THE SINGLE ERROR MOST PEOPLE MAKE REGARDING THE MUELLER REPORT

Footnotes do not make the Mueller report true nor credible…

As we have seen in both documents and congressional testimony, many of the participants in this sordid scandal have been shown to lie under oath and to engage in a continuing pattern and practice of deception when covering-up their unconstitutional and criminal activities.

Special Counsel Robert Mueller, his team, and many of the witnesses are deeply conflicted by interpersonal relationships and associations with past questionable legal activities. From its ignoble inception, it is likely that the entire report is the work product of a predicate crime, an active effort on the part of former President Obama and his Administration to obstruct an American presidential campaign, to spy on an opposition campaign – and American citizens – as well as cover-up numerous documented scandals that died while being investigated by the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The crime being committed by Obama and his cadre of progressives.  It is a diversion from the truth that could see some of the participants in prison.

But the single error most people make regarding the Mueller Report is to forget that this is a “prosecutor’s report” containing lies and allegations THAT HAVE NEVER BEEN CHALLENGED OR TESTED IN A COURT OF LAW.

The most damning statement in the report can be found on Page 1 ...

"In late July 2016, soon after WikiLeaks's first release of stolen documents, a foreign government contacted the FBI about a May 2016 encounter with Trump Campaign foreign policy advisor George Papadopoulos. Papadopoulos had suggested to a representative of that foreign government that the Trump Campaign had received indications from the Russian government that it could assist the Campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. That information prompted the FBI on July 31, 2016, to open an investigation into whether individuals associated with the Trump Campaign were coordinating with the Russian government in its interference activities."

Since when does a single drunken conversation rise to the level of probable cause to open a counterintelligence investigation against an American citizen and presidential campaign? Especially when there remains a credible suspicion that the event which happened on foreign soil was a possible set-up? In this statement alone, the Obamacons have fixed a timeline that might be the most dangerous indictment of the DNI/CIA/NSA/DOJ/FBI if it is shown that activities to unmask intelligence reports, spy on American citizens, and other criminal activities originated at the White House prior to this date. 

While the scope memos from Acting Attorney General Rod Rosenstein are not presented, hidden on Page 11 is the suggestion that the Steele Dossier played a significant part in creating those scope memos. Thus, the investigation was tainted from the beginning by uncorroborated allegations contained in documents that the intelligence and law enforcement agencies, knew were linked to opposition research paid for by the Clinton campaign and the DNC which was under the effective control of Clinton through Debbie Wasserman Schultz. 

Fruit of the poisonous tree...

Truth be told, the so-called Mueller Report is “Exhibit 1” in the prosecution of Barack Obama and Administration Officials for high crimes and misdemeanors. This is a report orchestrated, produced, and targeted at Donald Trump by and for progressive socialist democrats. 

And, let us not forget, it was the Mueller Team that arranged the report so that there were redactions on each page and wrote four "shaped" summaries of the report which they hoped would be made public concurrently with the report's release. 

Few people will read this report and will rely on the progressive mainstream media for interpretation -- another nail in the coffin of our constitutional republic.

The hypocrisy of Representative Adam Schiff D-CA) after the release of the Mueller Report...

Ignore the law?

"Whether these acts are criminal or not, whether the obstruction of justice was criminal or not, or whether these contacts were sufficiently illicit or not to rise to the level of criminal conspiracy, they are unquestionably dishonest, unethical, immoral, and unpatriotic and should be condemned by every American," No such comments on Hillary Clinton or Obama Administration-era scandals. Perhaps someone should investigate Adam Schiff who assured us that he had "significant evidence of collusion?" 

Bottom line...

One of the reasons we cannot accept the work of Mueller, the DOJ, and the FBI as legitimate can be found in a single email between two IT support employees of Platte River Networks who maintained Hillary Clinton's "secret" server and uncovered by a Freedom of Information Act request by Judicial Watch...

With this type of contemporaneous evidence, along with the numerous emails, testimony, and documentation gathered by the FBI -- The DOJ and FBI "exonerated" Hillary Clinton by inventing a non-existent element of a crime that was apparent to any lawyer with a modicum of training. 

You will also note that President Trump did not invoke "executive privilege," destroy documents, delete emails, or engage in the type of obstruction we saw from Obama and Clinton during the course of various scandals. Ironic for a president who was charged with "obstruction."

These progressives and their mainstream media surrogates are not credible, trustworthy, nor are they reliable. It is a sad day in America when a significant portion of the mainstream media and the progressive electorate are unhappy that an American President and other administration officials DID NOT collude with the Russians. And, it is not the duty of any Special Counsel or prosecutor to exonerate a potential or actual target, their duty is to charge or not charge and let the matter play out in a court of competent jurisdiction. 

We are so screwed.

-- steve