust Barack Obama -- who has steadfastly refused to disclose his activities and associations that took place during his college days … also refusing to provide access to his transcript or college writings?


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


Obama: Can't say it isn't true ...

Can anybody refute these facts?

Note: This commercial is in the format that is supplied to broadcast studios. Any comments?


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


[X] YES -- CA PROPOSITION 8 (2008): Gay Marriage -- Who says so?

UPDATE: 11-12-08 ELTON JOHN PROVIDES A VIEWPOINT ...

From USA Today ...

"'I don't want to be married. I'm very happy with a civil partnership. If gay people want to get married, or get together, they should have a civil partnership,' said John. 'The word marriage, I think, puts a lot of people off. You get the same equal rights that we do when we have a civil partnership. Heterosexual people get married. We can have civil partnerships.'"

"In December 2005, John and Furnish tied the knot in a civil partnership ceremony in Windsor, England. But, clarified the singer, 'We're not married. Let's get that right. We have a civil partnership. What is wrong with Proposition 8 is that they went for marriage. Marriage is going to put a lot of people off, the word marriage.'"

According to the people that I have spoken with since the inception of proposition 8, most do not plan to get married and are quite content with the concept of a civil union. This only reinforces my opinion that this is a wedge issue used by militant activists to force societal recognition of their lifestyle as being legitimate and valid. Which it is -- without requiring the futher re-definition of the word "marriage" or creating another protected class of super-citizens.

Original blog entry ...

I am trying my level best to supply my readers with actionable information and my thoughts on the matters being discussed. Therefore, I feel it is my duty as a blogger to re-visit subjects which require updating.

In a past, similarly-titled blog entry … 

[X] YES - CALIFORNIA PROPOSITION 8 (2008) -- GAY MARRIAGE,

I commented …

“That is, certain educators are planning to introduce new curriculum changes that highlight the gay lifestyle at all grade levels and that parents are going to be denied their constitutional rights to ‘opt out’ of the teaching of material which impinges on the parent’s and child’s freedom of religion.”

“It is not that these materials will be restricted to classes dealing with social customs and health issues or that they will be taught to older children; but these materials will become pervasive at all grade levels.”

“Thus the parents who are teaching their children one thing about religion and morality is being openly contradicted by the school’s teaching, which only serves to confuse the child and possible erode parental freedoms and respect.”

So I was amazed to see the California State Superintendent of Public Instruction appearing in a  paid "NO on Proposition 8" commercial claiming that:

“Prop. 8 has nothing to do with schools or kids.”

Isn’t the Superintendent of Public Instruction supposed to be above politics and concentrate on the needs of California’s children?

According to the State of California’s website, Jack O’Connell, the State Superintendent of Public Instruction, is a state official elected by the people on a nonpartisan ballot for a four-year term. He is accountable to the people of California for performing all the duties and responsibilities of his office.”

But Superintendent O’Connell appears to have greater political aspirations …

While he is currently serving in this position, his prior political service was as a liberal democrat in the California State Assembly’s 35th District and as a liberal democrat in the California State Senate’s 18th District.

A career politician, it is thought that he is preparing to run for the position of California’s Governor in 2010 and needs the homosexual lobby’s endorsement to run with the likes of Jerry Brown (current Attorney General and Past California Governor), San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom who openly performed gay marriages at city hall and the other far-left democrats who also aspire to the position.

But is he telling the truth about Proposition 8?

Apparently not!

Capture10-25-2008-10.39.09 PM

How many schools provide comprehensive sexual health education, even though it is not mandated?

“According to Sex Education in California Public Schools (PDF; Outside Source) (survey conducted PB Consulting, 2003), 96 percent of California school districts provide comprehensive sexual health education.”

At what grade level is comprehensive sexual health education to be taught?

“EC Section 51933 states that a school district may provide comprehensive sexual health education consisting of age-appropriate instruction in any grade from kindergarten through grade twelve. No specific topics are required to be taught in elementary grades; however, commencing in seventh grade, if comprehensive sexual health education is taught, districts shall comply with requirements outlined in EC 51933(b)(8-12).”

What does the EC say about providing sex education and HIV/STD instruction to students who may be lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgendered?

“EC sections 51933(b)(4) and 51934(b) require that instruction be appropriate for use with students of all sexual orientations and clearly states that part of the intent of the law is ‘to encourage a pupil to develop healthy attitudes concerning adolescent growth and development, body image, gender roles, sexual orientation, dating, marriage, and family.’”

“The law prohibits sex education classes from teaching or promoting religious doctrine and from promoting bias against anyone on the basis of any category protected by the state's school nondiscrimination policy, EC Section 220, which includes actual or perceived gender and sexual orientation.”

“All comprehensive sexual health education and HIV instruction, including topics such as sexual development, dating, family, and protection from STDs and pregnancy, must encompass the experiences of gay, lesbian, and bisexual students as well as those of their heterosexual classmates.”

Do parents and/or guardians need to be informed if their child is to receive sex education or HIV/STD instruction?

“Yes. The law recognizes that while parents and guardians support the teaching of medically accurate, comprehensive sex education in schools, they have the ultimate responsibility for teaching their children about human sexuality; they may choose to withdraw their children from this instruction.”
“EC sections 51937 and 51938 explain that parents or guardians must be notified (passive consent) by the school at the beginning of the school year about planned comprehensive sexual health education and HIV/AIDS prevention education, be given an opportunity to review materials, and be given the opportunity to request in writing that their child not participate in the instruction.”

