THE ONE QUESTION THAT COULD ELIMINATE HILLARY CLINTON AS A SERIOUS CANDIDATE
THE ULTIMATE CELEBRITY ENDORSEMENT

ONCE AGAIN THE UN DISTORTS GLOBAL WARMING DATA FOR POLITICAL PURPOSES

I have always questioned the motives of the United Nations and their attempt to further their political and financial control over sovereign nations such as the United States.

With cherry-picked statistics and horror stories based on the outliers (extreme cases) of their flawed computer models, they prattle on and on about global warming.

One example of this deliberate omission of critical research data involves the satellite temperature measurement program which has produced scientific and statistically relevant data which disagrees with the selected data points and massaged time periods used in United Nation's reports.

I have mentioned this discrepancy a number of times, the most recent of which can be found at the following links.

One Citizen Speaking...: UN official warns of ignoring warming ...

... considering that the satellite observations differ greatly from the terrestrial measurements, the fact that the mathematical models used for predictions ...
www.onecitizenspeaking.com/2007/11/un-official-war.html

One Citizen Speaking...: Books

While there are problems with historic global terrestrial temperature measurements, you very rarely find anyone willing to discuss the current satellite ...
www.onecitizenspeaking.com/books/

One Citizen Speaking...: I CAN'T WAIT: UNITED NATIONS TO RELEASE ...

Ask these all-knowing politicians and their paid scientists exactly why is it that the satellite weather observations (which are much more accurate) do not ...
www.onecitizenspeaking.com/2007/11/i-cant-wait-uni.html

One Citizen Speaking...: THE GRAND SCHEME: CONGRESS IS ABOUT TO ...

Three, why the satellite temperature observations show a major variance with the terrestrial observations. And four, the earthly benefits to be derived from ...
www.onecitizenspeaking.com/2007/10/the-grand-schem.html

And now another voice, that of Christopher Booker, is also noting that the United Nations' IPCC is ignoring the satellite data.

We are set on a course of 'planet saving' madness -- Christopher Booker

"The scare over global warming, and our politicians' response to it, is becoming ever more bizarre. On the one hand we have the United Nation's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change coming up with yet another of its notoriously politicized reports, hyping up the scare by claiming that world surface temperatures have been higher in 11 of the past 12 years (1995-2006) than ever previously recorded."

Apparently, politicians and businessmen of all backgrounds have signed on to this nonsense as a way to enrich both their organizations and themselves as the expense of the hard working citizens of industrialized nations.

"This carefully ignores the latest US satellite figures showing temperatures having fallen since 1998, declining in 2007 to a 1983 level - not to mention the newly revised figures for US surface temperatures showing that the 1930s had four of the 10 warmest years of the past century, with the hottest year of all being not 1998, as was previously claimed, but 1934."

The old adage that while "figures don't lie, but liars do figure" has never been truer as these scientific frauds manipulate time frames and perform certain adjustments to the calculations in order to arrive at numbers which seems to support their thesis. However, no fancy numbers are needed to debunk their findings. It can be done with any Excel-like spreadsheet that will allow you to list two variables (temperature and carbon dioxide) and compute the correlation between the two variables and the relationship between the variables themselves. Taking the time and trouble to do this, you may find that CO2 does not lead temperature rise but actually lags temperature rise by 800-1000 years. And CO2, as a greenhouse gas, is about one-tenth as influential on temperature as is simple water vapor such as that found in clouds. In fact, the CO2 dissolved in our oceans and atmospheric CO2 is somewhat constant and varies with the vapor pressure found over the oceans. Thus is forms sort of a self-regulating feedback loop.

If these poseurs who purport to be independent scientists were to be honest, the greatest determination of temperature remains the output of the sun, the surface reflectivity of the earth and the greenhouse gases which trap heat. The exact correlation between the factors is yet to be codified and experimentally tested.

Yes, there is global climate change. It has been happening since the dawn of time and appears to be cyclical in nature. Unfortunately, we cannot determine the periodicity of the cycle and when the temperature will regress towards the mean and move towards the other direction. Science is not performed by consensus, especially by those scientists who are seeking funding of their research from governmental and non-governmental sources with a not-so-hidden agenda.

This process has been occurring for a long, long time and there is plenty of time to study the phenomenon. Those who will distort the facts and create scary scenarios need to create a mind-numbing panic that will allow various political entities to plunder the public coffers without the citizen's raising a ruckus over the overblown hype.

I can hardly understand why a charlatan such as Al Gore is not pressed to provide proof of his assertions that man can affect the global warming phenomenon... as well as justify the disruption to the lives and hard-earned wages of Americans who will be further regulated and taxed to support this suspicious and bogus scientific fraud. When all is said and done, it is my belief that Al Gore, Nobel Peace Prize winner, will go down in history as one of the world's best con men or be remembered as the failed politician who fronted the world's biggest scientific hoax of the century.

What can YOU do?

Ignore the corrupt mostly anti-American politicians that run the United Nations and who are trying damage the United States economy for their own nefarious purposes.

Demand the candidates and elected officials establish a non-political "climate change" panel to review all of the current scientific findings as well as study the social, economic and political impact of implementing near-worthless controls over Carbon Dioxide (CO2).

Do not vote for any candidate or current politician who is willing to subvert the safety, security, sovereignty and economic strength of the United States or limit an individual's right of self-defense for personal power, prestige or profits.

-- steve

A reminder from OneCitizenSpeaking.com: a large improvement can result from a small change…

The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. -- Marcus Aurelius

Reference Links:

Christopher Booker: Planet-saving madness|U.K. Telegraph


“Nullius in verba.”-- take nobody's word for it!

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell


Comments