“In addition, to facilitate the collection of data needed by researchers to evaluate the effectiveness of sex education and other teen pregnancy prevention efforts, the law has modified the parental consent procedures governing student assessments. This law permits schools to administer anonymous, voluntary, confidential, age-appropriate surveys or questionnaires in which students are asked about their health risk behavior, including sexual activities and attitudes.”

“Parents must be notified of any planned assessments, be given the opportunity to review the assessments and, in grades seven through twelve, and be given the opportunity to request in writing that their children not participate. Prior to seventh grade, parents must give their active consent in order for their child to participate.”

These parental notification and consent policies apply only to sexual health education, HIV/AIDS prevention education, and related assessments.”

Does the law permit the use of outside speakers to deliver sex education or HIV/STD instruction?

“Yes. According to EC sections 51933 and 51934, schools may enter into agreements with outside agencies with expertise to provide comprehensive sexual health and/or HIV/STD prevention education, or to provide training to school personnel. Instruction provided by outside instructors shall comply with the same requirements as instruction provided by teachers employed by the school district.”

Who typically provides sex education and HIV/STD instruction?

“Individuals assigned to provide sex education and HIV/STD instruction are selected locally and typically include regular classroom teachers, health education teachers, school nurses, and trainers from community-based organizations, such as the American Red Cross, Planned Parenthood, local health departments, and AIDS service agencies.” <Source>

Additional information …

Comprehensive Sexual Health Education

Provides information concerning authorized comprehensive sexual health education.

“Education Code (EC) 51933 (Outside Source) specifies that school districts are not required to provide comprehensive sexual health education, but if they choose to do so, they shall comply with all of the requirements listed below.”

“Comprehensive sexual health education instruction shall be age-appropriate and bias-free, and all factual information shall be medically accurate and objective. Instruction shall be appropriate for students of all genders, sexual orientations, and ethnic and cultural backgrounds, and it shall be accessible for English language learner students and students with disabilities. Instruction shall encourage communication between students and their families and shall teach respect for marriage and committed relationships.” <Source>

Bottom line …

If proposition 8 passes, gay marriage will be equated with traditional marriage and thus may be incorporated into all teaching materials – even those having nothing to do with “comprehensive sexual health education” which requires parental consent or opt-out provisions. 

Misleading or lying for a future political advantage?

And while Superintendent O’Connell is technically correct that school districts are not mandated to teach comprehensive sexual health education, his department’s statistics show that 96% of all California School Districts have chosen to teach the sexual subject matter which makes his assertion, at the very least, misleading.

As for the inclusion of gay-themed marriage information into textbooks and other teaching aids, it would only be a matter of time until a court challenge was mounted against the State of California by the gay lobby – demanding “equality and fairness” in instruction materials. Thus further diluting parental rights to instruct their children on matters of religion, morality and behavior.

As for Jack O'Connell, a word to the wise -- if you truly want to be California's governor in 2010, I suggest that you start by not misleading the public. We have had a number of lying, thieving governors in the past years and I am not about to let another one assume office with impunity.

-- steve

Opposing viewpoints are welcome and will be discussed.


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


Will Obama democrats revive the enemies list and use government resources to investigate their enemies? (Updated)

UPDATE: 10-31-08 BACKGROUND CHECK FAR FROM ROUTINE

According to the Columbus Dispatch ...

"Vanessa Niekamp said that when she was asked to run a child-support check on Samuel Joseph Wurzelbacher on Oct. 16, she thought it routine. A supervisor told her the man had contacted the state agency about his case. Niekamp didn't know she just had checked on 'Joe the Plumber,' who was elevated the night before to presidential politics prominence as Republican John McCain's example in a debate of an average American."

"The senior manager would not learn about 'Joe' for another week, when she said her boss informed her and directed her to write an e-mail stating her computer check was a legitimate inquiry. The reason Niekamp said she was given for checking if there was a child-support case on Wurzelbacher does not match the reason given by the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services."

"Director Helen Jones-Kelley said her agency checks people who are 'thrust into the public spotlight,' amid suggestions they may have come into money, to see if they owe support or are receiving undeserved public assistance." "Niekamp told The Dispatch she is unfamiliar with the practice of checking on the newly famous. 'I've never done that before, I don't know of anybody in my office who does that and I don't remember anyone ever doing that,' she said today."

"Worried about her $69,000-a-year job and potential criminal charges, the 15-year state employee said she went to Inspector General Thomas P. Charles on Oct. 24. She has seen employees fired, and dismissed one herself, for illegally accessing personal information in support cases. Niekamp, a registered Republican, said politics played no role in what she told investigators. The e-mail that Niekamp said she wrote was not among records provided today to The Dispatch in response to a public-records request. Nor did the agency, as required by state law, say it withheld any records."

Someone needs to go to jail to send a message that political interference in state business will not be tolerated at any level and that the person who ordered the check is just as guilty as the hospital employee who allegedly viewed Britney Spears' medical file and sold data to the tabloids.

Obama camp ditches three newspapers who endorsed John McCain ...

In other news ... we have learned that the Obama team has removed three large daily newpaper reporters from the Obama plane in favor of two glossy "personality" magazines that cater to a black demographic. Sounds like political payback as these three newspapers endorsed John McCain. The Obama campaign cited lack of space and an unwillingness to add a second media plane. Yeah Right! It looks like the transformative bi-partisan candidate is anything but. Same old politician with same old politics.

UPDATE: 10-30-08  IT'S BEGINNING TO COME TRUE ...

From the Drudge Report ...

"The Obama campaign has decided to heave out three newspapers from its plane for the final days of its blitz across battleground states -- and all three endorsed Sen. John McCain for president!"

"The NY Post,
Washington Times
and Dallas Morning News have all been told to move out by Sunday to make room for network bigwigs -- and possibly for the inclusion of reporters from two black magazines, ESSENCE and JET, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned."

"Despite pleas from top editors of the three newspapers that have covered the campaign for months at extraordinary cost, the Obama campaign says their reporters -- and possibly others -- will have to vacate their coveted seats so more power players can document the final days of Sen. Barack Obama's historic campaign to become the first black American president." 

"Some told the DRUDGE REPORT that the reporters are being ousted to bring on documentary film-makers to record the final days; others expect to see on board more sympathetic members of the media, including the NY TIMES' Maureen Dowd, who once complained that she was barred from McCain's Straight Talk Express airplane."

UPDATE: 10-30-08  SPYING MORE EXTENSIVE THAN THOUGH, GOVERNMENT SOURCES SEEKING TO COVER THEIR ASSES BY FLOATING "SUSPICIONS THAT 'JOE THE PLUMBER' MAY BE CONCEALING ASSETS ...

From the Columbus Dispatch ...

"A state agency has revealed that its checks of computer systems for potential information on "Joe the Plumber" were more extensive than it first acknowledged. Helen Jones-Kelley, director of the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services, disclosed today that computer inquiries on Samuel Joseph Wurzelbacher were not restricted to a child-support system. The agency also checked Wurzelbacher in its computer systems to determine whether he was receiving welfare assistance or owed unemployment compensation taxes, she wrote."

"Jones-Kelley made the revelations in a letter to Ohio Senate President Bill M. Harris, R-Ashland, who demanded answers on why state officials checked out Wurzelbacher. Harris called the multiple records checks 'questionable' and said he awaits more answers. 'It's kind of like Big Brother is looking in your pocket,' he said. If state employees run checks on every person listed in newspaper stories as buying a business, 'it must take a lot of people a lot of time to run these checks,' he said. 'Where do you draw the line?'"

"The checks were run after the news media reported that Wurzelbacher was considering buying a plumbing business with more than $250,000 in annual income, Jones-Kelley wrote. "Given our understanding that Mr. Wurzelbacher had publicly indicated that he had the means to purchase a substantial business enterprise, ODJFS, consistent with past departmental practice, checked confidential databases ," she wrote."

" 'Not surprisingly, when a person behind in child support payments or receiving public assistance is receiving significant media attention which suggests that the person appears to have available financial resources, the Department risks justifiable criticism if it fails to take note and respond,' Jones-Kelley wrote."

"Jones-Kelley wrote that the checks were 'well-meaning,' but misinterpreted amid the heated final weeks of a presidential election. The administration of Democratic Gov. Ted Strickland has said the information was not improperly shared and that there were no political motives behind the checks. Jones-Kelly also has denied any connections between the computer checks on Wurzelbacher and her support for Obama. She donated the maximum $2,500 this year to the Obama campaign."

Can you say "plausible deniability?" However, the department shoud now be investigated and made to prove that it consistently checks people appearing in news sources against state databases. If there is not consistent record of these checks being made, or if they are only being made on the basis of political stories -- someone should fire Jones-Kelly for malfeasance and lack of supervision of her employees. If the employee is found to have leaked information to others in the office or to the media, they need to be prosecuted for illegal use of state computers.

Original  blog entry ...

For those with short memories …

“The White House FBI files controversy of the Clinton Administration, often referred to in the press as Filegate arose in June 1996 around improper access in 1993 and 1994 to Federal Bureau of Investigation security-clearance documents. Craig Livingstone, director of the White House's Office of Personnel Security, improperly requested, and received from the FBI, background reports without asking permission of the subject individuals. Estimates range from 400 to 700 to 900 unauthorized file disclosures. The incident caused a firestorm of criticism because many of the files covered White House employees from previous Republican administrations, including top figures such as James Baker, Brent Scowcroft, and Marlin Fitzwater. Under criticism, Livingstone resigned from his position.” <Source>

It doesn’t matter that the campaign principals or the candidates ordered the act, it was done on their behalf and for their benefit.

An investigation of “Joe the Plumber” …

We all saw how fast the Obama campaign and others sought to discredit and embarrass “Joe the Plumber” after he asked Barack Obama a question which led to a media firestorm over Obama’s answer.

Portrayed in the left-biased media as a scofflaw with a driving-related infraction, a tax lien and a lack of a “plumber’s license” (even though he worked under another licensed plumber’s supervision … someone needed to obtain the information so the campaign could leak it to the media. Or perhaps it was the media itself who used a web of connections in high places to obtain the information in an unauthorized, and potentially illegal, manner?

From the Columbus Dispatch …

“Investigators trying to determine whether access was illegal”

"State and local officials are investigating if state and law-enforcement computer systems were illegally accessed when they were tapped for personal information about "Joe the Plumber."

“Samuel Joseph Wurzelbacher became part of the national political lexicon Oct. 15 when Republican presidential candidate John McCain mentioned him frequently during his final debate with Democrat Barack Obama.”

“The 34-year-old from the Toledo suburb of Holland is held out by McCain as an example of an American who would be harmed by Obama's tax proposals.:

“Public records requested by The Dispatch disclose that information on Wurzelbacher's driver's license or his sport-utility vehicle was pulled from the Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles database three times shortly after the debate.”

“Information on Wurzelbacher was accessed by accounts assigned to the office of Ohio Attorney General Nancy H. Rogers, the Cuyahoga County Child Support Enforcement Agency and the Toledo Police Department.”

“It has not been determined who checked on Wurzelbacher, or why. Direct access to driver's license and vehicle registration information from BMV computers is restricted to legitimate law enforcement and government business.”

“The attorney general's office is investigating if the access of Wuzelbacher's BMV information through the office's Ohio Law Enforcement Gateway computer system was unauthorized, said spokeswoman Jennifer Brindisi.”

" ‘We're trying to pinpoint where it came from," she said. The investigation could become "criminal in nature,’ she said. Brindisi would not identify the account that pulled the information on Oct. 16.”

“Records show it was a ‘test account’ assigned to the information technology section of the attorney general's office, said Department of Public Safety spokesman Thomas Hunter.”

“Brindisi later said investigators have confirmed that Wurzelbacher's information was not accessed within the attorney general's office. She declined to provide details. The office's test accounts are shared with and used by other law enforcement-related agencies, she said.”

“On Oct. 17, BMV information on Wurzelbacher was obtained through an account used by the Cuyahoga County Child Support Enforcement Agency in Cleveland, records show.”

Interfering with a person’s children is a most serious matter …

“Mary Denihan, spokeswoman for the county agency, said the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services contacted the agency today and requested an investigation of the access to Wurzelbacher's information. Cuyahoga County court records do not show any child-support cases involving Wurzelbacher.”

“The State Highway Patrol, which administers the Law Enforcement Automated Data System in Ohio, asked Toledo police to explain why it pulled BMV information on Wurzelbacher within 48 hours of the debate, Hunter said.”

Why democrats feel they can act with impunity …

It has been my experience that most far-left liberal democrats believe that whatever they do is justified by their idealistic goal. A classic “the end justifies the means” argument to explain away improper and illegal behavior.

It is time to send people to jail …

It is time to reduce the hyper-partisan nature of most local, state and federal administrative agencies – especially when such agencies are headed by political appointees and staffed by hyper-partisan employees.

While all agencies leak information, including law enforcement and intelligence agencies, it is time to start sending “leakers” to jail. It is one thing to become a whistleblower to expose institutional malfeasance or illegality, it is another thing to attack individuals based on their politics.

What can YOU do?

Decide whether you want a government where people can compromise your privacy, and possibly your security, based on your politics.

Demand that your political party, candidates and elected officials prosecute anyone found to have breached official security for political purposes. Jail time is appropriate under these conditions. No political party, candidate, politician, elected official or partisan is or should be above the law. Opposition research should have some ethical limits.

Politics is a dirty business that seriously needs reform. Consider that Barack Obama is associated with the dirtiest government players known as the “Chicago Machine” whereas John McCain has a real record of attempting bi-partisan reform of broken government institutions.

-- steve

Quote of the day: “Nothing that we have authorized conflicts with any law regarding privacy or any provision of the constitution.” -- John Ashcroft (Bush Administration)

A reminder from OneCitizenSpeaking.com: a large improvement can result from a small change…

The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. -- Marcus Aurelius

Reference Links:

The Columbus Dispatch : Government computers used to find information on Joe the Plumber


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


Chicago is deadlier than Iraq and controlled by democrats like Barack Obama who want to stop you from defending yourself and your family against violent criminals.

285: The number of brave soldiers who gave their lives in defense of their country …

Capture10-24-2008-5.15.49 PM

<Source>

426: The number of needless deaths in Chicago, Illinois … Barack Obama’s hometown and completely controlled by far-left liberal  democrats …

According to CBS:

“As CBS 2's Mike Puccinelli reports, the Chicago Sun-Times pointed out on Friday that Chicago has seen 426 homicides this year through Tuesday, compared with 417 in New York and 302 in Los Angeles.”

And it is not even a matter of population    numbers … 

“There are more than 8 million people in New York, compared to slightly under 3 million in Chicago. The population of Los Angeles exceeds that of Chicago by more than 800,000.”

The conclusion is inescapable …

This is what you get with the democrats … and what has Barack Obama done about crime control other than to demand that law-abiding citizens give up their guns to make them more vulnerable to violent, deadly criminals.

Illinois State Rifle Association Executive Director Richard Pearson Issues Open Letter to Nation's Sportsmen Regarding Obama's History in the Illinois Senate …

Fellow Sportsman,
Hello, my name is Rich Pearson and I have been active in the firearm rights movement for over 40 years. For the past 15 years, I have served inthe Illinois state capitol as the chief lobbyist for the Illinois State Rifle Association.
I lobbied Barack Obama extensively while he was an Illinois StateSenator. As a result of that experience, I know Obama's attitudes toward guns and gun owners better than anyone. The truth be told, in all my years in the Capitol I have never met a legislator who harbors more contempt for the law-abiding firearm owner than does Barack Obama.
Although Obama claims to be an advocate for the 2nd Amendment, his voting record in the Illinois Senate paints a very different picture.
While a state senator, Obama voted for a bill that would ban nearly every huntingrifle, shotgun and target rifle owned by Illinois citizens.
That same bill would authorize the state police to raid homes of gun owners to forcibly confiscate banned guns. Obama supported a bill that would shut down law-abiding firearm manufacturers including Springfield Armory, Armalite, Rock River Arms and Les Baer.
Obama also voted for a bill that would prohibit law-abiding citizens from purchasing more than one gun per month.
Without a doubt, Barack Obama has proven himself to be an enemy of thelaw abiding firearm owner.  At the same time, Obama has proven himself to be a friend to the hardened criminal.
While a state senator, Obama voted 4times against legislation that would allow a homeowner to use a firearm indefense of home and family.
Does Barack Obama still sound to you like a "friend" of the law-abiding gun owner?
And speaking of friends, you can always tell a person by the company they keep. Obama counts among his friends the Rev. Michael Pfleger – a renegade Chicago priest who has openly called for the murder of gun shop owners and pro-gun legislators.
Then there is his buddy Richard Daley, the mayor of Chicago who has declared that if it were up to him, nobody would be allowed to own a gun.
And let's not forget Obama's pal George Soros -the guy who has pumped millions of dollars into the UN's international effort to disarm law-abiding citizens.
Obama has shown that he is more than willing to use other people's money to fund his campaign to take your guns away from you.
While a board member of the leftist Joyce Foundation, Barack Obama wrote checks for tens of millions of dollars to extremist gun control organizations such as the Illinois Council Against Handgun Violence and the Violence Policy Center.
Does Barack Obama still sound to you like a "friend" of the law-abiding gun owner?
By now, I'm sure that many of you have received mailings from an organization called "American Hunters and Shooters Association(AHSA)" talking about what a swell fellow Obama is and how he honors the 2nd Amendment and how you will never have to worry about Obama coming to take your guns.
Let me make it perfectly clear - everything the AHSA says about Obama is pure hogwash. The AHSA is headed by a group of left-wing elitists who subscribe to the British view of hunting and shooting. That is, a state of affairs where hunting and shooting are reserved for the wealthy upper-crust who can afford guided hunts on exclusive private reserves. TheAHSA is not your friend, never will be.
In closing, I'd like to remind you that I'm a guy who has actually gonenose to nose with Obama on gun rights issues.
The Obama I know cannot even begin to identify with this nation's outdoor traditions.
The Obama I know sees you, the law abiding gun owner, as nothing but a low-class lummox whois easily swayed by the flash of a smile and a ration of rosy rhetoric.
TheObama I know is a stony-faced liar who has honed his skill at getting what he wants - so long as people are willing to give it to him. 
That's the Barack Obama I know.
--------------------------------------------------------------
The ISRA is the state's leading advocate of safe, lawful andresponsible firearms ownership. Founded in 1903, the ISRA has represented the interests of millions of law-abiding Illinois firearm owners. WEB SITE: http://www.isra.org

DO NOT CONFUSE CRIME CONTROL WITH CRIME CONTROL … CRIME CONTROL MAKES US ALL SAFE – GUN CONTROL DISARMS US AND MAKES US PREY FOR VICIOUS CRIMINALS.

-- steve

Full disclosure: I am a life member (Patron Level) of the National Rifle Association


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


Judge rules on Obama's citizenship -- makes a major mistake?

While we do not have any opinion on Barack Obama’s citizenship in connection with his meeting the requirements to run for the Presidency of the United States, we certainly disagree with Judge Surrick’s assertion that “Berg lacked standing to bring the case, saying any harm from an allegedly ineligible candidate was ‘too vague and its effects too attenuated to confer standing on any and all voters.’"

Making the case …

On the contrary, a case could be made that the harm from an allegedly ineligible candidate who assumed the presidency is not vague, but a clear and present danger to any and all voters.

An ineligible candidate who was not a natural-born citizen of the United States as mandated by the United States’ Constitution brings forth the question of possible divided loyalties and/or allegiance to another sovereign nation.

Someone who may have divided loyalties or allegiance to another sovereign nation may be in a position to provide “state secrets” and other classified military intelligence and plans to that other sovereign nation which would immeasurably cause irreparable harm to the United States and its reputation and standing in domestic and international affairs.

Someone who may have divided loyalties or allegiance to another sovereign nation may be in a position make military and domestic decisions which would immeasurably cause irreparable harm to the United States and its reputation and standing in domestic and international affairs.

Assuming that Barack Obama is a qualified candidate for the Office of the President of the United States …

Without even considering the possibility that Barack Obama is ineligible to become the President of the United States, one can see any number of purely political problems with his candidacy that does not  assume his citizenship status.

Barack Obama is a Junior Senator who lacks the background and experience that would qualify a person for the position as the President of the United States.

Barack Obama has many troubling gaps in his background and the chronology of events leading up to his candidacy as put forth by the democrat party. Obama’s lack of candor, specificity and forthright assistance in providing background information makes it unlikely that he would be eligible for a “top secret” clearance that would be required for all high-level government officials. Although there is no formal requirement that the President of the United States possess a formal security clearance, the position does allow access to the highest levels of national classified information.

Barack Obama, likewise, has many troubling long-term associations with people who exhibit behavior antithetical to the interests of the United States and its citizens.

Barack Obama appears to have adopted a far-left liberal democrat agenda that will result in deleterious effects on the United States and its citizens. To wit:

  • The stated desire to curtail present military operations in Iraq, Afghanistan and other foreign locations – even though we are on the brink of seeing some form of resolution to these matters through the political and military self-sufficiency of the Iraqi and Afghani governments. To undertake an unreasoned approach to withdrawal from these areas, not only endangers the physical well-being of deployed United States forces; but also introduces a measure of uncertainty in our foreign affairs which may lead to serious consequential events in the future. Because those who oppose the United States’ actions, both foreign and domestic, any sign of weakness on the part of the United States is likely to invite further provocation and attacks on the United States, its allies and its assets.
  • Barack Obama’s public announcements with respect to Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, Russia and other foreign nations marks him as relatively unsophisticated in foreign affairs, naive in diplomacy and in a dangerous position of having to rely on his advisors without any “core” guidance which would enable him to determine the correct choice of action to pursue.

It appears that Barack Obama shares a common “tax and spend” philosophy among fellow democrats which would most likely result in an undue economic burden on this nation’s small businesses and individual citizens.

Obama’s plan to tax the wealthy and redistribute the wealth to those less fortunate smacks of the Marxist ideal of “To each according to his needs, from each according to his abilities.” This philosophy is also shared with some of Obama’s long-term associations with the openly anti-American racists, Reverend Wright, Reverend Phleger, Minister Farrakahn and the unrepentant domestics terrorists William Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn who openly admit that they have a radical socialist/Marxist/Communist philosophy.

And, considering his long-term (20+) years association with openly anti-Semitic clergy (Wright, Phleger, Farrakahn), I have to consider that Obama’s support for Israel may be less than 100% and that his actions may give aid and comfort to Muslim extremists in the region. I believe that Israel will do everything in its power to prevent Iran from obtaining and deploying nuclear weapons in the region. And that any interference by a United States President who is less than 100% committed to preserving the State of Israel would be disastrous.

Most troubling is Obama’s lack of leadership on any major issue and his willingness to “go along to get along” history. The President of the United States cannot simply vote “Present” when serious matters erupt; serious matters which require a decision – rather than a smile and some words about hope.

This disconnect between Obama’s rhetoric and his actions is also troubling. One can speak of change and hope – leaving its definitions and implementation to others. Obama simply has no previous history of acting in a bi-partisan manner on any significant issue requiring a reform of the existing system.

I will not be voting for Barack Obama …

Therefore, it should come as no surprise that I feel that, regardless of Barack Obama’s citizenship status, he is unqualified to assume the Office of the President of the United States.

I believe that he rose to his present position due to a confluence of events that could only have been made possible by a deeply polarized America where the majority of citizens have lost faith and trust in their elected officials. And that Obama’s support among the populace is more a function of those who hated Hillary Clinton as a presidential candidate and those who who hated President George Bush and his current Administration.

I also believe that the media has abrogated their journalistic responsibilities to “speak truth to power” and that their obvious left-liberal bias and support for candidate Obama has further polarized the United States, deepened our military and economic travails by a constant and continuing drumbeat of negative lopsided reporting on the issues of the day, and most importantly, the fact that candidate Obama has all of the physical and oratorical abilities of a “star” in a nation which has come to worship celebrity and ignores hard, unpleasant realities.

I would also urge that you consider the existing situation in terms of your own enlightened self-interest and the welfare of your family. It is hard to come to any conclusion other than Obama is not worthy of achieving the Office of the President of the United States.

And for those of you who remain undecided, I would point out that Barack Obama’s own Vice Presidential choice, Joseph Biden has said that Obama was not qualified to be the president, that the Presidency does not lend itself to on-the-job training, and most importantly, that it is likely that Obama will be tested by a “manufactured” international crisis ginned-up only to test his mettle. And even more chilling is Biden’s remarks that the citizens of the United States may believe that Obama’s response was inappropriate – and asking us, in advance, to continue supporting him.

Several scenarios present themselves for consideration:

  • Middle East action by Israel against Iran;
  • Unconditional withdrawal from Iraq, Afghanistan;
  • The need to invade Pakistan’s sovereign space in order to crush al QAEDA terrorists;
  • Russian action against one of its former satellite nations; and/or
  • Continued genocide and strife in Africa.

I cannot think of anything more chilling than knowing who are being targeted for attack for simply electing an inexperienced and, apparently, unqualified candidate.

Therefore, even though John McCain would not be my first choice for the Presidency of the United States, he is the best man for the position at this point in time. With McCain, I do not worry about his patriotism and willingness to defend the United States against all enemies, both foreign and domestic.

And while I do not believe John McCain has a great background in finance or economics, it appears that there are few solutions to the present situation that do not require a steady hand and a sufficient amount of time for these most troubling matters to resolve. If there was a simple, easy answer, it would have been taken by the present Administration. But I am confident that McCain will access the required people to resolve the problem – regardless of what side of the aisle they may be sitting.

About the ruling …

According to the Associated Press…

“ federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit challenging Barack Obama's qualifications to be president.”

“U.S. District Judge R. Barclay Surrick on Friday night rejected the suit by attorney Philip J. Berg, who alleged that Obama was not a U.S. citizen and therefore ineligible for the presidency. Berg claimed that Obama is either a citizen of his father's native Kenya or became a citizen of Indonesia after he moved there as a boy.”

“Obama was born in Hawaii to an American mother and a Kenyan father. His parents divorced and his mother married an Indonesian man.”

“Internet-fueled conspiracy theories question whether Obama is a "natural-born citizen" as required by the Constitution for a presidential candidate and whether he lost his citizenship while living abroad.”

“Surrick ruled that Berg lacked standing to bring the case, saying any harm from an allegedly ineligible candidate was ‘too vague and its effects too attenuated to confer standing on any and all voters.’"

About the Judge …

Nominated by Bill Clinton on April 11, 2000, Judge Surrick seems to have a rather undistinguished background. His required court procedures seem well-thought out and he does not appear to be an ideologue. He appears to be just another hard-working judge performing a difficult task.

“R. Barclay Surrick, of Media, Pennsylvania, has been a judge on the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County, Pennsylvania, since 1978. Prior to joining the state judiciary, Surrick was a shareholder at Cramp D’Iorio McConchie & Surrick from 1969 to 1977, and worked as an associate at Lutz Fronfield Labrum & Knapp from 1967 to 1969. He also served as a part-time attorney for the Delaware County Public Defenders' Office from 1965 to 1974, and ran a solo practice in Delaware County from 1966 to 1967. Surrick began his legal career as an associate for Basil C. Clare, Esq., from 1965 to 1966. He received his B.A. degree from Dickinson College in 1960, his J.D. degree from Dickinson School of Law in 1965, and his L.L. M. degree in judicial process from the University of Virginia School of Law in 1982.” <Source>

About the case …

BERG v. OBAMA et al

“Plaintiff Philip J. Berg alleged that Defendant Barack Obama is not eligible for the Office of the President because Obama lost his U.S. citizenship when his mother married an Indonesian citizen and naturalized in Indonesia. Plaintiff further alleged that Obama followed her naturalization and failed to take an oath of allegiance when he turned 18 years old to regain his U.S. citizenship status.”

Plaintiff: PHILIP J. BERG

Defendant: BARACK OBAMA, THE DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION and DOES 1-50 INCLUSIVE

Case Number: 2:2008cv04083

Filed: August 21, 2008

Court: Pennsylvania Eastern District Court

Office: Other Statutory Actions Office [ Court Info ]

County: Montgomery

Presiding Judge: HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK

Nature of Suit: Other Statutes - Other Statutory Actions

Cause: U.S. Government Defendant

Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant

Jury Demanded By: 28:2201 Injunction

For those wishing to review some of the documents filed with the court, they may be accessed here

What can YOU do?

Do not vote for any candidate or current politician who is willing to subvert the safety, security, sovereignty and economic strength of the United States or limit an individual's right of self-defense for their personal philosophy, power, prestige or profits.

-- steve

Quote of the day: “The effort to understand the universe is one of the very few things that lifts human life a little above the level of farce, and gives it some of the grace of tragedy”. - Steven Weinberg

A reminder from OneCitizenSpeaking.com: a large improvement can result from a small change…

The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. -- Marcus Aurelius


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


A glimpse of an Obama Nation's future?

There is no doubt that sections of Senator Barack Obama’s Illinois is fraught with democrat waste, fraud, mismanagement, corruption and crime.

Here is an illustration to Barack Obama’s total lack of awareness of what is happening in his own party and community even before he became a presidential candidate …

From the  Daily Southtown (1/12/2007)

U.S. Sen. Barack Obama has picked an interesting spot to celebrate Martin Luther King Jr. Day: Harvey.”

“The troubled city claimed the minor coup Thursday when the in-demand senator's office announced he will speak to an expected audience of 2,000 at St. Mark Missionary Baptist Church.”

“Obama, who is pondering a bid for the presidency, will be joined by Harvey Mayor Eric J. Kellogg, said St. Mark's pastor, Bishop William Jordan.”

The senator will be in Harvey for "reflection, not politics," his spokesman Julian Green said, adding he did not know if Obama was aware of a series of scandals plaguing Kellogg's administration.

Some of the details …

  • Harvey is a Chicago area city in Cook County, Illinois, United States.
  • The Harvey Police Department has come under scrutiny in recent years for misconduct and poor performance in closing murder cases.
  • On January 24, 2007, Cook County Sheriff's investigators and the Illinois State Police raided the Harvey police station to collect evidence from 5 years worth of unsolved gang crimes and other homicides. The decision was made to raid the police station after prosecutors began to inquire why Harvey police had not brought charges in many of the related cases. Harvey, a town of 30,000 residents, had 11 murders in 2006 and has been called "the murder capital of Southland."
  • In 2005, a Harvey police detective was charged with intentionally returning a seized firearm to the gun's owner (a convicted felon) who was later arrested for murder. According to prosecutors, the detective returned the firearm to the felon on orders from Harvey Mayor Eric Kellogg.

Even today, the United States Postal Service is refusing to deliver mail in certain sections of Harvey …

According to CBS2chigago.com

“Most Dangerous Block In U.S.? Mail Delivery Halted”

“Dozens of mailboxes remain empty after the post office suspends service in one south suburban neighborhood. Some people get angry when their mail is late. But in Harvey, people have been waiting for days and days. They're not getting any mail at all. CBS 2's Dana Kozlov reports that one mail carrier in Harvey feels threatened.”

“The U.S. Post Office seems to think that this is one of the most dangerous blocks in the country. People who live on it say they haven't gotten any mail delivered to their homes in almost two weeks.” 

“Venus Jones is one of them. ‘'Between robberies and shootings and delayed police response, several things going on, that would make it unsafe,’ said Harvey resident Venus Jones.”

“One of those shootings on the morning of October 10th reportedly happened yards away from the mail carrier. That's when the mail stopped on Marshfield between 151st and 152nd streets, but the post office didn't tell anyone.”

Symptomatic of democrat-led politics …

Look at most ghettos and you will often find a democrat administration that is more interested in politics, personal power and access to the public’s money than to insuring the welfare of their citizens.

Obama: blind to chaos and corruption?

And Obama is seemingly blind to the local corruption and exploitation of his own community. Which seems a personal character flaw that renders Obama unsuitable for the presidency. He is by no means a leader … all of his past success comes at the urging of others and with great external assistance.

He appears to be a “go along to get along” type of guy who sees a moral equivalency in all things.

Tone deaf …

If nothing else, Obama appears tone deaf to the nuances of politics as his long standing associations with crooks, racists and domestic terrorists would mark him, at least in more civilized surroundings, as a persona non grata.

In reality …

Barack Obama is a manufactured image created in his supporter’s mind. Because he has a very short history of accomplishment and few writings other than of his own making, Obama represents a blank slate upon which his followers cast their own dreams and aspirations: many hoping from a change from the current Administration which has frequently earned their contempt.

Alice and Wonderland …

Obama has managed to fall into the Rabbit hole – sliding between the cracks of the anti-Hillary Clinton and hate-George Bush crowds. The antipathy of a great number of Americans to the present day Bush Administration allows this relative inexperienced newcomers to sell his bill of goods to the American public.

A complicit media … or something more sinister?

The media used to be held in high regard. “Speaking truth to power” and becoming, in essence, the fourth branch of government as they exposed waste, corruption and wrongdoing by politicians.

But over time, most media outlets became little more than operational divisions of large corporations whose preoccupation with quarterly profits and the stock markets has often rendered the concept of journalistic ethics null and void.

So why does a self-described “neutral” media go all out for Barack Obama and relentlessly attack the Bush Administration – to the extent of ignoring anything positive produced by the Administration and further deepening America’s crisis of confidence in their institutions?

Could it be ideological – the media has been infiltrated by far-left activists whose toxic venom is spreading to the pages of newspapers and magazines as well as over the airwaves?

Or could it simply be that the corporate honchos are fighting for their economic lives in a severe financial downturn caused by a paradigm shift in the way people obtain and process news?

There is no doubt in anyone’s mind that both talk radio and the internet have decimated the traditional influence and profits of the conventional media. By the time the page is printed, people often know more about the story than is being portrayed. And thus, turn away from “stale” news to the financial detriment of the media, but more importantly, their advertisers.

What could a democrat Obama Administration bring to the table?

Quite simply, curbing the influence of the Internet with anti-network neutrality schemes which raises the costs for individuals wishing to use the Internet for both news and entertainment. It is no major secret that most of the Internet initiative promoted by the traditional media are not producing enough revenue to replace the revenue lost by their prime broadcast and print outlets. Not to mention the possibility of increased regulation of content under the guise of anti-pornography or anti-spam programs.

Even now the democrats are considering bringing back the fairness doctrine – an absolute legislative abomination which further diminishes free speech. This would not only provide aid and comfort to the incumbent party, but may also result in a congressional “quid pro quo” of reduced taxes on broadcast properties.

Bottom line: Obama appears blind to the corruption, crime and chaos surrounding him …

Obama, with his calm exterior demeanor and smooth oratorical tones appears to be something he is not. He is not a leader by any stretch of the imagination. And my fear is that he may not be so much as calm as he is apathetic to the actions of people and institutions around him.

I sincerely believe that Obama, by past word and deed, is indeed a racist: a man who views everything through the prism of race. I also sincerely believe that he is a product of the far-left socialist/Marxist/Communist views held by his long-term associates: Wright, Phleger, Ayers and others.  I also believe that, like all Chicago-machine politicians, he is either corruptible or blind to the type of political corruption that has surrounded him throughout his entire career.

All of which make me vote for John McCain – not as a reasonable choice – but as the only choice to avoid the chaos and corruption that a democrat-led Congress and a democrat-headed Administration will bring to our country.

I anticipate a blood-bath in our bureaucracy, not for the purposes of reducing the size of government, but for the sole purpose of placing democrat fellow-travelers in positions of power.

Therefore, I urge a no vote on both the democrats who have done little or nothing in Congress and Barack Obama who has shown absolutely no qualifications for the Office of the President of the United States.

-- steve

P.S.  Should anyone wish to join the discussion, I am open to guest blogging opportunities.


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS