INVESTIGATE THE BENGAZI BITCH HILLARY CLINTON

HILLARY-HOWLING AT THE MOON
Speaking at the World Forum on the Future of Democracy, Tech, and Humankind, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton ascribes her behavior and that of the progressive communist democrats to her opposition, clearly referencing the Trump administration and technologists like Elon Musk.

"There’s no way to sugarcoat it. There’s no way to explain it away. Autocracy is on the March, and we now have a government in the United States that has thrown in its lot with the autocrats, which has made a choice to support those who wage war, not peace, who has given enormous power to the men who control the information flow in our world, who have all pledged allegiance to the continuation of algorithms that not only addict us, but poison us with hatred and fear."

One must point out it was Hillary’s cadre of progressive communist democrats who used these very same technocrats, with the exception of Elon Musk, to censor the stream of accurate information and suppress and de-platform the voices of dissidents who countered the government’s narrative of the day. The progressive communist democrats had no comment on the algorithms that were used on their behalf when they were in power. It was Hillary Clinton and the progressive communist democrats who waged war around the world.

“So the emphasis on technology and artificial intelligence at this World Forum is not just another issue. It, in many ways, is the core issue facing our world today. Because as Maria said, where there are no facts that are agreed upon, that happen right before your eyes and you have leaders telling you to ignore it, that Putin did not invade Ukraine, that Ukraine somehow brought it upon itself, where there are no facts, there cannot be truth, and where there is no truth, there cannot be trust, and where there is no trust, there cannot be democracy and peace.”

Ukraine did not bring the war upon itself; it was proven, with documentary evidence and sworn testimony, that the United States, notably Democrat-led agencies like the CIA and the U.S. Department of State, proactively set the conditions that precipitated Russia’s actions. The truth that the progressive communist democrats chose to ignore is that ethnic Russians in Ukrainian border areas had opted to reunite with Russia. The truth under the progressive communist democrats was little more than narrative, unsupported by facts or even honest media coverage.

“And, of course, we'll hear more today and tomorrow about how the weaponization of technology and the imposition of artificial intelligence will, unless we act now, become partners to the autocrats. So this is as important an event, and I hope someday we'll look back on this in history and say, I was there, I was there at the World Forum, I heard these brave men and women speak out, and I thought what I could do, and then I acted. That should be the real takeaway from our time together.

Of course, the progressive communist democrats want to act now to neuter the power of the Trump administration and to secure the tools of power for themselves in their quest for true autocracy and perpetual political power.

Bottom line…

Not once did Hillary Clinton tell the truth about the diminished cognitive abilities of former President Biden or condemn the media for censoring the fact that the President of the United States was replaced with faceless progressive communist democrats, mostly acolytes of Obama and Clinton, using an autopen to create executive orders and pardons.

Hillary Clinton is a vicious, evil woman whose sense of entitlement and privilege knows no bounds.

Without a doubt, Hillary Clinton should be investigated and held accountable for the four Americans lost in Benghazi, Libya, during an unsanctioned illegal arms transfer to Islamic terrorists.

There is no doubt in my mind she hates the United States and is willing to trash-talk America and Americans in foreign venues.

With Hillary Clinton in any spotlight, we are so screwed.

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


THE DANGERS OF INSIDER EMPLOYEE SYMPATHIZERS WITH KEYS TO YOUR DIGITAL KINGDOM

Do you have a problem employee hidden in plain sight?

Insider-data-center
In today's interconnected world, organizations are increasingly vulnerable to internal threats—not just from malicious employees but also from well-intentioned sympathizers. These individuals may or may not have harmful intent but have access to sensitive data and systems, which can inadvertently put your company at risk.

Insider threats often arise from employees with access to key systems, networks, and databases. A sympathizer with access to the "digital kingdom" might share sensitive data out of misplaced loyalty, personal grievances, or even a sense of moral responsibility, believing their actions are for the greater good.

The risks are significant. From leaked trade secrets to compliance violations, an insider's seemingly minor data incursion can result in catastrophic breaches of trust, legal consequences, and reputational damage. Moreover, sympathizers often operate under the radar, making detecting or preventing such threats difficult until it's too late.

To protect your organization, implement strict access controls, regular audits, and an organizational culture of security awareness. Train employees to understand the potential risks and ensure they know the consequences of stealing or sharing sensitive data, no matter their intentions.

The digital kingdom may be vast, but protecting it requires vigilance, trust, and constant attention to internal risks. Along with access controls, the best protection is limiting the amount of data that can be downloaded during a session without multiple-party authentication and authorization.

The data came from somewhere…

Musk-hating hackers release names and addresses of every Tesla owner in the US with chilling symbol

Elon Musk-hating hackers have doxxed Tesla owners in the United States, releasing an interactive map showing their names, addresses, phone numbers and emails.

The disturbing website, called DOGEQUEST, also provides the locations of every Tesla showroom, charging station and the known residences of Department of Government Efficiency employees.

It even lists FBI Director Kash Patel's home and uses a symbol of a Molotov cocktail as its cursor.

The site's operators said they will only remove identifying information about Tesla drivers if they provide proof that they sold their electric vehicle amid a national boycott of the car maker.

It is unclear where the hacker got the information about the Tesla owners, but it has caused a lot of concern - with Musk labeling it 'extreme domestic terrorism.'

'Encouraging destruction of Teslas throughout the country is extreme domestic terrorism!!' he wrote on X Tuesday night.

The website says it 'neither endorses nor condemns any actions.'

'If you're on the hunt for a Tesla to unleash your artistic flair with a spray can, just step outside - no map needed,' it reads. 'At DOGEQUEST, we believe in empowering creative expressions of protest that you can execute from the comfort of your own home.' <Source>

Bottom line…

Crazed hyper-partisans, especially progressive communist democrats and anarchists, can be found anywhere.

Protect your data with strong encryption, or be prepared to be screwed.

--- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


A MONSTREROUS BLACK HOLE IN AMERICAN JUSTICE

The common wisdom that federal judges are competent, nonpartisan, and seek justice is a crock of bullshit. Federal judges are more likely to be vain, narcissistic, obstinate, and hyper-partisan, ruling their fiefdom with an iron hand and no fear from higher courts.

CLEAR-DANGER

Overlooking the safety and security of American citizens, Obama appointed Chief U.S. District Judge James Boasberg responded to a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union, Democracy Forward, and the ACLU of the District of Columbia, demanding that deportations of ultraviolent illegal aliens gang members to their native country.be halted. When lawyers informed him there were immigrants already en route to El Salvador and Honduras, Boasberg verbally ordered the planes be turned around but did not include the directive in his written order.

If the name Boasberg is familiar, remember he became a focal point in 2020 when he was tasked with overseeing investigations into the FBI’s use of FISA warrants, especially related to the surveillance of former Trump campaign advisor Carter Page. Boasberg, as the presiding judge of the FISA Court, was responsible for reviewing these warrants, which were later found to be flawed due to false information and omissions in the FBI’s applications.

And Boasberg was the judge who sentenced FBI attorney Kevin Clinesmith, the Trump-Russia hoax co-conspirator who pleaded guilty to improperly altering a CIA email to help obtain FISA surveillance against Carter Page, to just one year of probation and no prison time.

Tren de Aragua: A Clear and Present Danger to America 

The violent gang known as Tren de Aragua is one of the most notorious criminal organizations in Venezuela, spreading its influence not only across the country but into neighboring nations as well. Originating from the streets of Aragua State, the gang operates with extreme brutality, engaging in various illegal activities, including extortion, kidnapping, human trafficking, and drug smuggling. Tren de Aragua is infamous for its ruthless tactics, using violence and fear to dominate territories and maintain control over local populations. Their reach extends far beyond Venezuela, as they have infiltrated countries like Colombia, Chile, and Brazil, where they continue to exploit vulnerable communities. The gang’s structure is highly organized, with members showing a level of coordination and strategic thinking that allows them to evade law enforcement and grow their criminal empire. And they are here, in America, in increasing numbers.

The Myth of the Unbiased Federal Judge: A Closer Look at the Truth Under the Robes

  • The Illusion of Impartiality: At the heart of the myth of the “competent, nonpartisan, and just” federal judge is the notion that the judicial system operates like a well-oiled machine of objectivity. This idea paints a picture of judges as unemotional and logical, above politics and public opinion. The truth? Federal judges are appointed for life and wield significant power, often ruling on cases affecting millions. It’s no wonder some become so invested in their authority and beliefs.

In reality, many federal judges bring their personal biases—sometimes consciously, sometimes not—into the courtroom. Their political ideologies, past experiences, and personal beliefs shape their decisions like any other humans. This is especially true regarding the most controversial cases, where the stakes are high, and the public attention is even higher. When it feels like your career is on the line, it’s hard to resist the temptation to use the law as a tool to cement your personal beliefs.

  • The Rise of Judicial Narcissism: Federal judges don’t just have the luxury of interpreting laws—they also have the authority to shape the law as they see fit. Some judges relish this power, often ruling with a sense of superiority as if they’re the final word in all legal matters. This sense of inflated self-worth is too common in the judiciary, where an insular culture breeds arrogance.

Think about it: when was the last time a federal judge faced any real accountability for their rulings? High-profile decisions are often hard to challenge or overturn, and the power imbalance between judges and litigants is enormous. The judicial system operates in a vacuum, often removed from the lived realities of the people it is meant to serve.

This breeds a kind of narcissism among judges, who see themselves as infallible arbiters of justice and above reproach. It’s not just about ruling on the facts of a case anymore; it’s about asserting dominance over their domain.

  • Obstinance and the Iron Fist of Judicial Power: One of the most disturbing aspects of the federal judiciary is the obstinance some judges display regarding their decisions. Once a judge makes up their mind, it can be nearly impossible to change it—especially when they feel their decision is part of their legacy. Appeals and higher courts often seem like mere formalities, and even when they reverse a decision, the damage is frequently already done.

Some federal judges’ arrogance leads them to believe that their rulings are beyond reproach, leading to delays, unjust decisions, and a refusal to reconsider—even when new evidence or legal arguments arise. This resistance to change can make the judiciary feel like a fortress: once you’re in, the only way out is through the slow grind of bureaucracy.

  • A Judicial Legacy of Hyper-Partisanship: Perhaps one of the most glaring contradictions in the myth of the impartial federal judge is the pervasive influence of partisanship. Judges, particularly in recent decades, have been increasingly appointed based on their political alignment rather than their qualifications. The result is a deeply divided judiciary, where many judges have clear political affiliations and leanings that shape their rulings.

It is impossible to ignore the growing trend of hyper-partisanship, especially when high-profile appointments are often made to tip the ideological balance of the courts. The politicization of the judiciary doesn’t stop when judges take their seats—it carries over into their rulings, creating a judicial system that increasingly reflects the polarization of the American public.

Attorney General Pam Bondi Responds to Boasberg’s Outrageous Order…

USCA Case #25-5067 Document #2105940 Filed: 03/16/2025 Page 2 of 25

INTRODUCTION

A few hours ago, a District Court lacking jurisdiction issued an unprecedented, nationwide te1npora1y restraining order (“TRO”) purporting to halt the re111oval of aliens associated with Tren de Aragua (“TdA”), a designated foreign terrorist organization (“FTO”) pursuant to both the President’s constitutional authority to protect the nation and statuto1y authority under the Alien Enemies Act (“AEA”). A stay pending appeal is manifestly warranted, as is an immediate administrative stay.

This Court should halt this massive, unauthorized imposition on the Executive’s authority to remove people that Defendants had determined to be members of TdA, a group the President and the Secretary of State have found to be a threat to national security. This Court should halt this unprecedented intrusion upon the Executive’s authority to remove dangerous aliens who pose grave threats to the American people.

The district court acted without any jurisdiction-- these claims sound in habeas. See, e.g., Ludecke v. Watkins 335 U.S. 160 (1948) (considering challenge to action under AEA as habeas claim). Yet the plaintiffs waived their habeas claims after Defendants argued that only the Southern District of Texas, where plaintiffs were held, had jurisdiction over their claims. See Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 425, 435 (2004).

PAMELA J. BONDI
U.S. Attorney General

<Source>

Bottom line…

The idea that federal judges are impartial, competent, and universally just is bullshit. While some judges strive to act fairly and honorably, many are more concerned with their own power, legacy, and political agenda than with impartial justice. The system is broken, and it’s high time we recognize its flaws.

For too long, federal judges have been allowed to rule with impunity, their decisions going unchallenged or unreviewed, leaving the public to grapple with the consequences. If we are to trust the judicial system to serve justice, we must demand greater accountability, transparency, and reform. The myth of the unbiased, all-knowing judge needs to be shattered—and replaced with a system that prioritizes fairness over ego and political interest.

We are so screwed.

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


THE DARK ART OF POLITICAL BRIBES: HOW "BEHEST DONATIONS" HELP FUND POLITICIANS’ EXTRAVAGANCES

FOUNDATION-DONATION

In the deliberately complex world of politics, where the line between legal donations and unethical influence is often blurry, one of the more insidious methods of bypassing transparency and accountability is through “behest donations.”

These are donations made to third-party organizations—such as charities or political action committees (PACs)—that ultimately benefit the political figures who influence or solicit them. This practice allows lobbyists, corporations, and individuals with business before the government to fund lavish perks and expenses while obscuring the true source of the funds.

The use of behest donations has raised significant concerns over the years, especially among powerful political figures who are in a position to help their benefactors with favorable legislation or government contracts.

One of the more prominent examples of this practice involves former California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and his use of funds channeled through non-profit charities funded by lobbyists and individuals with business interests before the government.

What Are Behest Donations?

Behest donations occur when a public official directly or indirectly encourages a third party, like a charity, to receive a donation for the benefit of the official, their families and friends,  or their activities. These donations can be made to organizations that ostensibly serve public or charitable purposes but are often used to fund things like travel, accommodations, and events that indirectly benefit the official’s personal or political life. The key feature is that while the funds are technically donated to an independent organization, they are specifically solicited or requested by the politician.

How Behest Donations Bypass Regulations

Behest donations are effective at bypassing transparency regulations because they involve intermediaries. By making the donation to a charity or a PAC, the politician can avoid directly receiving the funds, which would be classified as a bribe. This indirect route can make it much harder to track where the money is coming from and, more importantly, who it is ultimately benefitting.

Because charities and non-profits are generally not required to disclose their donors like political campaigns must, it is easier for donors with business interests before the government to quietly support an elected official. In exchange for these generous gifts, the donors may gain favor or influence with the politician, all while maintaining the appearance of legitimate, non-political contributions.

Arnold Schwarzenegger’s Charitable Contributions and Travel Expenses

Former Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger’s use of charitable donations to cover personal and political expenses provides a stark example of how behest donations work in practice. During his time in office, Schwarzenegger was widely known for his close ties to powerful lobbyists and business figures. Many of these individuals were engaged in industries directly affected by state policies and decisions.

One notable aspect of his administration was his reliance on non-profits funded by lobbyists and business interests to cover his travel and entertainment costs. The Schwarzenegger Foundation, for example, was involved in receiving funds from major corporate donors with significant stakes in California’s business and regulatory landscape. These donors, some of whom were engaged in industries like real estate, energy, and entertainment, would often contribute to Schwarzenegger’s charitable initiatives, knowing their support could help them build a favorable relationship with the governor.

The Arnold Schwarzenegger Foundation paid for Arnold Schwarzenegger’s private jet flights between Sacramento and Santa Monica Airport. The foundation, a non-profit organization established by Schwarzenegger, received significant donations from corporate donors during his time as governor. These donations were used to fund various activities, including the private jet flights Schwarzenegger used for personal and political purposes. This raised ethical concerns, as the funds were ostensibly meant for charitable purposes but were also being used to cover travel costs for the governor. The situation led to criticism over the potential conflict of interest and lack of transparency surrounding the foundation’s financial activities.

These donations were not always explicitly used to fund the governor’s personal expenses. Still, many were funneled into expenditures that would benefit him or his administration. For example, Schwarzenegger was known to have taken international trips funded by the foundation, which were often described as “business” trips. While ostensibly aimed at promoting the state’s interests abroad, these excursions were also used to cover the governor’s personal travel, meals, and leisure activities. The charities funded by corporate donors would pick up the tab, effectively disguising what amounted to political bribery.

The Ethical and Legal Implications

Politicians’ use of behest donations to cover personal or political expenses is not illegal in many jurisdictions, as long as the contributions are made to third-party organizations and not directly to the official. However, this practice raises serious ethical questions. It becomes increasingly difficult to discern whether the contributions are truly for charitable purposes or if they are a way for wealthy individuals to gain access to and influence over political figures.

The danger of behest donations lies in their ability to perpetuate a system where elected officials are beholden to the very industries they are supposed to regulate. In Schwarzenegger’s case, his relationship with big donors potentially allowed them to influence policy decisions in their favor. At the same time, he enjoyed lavish perks funded by the people he was supposed to oversee.

Both sides of the aisle…

The Clinton and Trump Foundation have been the subjects of intense scrutiny and controversy, with critics pointing to potential conflicts of interest, unethical practices, and even illegal activities related to their donors and operations. While both foundations have insisted that their missions are charitable and philanthropic, the flow of money, particularly from wealthy individuals, foreign governments, and business interests, has raised suspicions of political influence, quid pro quo arrangements, and financial mismanagement.

The Trump Foundation was also accused of using donations to promote Donald Trump’s political image. In one instance, the Foundation made a $25,000 donation to a political group supporting Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi, who was then investigating fraud claims against Trump University. The donation, which came from the Trump Foundation, was made just before Bondi decided not to pursue legal action against Trump University, raising suspicions of a quid pro quo arrangement.

The donation to Bondi’s political group created a clear appearance of using charitable funds for political purposes, which is illegal under IRS rules. This raised concerns that the Foundation was being used to further Trump’s political ambitions, rather than to serve charitable causes.

In December 2018, the Trump Foundation agreed to dissolve and distribute its remaining assets, and Trump was ordered to pay $2 million in damages for misusing the Foundation’s funds.

 

Bottom line…

While using behest donations as a vehicle for political bribery may not always violate the letter of the law, it certainly undermines the spirit of fair governance. Arnold Schwarzenegger and the non-profit charities funded by lobbyists and business interests demonstrate how the system can be manipulated to fund personal expenses while obscuring the true source of political influence.

Any donation to an organization that directly benefits a politician or their associates should be treated as a political contribution, subject to the same disclosure and limitations as campaign donations.

We are so screwed.

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


DAN BONGINO, DEPUTY FBI DIRECTOR

Wishing Dan Bongino the very best on his new career assignment...

BONGINO-LAST-SHOW FBI-DEPUTY-DIRECTOR See You On The Other Side

Bottom line...

FLAG-GOD-BLESS

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


NET ZERO: THE DEMOCRAT DESTRUCTION MACHINE

NZE-2Net Zero is a communist-inspired plot to destroy America from within by starving the country of fossil fuels, the lifeblood of our industrialized economy.

The push for a “Net Zero” future is being sold as a solution to climate change, but some argue it’s much more than that—it’s a strategy to weaken America’s power from within. The idea behind Net Zero is simple: reduce carbon emissions to zero, which often means phasing out fossil fuels. However, critics suggest that this movement is not just about saving the planet—it’s part of a larger agenda to undermine the industrialized economy that relies on these resources.

Fossil fuels have been the backbone of America’s prosperity, fueling industries, creating jobs, and keeping the lights on across the nation. By restricting access to these energy sources, proponents of Net Zero may be intentionally starving the country of the very lifeblood that drives its economy. Some argue this could ultimately lead to economic ruin, with global dependence on other energy sources potentially opening doors for foreign influence.

They claim this is not just an environmental issue but a political one. Some critics view the push for Net Zero as inspired by far-left ideologies, akin to communist-style central planning, where control over resources equates to control over the people. They believe that reducing fossil fuel reliance isn’t just an energy transition but an attempt to dismantle the American industrial machine from within.

It’s no secret, that the progressive communist democrats want to destroy America’s economy, institutional infrastructure, capitalist system, and way of life.

Net Zero Is A Big Fat Zero For Economic Growth

Cutting greenhouse gas emissions was going to save the planet at no cost. Turns out it’s an economy wrecker, which is more feature than bug for many a climate alarmist.

Bluntly put, without cheap and reliable energy, which is what we get from fossil fuels, an economy turns sclerotic. Which is why the political left works so feverishly to end gas and oil. As we have said so many times before, the agenda behind cutting greenhouse gases is in actuality an assault on capitalism, which, as the legendary Milton Friedman famously said, is the only economic system that has enabled the masses to escape from “grinding poverty.”

There’s no better example than Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s New Green Deal, which her office called a “jobs and justice-centered plan to decarbonize the U.S. economy within 10 years.” But that was merely a cover for a much more sinister objective. “It wasn’t originally a climate thing at all,” according to the New York congresswoman’s former chief of staff, it was a “how-do-you-change-the-entire economy thing.”

The New Green Deal didn’t pass. But Joe Biden’s 2022 Inflation Reduction Act did, and it was “badly mistitled and intentionally so,” says H. Sterling Burnett of the Heartland Institute.

“In truth, the IRA was nothing more nor less than a backdoor effort to impose the Green New Deal scam that Biden and company had tried and failed to pass through Congress previously,” he adds. <Source>

The truth...

Net Zero Means People ‘Will Have To Change Their Lives’

The Labour Party’s Bill Esterson, the most senior British Parliament “backbencher charged with scrutinizing the government’s energy policy,” told the Telegraph that ordinary “people have to change their lives” to conform to the demands of the United Kingdom’s net-zero crusade. <Source>

Bottom line…

Whether or not you agree with this viewpoint, it’s clear that the debate surrounding Net Zero is about more than just emissions—it’s about the future of America’s economy, sovereignty, global standing, and your quality of life.

We are so screwed.

--- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


THE DEEP STATE BUREAUCRACY GOES FULL ALINSKY AT ARLINGTON CEMETARY

Disrespecting Venerated Service Members…

Arlington Cemetery website drops links for Black, Hispanic, and women veterans

The website for Arlington National Cemetery "unpublished" links to lists of notable graves, walking tours and educational material pertaining to Black, Hispanic and women veterans, as well as some Medal of Honor recipients.


ArlingtonArlington National Cemetery is the most venerated final resting ground in the nation, overseen by silent soldiers in immaculate uniforms with ramrod-straight discipline. Across its hundreds of acres in Virginia, they watch over 400,000 graves of U.S. service members dating back to the Civil War, including two presidents, and more than 400 Medal of Honor recipients.

But in recent weeks, the cemetery’s public website has scrubbed dozens of pages on gravesites and educational materials that include histories of prominent Black, Hispanic and female service members buried in the cemetery, along with educational material on dozens of Medal of Honor recipients and maps of prominent gravesites of Marine Corps veterans and other services.

Cemetery officials confirmed to Task & Purpose that the pages were “unpublished” to meet recent orders by President Donald Trump and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth targeting race and gender-related language and policies in the military.

Gone from public view are links to lists of dozens of “Notable Graves” at Arlington of women and Black and Hispanic service members who are buried in the cemetery. About a dozen other “Notable Graves” lists remain highlighted on the website, including lists of politicians, athletes and even foreign nationals. <Source>

What is going on?

Alinski

Saul Alinsky’s 12 Rules for Radicals

RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entity’s very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)

The establishment and deep-state bureaucracy is perverting President Trump’s Executive Orders by applying them inappropriately, without prudence and discrimination.

Bottom line…

Stand up and call bullshit whenever you encounter progressive communist democrats ideology, wherever and whenever it is discovered.

We are so screwed.

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


SOCIAL SECURITY: THE FACE OF FRAUD

From my inbox...

Once again the scumbag scammers are trying to trick social security recipients into providing non-public personal information or directing the download of malicious virus software. 

The header ending with ". id," uses the Internet country code top-level domain for Indonesia... not a domestic government (.gov) site.

Hdr

The body of the fraudulent message...

Body
The web address associated with the "Download Statement" button leads to a private "dropbox" account. 

Button
Bottom line...

NEVER CLICK ON ANY E-MAIL MESSAGE FROM A GOVERNMENT SOURCE. LOGON TO THEIR OFFICIAL WEBSITE AND SIGN IN.

DON'T BE SCAMMED.

Ssa

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


SCHMUCK SCHUMER'S GOVERNMENT SHUT DOWN

Chuck Schumer continues to celebrate the destruction of America from within…

Chuck-schumer

Democrats vote for waste fraud and abuse—and want to cripple America…

Government shutdown likely after Schumer says Senate Dems will block GOP funding bill

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer announced Wednesday that most Democrats in the upper chamber will not support a House Republican-passed bill to fund the federal government through the end of September, all but ensuring a partial shutdown beginning at 11:59 p.m. Friday.

“Funding the government should be a bipartisan effort, but Republicans chose a partisan path, drafting their [continuing resolution] without any input — any input — from congressional Democrats,” Schumer (D-NY) said on the Senate floor Wednesday. <Source>

Many a truth is spoken in jest…

Considering their love of condoms, it stands to reason that

GOVERNMENT-EMBLEM-CONDOM
Bottom line…

EXPLAIN-DEMOCRATS

We are so screwed.

Evil-democratsYes! Chuck Schumer is the devil!

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


PANIC: THE DEMOCRAT'S DESTRUCTION MACHINE

Once again, the Sludge Report is screaming Panic!

Media-panic2

Note: TV pundit Jim Cramer has an abysmal record regarding future events. 

Is this what winning looks like?

Hr1968crDemocrats for years have shrieked about the dangers of shutting down the government; I guess it really wasn’t that important.

The Paradox of Protesting Government Efficiency

In recent months, loud and sometimes violent protests have erupted against efforts to eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse in government programs. Led by both progressive communist Democrats and the establishment Republican collaborators, these miscreants argue that cutting spending and reducing government programs could lead to a recession—if not a full-blown depression—with thousands of displaced federal workers flooding the job market and disrupting local economies.

The logic behind this opposition rests on a Keynesian view of economics: government spending is essential for maintaining economic stability. In this view, as long as the government continues to pump money into the economy, it drives demand, creates jobs, and fuels growth. Reducing or eliminating these programs, the progressive communist democrats argue, would cut off this vital financial lifeline, leading to unemployment and economic downturn.

However, the crux of the issue is the nature of these programs. Many were designed to secure political support rather than address real needs, resulting in inefficient spending and a bloated government. The push for efficiency is an attempt to refocus resources and eliminate waste—yet it’s being met with fierce resistance, as those reliant on these funds fear the consequences.

These economically illiterate fools fail to see that excessive government expenditure, partly with high-interest borrowed money, leads to massive economy-killing stagflation and the degradation of quality of life.

Bottom line…

Ultimately, the question isn’t whether cutting waste will harm the economy but whether continuing to fund inefficient programs is a sustainable path forward. As we balance fiscal responsibility with economic stability, the need for reform has never been more evident.

The progressive communist democrats do not give a rat’s ass about America and Americans; it’s all about political power and the destruction of America from within on behalf of their communist ideology, where Americans will be subservient to a ruling class of wealthy elites.

We are so screwed.

-- Steve

Af-ssa


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


DEMOCRATS AND THEIR PROPAGANDISTS WANT TO CRASH THE ECONOMY

There is no doubt in my mind that the progressive communist democrats and their media propagandists want to crash the American economy as a means of fighting President Trump’s Administration and to provide talking points for the 2026 mid-term election attempt to re-capture the House and Senate.

These are the very same people who are attempting to destroy America from within using fear, chaos, panic, and identity politics.

The last things the progressive communist democrats want are a predictable economy, smaller government, significantly reduced spending, fewer regulations, and fewer taxes.

Oh My God, the sky is falling, reports the radical left Sludge Report…

Economy
The Dangers of Politically-Driven Panic and Its Impact on the Economy

In the complex world of economics, confidence is key. When panic sets in, even minor triggers can lead to disastrous consequences. One of the most dangerous forms of panic is when it’s politically driven, as it can accelerate economic downturns, destabilize markets, and affect millions of lives.

A notable example of this occurred during the 2008 financial crisis, particularly with the crash of IndyMac Bank. Political leaders played a key role in fueling the panic in the months leading up to the collapse. Senator Chuck Schumer, in particular, sent a letter to federal regulators expressing concerns about IndyMac’s financial stability. The letter had the intended effect of igniting fear. Schumer’s statement led to a run on the bank, with depositors withdrawing their money in mass panic. Within days, IndyMac was taken over by the FDIC, marking one of the most significant bank failures in U.S. history.

How Chuck Schumer Caused the Second Largest Bank Failure in US History

Federal officials aren’t supposed to cause bank runs. In fact, much of the New Deal bank regulatory apparatus was set up for the purpose of eliminating such panics. When FDR was hit with a massive set of bank runs shortly after taking office, he gave an address in order to calm terrified depositors, assuring them that the banks would reopen shortly, and that everything would be fine.

But Chuck Schumer is no FDR. He doesn’t stop bank runs; he starts them. Or, at least, has started one. The collapse of IndyMac bank, the second largest bank failure in American history, began with a letter from the office of Senator Charles Schumer on June 27. He questioned the viability of the bank. When a senior senator who is in a number of influential posts regarding oversight of bank regulators directly attacks the confidence of a depository institution, it matters. Not surprisingly, the director of the Office of Thrift Supervision concluded that the collapse of the bank immediately following the Senator’s comments was not a coincidence. Director Reich concluded that Senator Schumer had ‘given the bank a heart attack.’

Why? Why would a federal official with enormous power, destroy an institution on which tens of thousands of depositors (not all of whom are insured) and employees depend? Why would a New York Senator attack a Pasadena bank, acting as some sort of amateur, self-appointed, long-distance bank examiner?

Perhaps this might help answer the question: IndyMac has been under attack from the hard left. The Center for Responsible Lending issued an attack on IndyMac within a few days of Schumer’s letter. CRL is part of a small army of left of center’ research’ groups, community organizers, and public interest law firms who make their living accusing home lenders of racial redlining and predatory lending. On June 20th the Center accused IndyMac of unfair practices regarding minority borrowers.

A suspicious person might think that a network of lefty attack groups proficient in bank bashing and frequently funded by trial lawyers and short-sellers, coordinated their activities with a law firm on the hunt and a Senator who works closely with the network.

On the other hand, maybe it is a coincidence that CRL and Sen. Schumer attacked the same bank in the same week. Maybe he didn’t know about the CRL report, nor CRL about his letter. Maybe the community group didn’t know about the trial-lawyer class action lawsuit which was launched against Indy a couple of weeks before all of this started.

Yeah, right. <Source: CNBC>

It must be a coincidence that some of Schumer’s major donors swept in to purchase the bank’s assets from the FDIC in a pennies-on-the-dollar fire sale. They profited handsomely, with the FDIC assuming the majority of the losses.

While politicians like Schumer interfere in the economy, their actions can have far-reaching consequences when they stoke public fear. A politically driven panic can be contagious, undermining trust in financial institutions, causing stock market volatility, and ultimately crashing the economy.

The IndyMac disaster is a cautionary tale of how powerful words and actions can be when it comes to economic stability. It underscores the importance of thoughtful leadership and communication, particularly in times of financial uncertainty. Politicians must carefully consider the broader impact of their actions and avoid fueling panic that can lead to dire consequences for the economy and everyday citizens.

Bottom line…

In conclusion, financial manipulators understand that profitability is not limited to periods of economic growth or stability. Whether times are good or bad, volatility drives their success. For traders who create no tangible economic value, the key to their profit lies in strategically placing hedged bets, capitalizing on market fluctuations, and exploiting instability for personal gain. In this landscape, the ability to navigate volatility becomes the ultimate tool for wealth generation, regardless of the broader economic context.

We are so screwed.

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


DEMOCRATS SUPPORT CRIMINALS, CRAZIES, AND TERRORISTS

Before you support another progressive communist democrat, consider their basic philosophy of supporting terrorists and other evil causes and individuals...

Democrats-terrorismImmigration agents arrest Palestinian activist who helped lead Columbia University protests

Federal immigration authorities arrested a Palestinian activist Saturday who played a prominent role in Columbia University’s protests against Israel, a significant escalation in the Trump administration’s pledge to detain and deport student activists.

Mahmoud Khalil, a graduate student at Columbia until this past December, was inside his university-owned apartment Saturday night when several Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents entered and took him into custody, his attorney, Amy Greer, told The Associated Press. <Source>

We are so screwed when the democrats support terrorists, and terrorist sympathizers who want to kill us, along with Jews, Christians, and even Muslims who do not share their radical Islamicist ideology. 

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


HOW POLITICIANS SELL THEIR BRAND OF BULLSHIT

I-CALL-BULLSHIT-1

In the modern political landscape, we exist between two realms: the known and the unknown.

Between these two extremes falls the shadow of politicians and their carefully selected teams of public relations experts, working relentlessly to sell a brand of reality and ideology that often bears little resemblance to the truth. The reality they present is always less grounded, less honest, and far more profitable than the raw, unvarnished truth beneath the surface.

They are selling a story, not the story.

Public relations has become an indispensable tool for politicians. It allows them to craft narratives that serve their interests, carefully spinning stories that portray them as the leaders we need, all while selling their ideological vision as the only plausible path forward.

Behind these polished images, however, lies a different reality—one that is often distorted, misleading, and designed to conceal more than it reveals. The truth is always less glamorous, less marketable, and certainly less profitable than the political narratives the PR industry sells to the public.

The Machinery of Deception

Politicians today live in a world shaped by public relations experts whose sole job is to manipulate how they are perceived. With the rise of social media and 24/7 news cycles, these PR professionals have transformed political campaigns into finely-tuned operations of persuasion, where every word, gesture, and image is designed to craft a narrative. Whether it's a promise to "drain the swamp," "make America great again," or "unite the nation," the message is always tailored to appeal to the electorate, while the truth is often obscured in favor of a more sellable version.

The truth, as we know, doesn’t always sell. It doesn’t fit neatly into sound bites or shareable tweets. It doesn’t fit the perfect story of success or triumph that voters want to hear. It’s messy, complex, and often uncomfortable. But that’s precisely why professional politicians, with the help of their PR teams, go to great lengths to shape their own version of events—one that casts them in the best light possible while distracting from the less glamorous, more complicated realities of governance.

Selling Ideology, Not Truth

Politicians rely heavily on PR to sell not just their brand, but their ideology. They use carefully curated images and stories to paint a vision of the future—one that promises progress, prosperity, and unity. But these promises are often far removed from the reality of the political decisions they make once in power. The political ideology they promote, whether left, right, or somewhere in between, is crafted to be palatable, emotionally resonant, and marketable. The truth of those ideologies, however, is often more nuanced and less easily digestible.

Consider communism and its precursor, socialism. Historically, you are faced with the reality of torture, murder, and mayhem, with millions of lives, and countless others mired in misery, lost to unworkable political schemes conceived and executed by truly evil individuals. A far cry from the equality and shared prosperity pictured by the proponents of socialism.

What we see during political campaigns is are politicians selling their brand: a story of hope, change, or stability and a redress of historical grievances, depending on what resonates with voters.

However, once the election is over, the policies they actually pursue often fail to match the rhetoric. The PR teams have done their job, creating an image of the politician as the perfect leader, one capable of achieving grand promises. But when it comes time to act, the reality is far less inspiring. The compromises made, the backroom deals, and the policies that serve special interests are not the stories that make the headlines.

Ask yourself if what the Democrats promised in 2020 matched the reality that we experienced by the end of his term 2024? Ask yourself if President Joe Biden was the competent, compassionate, and mentally agile leader of the nation or were we being led by a cabal of “handlers” who kept President Biden sequestered and where every executive order was signed by an autopen operated by some unknown, unelected individual? How can the Democrats explain the deception and the failure of both foreign and domestic policies?

The Illusion of Success

A well-crafted PR campaign can make even the most controversial politician appear to be a champion of the people, while the underlying truth about their actions and motives is kept in the shadows. It’s not uncommon for politicians to tout their achievements during press conferences, only to have those very "achievements" be framed in ways that obscure their real-world consequences. Policies that favor the rich, neglect social issues, or undermine democratic institutions are often spun as victories for the greater good. Meanwhile, the real impacts on marginalized communities or the environment go unreported.

Politicians and their PR professionals create a polished image of success, while conveniently ignoring the aspects of governance that are less glamorous and more contentious. The truth about political compromises—whether it’s the erosion of civil rights, the concentration of power, or the deepening of inequality—is often hidden behind the curtain of carefully crafted messaging. The narrative becomes about what is profitable to sell, rather than what is actually happening.

The Consequences of a Manufactured Reality

The impact of this PR-driven reality is profound. When the public consistently consumes information filtered through the lens of professional PR teams, we begin to accept the manufactured versions of reality as truth. We trust the stories that are told, even when they are carefully constructed to mislead us. The consequences of this are far-reaching: public trust in politicians erodes, misinformation spreads, and democratic processes become tainted by a constant barrage of propaganda.

This manufactured reality is dangerous because it discourages critical thinking. It encourages citizens to accept a simplified, sanitized version of politics that suits the interests of those in power. The true complexities of governance—the tough decisions, the trade-offs, the failures—are buried beneath the surface, leaving voters with an incomplete understanding of the issues that truly matter.

Understanding President Donald Trump

Understanding President Donald Trump requires recognizing his fundamentally transactional nature. Trump is not driven by ideology or principles in the traditional sense but by the art of the deal—saying anything necessary to secure a favorable outcome. His rhetoric is often filled with grandiose proclamations and outrageous demands, designed to put his opponents on the defensive and move the negotiating table in his favor.

What may seem like extreme positions or unyielding stances are, in reality, strategic moves. Trump knows full well that he will likely settle for something less than his initial demands, but that "something less" is often still more than what was originally offered or anticipated.

This approach allows him to create the perception of a victory, even when the actual terms of the deal are more moderate. It’s this willingness to push boundaries, make bold statements, and then back off slightly that has allowed Trump to continually negotiate from a position of strength, leaving his opponents to grapple with the fallout of his unpredictability.

Bottom line…

As citizens, we must learn to look beyond the narratives being sold to us. We must critically analyze the messaging we are fed, question the authenticity of the stories we hear, and demand greater transparency from those who wield power.

The truth is often less glamorous, less profitable, and less appealing than the carefully crafted reality politicians present to us. But it is the truth that we need to confront if we are to make informed decisions and hold our leaders accountable.

In a world where the shadow of PR persuaders looms large, it is up to us to seek out the truth that lies beyond the glittering façade they create.

Ultimately, between the known and the unknown, the truth is often buried under layers of political spin. But by refusing to accept the manufactured reality, we can begin to uncover the facts—and make choices based on substance, not image.

We are so screwed.

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


DANGER: A WARNING FOR AMERICANS VISITING CHINA

Ca-spy

TREASON!  

DOJ-HEADER

Active-Duty and Former U.S. Army Soldiers Arrested for Theft of Government Property and Bribery Scheme

Jian Zhao, and Li Tian, active-duty U.S. Army soldiers stationed at Joint Base Lewis-McChord, along with Ruoyu Duan, a former U.S. Army soldier, were arrested today following indictments by federal grand juries in the District of Oregon and the Western District of Washington. Tian and Duan were charged in the District of Oregon for conspiring to commit bribery and theft of government property. Zhao was charged in the Western District of Washington for conspiring to obtain and transmit national defense information to an individual not authorized to receive it, and also for bribery and theft of government property.

The defendants arrested today are accused of betraying our country, actively working to weaken America’s defense capabilities and empowering our adversaries in China,” said Attorney General Pamela J. Bondi. “They will face swift, severe, and comprehensive justice.”

The indictment in the District of Oregon alleges that beginning on or about Nov. 28, 2021, and continuing to at least on or about Dec. 19, 2024, Duan and Tian along with others, known and unknown to the grand jury conspired with each other to surreptitiously gather sensitive military information related to the United States Army’s operational capabilities, including technical manuals and other sensitive information, and that Tian transmitted this information to Duan in return for money, in violation of his official duties as an active-duty U.S. Army officer. Specifically, Tian was tasked with gathering information related U.S. military weapon systems, including information related to the Bradley and Stryker U.S. Army fighting vehicles, and transmitting them to Duan.

The indictment in the Western District of Washington alleges that beginning in or about July 2024, and continuing to the date of the arrest, Jian Zhao, an active-duty U.S. Army Supply Sergeant, conspired with others known and unknown to the grand jury to obtain and transmit national defense information to individuals based in China. Zhao is further alleged to have committed bribery and theft of government property.

Specifically, Zhao was charged for his conspiracy to collect and transmit several classified hard drives, including hard drives marked “SECRET” and “TOP SECRET”, negotiating with individuals based in China for their sale, and agreeing to send the classified hard drives to the individuals in China. In exchange for the sale of the classified hard drives, Zhao received at least $10,000. Zhao is further alleged to have conspired to sell an encryption capable computer that was stolen from the U.S. Government, and sensitive U.S. military documents and information, including information related to the High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS), and information related to U.S. military readiness in the event of a conflict with the People’s Republic of China. Zhao is alleged to have violated his duties as a U.S. Army Soldier and public official to protect sensitive military information in exchange for money. In total, Zhao is alleged to have corruptly received and accepted payments totaling at least $15,000.  <View the indictment for Jian Zhao.>

An indictment is merely an allegation. All defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

A warning to Americans: The Communist Chinese Practice of Falsely Imprisoning Americans for Spy Swaps

In recent years, a disturbing pattern has emerged where the Chinese government has been accused of falsely imprisoning American citizens on trumped-up espionage charges. This practice is often seen as a strategy to secure the release of Chinese spies arrested in the United States, a geopolitical bargaining chip used in negotiations with the U.S. government.

In November 2024, the United States and China conducted a significant prisoner exchange involving individuals convicted of espionage-related offenses. The U.S. released three Chinese nationals:

  • Ji Chaoqun: Convicted in 2022 for acting as an unregistered agent of China's Ministry of State Security (MSS), Ji was involved in attempting to infiltrate the U.S. Army Reserves and gather information on Chinese nationals in the U.S.

  • Yanjun Xu: The first Chinese intelligence officer extradited to the U.S., Xu was convicted in 2021 for attempting to steal trade secrets from U.S. aviation companies.

  • Shanlin Jin: Convicted of possessing child pornography, Jin's release was part of the broader exchange.

In return, China released three American citizens:

  • Mark Swidan: Detained in China since 2012 on drug charges without substantial evidence, Swidan faced a death sentence.

  • Kai Li: Imprisoned since 2016 on charges of espionage, Li's release was secured through the exchange.

  • John Leung: Sentenced to life imprisonment in 2021 for espionage-related activities, Leung was among those freed.

The allegations against Americans often lack substantive evidence, with many detained individuals facing vague accusations or coerced confessions. These wrongful imprisonments have sparked outrage and concern among human rights organizations, diplomatic officials, and the public, as they represent a clear violation of international law and the basic principles of justice.

This practice also highlights the growing tensions between the U.S. and China, as both nations engage in an escalating battle over trade, technology, and global military influence.

While the U.S. has made efforts to secure the release of wrongfully detained citizens, the Chinese government continues to manipulate legal systems for its own gain, often in the hopes of exchanging prisoners in high-stakes diplomacy.

 Bottom line…

American travelers to China: Forewarned is forearmed.

 We are so screwed.

--   Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


CALIFORNIA WILDFIRES: WHY DEMOCRAT POLITICIANS SHOULD BE SHUNNED

Newsomefire

Unions are destroying public safety using their democrat sock puppets like California’s Governor Gavin Newsom.

Undoubtedly, both public- and private-sector unions have long held significant political influence and the ability to shape policy and decisions within California’s progressive communist democrat uniparty.

Unions and the Disbandment of Team Blaze

Team Blaze was established in 2020 to provide a volunteer-based firefighting force trained to assist in managing the growing wildfire crises in California. The unit comprised volunteers who underwent rigorous training and worked alongside professional firefighters in high-stress, high-risk environments. By 2021, Team Blaze had already proven its value during the Dixie Fire, receiving commendations from the state for its performance and efficiency.

In 2023, Governor Gavin Newsom controversially decided to disband Team Blaze, a volunteer firefighting force within the California State Guard. This decision followed the appointment of Matthew Beevers as adjutant general of the California Military Department, who promptly decommissioned the Emergency Response Command, which included Team Blaze. The disbandment was justified because the unit was “inadequately trained,” and its structure did not meet the state’s evolving needs.

There is little doubt that Beevers’ action was more about appeasing union demands than prioritizing public safety.

The firefighters’ unions played a key role in pressuring the governor to dismantle the unit. They lobbied Governor Newsom and Beevers to dismantle Team Blaze, seeing the volunteer unit as a threat to paid firefighters’ job security and compensation. With the fire season growing more intense and demanding, the unions argue that relying on paid, professional firefighters is crucial to maintaining safety standards and effectiveness in handling wildfires.

Unions and the Attack on Private Firefighters

Union-backed Los Angeles progressive communist democrats and the largest firefighter union in the state have joined forces to make public fire hydrants off-limits to private fire crews attempting to protect California homes.

With a membership of more than 35,000, California Professional Firefighters (CPF) is the largest statewide organization dedicated exclusively to serving the needs of career firefighters. It is one of the nation’s strongest and most influential public employee organizations. <Source>

Introduced by Assembly Members Isaac Bryan (D-Los Angeles) and Tina McKinnor (D-Los Angeles), California Assembly Bill 1075 would require the Office of Emergency Services “to develop regulations prohibiting privately contracted firefighters from hooking up their equipment to public water sources.”

Sponsors

AB 1075, as introduced, Bryan. Fire protection: privately contracted firefighters: public water sources.

Existing law establishes in state government, within the office of the Governor, the Office of Emergency Services. Existing law requires the office to be responsible for the state’s emergency and disaster response services for natural, technological, or manmade disasters and emergencies, including responsibility for activities necessary to prevent, respond to, recover from, and mitigate the effects of emergencies and disasters to people and property. Existing law, the FIRESCOPE Act of 1989, requires the office to establish and administer a program, known as the FIRESCOPE program, to maintain and enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of managing multiagency firefighting resources in responding to an incident. Existing law requires the office, in collaboration with the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection and the board of directors of the FIRESCOPE program, to develop standards and regulations for any privately contracted private fire prevention resources operating during an active fire incident in the state, as provided, and to develop regulations to govern the use of equipment used by privately contracted private fire prevention resources during an active fire incident, as provided.

This bill would additionally require the office to develop regulations prohibiting privately contracted firefighters from hooking up their equipment to public water sources. <Source>

Leave it to the progressive communist democrats to make a classist attack by claiming that most of the private firefighters work for insurance companies and protect the wealthiest individuals and their expensive properties and that they consume water that becomes unavailable for ordinary and underserved individuals.

Bottom line…

No special interest group in California wields more influence over state and local politics than public sector unions.

Union-backed policies in California aim to increase the union’s membership, political power, and investable pension proceeds, but when prioritized over public safety considerations, they leave California vulnerable to disasters and slow the response needed to protect its citizens.

It is time to disrupt California’s progressive communist democrats, who are primarily backed by union funding and support-- and continue to coerce politicians into disastrous decisions with unintended consequences.

We are so screwed when we allow the union-backed political machinery to control malignant progressive communist democrats who are continuing to shape California’s future.

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


PROGRESSIVE COMMUNIST DEMOCRAT MEDIA: A NATIONAL HEALTH EMERGENCY

Nyt-pravda

While media should ideally serve as a neutral platform for information and diverse perspectives, corporatized, virulent, and radical progressive communist democrat media propagandists have become a potent force for division, disillusionment, and dissatisfaction among America’s population.

Media outlets driven by radical, far-left ideologies dominate the conversation and play a significant role in shaping public opinion, influencing behavior, and forming America’s collective consciousness.

The constant barrage of this biased, censored, and often sensationalized propaganda goes beyond mere discomfort; it extends into the realm of mental health, potentially causing psychotic dysfunction for those who consume it regularly.

Given the magnitude of these consequences, the toxic influence of progressive media should be recognized as a national health emergency.

  • Disillusionment

One of the most noticeable effects of progressive communist democrat media on its audience is disillusionment. The portrayal of society through the lens of progressive ideologies paints a picture of constant crisis and injustice. Whether it’s framing issues like climate change, systemic racism, or inequality, progressive media tends to exaggerate problems, often without offering tangible proof or proposing commonsense solutions, instead offering communist slogans rooted in identity politics. This sense of perpetual crisis and urgency leaves many individuals feeling overwhelmed and powerless.

The media focuses heavily on negative stories, crises, and personal grievances, perpetuating a narrative of victimhood. While significant societal issues need attention, the continuous bombardment of worst-case scenarios fosters a sense of hopelessness. The progressive message is clear: things are getting worse, and we are helpless to change them unless you surrender some of your inalienable rights and freedoms. For many, this constant exposure to negativity causes disillusionment with the world, systems of governance, and even the concept of commonsense reform itself.

Disillusionment in this context isn’t just about losing faith in the media but also extends to larger institutions like government agencies, institutions, corporations, and society as a whole. When media focuses predominantly on flaws and failures, it can create an environment where people begin to see America as irreparably broken, thereby leading to personal dissatisfaction and a lack of trust in societal structures.

  • Dissatisfaction

The next phase in the cycle of media-induced mental deterioration is dissatisfaction. While disillusionment centers on the loss of hope and belief in societal progress, dissatisfaction is more personal. It’s the feeling of being unfulfilled or perpetually lacking compared to the narrative being sold by media propagandists. Progressive media often showcases idealized and unrealistic representations of reality, mainly through social media influencers and celebrities, where the standard for personal achievement and morality is set impossibly high or is deceptively created using props.

As individuals consume progressive communist democrat media content, they are bombarded with narratives about how society should function in a non-existent perfect world, what behaviors are acceptable, and what kinds of people are worthy of admiration. The constant reinforcement of these standards creates feelings of inadequacy, and those who fail to meet these ideals, often due to systemic factors beyond their control, experience a heightened sense of dissatisfaction with themselves and their lives. 

Additionally, the progressive communist democrat media elevates victimhood as a badge of honor, perpetuating a culture where personal grievances are not only validated but celebrated. The progressive communist democrat narrative suggests that everyone should be fighting for social justice, and if you are not actively engaged in activism or aligning with the latest cause, you are somehow less virtuous. This leaves many individuals feeling disconnected and alienated from their communities, contributing to dissatisfaction with their roles in the peer hierarchy.

  • Dysfunction

The final, and perhaps most disturbing, outcome of prolonged exposure to toxic progressive communist democrat media is psychotic dysfunction—sometimes leading to suicide or the commission of egregious acts of violence to achieve acceptance and acclaim. While this may sound extreme, the mental health implications are significant. A growing body of research has shown the detrimental effects of media consumption on mental well-being, with some studies linking constant media exposure to anxiety, depression, and even psychosis in extreme cases.

One of the most concerning elements of progressive communist democrat media is the creation of groupthink echo chambers. Social media algorithms, often dominated by progressive ideologies, reinforce content that aligns with an individual’s preexisting beliefs, creating a feedback loop. This constant reinforcement of a single worldview can cause individuals to become disconnected from reality. When faced with opposing viewpoints or differing opinions, these individuals may react with hostility or even paranoia, as the progressive media’s narrative has so successfully convinced them of an all-encompassing societal collapse that any disagreement feels like an existential threat.

Moreover, progressive media often fuels feelings of anger and hatred toward perceived enemies—whether those enemies are political conservatives, large corporations, or even entire countries. This environment of constant vilification and an “us versus them” mentality can create psychological distress, heightening paranoia and fueling negative emotions. In some individuals, this can escalate into full-blown psychotic episodes, where they lose touch with reality and begin to view the world through a distorted, increasingly dangerous lens.

Bottom line…

It is clear that the psychological consequences of consuming toxic progressive media are far-reaching, affecting individuals’ mental health, well-being, and ability to interact constructively within society.

The rising rates of anxiety, depression, and psychosis in younger generations—who are disproportionately affected by media consumption—underscore the seriousness of the issue. If these trends continue, we may be facing a mental health crisis of unprecedented proportions, exacerbated by the continuance of an unchecked influence of progressive media.

This situation demands immediate action. Both governmental and societal institutions must recognize this media's toxic nature and take steps to mitigate its impact. Media literacy programs should be implemented nationwide, teaching individuals to critically engage with the content they consume, to differentiate between fact and opinion, and to develop a healthy skepticism toward sensationalized narratives.

Additionally, mental health professionals must be trained to understand the unique pressures and challenges posed by toxic media consumption, particularly in younger populations. Support systems should be established to help individuals who are struggling with the mental health repercussions of media-induced dysfunction.

Only by confronting the toxic nature of progressive communist democrat media head-on can we begin to heal the mental and emotional damage it has caused and restore a sense of hope, balance, and personal well-being in America.

We are so screwed.

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


JULIA BROWNLEY DISRESPECTS THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

My representative, Congresswoman Julia Brownley (D-CA), appears to have become a hack hypocrite…

JB
How Brownley can disparage and condemn President Trump while she blindly followed a manifestly corrupt, mentally challenged, incompetent fool who pretended to be Presidential when he wasn’t on vacation or hidden away from the public and press by his handlers, mostly Obama acolytes, is beyond me.

BROWNLEY

Congresswoman Julia Brownley (D-CA) issued the following statement after President Donald Trump’s address at the Joint Session of Congress.

“Tonight, as President Trump stood before Congress, I walked out of the chamber because I could not, in good conscience, dignify a speech so detached from reality and so disrespectful to the American people. Once again, President Trump demeaned the dignity of his office and embarrassed our nation with his ignorance of real-world problems and his open contempt for the democracy he swore to protect.

[OCS: What conscience? You were following some of the most radical and racist progressive communists democrats out the door. You are either naïve or useful idiot. There is no dignity among Democrats.]

“Rather than offering a vision to unite our country or solutions to the very real challenges facing working families, President Trump instead demonstrated – yet again – that he is unfit to lead the free world. He has neither the capacity nor the desire to meet the pressing needs of families across our nation. He spent more time boasting about his self-serving agenda than addressing the crushing costs keeping families up at night – costs that are rising because of his administration’s disastrous economic policies.

[OCS: And yet you said nothing about President Biden being unfit to lead the United States and the national security risk he posed as the senile Commander-in-Chief.]

“The tariffs he announced this week threaten to ignite a devastating trade war, driving up prices on everything from groceries to gas, hurting small businesses, and leaving working families to pay the price. Meanwhile, the Republican budget passed last week handed out trillions in tax breaks to the wealthiest Americans and big corporations, shifting the burden onto middle-class families – all while slashing critical programs like Medicaid and nutrition assistance that millions of families rely on just to get by. This President is dangerously out of touch with the reality of American life – and by reiterating his radical, self-serving agenda tonight, he made clear he has no intention of changing course.

[OCS: Biden was the one who was dangerously out of touch reality, and you said and did nothing.]

“Even more disturbing than the President’s rhetoric is his relentless assault on the truth itself. His remarks tonight were riddled with falsehoods and deliberate misinformation – part of an ongoing effort to divide Americans against one another and erode public trust in our institutions. His crass language, misleading claims, and blatant disregard for facts are not just beneath the office he holds – they are an attack on the very foundation of our democracy.

[OCS: Truth? You mean like who is actually running the Biden Presidency? You mean like weaponizing major government agencies and institutions? You mean like subverting democracy by using activist judges and bogus lawsuits to circumvent democratic processes?] 

“But this President’s reckless behavior does not exist in a vacuum. It is enabled every day by the silence and complicity of my Republican colleagues. As we stand on the brink of a government shutdown that could devastate our economy and hurt millions of Americans, House and Senate Republicans refuse to stand up to this President’s overreach and abuse of power. Instead of serving as a check on his reckless dismantling of vital government services, they applaud it – turning a blind eye to his unconstitutional schemes and the unchecked influence of an unelected, unvetted billionaire pulling the strings behind the scenes.

[OCS: Brownley’s party is the epitome of corruption and abuse of power. All political appointees are unelected. As for unvetted, Elon Musk holds the highest security clearances and is the backbone of America’s space program. What Brownley may characterize as “vital government services” are partisan pork, riddled with waste, fraud, and abuse.]

“Rather than providing the steady leadership our country desperately needs, Republicans in Congress have chosen to shield this President from accountability at every turn – even as he disgraces us on the global stage, undermines our democracy, and wages war on the very values that make America strong. Their refusal to confront the dangers posed by this administration is a profound betrayal of their oath and a direct threat to the future of our nation.

[OCS: The only leadership demonstrated by the progressive communist democrats in Congress was to point America down a road of domestic and foreign decline. Opening our borders to an invasion of illegal aliens who decimated government services and safety nets.]

“Republicans have made their priorities clear: they are willing to sacrifice our nation’s future to cling to political power. With majorities in both chambers of Congress and control of the White House, they can no longer hide behind excuses for their failures. They own this chaos.

[OCS: A classic case of projection, where you attribute your behavior to the opposition. The Democrats have proven “they are willing to sacrifice our nation’s future to cling to political power. And “they can no longer hide behind excuses for their failures. They own this chaos.”]

The American people deserve better. They deserve leaders who put country over party – leaders with the courage to defend our democracy and fight for the hard-working families who built this nation. I urge my Republican colleagues to reflect on their responsibilities – not to their party, but to their constituents and to the Constitution itself. I urge the President to reflect on his own duty to our nation.

[OCS: Yes! “The American people deserve better. They deserve leaders who put country over party – leaders with the courage to defend our democracy and fight for the hard-working families who built this nation.” Pretty much why the Democrats need to be destroyed at the ballot box in the 2026 mid-terms.]

“If and when they are ready to put the American people first, House Democrats stand ready to work together to lower costs, create good-paying jobs, and build safer, healthier communities. Until then, we will not waver in our fight to protect our democracy, defend working families, and stand up for the fundamental principles of fairness, justice, and equality for all.”

[OCS: This is bullshit. Why didn’t they “work together to lower costs, create good-paying jobs, and build safer, healthier communities” when they controlled the government and most of its agencies and institutions? Was it because they were trying to achieve perpetual political power and to destroy Donald Trump?]

<Source>

Bottom line…

I regarded Julia Brownley as a moderate Democrat with a modicum of commonsense. Other than her admirable advocacy for veterans’ affairs, she appears to be an old-time liberal. Now, I am not so sure that she hasn’t turned to the dark side along with the most radical and corrupt progressive communist Democrats seeking to destroy America from within.

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


DEMOCRAT DISRESPECT AT STATE OF UNION

As President Donald Trump delivered a historic address to a joint session of Congress, outlining his America First agenda on immigration, the economy, and national security, the progressive communist democrats sat silently with their paddlelike signs as his early achievements and aspirations were highlighted.

Algreen

Sittin on their collective asses and ratifying waste, fraud, and abuse...

Congress
Pitiful...

Dems

This is my fifth such speech to Congress, and, once again, I look at the Democrats in front of me and I realize there is absolutely nothing I can say to make them happy or to make them stand or smile or applaud. Nothing I can do. I could find a cure to the most devastating disease, a disease that would wipe out entire nations or announce the answers to greatest economy in history or the stoppage of crime to the lowest levels ever recorded, and these people sitting right here will not clap, will not stand, and certainly will not cheer for these astronomical achievements. They won’t do it no matter what. Five, five times I’ve been up here. It’s very sad. And it just shouldn’t be this way.

So, Democrats sitting before me, for just this one night, why not join us in celebrating so many incredible wins for America? For the good of our nation, let’s work together and let’s truly make America great again.

Screw the Progressive Communists who have attempted to destroy America from within. 

Trump-speech

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


OOPS! BLOG HOST DIED LAST NIGHT AND RECOVERED EARLY IN THE MORNING

NAGGING


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


WE HAVE OUR ANSWER: ZELENSKYY IS A DEMOCRAT DUPE!

ZELYNSKYY-STOP

In yesterday’s blog, we asked, “Is Zelenskyy Playing with the Democrats, Hoping for a Congressional Win in 2026?” Today, we apparently have our answer.

Democrats Encouraged Zelensky to Scoff at a Possible Peace Deal, Setting Up Oval Office Blowout

Democrat Senator Chris Murphy (CT) and presumably others encouraged Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to reject the prospect of a peace deal without so-called “security guarantees” (a euphemism for American military commitments) just before the now-infamous Oval Office blow-out.

Cm
Less than an hour before entering the Oval Office, Zelensky met with several lawmakers, including Murphy and other Democrats. Based on the wording of the above post, the senator (or someone else at the table) pressed the Ukrainian president to reject a “fake peace agreement,” which is a clear shot at Trump’s attempts at diplomacy. At the very least, these Democrats encouraged Zelensky to remain defiant in that position, and we all know what happened next.

Attending that meeting and glad-handing with left-wing partisans who do not want peace because it would make them look bad was a colossal mistake by Zelensky. He needed to go into the Oval Office with a reconciliatory attitude. No one was asking him to sign a peace deal with Russia on the spot. All Trump wants to do is hold talks. Ukrainian leaders would still hold the right to reject ceasefire terms if they saw fit. 

That’s what makes this entire thing so mind-numbing. There was no reason for Zelensky to do what he did. Trump was ready to give the bag away on a very Ukraine-friendly mineral rights deal. To blow that up served no purpose whatsoever. Details of any possible ceasefire could be hashed out much later and not in a way meant to embarrass the president and vice president.

Zelensky needs to understand that these Democrats have no power. The Biden administration is gone, and Republicans control both the Senate and the House. Chris Murphy isn’t going to be writing Ukraine a check. All he and his cohorts can do is virtue-signal, and that’s not winning any battles against Russia. If things are going to be patched up with the Trump White House, Zelensky has to accept that reality and stop believing that he can bully his way to American military commitments by appealing to the press and Democrats.

[OCS: Unless, of course, the progressive communist democrats, the establishment republicans, and the media propagandists have convinced Zelenskyy to hang on and wait for the 2026 midterms when the Democrats have another shot at capturing the House and Senate and will keep the gravy-train rolling.]

<Source>

Secretary of State Marco Rubio explains it to Democrat shill George Stephanopoulos…

No one here is claiming Vladimir Putin is going to get the Nobel Peace Prize this year, or whether he should be The Man of the Year of the Humanitarian Association. What we're arguing here is, he has a very large country on full war footing — they're cranking out weapons now at a war-footing pace — and we need to figure out — is there a way to get them to stop the war? And the only way you're going to do that is to get Russians engaged in negotiations — something the Europeans haven't be able to do; the Biden administration wasn't able to do or didn't even try.

That's the goal, here; it's that simple. Can we try to sit with them and figure out ... what are the Russians demands? [Under] what conditions would the Russians be willing to stop this war? And we don't know because we haven't talked to them in three years. That's the singular goal, here — to bring an end to this conflict and it begins by getting them to the table.

Ultimately, like any truce — like any peace agreement, anywhere in the world — those things will have to be enforced; they'll have to be enduring; there'll have to be safeguards put in place, everybody understands that. But it begins with a first step, and that is engaging them to see if that is even possible. Because if it's not possible, then what we're looking at is a protracted stalemate, with thousands of people dying, billions of dollars pouring in, and more death and destruction, and that's not something the president wants to do. <Source>

Bottom line…

I do not know what game Zelenskyy is playing, but it is a deadly one that is costing hundreds of lives per day and the continuing destruction of his country.

I believe the bogus minerals agreement was a negotiating ploy to reach ceasefire talks, followed by some form of peace plan.

If Zelenskyy thinks he can trust the Democrats, perhaps he needs a history refresher, starting with former Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Victoria Nuland’s color revolution in Ukraine.

As for the progressive communist democrats, did they just tell a foreign sovereign power to defy the President of the United States?

We are so screwed while Europe postures and the American taxpayers pay the bills and send military aid that depletes our stockpiles.
-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


IS TRUMP GASLIGHTING AMERICA WITH THE UKRAINE MINERALS DEAL?

BullshitWhile President Donald Trump and his administration’s advisors are exponentially superior to former President Biden and his Obama acolyte handlers, we must be mindful that Donald Trump is transactional, doing what’s best for Donald Trump and his deals, as well as his abilities as a master bullshit artist and tendency to distort facts, exaggerate, and make false as a negotiating tactic.

Therefore, I am challenged to review the United States/Ukraine minerals agreement, which is meant to reimburse the United States for its part in delivering weapons and financial assistance to Ukraine and its conflict with Russia. Or, at least, that is the assertion being used to assuage American concerns in the lead-up to the 2026 mid-term elections.

How much did we really transfer to Ukraine?

While the government’s accounting is deceptive by design, a January 20, 2025 report by the Department of State’s Bureau of Political-Military Affairs suggests that the U.S. aid to Ukraine, as of September 2024, is approximately $183 billion. <Source: U.S. Security Cooperation with Ukraine - United States Department of State>

What are the actual terms and conditions of the “Agreement?”

As far as I can tell, only the United Kingdom’s The Telegraph has revealed any details of this closely-held agreement.

TERMS AND CONDITIONS AGREEMENT
DRAFT AS OF FEBRUARY 7, 2025 – Privileged & Confidential

WHEREAS the United States of America has provided significant financial and material support to Ukraine since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022;

WHEREAS the American people desire to invest alongside Ukraine in a free and secure Ukraine;

WHEREAS the United States of America and Ukraine desire a lasting peace in Ukraine and a durable partnership between their two peoples and governments;

WHEREAS the United States of America and Ukraine wish to ensure that hostile parties to the conflict do not benefit from the reconstruction of Ukraine following a durable peace;

NOW, THEREFORE, the United States of America and Ukraine intend to enter into an agreement on the establishment of a Reconstruction Investment Fund herein to deepen the partnership between the United States of America and Ukraine.

The agreement covers the “economic value associated with resources of Ukraine”, including “mineral resources, oil and gas resources, ports, other infrastructure (as agreed)”, leaving it unclear what else might be encompassed. “This agreement shall be governed by New York law, without regard to conflict of laws principles,” it states.

The US will take 50pc of recurring revenues received by Ukraine from extraction of resources, and 50pc of the financial value of “all new licenses issued to third parties” for the future monetization of resources. There will be “a lien on such revenues” in favor of the US.

It states that “for all future licenses, the US will have a right of first refusal for the purchase of exportable minerals.” Washington will have sovereign immunity and acquire near total control over most of Ukraine’s commodity and resource economy. The fund “shall have the exclusive right to establish the method, selection criteria, terms, and conditions” of all future licenses and projects. And so forth, in this vein. It seems to have been written by private lawyers, not the US departments of state or commerce. <Source>

I cannot verify the authenticity of the alleged document and have reason to doubt its authenticity because, from its appearance, this looks like the first outrageous demand, with the actual terms and conditions to be negotiated in further sessions. Likewise, federal agreements adhere to federal, not state, laws.

Published Valuations are bullshit…

Rare earth minerals are not exceptionally rare but expensive to mine, refine, and convert to usable forms. Even if one values the estimated in situ wealth of minerals, production costs often greatly outweigh the value of any marketable minerals. Otherwise, the government or private enterprise would have invested in their recovery.

Before the war, Ukraine’s total mining output was only $15 billion per year, mainly coal and metal ores, which is suspiciously low for a country with “trillions of dollars of minerals.”

The idea of the US extracting $500 billion from a Ukraine mineral deal is absurd.

Bottom line…

The innocent civilians of all combatant parties deserve peace and to remain unmolested by their respective governments.

The American taxpayers need relief from our elite grifter class, who exist on the spectrum of political corruption.

Much of the money allocated by Congress to support Ukraine was given to U.S. defense contractors and cycled through intermediaries such as politically connected non-governmental humanitarian organizations, which has led to inefficiencies and a lack of direct impact on Ukraine’s war effort. No matter the outcome, the military-industrial complex will continue to do well as near-empty stockpiles of fully depreciated, aged, and obsolete U.S. weapons will be replaced at significantly higher costs.

Did both parties agree to blow up the deal before someone called bullshit?

I remain skeptical of all politicians, no matter their professed intentions.

Hence, we are so screwed.

-- Steve

Media-true




“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


WHAT A JOKE: NBC WILDFIRE COVERAGE

Gs1

We have all seen the dramatic television news shots where a reporter in a heavy raincoat leans into hurricane winds or appears to be standing in a flooded area, only to see some individual casually walk by in shorts and a tee shirt.

So I wasn't surprised when NBC, the home of fake news, had a reporter dressed in yellow in front of what appears to be a greenscreen playback of a local wildfire.

The tip-off is that she is not wearing a genuine fire turnout coat, protective eyewear, a head cover to prevent embers in her hair, or a filtration mask. Notice how close she appears to the fire without a single firefighter in the shot. 

Firefighter chic...

Ffc

No Joke! Here's what a real on-scene network fire reporter in California looks like...

Kanya-Whitworth-ABC

Her cameraman is similarly dressed.

Bottom line...

Nothing on NBC or MSNBC seems real.

-- Steve

 

 


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


IS ZELENSKYY PLAYING WITH THE DEMOCRATS, HOPING FOR A CONGRESSIONAL WIN IN 2026?

Faces-of-evil

Susan Rice, long seen as a progressive communist democrat behind-the-scenes power player, especially during the corrupt Obama administration where she served as the National Security Advisor and previously as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, characterized the Trump-Zelenskyy meeting as a “set-up.”

And she might have said the quiet part out loud. Yes, it was a set-up, apparently orchestrated by the progressive communist democrats, the establishment republicans, and their media propagandists to damage President Trump and keep the unauditable multi-billion dollar defense industry gravy train on track.

Susan Rice joining Nicolle Wallace on "Deadline" to defend Zelenskyy and disparage President Trump…

[Nicolle Wallace]  Joining our ongoing coverage, former United States Ambassador to the United Nations, former National Security Advisor to President Obama, Ambassador Susan Rice is here. Ambassador, your reaction?

[Susan Rice]  Well, Nicole, obviously, it’s a very sad day and an embarrassment for the United States on the world stage. But let’s step back and analyze what’s happened here. I think there’s no question that this was a set-up.

You heard Donald Trump say at the end of that clip you played, this is great television. This was a set-up. Vladimir, I mean, excuse me, Vladimir Zelenskyy was compelled to agree to a horrible deal that would have sent Ukraine’s minerals to the United States without any concrete security guarantees.

And yet, because he was trying to improve a relationship with Donald Trump, he came to Washington, he came to the Oval Office, and sat down for a meeting, hat in hand. And soon after he got there, the Vice President of the United States lit into him and started a confrontation. Now, I’ve been in countless Oval Office meetings with heads of state, presidents, and vice presidents, as National Security Advisor, as UN Ambassador, and in other roles.

[OCS: This is not the first time Zelenskyy was in the United States. He notably visited with democrats and appeared to provide support during a U.S. election.]

I can tell you that the Vice President or the Secretary of State or anybody else, they don’t jump in, hijack a conversation without the express blessing of the President of the United States. So, J.D. Vance did that deliberately. Donald Trump knew what he was going to do.

[OCS: Donald Trump 2.0 is now more inclined to sit back and respectfully let others take the stage to make his points. Whether J.D. Vance, Elon Musk, Cabinet Officials, or others, Trump allows them to speak.]

And I think, as he said at the end, because he can’t help himself, this was a set-up for the cameras. It was a play to his base. But above all, it was a play to Vladimir Putin, to show fealty to Vladimir Putin, and to try to humiliate Zelenskyy.

[OCS: Donald Trump is transactional more than he is political. Evidence indicates Trump was there to announce the signing of the United States-Ukraine minerals agreement, take a victory lap, and go back to what he was doing.]

But Zelenskyy didn’t play along with the script, because Zelinskyy’s got dignity and guts. And Zelenskyy has people that he democratically represents. And as a result, he couldn’t sit there in silence, as lies were being told about how the war was started, whose responsibility it was, et cetera, et cetera.

[OCS: Not surprisingly, Zelenskyy did not mention that the war was started by Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs' Victoria Nuland’s cabal that ultimately ended with Zelenskyy in power. Or the fact that the U.S. threatened to allow Ukraine to join NATO, a clear provocation of the Russians. Or that the overwhelming majority of ethnic Russians in the seized areas had voted to affiliate with Russia rather than Ukraine. Not to mention that politicians and oligarchs were using a manifestly corrupt Ukraine to launder their ill-gotten gains.]

And he tried to explain what is, in fact, the case. To suggest that he was not thankful, I can’t count the number of times that Zelenskyy has thanked the American people, the American government, the President of the United States for the critical support that we’ve provided. It’s not about gratitude.

It was an effort to humiliate him, to scuttle the U.S.-Ukraine relationship, so that Trump no longer feels any obligation to provide support, and to hand U.S. interests and Ukraine, and potentially Europe, to Putin on a silver platter. Why? That’s a great question.

[OCS: And the Russia-Trump hoax goes on. We should be mindful of Rice’s attendance in the January 5, 2017 oval office meeting with the other key Russia collusion hoax perpetrators.]

Yeah, Nicole, I think we have to understand that what happened today is really a piece of a larger puzzle. We’ve seen this building, frankly, since before Trump returned to office. But literally, so much of what he has done in his first five weeks in office have been to the benefit of Russia and China.

[OCS: A classic case of projection: blaming the opposition for your behavior, especially Biden and China, and Clinton with Russia.]

<Source>

Rice’s remarks provoked a sharp response along the lines of Shakespeare’s “The lady doth protest too much, methinks.”

From Investigative Reporter Mollie Hemmingway…

Yesterday, Susan Rice said of the Trump-Zelenskyy meeting, "There is no question this was a set up." She revealed full knowledge of the mineral agreement, complained that it didn't include "concrete" security agrees (meaning, apparently, commitment of US troops on the ground if conditions merit), and then mischaracterized Trump's behavior, counting on most Americans to not have watched what transpired over the entire hour in the Oval Office.

You can look at this and dismiss it as typical Democrat talking points, but you could also view it as almost a confession, one that includes details about the current "Get Trump" effort.

Yes, Trump won the popular vote against unbelievable odds, but if you think Team Obama is being any less involved in quiet insurrections than they were during the first Trump administration (Russia collusion, Ukraine impeachment, etc.), you're clueless. I'll remind you that Susan Rice was in the small Jan. 5, 2017 meeting in the WH with other key Russia collusion hoax perpetrators. <Source>

Of course, Rice fired back at the suggestion that she was involved…

You clowns are up to the same old tired crap. When your guy screws up and royally embarrasses himself and the U.S., you try to change the subject and lie about a favorite target to distract and deflect. For the record, I have never met Zelenskyy and never spoken to him. Ever. Or advised him or anybody around him. It’s a shame that you contend that it is in the U.S. national interest to sell out Ukraine and suck up to Putin. <Source>

Bottom line…

It is a very dangerous game that the progressive communist democrats are playing, given their demonstrated willingness to burn down institutions and norms to be rebuilt in their corrupt image.

We are so screwed.

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


PRESIDENT SENDS ZELENSKYY PACKING

TV

Unlike the pussified Obama and Biden Administrations, the Trump Administration is not afraid of the Congressional Democrats, establishment Republicans, the deep state, and the progressive communist media propagandists.

Trump, with J.D. Vance at his side, is willing to stand up in front of the world and remind a corrupt petty tyrant that we are the United States of America and that we have proposed a path to ending the continuing destruction of Ukraine and a method to finance the massive rebuilding of the country.

Though the deal was pre-negotiated and a ready-to-be-accepted agreement to develop mineral extraction projects in Ukraine jointly was to be announced at a joint press conference, Zelenskyy appeared to be holding the deal hostage to extract hard “security guarantees” in front of the world’s media.

What was unexpected was that Ukraine’s President Zelenskyy would openly criticize the U.S. for not stopping Russian President Vladimir Putin and try to lecture the President of the United States on Ukraine’s history—rolling his eyes and interrupting the President. 

The transcript...

J.D. Vance: For four years, in the United States of America, we had a president who stood up in press conferences and talked tough about Vladimir Putin, and then Putin invaded Ukraine and destroyed a significant chunk of the country. The path to peace and the path to prosperity is maybe engaging in diplomacy. We tried the pathway of Joe Biden, of thumping our chest and pretending that the president of the United States’ words mattered more than the president of the United States’ actions. What makes America a good country is America engaging in diplomacy. That’s what President Trump is doing.

Volodymyr Zelensky: He [Putin] occupied various parts of Ukraine in 2014. During that time, it was President Obama, then President Trump, then President Biden, and now it’s President Trump and he will stop him [Putin]. But during 2014, nobody stopped him. He just occupied and took. He killed people. From 2014 till 2022, the situation was the same—people have been dying on the contact line and nobody stopped him. We had a lot of conversations with him, including a bilateral conversation. As a new president in 2019, I signed with him a cease-fire deal alongside Macron and Merkel. All of them told me that he will never go. We also signed a gas contract with him. But after all of that, he broke the cease-fire. He killed our people, and he didn’t exchange prisoners. We signed the exchange of prisoners, but he didn’t do it. What kind of diplomacy, J.D., are you speaking about? What do you mean?

Vance: I’m talking about the kind of diplomacy that’s going to end the destruction of your country. [Zelensky begins to respond] Mr. President, with respect, I think it’s disrespectful for you to come to the Oval Office and try to litigate this in front of the American media. Right now, you guys are going around and forcing conscripts to the front lines because you have manpower problems—you should be thanking the president for trying to bring an end to this conflict.

Zelensky: Have you ever been to Ukraine to see what problems we have? Come once.

Vance: I’ve actually watched and seen the stories, and I know what happens is you bring people on a propaganda tour, Mr. President. Do you disagree that you’ve had problems bringing people in your military, and do you think that it’s respectful to come to the Oval Office of the United States of America and attack the administration that is trying to prevent the destruction of your country?

Zelensky: First of all, during the war, everybody has problems, even you. But you have a nice ocean and don’t feel [the problems] now. But you will feel it in the future.

Donald Trump: You don’t know that.

Zelensky: God bless, you will not have war.

Trump: Don’t tell us what we’re going to feel. We’re trying to solve a problem.

Zelensky: I’m not. I’m answering the question that…

Trump: You’re in no position to dictate what we’re going to feel. We’re going to feel very good.

Zelensky: You are going to feel influenced…

Trump: We’re going to feel very good and very strong. You’re, right now, not in a very good position. You’ve allowed yourself to be in a very bad position. You don’t have the cards right now with us. [Zelensky continues speaking] You’re gambling with the lives of millions of people. You’re gambling with World War Three. You’re gambling with World War Three, and what you’re doing is very disrespectful to this country that’s backed you far more than a lot of people say they should have.

Vance: Have you said thank you once?

Zelensky: A lot of times.

Vance: No, in this entire meeting, have you said thank you? You went to Pennsylvania and campaigned for the opposition in October. Offer some words of appreciation for the United States of America and the president who’s trying to save your country.

Zelensky: Please, you think that if you will speak very loudly…

Trump: He is not speaking loudly. Your country is in big trouble.

Zelensky: I know. Can I ask…

Trump: No, no, you’ve done a lot of talking. Your country is in big trouble.

Zelensky: I know.

Trump: You’re not winning this. You have a damn good chance of coming out okay because of us.

Zelensky: Mr. President, we are staying strong in our country. From the very beginning of the war we’ve been alone and we are thankful. I said thank you in this cabinet.

Trump: We gave you, through this stupid president, $350 billion. We gave you military equipment. Your men are brave but they have used our military equipment. If you didn’t have our military equipment, this war would have been over in two weeks.

Zelensky: In three days, yes. I heard it from Putin.

Trump: It’s going to be a very hard thing to do business like this.

Vance: Just say thank you.

Zelensky: I said thank you—I say thank you to the American people.

Vance: Accept that there are disagreements, and let’s go litigate those disagreements, rather than trying to fight it out in the American media, when you’re wrong. We know that you’re wrong.

Trump: You see, I think it’s good for the American people to see what’s going on. I think it’s very important. That’s why I kept this going so long. You have to be thankful. You don’t have the cards. You’re buried there. You people are dying. You’re running low on soldiers. Listen, you’re running low on soldiers. It would be a damn good thing. Then you tell us, “I don’t want to cease fire. I don’t want to cease fire.” If you could get a cease-fire right now, I tell you, you take it so the bullets stop flying and your men stop getting killed.

Zelensky: Yes, of course I want to stop the war. But, as I’ve said to you, with guarantees. Ask our people about the cease-fire, what do they think.

Trump: That wasn’t me. That was with a guy named Biden, who was not a smart person. That was with Obama, who gave you sheets. I gave you javelins. I gave you the javelins to take out all those tanks. Obama gave you sheets. In fact, the statement is Obama gave sheets and Trump gave javelins. You got to be more thankful, because, let me tell you, you don’t have the cards. With us, you have the cards, but without us, you don’t have any cards. It’ll be a tough deal to make because the attitudes have to change.

Truth

Bottom line…

So, I am extremely proud of our President who sent the grifter packing and told him to come back "when he is ready for peace."

We are so screwed.

-- Steve

Breaking_wave



“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


DO I SEE A FALSE FLAG OPERATION?

I found something curious in a Cincinnati.com/Enquirer story about a predominantly black town allegedly protecting itself from a potential neo-Nazi incursion…

Being a skeptical observer, I could not help but think that the story was either an exploitation of an organically occurring event or, possibly, a false flag operation. 

Cincinnaticom-the-enquirer-logo-dark-gannett-transparentArmed men are guarding the streets of Lincoln Heights, stopping cars and vetting passersby

In the days since a neo-Nazi demonstration rattled residents here, a group of men began guarding its streets, many donning all black and wearing masks, with rifles in hand.

But they are doing more than your typical neighborhood watch: They’ve stopped people from passing through, approached cars in a fast food drive-thru and even threatened to shoot a property owner.

The Enquirer reviewed more than three dozen 911 calls from the Lincoln Heights area since a Feb. 7 white supremacist demonstration on the I-75 overpass at Vision Way left residents on edge. Several callers expressed concerns with seeing the men with guns, but three callers recounted confrontations with the armed men that step beyond what many would consider within the limits of Ohio’s open carry laws.

Jim Meister, who owns a business in Lincoln Heights, told The Enquirer one of the armed men pointed his rifle at him and threatened to shoot.

Meister called police Feb. 11 after seeing a car parked in a fenced off, vacant lot he owns adjacent to his business. When Meister arrived there with a 911 dispatcher on the phone, three men got out of the car and approached him.

C1

“I’m calling the police,” Meister is heard saying to the men in a recording of the 911 call.

“We are the police. What’s wrong?” one man appears to reply. “We’re protecting Lincoln Heights.”

Meister said one of the men, carrying what looked like an assault rifle, then pointed his gun at Meister and his friend. They argued about who owned the lot and when police arrived, the men admitted they didn’t know Meister was the owner.

The sheriff and her spokeswoman Kyla Woods did not respond to emails or a call from The Enquirer Tuesday afternoon asking for more information about the confrontations and whether they are taking any action.

I feel as though the police are hoping this will go away by not doing anything with it,” Jacobs said. <Source>

Why I am skeptical…

Do you see the arm patch on the so-called anonymous “protector” dressed totally in tactical gear? Look closely!

Nbp-patch

Bad news…

The New Black Panther Party is a far-left extremist group that advocates for the creation of a separate Black nation, which they believe should be free from the control of the U.S. government, teaching that Black Americans cannot coexist with white Americans in a unified society due to the historical and systemic oppression faced by Black people.

They are rooted in a form of Black nationalism that espouses a communist ideology, including support for the abolition of capitalism, redistribution of wealth, and the establishment of a society that is more “equitable” for Black Americans.

The New Black Panther Party is notorious for its anti-white rhetoric and the promotion of racist and anti-Semitic views.

Like Louis Farrakhan’s much larger Nation of Islam,  they maintain a militant, paramilitary posture, with a focus on self-defense and preparedness for violent confrontation.

Wherever racial trouble appears, the New Black Panther Party seems not far behind. And it is not a coincidence!

Bottom line…

You hear progressive communist democrats prattle on and on about White Supremacy and their militias, but they are strangely silent about Black Supremacists and their militias.

Both represent a perversion of lawful police protection and highlight the cowardice and ineffectiveness of certain law enforcement agencies that have been cowed into fearing for their personal and professional futures should they take lawful action against a person of color.

Ask former Minneapolis, Minnesota police officer Derek Chauvin, who languishes in prison for doing his job in arresting a drug-addled criminal resisting arrest—lynched by a corrupt activist prosecutor and judge who community activists and progressive communist democrat media propagandists deeply influenced.

Another reason that ordinary citizens should have access to AR-15-style semi-automatic rifles, high-capacity magazines, and suppressors. 

We are so screwed.

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


GAY CALIFORNIA DEMOCRAT WANTS YOU TO RUN AWAY OR FACE PROSECUTION WHEN CONFRONTING AN ASSAILANT

Commie-LEGISLATOR

Once again, a pussified gay liberal democrat, Rick Chavez Zbur (Yale, Harvard), wants to protect criminals and restrict your God-given inalienable right to self-protection.

Rick Zbur (D-CA) introduced Assembly Bill 1333, which would limit self-defense rights against criminals in California, mandate retreat, and eliminate the justifiable use of force in certain circumstances.

Even worse, it would open every act of self-defense to armchair quarterbacking by law enforcement and jurors regarding how much force is reasonable and justifiable in homicide cases—with no way to ascertain the effects of the physiological effects of fear like an adrenaline surge.

ZBUR -- AB-1333 Crimes: homicide. (2025-2026)

As Amends the Law Today

SECTION 1.  Section 197 of the Penal Code is amended to read:

197. (a) Homicide is also justifiable when committed by any person in any all  of the following cases:

(1) When resisting any attempt to murder any person, person  or to commit a felony, or to do some great bodily injury upon any person.

(2) When committed in defense of habitation, property, or a person, against one who manifestly intends or endeavors, by violence or surprise, to commit a felony, or against one who manifestly intends and endeavors, endeavors in a violent, riotous, or tumultuous manner, to enter the habitation of another for the purpose of offering violence to any person therein.

(3) When committed in the lawful defense of such person, or of a spouse, parent, child, master, mistress, or servant of such person, when there is reasonable ground to apprehend a design to commit a felony or to do some great bodily injury, and imminent danger of such design being accomplished; but such person, or the person in whose behalf the defense was made, if he or she was the assailant or engaged in mutual combat, must really and in good faith have endeavored to decline any further struggle before the homicide was committed. accomplished.

(b) Homicide is not justifiable when committed by a person in all of the following cases:

(1) When the person was outside of their residence and knew that using force likely to cause death or great bodily injury could have been avoided with complete safety by retreating.

(2) When the person used more force than was reasonably necessary to defend against a danger.

(3) When the person was the assailant, engaged in mutual combat, or knowingly engaged in conduct reasonably likely to provoke a person to commit a felony or do some great bodily injury, except if either of the following circumstances apply:

(A) The person reasonably believed that they were in imminent danger of death or great bodily injury, and had exhausted every reasonable means to escape such danger other than the use of force likely to cause death or great bodily injury.

(4) (B) When necessarily committed in attempting, by lawful ways and means, to apprehend any person for any felony committed, or in lawfully suppressing any riot, or in lawfully keeping and preserving the peace. In good faith, the person withdrew from the encounter with the other assailant or assailants and indicated clearly to the other assailant or assailants that the person desired to withdraw and terminated the use of any force, but the other assailant or assailants continued or resumed the use of force.

SECTION 2

No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution.

<Source>

Who is Rick Chavez Zbur?

Rick Chavez Zbur, representing California's 51st Assembly District, encompassing Hollywood, West Hollywood, Beverly Hills, Westwood, Santa Monica, and portions of Los Angeles, is another progressive issue politician who prioritizes LGBTQ+ rights, climate change, social justice, criminal justice, and civil rights over public safety.

Zbur-1

Bottom line…

When will Californians regain the right to protect their lives and property against criminals, many of whom are irrational, armed, and drug-addled aggressors?

We are so screwed.

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


SELLING OFF AMERICA TO FOREIGN INTERESTS?

It should come as no surprise that high-ranking foreign government officials and their family members have large luxury homes throughout the United States. Now, President Trump plans to democratize the landscape by offering semi-rich individuals the opportunity to live, work, and invest in America, with a pathway to citizenship at the end of their journey.

TRUMP-GOLDCARD4
The new visa is being pitched as a replacement for the 35-year-old EB-5 investor visa program and a way to attract wealthy and successful individuals who will contribute to the U.S. economy.

"They’ll be wealthy, and they’ll be successful, and they’ll be spending a lot of money and paying a lot of taxes and employing a lot of people, and we think it’s going to be extremely successful. "It’s somewhat like a green card, but at a higher level of sophistication... It’s a road to citizenship for people, and essentially people of wealth or people of great talent,"

Bottom line…

Of course, the devil is in the details, and it is doubtful that any visa program can be created without Congressional approval.

Considering that a $5 million buy-in is nothing for major scammers seeking to prey on Americans, one hopes that applicants will be adequately vetted.

We are so screwed.

-- Steve

Trump-White-House1

 


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


ANOTHER WIN FOR AMERICA: DAN BONGINO AS FBI DEPUTY DIRECTOR

The progressive communist democrats and their media propagandists are upset over President Trump’s appointment of Dan Bongino as the Deputy Director of the FBI.

Bongino_Senate

Unqualified:  Primarily, Bongino is an outsider who is not and was not a career FBI senior agent, breaking “precedents and norms” established in the Bureau’s 117 year history.

Partisan:   A conservative radio talk show host who openly promoted the Trump candidacy, supported conspiracy theories, and disparaged democrats using disinformation.

An easy rebuttal of the value of a senior agent as Deputy Director.

Consider the performance of former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe: 

  • McCabe, as corrupt FBI Director James Comey’s number two, was heavily involved in the Trump-Russia Hoax, the FBI's corrupt investigation, known as "Crossfire Hurricane" based on fabricated claims that individuals linked to the Trump campaign had suspicious contacts with Russian officials.

  • McCabe was involved in decisions related to the use of the bogus, Hillary Clinton-financed Steele Dossier in obtaining FISA surveillance warrants to monitor Trump campaign officials.

  • McCabe participated in the hoax cover-up, insisting that the Bureau followed established procedures and did not act with political bias.

  • McCabe, who was dismissed from the FBI on the recommendation of the Office of Professional Responsibility that concluded that McCabe lied about leaking classified information to the media.

However, the greatest recommendation of all, liar, leaker, perjurer Senator Adam Schiff’s disapproval…

Schiff-bongino

Strengths in Consideration for Deputy Director of the FBI:

  • Law Enforcement Experience:  Bongino served as a New York policeman and a Secret Service agent for several years, which gave him a solid foundation in federal law enforcement and an understanding of national security protocols. His role with the Secret Service involved protecting high-profile individuals, including the President of the United States, which required a high level of skill, responsibility, and crisis management.

  • Understanding of Federal Agencies: As a Secret Service Agent, Bongino's understanding of the inner workings of a federal law enforcement agency is a definite advantage.

  • National Security Expertise: Bongino's background in security and his work with high-stakes protection assignments provide him with knowledge of counterterrorism, security threats, and investigative processes, which are key areas of focus for the FBI. His understanding of how agencies coordinate on national security matters is invaluable in a senior role within the FBI.

  • Leadership and Public Speaking: As a former law enforcement official, Bongino’s experience in leadership positions and his career as a public speaker could make him effective in representing the FBI and communicating its priorities. His ability to navigate public relations and communicate clearly might be beneficial in times of crisis or when the FBI needs to engage with the public.

  • Political and Policy Insight: Bongino is known for his outspoken views on government transparency, political accountability, and civil liberties. If the FBI were to pursue policy changes and reforms, Bongino’s perspective could provide valuable insight into how law enforcement interacts with the public, especially regarding public trust. 

  • Knows the Players and the Playing Field:  Bongino is the author of two books, “Exonerated: The Failed Takedown of President Donald Trump by the Swamp” (2019) and “Follow the Money: The Shocking Deep State Connections of the Anti-Trump Political Machine” (2020), which are in-depth looks at the corruption within the Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Department of State. 

  • Patriotism:  Sacrificing his media career and millions of dollars to assume the position. Not to mention risking his health as a cancer survivor.

Bottom line...

Another major win!

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


HYPER-PARTISAN JOHN BRENNAN WHINES ABOUT THE POLITICIZATION OF THE FBI

Dan Bongino is on the case...

Bongino-podium

There are few Clinton/Obama acolytes more deserving of a federal investigation than Obama’s former CIA Director John Brennan.

Brennan’s role in what has been characterized as the “Trump-Russia Hoax,” from his participation in the January 6, 2017 briefing with Donald Trump in the presence of National Intelligence Director James Clapper,  FBI Director James Comey,  National Security Agency Michael Rogers, and National Security Advisor to President Obama, Susan Rice, to his sworn testimony before Congress, continues to appear disingenuous.  

It appears that Brennan was incurious about President Obama’s and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s association with Russians, including Obama’s 2012 private conversation with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev during the Nuclear Security Summit in Seoul, South Korea, where Obama was caught on an open microphone telling Medvedev: “This is my last election. After my election, I have more flexibility” and Medvedev responded with, “I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir.” Medvedev served as Russia’s president at the time while Vladimir Putin was prime minister.

Brennan, now an NBC/MSNBC commentator, continues to whine about being listed in Kash Patel’s book on the Trump-Russia hoax, especially now that Patel has been confirmed as the 9th Director of the FBI and Attorney General Pam Bondi heads the Department of Justice.

Oh No! The corrupt FBI who framed Donald Trump and associates now needs to be restrained.

Brennan--msnbc

And what I’m concerned is right now with all of these individuals that Musk and Doge have sent into our government institutions and having access to those systems and networks and databases, this is something that is ripe for exploitation by the Russians and the Chinese in terms of intelligence. These are individuals who haven’t been vetted, they don’t have the security clearances or background, and so they are now accessing all this information that involves U.S. citizens, sensitive U.S. databases, and other things. And if the Bureau is going through these dislocations, its mission is being disrupted.

And like Frank, I am very concerned about the politicization of the leadership of the Bureau. Kash Patel. I’m on Kash Patel’s enemy list in his book.

And so between Kash Patel, Pam Bondi, and others, is the Bureau, is the Department of Justice going to uphold its tradition of making sure that they carry out their responsibilities with integrity and in an apolitical fashion?

And I think there are serious questions, including among the people within DOJ and FBI right now, about whether or not their leadership is going to bring them down this very dark place where it’s unprecedented in American history.

And it just gets worse for Brennan and the deep state swamp…

Trump names Dan Bongino deputy FBI director…

Bongino

Bongino is the author of two books, “Exonerated: The Failed Takedown of President Donald Trump by the Swamp” (2019) and “Follow the Money: The Shocking Deep State Connections of the Anti-Trump Political Machine” (2020), which are in-depth looks at the corruption within the Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Department of State.

Both Patel and Bongino knew the players and where most of the political bodies are buried before being appointed and will hit the ground running.

Bottom line...

Today, we are a little bit less screwed.

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


BAD NEWS: DANGEROUSLY WOKE FORMER BIDEN OFFICIAL IS JOINING MY ELECTRICITY SUPPLIER

Climate-reality

Just when you thought California's energy sector was recovering and Biden-era corruptocrats were being neutralized, you find that Biden’s former Secretary of Energy, Jennifer Granholm, is joining the Board of your electricity provider.

Edison International and Southern California Edison today announced that Jennifer Granholm will join the board of directors of each company, effective April 1.

Granholm brings extensive experience advancing reliable, resilient, clean energy solutions and deploying zero-carbon technologies from her recent service as U.S. secretary of energy and prior experience as governor of Michigan.

She brings a strong background in cybersecurity and protection of the power grid and electric utilities. Under her leadership, the Department of Energy (DOE) invested heavily in cybersecurity tools and technologies to strengthen the resilience of U.S. energy infrastructure. She has also worked to find a solution for spent nuclear fuel, which could help spur industry growth.

In her two terms as governor of Michigan, Granholm diversified the state’s economy to focus on clean energy. Granholm taught law and public policy at UC Berkeley, specializing in clean energy and public leadership. An honors graduate of Harvard Law School, she is the author of “A Governor's Story: The Fight for Jobs and America’s Economic Future.” <Source>

Great! On April Fool’s Day, California gets another progressive communist democrat to muck up California’s dysfunctional energy sector.

Steeped in radical progressivism (University of California, Berkeley, Harvard Law), Granholm is no stranger to democrat deals and ethics violations.

Granholm’s Energy Department ignored warning about conflict of interest in $14B of loans given to Michigan energy companies
Inspector general warned that energy projects posed fraud risk

Former U.S. Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm awarded $14 billion in below-market loans to Michigan energy companies before leaving office, despite an Energy Department alert about conflicts of interest.

Inspector General Teri L. Donaldson warned Granholm’s undersecretary for energy infrastructure in December that the Energy Loan Programs Office was administering more than $385 billion in new loans without an effective system to manage conflicts of interest.

“This poses a significant risk of fraud, waste, and abuse,” Donaldson wrote. “The projects funded with this authority, which involve innovations in clean energy, advanced transportation, and tribal energy are inherently risky in part because these projects may have struggled to secure funding from traditional sources such as commercial banks and private equity investors.”

DTE Gas Clean Energy will get $1.64 billion from the Energy Department’s Loan Program Office. DTE Electric Clean Energy will get $7.17 billion, Consumers Energy Clean Energy will get $5.23 billion. AEP, an Ohio-based company, will get $1.6 billion for transmission projects across several states, including Michigan. <Source>

In August 2024, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) awarded a $600 million federal grant to California to enhance its electricity grid. This funding was allocated to a consortium comprising the California Energy Commission, the California Public Utilities Commission, the California Independent System Operator, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, and Southern California Edison (SCE). The initiative, known as the California Harnessing Advanced Reliable Grid Enhancing Technologies for Transmission (CHARGE 2T) program, aims to upgrade over 100 miles of transmission lines with advanced conductor technologies.

While the grant is intended to enhance grid reliability and support clean energy integration, some critics have raised concerns about the involvement of private entities like SCE in the funding allocation process. They argue that such collaborations may lead to conflicts of interest or prioritize corporate interests over public benefits. However, proponents contend that public-private partnerships are essential for leveraging expertise and resources to modernize infrastructure effectively.

When Granholm was governor, she awarded the chemical company Dow $108.3 million in state financial incentives. Granholm announced the payout in February 2010.

As governor, Granholm was term-limited and left office in January 2011. She was appointed to Dow’s board of directors in March of that year, according to Business Wire. At the time the position paid between $150,000 and $200,000 annually, according to MLive. She left the board in October of the same year, Business Wire reported.

The Revolving Door

The revolving door between government and industry poses significant risks to effective governance, the economy, public trust, waste, fraud, and abuse in government, as well as higher prices for consumers.

The revolving door, where government officials move between governance and private sector positions, exacerbates this issue. Promising lucrative post-government jobs can create conflicts of interest, influencing decisions that benefit corporations rather than citizens. This revolving door breeds corruption, undermines policy objectivity, and elevates the costs of essential services as companies pass the financial burden of regulatory leniency onto the public.

The effect of the revolving door results in higher costs, inefficiencies, and diminished public trust. Governments must implement strict ethics rules and transparency to curb these dangers and ensure that public interest remains at the forefront of policy-making.

Woke Policies at Southern California Edison…

Investment Thesis: Wires-focused electric utility with a strong ESG [Environmental, Social, and Governance] profile and regulated rate base growth aligned with California’s aggressive clean energy goals. <Source

There is little doubt that Edison International, the parent company of SCE (Southern California Edison), has adopted "woke" policies, prioritizing social issues over the company's core mission of providing reliable and affordable energy.

These policies, which include diversity and inclusion initiatives, environmental activism, and progressive communist democrat stances on social justice, have raised serious concerns about the balance between corporate responsibility and business performance, with “woke” initiatives continuing to drive up operational costs and divert attention from essential services.

NET ZERO ENERGY

Nze-flag

  • Green Greed: Granholm has been a strong advocate for green energy and combating climate change, which aligns with the Biden administration's broader environmental goals. She has prioritized investments in clean energy infrastructure and renewable technologies, with a focus on decarbonizing the energy sector These policies, based on a scientific hoax, are part of the progressive communist democrat agenda.

  • Diversity and Equity in Energy Policies: Under Granholm's leadership, the Department of Energy (DOE) has pushed for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. For example, the DOE has supported programs to ensure historically marginalized communities benefit from clean energy investments, addressing environmental justice issues. This includes ensuring that communities of color and low-income groups have access to clean energy technologies and are not disproportionately affected by pollution or climate change.

  • Environmental Justice: Granholm has emphasized environmental justice as a key policy priority. This approach involves addressing the disproportionate environmental harms faced by vulnerable communities, especially communities of color. While many see this as a positive move toward equity, it leads to overregulation and higher business costs.

  • Supporting Electric Vehicles (EVs) and Charging Infrastructure: Granholm has strongly supported the transition to electric vehicles to reduce emissions and combat climate change. Under her leadership, the Biden administration's policies have promoted EV adoption, tax incentives for electric vehicle buyers, and the expansion of EV charging infrastructure. Opponents often criticize these policies as part of a "woke" agenda to reshape transportation in ways that might not be feasible for all Americans, particularly those in rural areas or with limited access to EV infrastructure.

  • Green New Deal Influence: Granholm’s work is often associated with elements of the Green New Deal, which advocates for large-scale investments in renewable energy, green jobs, and sustainability. While she does not directly endorse the Green New Deal in its entirety, her support for policies that reduce carbon emissions and invest in clean energy jobs aligns with its objectives.

Bottom line…

Jennifer Granholm brings nothing to California except her Rolodex of contacts in the government.

We are so screwed.

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


DEAD BABIES: WHEN CULTURES COLLIDE

No Excuses Will Suffice…

Bibas Family

“Following the completion of the identification process by the National Institute of Forensic Medicine in collaboration with the Israel Police, IDF representatives informed the Bibas family that their loved ones, Ariel and Kfir Bibas, have been identified. According to the assessment of professional officials, based on the intelligence available to us and forensic findings from the identification process, Ariel and Kfir Bibas were brutally murdered by terrorists in captivity in November 2023. They were manually strangled and their bodies mutilated by rocks to simulate death by an alleged Israeli airstrike.”  -- Israeli Defense Force

 

“When peace comes, we will perhaps in time be able to forgive the Arabs for killing our sons, but it will be harder for us to forgive them for having forced us to kill their sons. Peace will come when the Arabs will love their children more than they hate us.” 

― Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir, A Land of Our Own: An Oral Autobiography

 

Hamas terrorists did not take these children; they were kidnapped by Gazan civilians who acted alongside the terrorists.

There is no legal or moral justification for such horrific acts as manually strangling babies and young children and then mutilating their bodies to advance a political agenda. Even more disturbing is a population that would voluntarily support those who perform and celebrate egregious and heinous acts.

Inflicting harm, particularly to the most vulnerable, is an affront to the fundamental principles of human rights and dignity. Children, as the most defenseless members of society, deserve to be protected, nurtured, and cared for, not subjected to violence or mutilation.

Any practice that involves cruelty or violence toward children is unequivocally condemned in every civilized society. There is no political narrative that can ever justify such acts of brutality. We must collectively reject any ideology or belief system that promotes such actions, hold those responsible accountable, and work towards a world where respect for life and human dignity are paramount.

Progressive Communist Democrats in the United States Provide Aid and Comfort to the Barbarians.

According to progressive communist democrats, moral principles are not absolute but are shaped by cultural, historical, or individual contexts. In other words, what’s considered “right” or “wrong” can vary significantly from one culture or society to another. Proponents of moral relativism argue that this flexibility helps promote understanding and tolerance between different cultures, acknowledging that each community’s values are valid within its own context.

Those who believe in cultural relativism and tell us to respect the diversity of traditions and belief systems of other cultures, especially when such cultures are entrenched in outdated or harmful ideologies, are perpetuating evil. 

Our world cannot afford to turn a blind eye to the suffering that continues to occur in the name of tradition. As we navigate the complexities of cultural diversity, we must prioritize the well-being and rights of individuals above all else, striving to create a future where no one is subject to the barbarities of the past, no matter where they come from.

The Failure of the United Nations

The United Nations was founded on the promise of maintaining international peace and security, yet it has repeatedly failed to prevent atrocities such as genocide. The U.N. has often fallen short of its mandate, allowing those responsible for heinous crimes to escape accountability. Worse still, it has enabled dictators, anti-Semites, and other tyrannical figures to take seats in influential bodies, diluting its credibility and effectiveness.

Given its inability to address global crises effectively and its acceptance of regimes that contradict its core values, it may be time to reconsider the U.N.’s location. Moving the United Nations from the U.S. to Europe could bring fresh perspectives and potentially strengthen the organization’s resolve to pursue genuine human rights reforms and peacekeeping measures.

The U.N. must evolve to serve its founding mission: to protect human dignity, prevent atrocities, and hold perpetrators accountable rather than offering platforms to those who perpetuate harm.

Bottom Line…

The act of manually strangling children or mutilating their bodies for any reason, whether political, cultural, or otherwise, starkly contradicts the notion of basic human dignity and rights. While cultural practices should be respected and understood within their context, certain actions transcend cultural boundaries and are universally recognized as wrong. In this endeavor, we must be prepared to make difficult decisions about what must be preserved and what must be destroyed.

Kill the cockroaches hiding in the dark!

We are so screwed.

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


KASH PATEL CONFIRMED: I AM LOOKING FORWARD TO THE INVESTIGATION OF ADAM SCHIFF

The U.S. Senate confirmed Kashyap Pramod Vinod Patel as the new Federal Bureau of Investigation Director...

Patel-confirmed
As Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, then-Representative Adam Schiff was undoubtedly one of the most corrupt conspirators in the Russia collusion hoax and the dishonest instigators of a presidential impeachment.

Fbi-patel
It is time to investigate the relationship between Schiff, his office staff, and the unnamed whistleblower, Eric Ciaramella. Ciaramella is reportedly a CIA officer detailed to the National Security Council. He is suspected of filing the complaint about Donald Trump’s telephone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, which led to the impeachment investigation.

Further questions involve the role of Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman, an Army officer and expert on Ukraine serving as a Director for European Affairs at the National Security Council, and the unknown conspirators who surreptitiously modified the complaint form, which required whistleblowers to have first-hand knowledge of the wrongdoing, to allowing the reporting complaints based on second-hand information or hearsay—specifically if the whistleblower had heard about the events from others who were directly involved or had knowledge of the situation.

Of course, additional questions involve abuse of process, manipulating evidence, perjury, and leaking classified information to the media.

Extraordinarily and preemptively pardoned by President Joe Biden, Schiff, and other co-conspirators are immune from all federal criminal and civil charges, which precludes the use of their Fifth Amendment rights, and must testify truthfully or face perjury charges in any official inquiry. Preemptive pardons have never been tested in Court and may be unconstitutional, especially when they insulate political cronies and family members of the President. Likewise, there is a question regarding Biden’s mental incapacity to understand what he was signing.

 Bottom line…

It is about time that the FBI departs from corrupt partisan directors (Mueller, Comey, and Wray) and returns to its primary role as the premier law enforcement agency protecting America from her enemies, both foreign and domestic.

We are less screwed today than we were yesterday.

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


DISGUISED SWAMP CREATURES?

Tucker--jeffrey
I recently watched former Fox host Tucker Carlson interview Professor Jeffrey David Sachs in a forum billed as the “First Annual Tucker Carlson Summit (2025)” to explore the future of international relations and global security.

Along with the apparent flattery of President Donald Trump, I got the feeling that I was watching a disguised swamp creature trying to influence U.S. foreign policy by disparaging U.S. arrogance and neocon behavior and suggesting that we become more forgiving and tolerant of those trying to destroy America.

Judge for yourself… 

Professor Jeffrey David Sachs, 70, is widely regarded as a telegenic, well-known, well-educated, and well-spoken “public intellectual.” He is an American economist and public policy analyst recognized for his work in development economics, global health, and environmental sustainability. He has had significant roles with major institutions like Harvard University and Columbia University and has advised international organizations, governments, and political leaders. His broad expertise and involvement in various United Nations global policy initiatives have made him influential and controversial.

Rather than seeking U.S. global dominance, Sachs advocates for a multi-polar world where the U.S. shares power with emerging global players like China, Russia, and Iran. His approach emphasizes cooperative diplomacy and international solidarity to tackle issues like climate change and global health crises. This contrasts sharply with a more aggressive U.S. foreign policy, leading Sachs to criticize American actions such as NATO expansion and military interventions, especially in the context of the Ukraine War.

Sachs has controversially claimed that the war was a direct result of U.S. arrogance in pushing a global game of Risk,” provoking Russia’s security concerns, and laying the entire Ukraine war and the loss of thousands of lives directly at the doorstep of U.S. arrogance rather than its actual source in political corruption and the exploitation of Ukraine’s natural resources.

Raised in a traditional Jewish social justice household, Sachs’ education and environment have shaped much of his approach to international relations, where he often stresses the importance of human dignity, justice, and peace. However, his connection to Judaism does not seem to have made him particularly focused on Israel-specific political issues in the way some of his background might be. He is more often associated with global solidarity, human rights, and far-left Catholic viewpoint, where his Jewish values of compassion and community should have aligned with his professional stance.

Though Sachs has played a significant role in shaping global policy, his contrarian views on U.S. foreign interventions and diplomatic engagement with Russia and Iran have made him a polarizing figure. While some criticize him for being too lenient toward authoritarian regimes, others see him as a visionary calling for reform and a more cooperative global order. 

No friend of Israel…

Like many progressive democrat Jews, Sachs appears to have a particular hatred of Israel. In this interview with Piers Morgan, Sachs’s views are on display for all to see. 

[Sachs]  What we’re watching is this crazy Netanyahu idea of regional war so that Israel can have its greater Israel, as they call it. In other words, everything is to stop the Palestinian cause, and the U.S. keeps being involved in these wars. And there was Jake Sullivan again today explaining, yeah, terrorists, terrorists.

Who cares about terrorists? We’re toppling Assad. And this is, again, for the Israel lobby, basically.

[Morgan] It’s tragic. You’re blaming Israel for all of it. I’m fine. That’s your view. Many people would say no.

[Sachs]  I am. I’m blaming Netanyahu in particular.

Even the pro-Islamacist Al Jazeera has taken note...

Professor Jeffrey Sachs: ‘US is complicit in Israeli genocide’

Columbia University’s Jeffrey Sachs says the war in Gaza could end today if the United States stopped supplying weapons to Israel.

Does the United States want to be complicit in genocide?” This is the question that US leaders should be asking themselves as Israel’s war on Gaza continues, argues Columbia University Professor Jeffrey Sachs.

Sachs tells host Steve Clemons that Israel could not continue “for one day” without US support, and the rhetoric from top Democrats criticising Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is “meaningless” because no action is taken to stop the war crimes.

This has led to US isolation on the world stage, as Israel is allowed to continue “whatever they have in their minds… which will never lead to peace”. <Source>

Bottom line…

There is little doubt in my mind that Tucker Carlson, a wealthy, aging, frat-boy elitist media host, and the professorial-looking anti-America, anti-Israel Sachs represent a clear and present danger to the Trump Administration as they cloak their neo-progressive values in the guise of conservatism. These individuals are representative of swamp creatures found in the high echelons of government organizations like our intelligence agencies, the State Department, and the deep state bureaucracy.

For me, the red flags are flying. As an economist, Sachs is a devoted disciple of John Maynard Keynes, who believed governments could spend their way out of difficulty. Likewise, radical, far-left disrupter of governments, billionaire George Soros is one of Sachs's biggest supporters. His unwavering support for the corrupt UN Inter-Governmental Panel on Climate Change marks him as a harbinger of disinformation.

It is my fear that Americans, with little time from their day-to-day concerns, may allow the views espoused by Carlson and Sachs to condition their thinking, causing them to turn away from the philosophy of American exceptionalism and Trump’s “America First” worldview to give the swamp creatures new life in the 2026 mid-term elections when the neo-liberals, aka the progressive communist democrats, have an opportunity to recapture the House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate.

We must be vigilant in clutching political snakes to our breasts, lest we are fatally bitten.

We are so screwed.

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


AMERICA'S RESILENCE IS BEING FRITTERED AWAY

Tel-resilience

We Are Screwed: America is Becoming Increasingly Vulnerable and Less Resilient as Americans Are Forced to Accept Cellular Service in Place of Landlines.

It’s no secret that America has undergone significant changes over the past few decades, especially in how we communicate. But as we rush headlong into the digital age, there’s a growing concern that we’re sacrificing resilience in exchange for convenience. The shift from traditional landlines to cellular services may seem like a natural progression, but this transition is slowly making America more vulnerable beneath the surface.

Let’s take a step back in time and think about it. The landline was a reliable, low-tech solution that, for decades, kept us connected to the world. It was sturdy, simple, and—here’s the kicker—resilient.

Unlike cell phones, which depend on batteries and external networks, landlines worked even when power went out. They were the backbone of emergency communication, offering peace of mind that you could pick up the phone and get through when disaster struck.

But today, in 2025, things are different. As we’ve become more dependent on smartphones, 4G, and now 5G, the familiar hum of the landline has all but disappeared from American homes. Many phone companies are phasing out landline service entirely, forcing Americans to embrace the more expensive and less reliable cellular alternatives.

AT&T plans to end landline services by 2029 in most of its service areas in the United States, excluding California. The company is giving customers and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) five years to transition to other services.

And we’re told it’s progress. But is it?

The Vulnerabilities of a Cellular Society

Cell phones are convenient—there’s no denying that. They keep us connected to our families, work, and the world. However, they also come with unique vulnerabilities that could expose Americans when the going gets tough.

  1. Power Dependency: Cell phones are reliant on power sources. When the lights go out, so do your communications. Think about the last major storm that knocked out power in your area. How long did it take for your phone to go from a lifeline to a brick? Without power, cell towers go dark, and your phone becomes just another piece of useless plastic. Landlines didn’t have this problem—they were powered directly through the phone line, unaffected by local power outages.

  2. Network Overload: Remember the chaos during significant events, like 9/11 or Hurricane Katrina, when cell networks became overloaded, inaccessible, or were destroyed altogether? This is still a problem today, but we’re even more dependent on mobile networks for daily life. If too many people try to make a call during an emergency or natural disaster, the network becomes congested, and getting through can be next to impossible. In contrast, landline systems weren’t as prone to these types of failures, even during high-demand situations.

  3. The Digital Divide: Not everyone has the same access to cell service, especially in rural or underserved areas. While cell phones are commonplace in urban areas, they still can’t reach every corner of the country. Rural Americans often have to rely on unreliable or spotty cellular networks that are more prone to failure. For many, the landline was the one constant that didn’t rely on the whims of mobile providers or the limitations of remote towers. And yet, they’re being forced to abandon this lifeline.

  4. Security Risks: As cell networks become more intricate and interconnected, they also become more vulnerable. Hacking, data breaches, and surveillance are just a few concerns plaguing cellular networks. Landlines, by comparison, were more challenging to infiltrate. They might have been more straightforward, but that simplicity made them more secure. And when you’re relying on these vulnerable systems for communication, privacy becomes another casualty.

  5. Cheap Cellular Signal Disrupters: Another growing concern with the widespread reliance on cellular networks is the rise of cheap signal disruptors. These devices, often sold online for relatively low prices, can block or jam cellular signals in a given area. While they’re typically used for personal or commercial purposes, such as creating “dead zones” in certain locations or preventing unwanted communications, their presence can pose serious problems in emergencies. In times of crisis, when every second counts, the interference of these disruptors could render entire regions unable to make emergency calls or access critical services. With the increasing prevalence of such technology, we’re not just relying on an already vulnerable system—we’re making it even more fragile by allowing easy access to tools that can disable communications and cellular alarms when we need them most.

The Emergency Communication Crisis.

Perhaps the most chilling aspect of this shift is its impact on emergency preparedness. When disaster strikes—be it a natural disaster, a cyberattack, or a grid failure—the ability to communicate becomes a matter of life or death. People who have landlines can still connect with emergency services, even when cell networks go down. This isn’t the case for those relying entirely on their smartphones.

In times of crisis, you need to be able to count on your communication devices; unfortunately, the cellular network just doesn’t cut it. It’s too dependent on external factors: power, tower accessibility, network congestion, and—frankly—user errors. And once the system fails, it leaves you in the dark, cut off from those who can help.

Are We Prepared?

As we stand at the crossroads of a society entirely dependent on cell phones, it’s worth asking: “Are we ready for the consequences?”

If an emergency or catastrophe hits, will we be able to communicate effectively with the outside world? Will we be able to rely on the very devices we’ve embraced for convenience? Or have we inadvertently traded our safety and security for a sleek, more “modern” way of living?

As more states phase out landlines, we may become increasingly dependent on fragile, temporary, and far from bulletproof technology.

Bottom Line…

We should not abandon cellular service—it’s clearly here to stay. But we should demand better backup systems, greater infrastructure for emergency communications, and more reliable power sources that ensure our phones will work when we need them most.

Until then, it’s worth remembering the resilience we’ve lost and the vulnerability we’ve gained.

America, it seems, is becoming more connected—and simultaneously, more exposed to natural disasters and our enemies, including tyrannical government agencies and their unaccountable contractors.

Until they are phased out, I will keep my landline in addition to other communications devices.

We are so screwed.

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


CONGRESS: BEHIND THE SCENES -- DON'T TOUCH OUR PORK

Rep-dem-deal

  • Why has every administration, Democrat or Republican, pledged to reduce or eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse, and nothing significant has occurred?

  • Why do Republicans seem complacent when voting with their Democrat colleagues in Congress?

  • Why does the Government Accounting Office issue adverse report after adverse report on the lack of financial controls, and no government official is held responsible?

Our political system is strategically governed by democratic principles but tactically by crony capitalism.

Politicians on both sides of the aisle seek to protect their cushy positions by protecting government money flowing into their districts--powering the special interests, such as unions and military contractors, that fund their campaigns and provide mass voter engagement.

It's an open secret...

The waste, fraud, and abuse being uncovered by Elon Musk's DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency) was created by politicians on both sides of the aisle as "earmarks," provisions inserted into discretionary spending appropriations bills that direct funds to a specific cause or recipient, often circumventing merit-based or competitive bids.

Murkowski says Congress needs to assert its authority, to limit Trump

Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, thinks President Trump and his designated spending-slasher, Elon Musk, are acting beyond the limits the Constitution places on executive power as they hack away at agencies and programs Congress enacted.

“To have the executive basically come in and dismantle something that was legislatively created — that’s outside the bounds of the executive,” she said Monday. “So it requires us, in the legislative branch, to then assert our responsibility, which is to not cede the authority.”<Source>

Just enough to give the appearance of action...

The situation is analogous to crime in America, where the law enforcement and judicial authorities must contain the most egregious acts lest they be replaced for non-performance, but not so much as to jeopardize their lucrative unionized jobs or legal revenue streams.

Likewise, the situation with the homeless seems to expand in proportion to the funding available. Special interest developers, landlords, property managers, and the government bureaucracy serving the homeless are in jeopardy of losing their respective revenue streams. 

The Republicans are complicit…

There’s a quiet, unspoken truth lurking behind the GOP’s outrage over the “waste, fraud, and abuse” that many conservative lawmakers claim to be fighting. While the headlines often focus on the familiar targets — woke programs, diversity and equity initiatives, or international grants for LGBTQ arts — the actual battle is not just about these obvious symbols of liberal excess. It's about something more profound: control over money and power, often wrapped in the language of fiscal responsibility.

The so-called “easy targets” are the low-hanging fruit in this fight, those elements of government spending that seem like an easy win for conservatives looking to shore up their credibility. They include diversity and equity contracts, grants for LGBTQ operas or comic books that conservatives like to decry as symbols of government overreach, vacant buildings that eat up taxpayer dollars without serving any real purpose, and expensive executive “coaching” contracts that seem like a bad joke when money is tight.

The real pushback from Republicans will come when the Trump administration decides to cap the overhead costs on research grants, impacting GOP congress members who represent large, well-funded academic institutions in their districts.

Republican lawmakers from agricultural-heavy states are concerned about removing lucrative international food-aid programs from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and struggling to relocate those same programs to the less controversial Agriculture Department to keep those valuable food aid dollars flowing into their home states. It’s not just about international generosity; it’s about preserving a crucial revenue stream that keeps farmers, processors, and local economies in cash.

Then there is the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), which funds programs such as the International Republican Institute (IRI), which, unsurprisingly, includes current and former GOP figures on its board.

Bottom line...

TIRED

When waste, fraud, and abuse are removed from the system, everyone—Democrats, Republicans, and Independents—will sacrifice something. That sacrifice will be borne mainly by those in their districts. People will lose employment, homes, and perhaps their health. The key is examining the impacts before drastic measures are implemented.

It is time to confront corrupt politicians on both sides of the aisle and their media propagandists. One can only hope that commonsense will prevail and that the result will benefit the majority of Americans rather than a small slice of the privileged, protected, and positioned special interests.

We are so screwed.

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


NAACP: NATIONAL ASSOCIALION for the ADVANCEMENT OF COMMUNIST PEOPLE?

“We can judge our progress by the courage of our questions and the depth of our answers, our willingness to embrace what is true rather than what feels good.” — Carl Sagan (1934-1996)

Naacp-communist
NAACP: Advancing far left-wing, socialist policies that resonate with communist ideologies.

The NAACP, once a revered civil rights organization dedicated to advancing racial equality through legal challenges, education, and advocacy, has increasingly shifted its focus toward promoting radical far-left progressive communist democrat ideologies that are divisive, demonize American institutions, and encourage anti-America and anti-White rhetoric.

In recent years, the organization has distanced itself from its original mission of racial integration and equality in favor of embracing policies and rhetoric aligned with socialist and even communist principles, including the NAACP’s vocal support for defunding the police, its endorsement of sweeping progressive policies on social justice, and its alignment with movements that challenge traditional capitalist frameworks as evidence of this ideological shift.

Let us not forget the organization’s historical association with Marxism, Communism, Black Liberation movements, and separatist theology, which remain motivating factors for leadership and membership.

NAACP lists companies that dump DEI in its tactical spending guide for Black Americans

WASHINGTON (AP) — The NAACP wants Black Americans to steer their buying power toward companies that haven’t pulled back from diversity, equity and inclusion programs under conservative pressure, and the nation’s oldest civil rights organization is listing which brands have stood by — or reversed — past commitments to DEI.

The NAACP says the spending guide it published Saturday is needed because DEI initiatives promote the social and economic advancement of Black Americans, who are projected to consume nearly $2 trillion in goods and services in nominal dollars by 2030, according to the McKinsey Institute for Black Economic Mobility.

“Diversity is better for the bottom line,” NAACP President Derrick Johnson said in an exclusive announcement to The Associated Press. “In a global economy, those who reject the multicultural nature of consumerism and business will be left in the past they are living in.”

Keisha Bross, an economic strategist at the NAACP, says they are not calling for a “boycott” of companies but instead encourage consumers to “buy-in” on companies that back their values. People of all backgrounds are encouraged to use the Black Consumer Advisory. <Source>

Between the perception and reality of DEI falls the specter of Communism…

There is little doubt in my mind that DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) is part of a large, nefarious ideological plot used by progressive communist democrats and their race hustlers to deepen societal divides, promote further racial division, damage public discourse, and weaken social cohesion. A racist ideology of victimhood that institutionalizes reverse racism by emphasizing group identity over individual merit.

Rhetorically, DEI initiatives promise a world of equality, where everyone is treated fairly regardless of their race, gender, sexual orientation, or other personal characteristics. However, in reality, DEI claims to rectify historical injustices and promote fairness in workplaces by implementing affirmative action, a legally codified form of reverse discrimination that promotes political and cultural ideologies that challenge the foundational aspects of American identity, such as private property rights, capitalism, and colorblindness. DEI perpetuates division, resentment, and reverse discrimination rather than fostering genuine equality.

Why DEI Promotes Division, Disunity, and Racism

DEI initiatives have become central to politically-driven discussions in workplaces, schools, and organizations in recent years. While these efforts were initially intended to promote fairness and inclusivity, a review of practices demonstrates they are doing the opposite, deepening division and disunity with their excessive focus on group identity rather than individual merit.

While it’s important to acknowledge historical injustices and disparities, when DEI programs emphasize race, gender, or other identity markers above all else, they create discriminatory separation. Instead of treating individuals as unique, multidimensional human beings with varying skills, DEI initiatives push people into narrow categories, fostering a mentality of “us vs. them,” leading to unnecessary resentment, division, and stereotyping. By constantly drawing attention to racial and gender differences, DEI reinforces these distinctions rather than breaking them down.

Bottom line…

Rather than relying on divisive identity politics and embracing DEI, it is essential that we cultivate and promote a culture where people are encouraged to embrace diversity of thought, native abilities, skills, experience, and perspective. Doing so can promote unity and understanding and move away from policies that foster disunity and resentment.

We are so screwed.

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


CALIFORNIA POLITICS: THE WILDEST OF THE WILD CARDS FOR GOVERNOR IN 2026

I don’t know whether to laugh or cry…

Kh-appears--drunk

February 2025 California Poll: Kamala Harris Emerges as Democratic Frontrunner for Governor

A new Emerson College Polling/Inside California Politics/The Hill survey of California voters finds that most Primary voters (57%) would support former Vice President Kamala Harris if she ran for Governor.

Former Rep. Katie Porter follows, at 9%. Four percent support former Speaker of the California State Assembly Antonio Villaraigosa and Lieutenant Governor Eleni Kounalakis, respectively; 17% are undecided. Without Harris on the ballot, a plurality (45%) are undecided, while 21% support Porter, 9% Villaraigosa, and 5% Kounalakis.

“Support for Harris is strongest among women (60%), Hispanics (61%), and Black voters (64%),” said Spencer Kimball, executive director of Emerson College Polling.

“If Vice President Harris enters the primary, she would start as the clear favorite. Without Harris in the race, the primary is wide open. Former Rep. Porter leads the pack, performing well among voters with college degrees (26%) or postgraduate degrees (25%).” <Source>

What do the last four years of the Joe Biden Dementia Cover-Up and the Kamala Harris Switcheroo tell you? 

The Absurdity of Considering an Inarticulate, Wine-Loving Loser for Governor of California 

California has long been a beacon for innovation, progress, and culture, with its sprawling coastlines, cutting-edge tech scene, and rich history of political activism. It’s the state where the world’s brightest minds have gathered to forge new paths in nearly every industry. But as we watch the increasing political circus unfold, it seems like California might soon be considering an unlikely contender for governor: an inarticulate, wine-loving individual whose only claims to leadership in California were based on the powerful political support from Willie Brown, her married boyfriend.

Before anyone gets defensive, let’s break down why such a consideration feels illogical and bordering on farcical.

The Art of Leadership: It’s Not About Wine, It’s About Wisdom

The image of a “wine-loving loser” conjures up a troubling narrative that suggests a lackadaisical, indifferent individual who lacks the requisite grit or intellect to lead a state as complex and diverse as California. Leadership is not about leisurely sipping vintage California wines as the state faces pressing challenges such as political corruption, financial disaster, homelessness, skyrocketing housing, food, fuel, and the costs of other necessities. It’s about understanding policy, navigating difficult conversations, and making tough decisions that impact millions of lives as the state is filled with record welfare recipients and illegal aliens. 

So when an individual with little political experience, poor articulation, and a public record of failure is considered for such a monumental role, it makes us wonder: is this really the best California has to offer?

The Articulation Issue: Words Matter

Let’s be honest. Communication is key in the governor’s role. We’re not living in a time when a person can get away with stumbling through speeches or offering half-baked opinions on social media platforms. Californians need someone who can articulate complex issues with precision and empathy, inspire the masses, and gain support even when the going gets tough.

In an era of constant media scrutiny, where every word is dissected and analyzed, having a leader who can barely string together a coherent sentence is, quite frankly, a liability. What do you have left to rely on when your words fail you? For a potential governor, clarity, vision, and the ability to speak to diverse groups of people are non-negotiable.

A History of Losing Isn’t a Winning Qualification

To add insult to injury, this failure, as a candidate and office holder,  is often tagged as a “loser.” Whether through failed assignments of her office, political missteps, or simply poor judgment, it’s hard to see how anyone could justify placing someone with a track record of failure at the helm of one of the most influential states in the nation. Sure, we all stumble and fall, but a governor must demonstrate resilience, competence, and, above all, the ability to turn failures into lessons, not repeat them as behavior patterns.

Running for governor of California requires vision and a track record that aligns with that vision. Not one of self-sabotage or reckless choices.

California Deserves Better

Californians deserve a leader who reflects the state’s diversity, aspirations, and forward-thinking attitude. The last thing we need is a figurehead whose only qualifications are a penchant for fine wine and an inability to connect with voters, fellow legislators, and her own staff. The stakes are too high, the challenges too great, and the solutions too urgent to entrust them to someone whose only claim to fame is failure and blunders.

Leadership in California should inspire us to dream bigger, innovate, and work toward the greater good. It should challenge the status quo rather than perpetuate mediocrity. Californians are proud of their state and deserve a governor who can speak intelligently, act decisively, and lead with integrity.

Ric Grenell is the GOP answer to the progressive communist democrat uniparty...

It is possible that President Trump’s “Go-to” guy, Richard “Ric” Grenell, the former ambassador to Germany during Trump’s first term, also currently serving as an envoy for special missions in the president’s administration and helping lead its response to the California wildfires, could become the Republican candidate.

Richard Grenell is open to challenging Kamala Harris for California governor’s race

Richard Grenell, the Trump administration’s envoy for “special missions,” said he would consider running for California’s gubernatorial race if former Vice President Kamala Harris enters it.

“That is a hot topic. I’ll make a little news, depends on if Kamala Harris runs,” Grenell told reporters at the Munich Security Conference after he was asked who he would support in the governor’s race.

“If Kamala Harris runs for governor, I believe that she has such baggage and hundreds of millions of dollars in educating the voters of how terrible she is, that it’s a new day in California, and that the Republican actually has a shot. And I wouldn’t say ‘no,’” Grenell said during his Germany trip.

Trump tapped Grenell to oversee the administration’s response to the Southern California wildfires last month. Grenell appeared in Los Angeles last week with Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin and Democratic Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass to evaluate fire recovery and debris removal efforts. <Source>

Bottom line…

It’s time to shake up California’s deeply entrenched and corrupt uniparty system by electing a constitutional conservative as governor.

For far too long, the Assembly and Senate have been dominated by a single political ideology that prioritizes power and self-interest over the will of the people.

A new leader committed to upholding the Constitution who can start the hard work of flushing out corruption, restoring accountability, and ensuring that decisions are made based on principles, not partisan agendas. California needs a governor who will fight to limit government overreach, defend individual freedoms, and bring transparency and integrity back to the state’s leadership. It’s time for a fresh start—one that moves beyond the status quo and into a future where the people’s voice truly matters again.

We need Ric Grenell, and he has my enthusiastic endorsement.

We are so screwed here in California.

-- Steve

California-screwed


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


DEMOCRATS NOW SUPPORT WASTE, FRAUD, AND ABUSE AND RESIST DISCOVERY AND MEDIATION

It is beyond ironic that the progressive communist democrats screaming the loudest over President Trump’s review of fraud, waste, and abuse in the federal government are the same people who voted to hire 80,00 armed IRS agents to audit you, the American taxpayer.

WFA-1 Kennedy
You will notice that the iconic American entrepreneur, financial engineer, and multi-billionaire Elon Musk, with the approval of the President of the United States, has read-only access to review government data, targeting defective systems, not policies, to stop the improper misdirection of taxpayer funds.

What has been found…

Most of the waste, fraud, and abuse discovered have been linked to progressive communist democrats supporting progressive non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that were either funding or advancing the progressive agenda.

These organizations often received large amounts of public funding, which, in some cases, was misallocated, mishandled, or used to support projects with questionable outcomes.

Additionally, many of these NGOs were found to employ individuals with extreme ideological leanings, raising concerns about whether the resources were being used efficiently or merely to further the political interests of radical progressives.

This has sparked debate about the accountability of such organizations, especially when they play influential roles in shaping public policy and social movements.    

The Double Standard

The double standard is why the progressive communist democrats appear to be supporting widespread government waste, fraud, and abuse that is being discovered and remediated by Donald Trump and Elon Musk, yet generally claim to be against government waste, fraud, and abuse when the progressive communist democrats are in power.

So, why this inconsistency?

Political polarization and differences in how waste, fraud, and abuse are framed stem from broader ideological divides.

For conservatives, Trump and Musk represent the idea of private-sector efficiency and government accountability—values that align with their belief in reducing government interference.

For progressive communist democrats, the fight against government waste is seen as an internal problem within the system, and their solution often involves more government and significantly larger reinvestments into the system, which creates inherent blind spots for increased waste, fraud, and abuse. 

When figures like Trump or Musk bring the issue of government waste to light, it’s often seen through the lens of reform and accountability. On the other hand, when similar issues are uncovered by Democrats or within Democratic-led initiatives, the response is frequently one of damage control, defending programs, or seeking new regulations rather than rethinking the whole system. 

Bottom line...

The solution isn’t about who discovers waste, fraud, and abuse—whether it’s Trump, Musk, or Democrats—but about how we approach accountability and systemic reform. Regardless of political affiliation, Americans deserve a government that prioritizes efficiency, transparency, and accountability. If waste, fraud, and abuse are present, the focus should be on discovering and addressing them effectively, not based on partisan loyalty.

Unlike the propaganda spewed forth by the progressive communist democrat media, cutting government spending is not unpopular--with taxpayers on both sides of the political spectrum supporting reforming a corrupt, politicized system. 

To move forward, citizens must recognize that reforming government waste isn’t a political issue—it’s an efficiency, transparency, and accountability issue that should transcend political loyalty and be remedied at the ballot box in 202. We know who is blocking corruption reform and who are the reformers—vote accordingly. 

We are so screwed.

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


ANOTHER BAT-SHIT CRAZY LIBERAL WHITE INFLUENCER

I am shocked at the bat-shit level of insanity displayed by some liberal women who are little more than partisan political dupes. 

Women who the liberal mainstream media have conditioned to believe their feelings are more important than facts, sworn testimony, and documentary evidence. Women who are so intellectually lazy and incurious as to refuse to research their assertions, blindly accepting the word of progressive communist democrats that some of the most corrupt and dangerous individuals in the world are, somehow, the good guys.

I was sent a copy of a TikTok video that was hosted on a site controlled by and beholden to the Communist Chinese Party.

The video features Leigh McGowan, who launched the website PoliticsGirl with the tagline “Working to save democracy through a no-nonsense, everywoman approach to understanding politics.” She is a performative influencer.

Politicalgirl
TikTok Transcript…

Where the fuck are our leaders? This is a sincere question. As a foreign-born billionaire and his unvetted lackey hackers, override Congress and take control of all departments of our federal government, including all of America’s most personal information. While the Justice Department argues against birthright citizenship.

While our government cuts foreign aid and supports ethnic cleansing and opens concentration camps. While the President’s Senate approves the Secretary of Defense who will use our military against our people. An Attorney General who will use the Justice Department against their political enemies.And head of the FBI who will turn our federal agents into the President’s own private army.

[OCS: A scurrilous attack that mirrors the most radical progressive communist democrat talking points put forth by paid media propagandists. Aren’t these the actions taken by President Biden?]

So I ask you again, where are our leaders? Where is President Obama and President Bush and President Clinton and President Biden? Where are our former Joint Chiefs of Staff? The leaders of the American military. General Brown, General Milley, General Dunford, General Dempsey.

[OCS: Unbelievable.

  • President Obama, the man that racialized and divided America while providing Iran, a terrorist state, with a path to nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles.
  • President Clinton, the man that sold his office, allowed North Korea to go nuclear, improved the accuracy of Chinese ballistic missiles, and weaponized the Department of Justice.
  • President Biden, a senile egomaniac controlled by his radical progressive communist democrat handlers, and warmonger.
  • General Milley, a traitor who offered the Communist Chinese information on future nuclear operations by the President of the United States.]

Where are the State Department leaders? American Ambassadors, Secretary of State. Where is Rex Tillerson and Hillary Clinton and John Kerry and Condoleezza Rice? Where are the former heads of the FBI and CIA like Leon Panetta and John Brennan and Christopher Wray and James Comey? Where are the former Vice Presidents? Gore, Pence, Quayle, Harris. Our former Speakers of the House, Paul Ryan, John Boehner, Nancy Pelosi.

[OCS: Look closely at the names—a collection of corrupt, liars, leakers, ideologues, most of whom are guilty of treason or other criminal acts. With the exception of a few unexceptional Republicans, President Bush, Condoleezza Rice, Mike Pence, and Dan Quayle, the rest should be sitting in prison cells for their corruption or attempt to subvert and overthrow our government.

Panetta, Brennan, Wray, and Comey – all traitors who attempted to subvert the Office of the Presidency.]

Many of you ran to be President yourself. You know what’s going on. You understand how unconstitutional and illegal and wrong this is.

[OCS: Most of the people listed are poster candidates for “unconstitutional, illegal, and wrong” behavior.]

You know this is a coup. A hostile takeover of the American government. And you know that our courts, which are the only group even remotely standing up for the rule of law right now, are not going to be able to move fast enough to stop what’s happening.

[OCS: A classic case of projection, where the party at fault projects their behavior on their opposition while falsely asserting their moral high ground. The progressive communist democrats are the ones behind lawfare, the use of the law to interfere with ongoing government operations to stem the tide of governmental corruption.]

Someone has to stand up to this takeover and they have to do it fast and now before it’s too late. So we need our leaders to combine their collective authority to oppose this rising dictator. We need you to join forces on behalf of the oath you all took to protect this nation from enemies both foreign and domestic.

[OCS: Look closely, these are the people who did “combine their collective authority to oppose” Donald Trump, the man who promised the American people he would hold evildoers accountable for their unconstitutional and criminal actions.]

I am just a woman in my kitchen. The protesters are just citizens on the street. The few Democratic Congress members using their voice for our rights are the minority.

For God’s sakes, you are our chosen leaders. Give us an alternative now. Find the courage to stand up and protect us.

As Ezra Klein said, Trump is acting like a king because he is too weak to act like a president. He can’t get things passed through Congress so he is signing all of these executive orders hoping we don’t understand it doesn’t work like that. You need to come out and tell us that.

You need to use your collective influence to explain to the public that he can’t do this. That he doesn’t have the power. That it’s not allowed and it’s not normal.

[OCS: Where were you when the progressive communist democrats were selling out America to her enemies and looting the Treasury?]

And you need to be the ones to challenge this bullshit leader to leader however far it needs to go. You made a promise to protect this nation, its people, and the Constitution. We need you to honor that promise now because now is when it really matters.

[OCS: Leigh McGowan is on the wrong side of history.]

Bottom line…

This is a stunning example of a progressive communist democrat propagandist projecting bad behavior on those she believes are the opposition.

We are so screwed.

-- Steve

P.S. Personally, I wish Leigh well, knowing she suffers from pulmonary arterial hypertension, a potentially fatal and grossly debilitating disease. That she has found a way to espouse her views in a productive manner is a testament to her resiliency.


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


HOW CORRUPT ARE THE PROGRESSIVE COMMUNIST DEMCRATS

Progressive-communist-democrats

  • The progressive communist democrats are screaming about access to personal data in Social Security and Medicare but say nothing of the rampant fraud and abuse that is rapidly bankrupting the system.

  • The progressive communist democrats are screaming about auditing USAID and claiming the lack of procedural protections but say nothing about the billions of dollars in waste, fraud, abuse, and unauthorized distributions.

  • The progressive communist democrats are screaming about access to the Treasury Department’s payment system but say nothing of the unauthorized automatic payments and the lack of justification and program codes on disbursements.

  • What the progressive communist democrats are really screaming about is that their gravy-train funding sources are being discovered, exposed to the American public, and eliminated.

The Hidden Agenda Behind Progressive Democrat Outcries: A Closer Look at the Real Issues.

Lately, progressive communist democrats have been vocal about several issues that they claim threaten the fabric of America. Whether it’s about access to personal data in Social Security and Medicare, calls for auditing USAID, or concerns about Treasury Department payment systems, their rhetoric is loud and often persuasive. But, if we look beneath the surface, their complaints may not be as altruistic as they seem. Many of these outcries are little more than smoke and mirrors, designed to divert attention from the real issues plaguing our government systems for years.

Social Security and Medicare: Fraud is Bankrupting the System.

One of the most recent points of contention from progressive communist democrats is the issue of personal data within Social Security and Medicare. They’ve raised alarms about potential privacy breaches and unfair access to sensitive information. While privacy concerns are valid, these criticisms fail to address the much more pressing issue: the rampant fraud and abuse within the system.

Social Security and Medicare are two pillars of the American safety net, but both systems have been hemorrhaging money due to fraudulent claims, identity theft, and inefficiencies. Fraudsters can siphon funds, and the bureaucratic red tape makes it nearly impossible to hold anyone accountable. Meanwhile, millions of taxpayer dollars are wasted, and the very solvency of these programs is at risk. Yet, instead of focusing on these critical issues, many progressive democrats are shouting about data access—diverting attention away from the ongoing financial crisis within these programs.

USAID: The Waste, Fraud, and Abuse Nobody Wants to Talk About.

Another hot progressive topic is the call to audit USAID (U.S. Agency for International Development). They claim the need for more procedural protections and a crackdown on corruption. While some level of oversight is undeniably essential, their outcries seem strangely selective. They rarely, if ever, address the enormous waste, fraud, and abuse that has been plaguing USAID for decades.

Billions of taxpayer dollars have been distributed without proper oversight, with little accountability for spending funds. From ineffective foreign aid programs to the mismanagement of funds in countries where corruption runs rampant, USAID’s reputation for fiscal responsibility is, at best, questionable. Still, progressive democrats would instead focus on hypothetical procedural violations instead of the actual financial mishandling that undermines the agency’s core mission and depletes taxpayer dollars.

Treasury Department Payment Systems: The Elephant in the Room.

Perhaps most concerning is the ongoing failure to properly audit and regulate the Treasury Department’s payment system. Progressives have raised alarms about access to this system, seemingly concerned that unauthorized individuals might gain access to public funds. While security concerns are valid, the more significant issue is the complete lack of transparency in how funds are disbursed from the Treasury.

Automatic payments are routinely made without proper justification, and no clear program codes are associated with many disbursements. This means that billions of taxpayer dollars are being allocated without clear accountability, opening the door to fraud, waste, and mismanagement. Yet, instead of focusing on this, the loudest voices in the progressive camp are too busy focusing on access issues that have little impact on these underlying problems. It’s almost as if the real systemic issues are being intentionally ignored.

Exposing the Gravy Train.

So, what are progressives really upset about? The answer is simple: their gravy-train funding sources are being exposed to the public. The personal and political interests that have been thriving off the current state of these systems are starting to come to light. These systems, filled with waste, fraud, and lack of oversight, have allowed political insiders, contractors, and special interest groups to thrive at the expense of the American taxpayer.

When these issues are exposed, the waste is uncovered, and accountability becomes a reality; those benefiting from the system are understandably upset. They are the ones who stand to lose when reform is introduced, and they are the ones who are working hard to maintain the status quo.

Bottom line…

It is time to prioritize reform of bloated and fraud-filled, wasteful programs over progressive communist democrat rhetoric.

While the progressive communist democrats may scream loudly about access to personal data or bureaucratic inefficiencies, they often neglect to address the more critical issues at hand. Fraud, waste, and abuse are running rampant in programs like Social Security, Medicare, USAID, and the Treasury Department, and these issues are undermining the very fabric of our government systems. And they have refused to take action, full well knowing that the American public was being screwed.

So, instead of focusing on irrelevant progressive communist democrat distractions, it’s time to demand accountability and transparency. The real battle is not about data access or auditing procedures; it’s about ensuring that taxpayer dollars are being spent wisely and that fraudsters are not allowed to siphon funds from the American people. Until we face these issues head-on, the systems we rely on will continue to crumble under the weight of inefficiency and abuse.

We are so screwed, and it is primarily the progressive communist democrats who are screwing us.

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


U.S. DISTRICT JUDGES: THE MAKING OF CORRUPT MINI-KINGS

Lady-justice-b

The Struggle Between Judicial Overreach and Presidential Authority

In an increasingly polarized political landscape, the role of U.S. District Judges has come under scrutiny. Recent developments have revealed a pattern of partisan judicial intervention that appears to go beyond legal reasoning, with judges wielding significant power to delay or even thwart President Trump’s agenda and Executive Orders. This trend raises serious constitutional questions about the proper scope of judicial authority, the balance of power between the branches of government, and the real threat of a partisan judicial conspiracy to override the will of the American people.

The judicial usurpation of the unitary power of the President of the United States…

One of the most concerning examples is the ability of any individual with alleged standing to file for a temporary restraining order (TRO) against the government, potentially halting or altering executive actions nationwide. While this process can be a tool of accountability, it has become a double-edged sword, allowing judges to shape policy outcomes based on their narrow, often partisan perspectives.

Senator Mike Lee recently expressed his concerns, pointing out that some judges are not simply interpreting the law but are actively working against legitimate presidential authority. According to Lee, these judges’ actions are more akin to political partisanship than the impartial adjudication expected from the judiciary. His criticism echoes frustrations from other corners of the political spectrum, where many feel the judicial branch has overstepped its bounds.

Lee referenced a striking incident where a judge ordered the CDC, FDA, and HHS to restore deleted webpages under a Trump executive order. As CBS News reported, this action demonstrates how judges can influence government operations, potentially undermining executive decisions that fall within the President’s purview.

Judge orders HHS, CDC and FDA to restore deleted webpages with health information

A federal judge on Tuesday ordered the Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Food and Drug Administration to restore webpages and data that had been scrubbed in compliance with President Trump's executive order on gender ideology while litigation moves forward.

U.S. District Judge John Bates agreed to grant a temporary restraining order sought by the group Doctors for America, which argued that its members used the websites when treating patients and conducting research. The nonprofit organization said that the removal of the webpages by the Department of Health and Human Services and its components violated federal law.

Bates found that the challengers were likely to succeed in their claims that the Department Health and Human Services, CDC and FDA acted unlawfully when they stripped medical information from public-facing websites.

"It bears emphasizing who ultimately bears the harm of defendants' actions: everyday Americans, and most acutely, underprivileged Americans, seeking healthcare," he wrote. Citing declarations from two doctors filed in the case, Bates said if they "cannot provide these individuals the care they need (and deserve) within the scheduled and often limited time frame, there is a chance that some individuals will not receive treatment, including for severe, life-threatening conditions. The public thus has a strong interest in avoiding these serious injuries to the public health."

His order directs the agencies to restore earlier versions of their websites by 11:59 p.m. Tuesday. It comes after Bates held a hearing on the matter Monday.<Source>

A Court Primer…

The Judiciary Act of 1789 created the U.S. District Courts. This landmark piece of legislation, signed into law by President George Washington on September 24, 1789, established the structure of the federal judiciary, including the creation of district courts as the trial-level courts of the federal system.

The Act divided the country into judicial districts, each with a district court, and set the number of courts and their jurisdiction. These courts were designed to handle federal cases involving federal law, diversity of citizenship cases, and certain admiralty and maritime matters.

U.S. District Judges have specific limitations on their judicial power, grounded in both the Constitution and legal precedents. While their role is crucial in interpreting and applying the law, several key boundaries govern their authority:

  1. Scope of Jurisdiction: District judges have limited jurisdiction, meaning they can only hear cases within specific boundaries defined by federal law. They can’t make rulings on matters outside their jurisdiction, including cases that don’t involve federal regulations, the U.S. Constitution, or citizens from different states when diverse jurisdiction is invoked.

  2. Judicial Review: District judges can review executive and legislative actions to ensure they comply with the Constitution and federal law. However, their power to block or delay presidential orders is not unlimited. They must base decisions on legal principles, not personal or partisan preferences.

  3. Temporary Restraining Orders (TROs) and Injunctions: A judge can issue a TRO to halt an action temporarily, but only if a plaintiff demonstrates immediate harm or risk of harm. These orders are meant to preserve the status quo until further hearings occur. They are temporary and must not unduly disrupt government functions or overstep the judicial role. TROs should apply to the individual or individuals seeking relief and not the entire nation at large.

  4. Separation of Powers: The U.S. Constitution establishes the separation of powers between the three branches of government, and this principle also binds district judges. While they can check executive overreach, they must respect the executive branch’s authority to carry out its constitutional duties. Judges are not to make or enforce policy and must avoid overstepping into areas reserved for the executive or legislative branches.

  5. Precedent and Legal Principles: Judicial power is constrained by legal precedents set by higher courts, especially the U.S. Supreme Court. District judges must follow these precedents and cannot create new interpretations of the law that go against established rulings.
  6. Appeal Process: A U.S. District Judge's decision is subject to appeal. If a party disagrees with a ruling, they can take the case to a higher court, typically a U.S. Court of Appeals. This ensures that no single judge has unchecked power over the law.

 

In sum, U.S. District Judges are bound by constitutional limits, their jurisdiction, and the principle of judicial restraint, which ensures they don’t exceed their role as interpreters of the law but remain within the boundaries of their judicial authority. Their power to block or delay presidential orders and other executive actions is carefully regulated, mainly to prevent judicial overreach that could disrupt the functioning of the government.

Bottom line…

While judicial checks on executive power are an essential part of the Constitution’s system of checks and balances, the ability of district judges to unilaterally impede or delay policy enforcement has raised alarms since many of these moves are politically motivated and constitute the use of “lawfare” (legal warfare) on behalf of progressive communist democrats.

It’s clear that district judges’ role in shaping policy is expanding, and their influence is greater than ever before. This seriously erodes the democratic process and the essential safeguards against judicial overreach.

I cannot find any authority in the U.S. Constitution that gives a federal judge the power to issue a national injunction that affects the prerogatives of the Executive Branch. 

We are so screwed.

-- Steve

Many a truth is spoken in jest...

MC-activism_021125-800x0


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


TIME TO END THE ISRAELI HOSTAGE CRISIS

Hostages

Hamas’s cruel treatment of the hostages it has kidnapped has become increasingly evident. With each staggered release of a few hostages at a time, families are left in constant agony, clinging to the hope that their loved ones might return home, only to endure the emotional toll of uncertainty.

Tragically, the reality is that many of the remaining hostages may either be dead or in such poor physical condition that their release could be a public relations nightmare for Hamas.

Patience with Hamas is fast running out…

President Donald Trump recently remarked that the last batch of hostages looked like “Holocaust survivors,” highlighting the appalling conditions these individuals have endured. This comparison emphasizes the severe toll on their health and well-being, suggesting the unimaginable suffering these hostages have faced under Hamas’s captivity. While some hostages are fortunate enough to be released, the ongoing ordeal for those still held captive speaks to the depths of cruelty and disregard for human life exhibited by this group.

Trump says the ceasefire should be canceled if Hamas doesn’t release all hostages by Saturday

Trump says the ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas should be canceled if Hamas doesn’t release all the remaining hostages it is holding in Gaza by midday Saturday. [February 15, 2025.]

In comments to reporters as he signed a series of executive orders, Trump said it was ultimately up to Israel. But he warned that “all hell is going to break out” if the remaining hostages aren’t released, adding that he feared many were dead.

“I’m speaking for myself,” Trump said. “Israel can override it.” <Source>

There was some concern that Hamas did not have possession of all the hostages, and there were several terrorist groups involved.

The future for Gazans looks increasingly bleak, deservedly so, as the majority support Hamas and elected the terrorists into governing power. 

Palestinians

Returning to an area devastated by years of conflict, they face the daunting challenge of rebuilding their lives in a region with little or no infrastructure. To make matters worse, they are under the rule of the corrupt and malevolent Hamas government, which has been diverting humanitarian aid meant for the people, using it instead for its own purposes.

This has compounded the suffering of civilians, leaving them trapped in a cycle of poverty and instability with no clear path to a better future. The lack of resources, coupled with a government more concerned with its own power than the well-being of its people, paints a grim picture for those living in Gaza.

And this is what some misguided American students support at the urging of their Islamic activists and agitators.

Bottom line…

Terrorism is unacceptable, and the Hamas terrorists, including those Islamicists who have escaped into the United States under the Biden Administration’s open borders program, need to be eliminated like cockroaches.

We are so screwed.

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


CALIFORNIA POLITICIANS: TALKING OUT OF BOTH SIDES OF THEIR MOUTH

Politicians who claim to support the disabled act far differently when powerful unions demand they kick disabled workers to the curb instead of accommodating their special needs.

Pride3

In a troubling development, PRIDE Industries, a Roseville, California-based social enterprise dedicated to creating employment opportunities for people with disabilities, has announced a significant reduction in force affecting disabled prison contractors at the California Medical Facility (CMF) in Vacaville.

The layoffs, which involve around 62 employees, are a direct result of a union dispute that has forced the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) to cease employing PRIDE workers in custodial positions traditionally held by civil service employees.

PRIDE Industries has long been known for providing competitive business services to various commercial, industrial, and government clients. The organization has become a model for inclusive employment, offering meaningful work opportunities to individuals with disabilities who may otherwise face significant barriers to entering the workforce.

However, the recent setback is a blow to PRIDE and the affected employees. The dispute centers around the grievance filed by the Service Employees International Union Local 1000 (SEIU Local 1000), one of the most powerful unions in the state.

According to the union, outsourcing custodial services to PRIDE Industries at the California Medical Facility violates the civil service protections guaranteed in the California State Constitution. These protections are designed to ensure stable, fair employment for public workers and safeguard against the privatization of jobs traditionally held by state employees.

A spokesperson for SEIU Local 1000 explained the union’s position, stating, “We challenged the outsourcing of custodial services at the California Medical Facility in Vacaville because it violated civil service protections enshrined in the California State Constitution, which safeguard stable employment and fair treatment for public workers.” The union’s concerns are rooted in a desire to protect unionized workers and prevent further erosion of public sector jobs.

Despite the ongoing grievance, PRIDE Industries has continued to advocate for its disabled workers, urging both the state and the union to consider alternative solutions allowing the employees to remain in their roles. Unfortunately, the state has allowed the contract to expire and, with it, the employment of these individuals. The contract is set to conclude by the end of February 2025, leaving the 62 workers facing uncertain futures.

Where are the progressive champions of inclusion?

What stands out in this situation is the lack of proactive efforts to integrate these workers into the civil service system or to provide accommodations for their continued employment within state agencies. Rather than taking meaningful steps to ensure that these workers can remain employed within state service, the state has chosen to let the contract run its course, resulting in the layoffs of disabled workers who had relied on PRIDE Industries to provide them with stable, dignified employment.

The situation has sparked a broader conversation about the treatment of disabled workers within the public sector and the need for meaningful reforms in how outsourcing is handled in government contracts.

Advocates for people with disabilities argue that the issue is not simply about labor contracts but about ensuring that all individuals, regardless of their abilities, have access to fair employment opportunities.

About the SEIU...

  • SEIU Local 1000 Corruption Allegations and Scandals:  SEIU Local 1000 has faced several allegations of corruption, with critics accusing its leadership of mismanaging funds, engaging in undemocratic practices, and using its influence for personal gain. One of the most notable controversies occurred when former union leaders were accused of embezzling funds for personal use. Investigations revealed that union members' dues were misallocated for purposes unrelated to their interests, such as lavish vacations and high-end perks for union leadership. These actions sparked outrage among union members who felt their hard-earned dues were being squandered by corrupt officials.

  • Allegations of Power and Influence Abuse:  Another major issue surrounding SEIU Local 1000 is its alleged abuse of power and its often controversial political influence. The union has been accused of exerting undue influence on political candidates and decisions in California. Its significant campaign contributions have raised concerns about the union's ability to sway political agendas in its favor, sometimes putting union interests over the public good. Such power can lead to conflicts of interest, where the interests of union leadership or political allies overshadow the needs of rank-and-file members.

Bottom line...

As the clock ticks down to the contract's expiration at CMF, the future of the 62 disabled workers remains uncertain.

PRIDE Industries has called on state officials and the union to find a solution allowing these workers to continue contributing to the California Medical Facility and other state services.

Advocates for disability inclusion hope that this situation will prompt a broader conversation about the need for reforms to ensure that people with disabilities are not excluded from opportunities to serve their communities, even in the face of union challenges or political disputes.

The outcome of this situation could set an important precedent for how California handles the inclusion of disabled workers in public service positions and balances the interests of labor unions with the need for inclusive, equitable employment opportunities for all citizens.

Californians, call your legislator now. Demand that they back their mealy-mouthed words with real action.

With California's progressive communist democrat uni-party, everybody is screwed.

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


DISASTER RECOVERY: HERE COME THE CALIFORNIA COMMUNISTS

Rahm

In response to the devastating wildfires in the Los Angeles region, particularly in Pacific Palisades/Malibu, where more than 6,800 structures were destroyed and nearly 1,000 damaged, as well as in Altadena, where 9,400 structures were lost and 1,000 damaged, government officials are preparing to use the disaster recovery process as an opportunity not just to restore and modernize what was lost, but to push forward a progressive communist democrat social engineering agenda under the guise of recovery efforts.

According to Los Angeles County Supervisor Kathryn Barger…

When we think about recovery, we must think beyond simply reconstructing what was lost. Our mission is bigger than rebuilding houses and businesses. We must also work hard to restore hope with tangible and scalable solutions that are accessible, sustainable, and can be delivered quickly.

My promise to rebuild is also based on the fact that we have an opportunity to modernize our infrastructure, to create scalable and cost efficient housing solutions, and to ensure that every resident — no matter their economic standing — has an option to return home. <Source>

Gavin Newsom Says Californians Need to Rebuild With Science and Climate Change in Mind

"You can't rebuild the same, so we have to rebuild with science, we have to build with climate reality in mind, we have to look at infrastructure, redundancy systems, ingress, egress as it relates to emergency management and planning, materials, all of that is being reviewed and reconsidered with the latest iterations in terms of understanding and technology." 

The Dangers of Using Disaster Recovery to Advance a Progressive Agenda

Communities face the daunting task of rebuilding after natural disasters. The damage done to infrastructure, homes, and livelihoods often requires a massive, coordinated effort from government agencies, businesses, and citizens to return to normalcy. However, while disaster recovery is an urgent priority, some policymakers have used these critical moments of crisis to advance progressive agendas that go far beyond the simple restoration of what was lost.

The problem arises when the recovery process is hijacked to impose social engineering projects that transform the character of communities in ways that may not align with the interests or preferences of the people who live there.

The results are detrimental when disaster recovery funds and regulatory changes promote high-density, low-income housing in neighborhoods once zoned as single-family residential. This transformation often happens through local zoning laws, building codes, and permits—tools that should ensure safety and consistency but can also be wielded to promote a broader political or social agenda.

1. High-Density Housing in Single-Family Neighborhoods

One of the most controversial strategies is the demand for high-density, low-income housing in previously single-family residential areas. Sometimes, these policies are justified as a solution to housing shortages or a response to low-income communities' economic challenges. However, the unintended consequences of these projects often include:

    • Devaluation of Property Values: Introducing multi-family or low-income housing into areas previously dominated by single-family homes can significantly alter the neighborhood's character. It can drive down property values for existing homeowners who may have invested in the area for its residential stability.
    • The strain on Resources: High-density housing can strain local infrastructure, schools, roads, and emergency services, which were not designed to handle such a volume of people. The influx of residents without corresponding upgrades in essential services can reduce the quality of life for new and existing residents.
    • Loss of Community Identity: These developments may disrupt the community's social fabric, eroding a neighborhood's unique character and cohesion.

2. Public Transit Mandates and Zoning Restrictions

In some disaster recovery plans, policymakers mandate conformity to public transit routes, pushing for projects like creating public transportation infrastructure in areas that may not need it or are not equipped to support such an endeavor. While public transit is beneficial in many cases, it is not always appropriate in areas better served by private transportation options, such as cars or ride-sharing services.

Additionally, these types of mandates can encroach upon local zoning laws designed to protect residents' freedom to determine the future of their communities. Forced conformity to top-down solutions is an imposition that undermines the principles of local governance and autonomy.

3. Regulatory Capture and Eminent Domain

In some cases, desirable, disaster-stricken land becomes subject to eminent domain, where government entities seize privately owned property for public use. The real danger lies in how this power is sometimes used to capture prime real estate for public parks, green spaces, or commercial developments that serve specific political or social interests. This could result in:

    • Loss of Property Rights: When the government exercises eminent domain under the guise of disaster recovery, individual property owners lose their rights over their land, potentially without fair compensation or proper consultation with the community.
    • Political Agenda-Driven Land Use: The public good is often cited as the justification for these takings, but in many cases, it is less about actual public benefit and more about fulfilling a progressive agenda, such as creating more public parks or forcing the introduction of certain types of infrastructure that align with a political ideology.

4. The Climate Change Prescription: Overreach in the Name of Sustainability

Another alarming trend is using disaster recovery as an opportunity to implement climate change prescriptives. This includes stringent regulations on energy consumption, transportation, appliances, and even the types of fuel used in everyday life. For example:

    • Gas Station Closures and Restrictions: To promote electric vehicle adoption, some localities are enacting regulations that severely limit or outright forbid the construction of new gas stations. While arguably beneficial in the long-term transition to greener energy, this move can create unnecessary obstacles in communities with limited transportation options, especially in rural areas.
    • Electric Vehicle Charging Stations: As part of the green agenda, many recovery plans now mandate the installation of electric vehicle charging stations. While the shift toward electric vehicles is not inevitable, these mandates often occur without considering whether the infrastructure is practical or needed in a specific area. In communities with limited demand for electric vehicles or inadequate, stressed power grids, forcing these installations can divert resources away from more pressing needs.
    • Appliance Restrictions: To combat the use of fossil fuels, new construction is often forced to curtail appliances such as gas water heaters or gas cooking stoves. This is definitely a tyrannical approach to restricting personal freedoms without any moral or scientific justification. Even if all of the gas-powered vehicles, stoves, and heaters were eliminated, it would have a non-measurable effect on the global climate.

5. The Hidden Cost of Social Engineering Through Recovery

While progressive policies in the wake of disaster recovery might be well-intentioned, they can have unintended consequences that impact residents for generations. These policies often prioritize ideological goals over practical considerations, resulting in:

    • Increased Division: When communities are restructured according to a top-down vision, residents may feel alienated or disconnected from their own neighborhoods. It is essential to involve local stakeholders in the recovery process to ensure that rebuilding efforts align with their needs and values.
    • Loss of Community Voice: Disaster recovery should be a time to heal, rebuild, and listen to the needs of the affected population. Imposing a social engineering agenda risks sidelining the voices of those directly impacted by the disaster.
    • Communist Ideals: Taking from one group of creators and producers and giving to another group of non-contributors by following the Marxist dicta of "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs."

Explain this...

Newsom Authorizes $50M To Fight Trump … After Begging For Federal Fire Aid

California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) signed two bills Friday providing $50 million to fight President Donald Trump’s policies—after returning from a trip to Washington, DC, where he sought federal aid money for recent wildfires in his state.

Both bills were passed after a special legislative session called by Newsom after the election to prepare California to lead the opposition to the second Trump administration. Newsom and the Democrat-controlled legislature reached a deal to fund the anti-Trump effort even as the Palisades Fire and Eaton Fire were still smoldering in Los Angeles. <Source>

Grenell Calls Out Bass-Appointed L.A. Fire Recovery Chief for $500K 3-Month Salary: ‘Gross, Offensive’

Ric Grenell, President Donald Trump’s Envoy for Special Missions, slammed Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass’s (D) fire “recovery czar” for his large three-month salary of $500,000 paid by charity groups.

Real estate executive Randy Johnson, who worked with Soboroff in developing the ritzy Playa Vista neighborhood in the Westside area of L.A., will receive $250,000 from charity groups over the 90-day period as he helps with the recovery efforts. <Source>

Bottom line…

Residents and others must resist the politician's temptation to use recovery efforts to advance political agendas far beyond the immediate needs of rebuilding homes and more resilient infrastructure.

Focusing on restoring communities and ensuring that recovery efforts reflect the desires of the people who live there, we can avoid the dangers of tyrannical government overreach and create a more responsive approach to disaster recovery.

We are so screwed.

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


THE BIOHAZARD DANGER OF UNKNOWN SEED PACKETS ARRIVING FROM CHINA: WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW

The days of kinetic warfare are almost over, as bombing and shooting individual clusters have become some of the least effective weapons in our arsenal.

Only fools prepare to fight the last kinetic war when artificial intelligence-driven cybercrimes, disinformation/persuasion campaigns, and anonymized biological agents have been shown to cause widespread damage, with the aggressor, even if known, not suffering instant and overwhelming retaliation.

Biohazard-seed
In recent years, there has been an alarming trend of mysterious seed packets arriving at people’s doorsteps worldwide, especially in the United States, often from China. These unsolicited seed shipments have sparked concern and curiosity and are far more than a random, unusual package. They pose potential biohazard risks to local ecosystems, agriculture, and public health. Here’s everything you need to know about the dangers associated with these seed packets.

The Mystery of Unsolicited Seed Shipments

Bio-seed

It started innocently enough: individuals started receiving unsolicited seed packets from unknown senders, often marked as “jewelry” or “toys” on the customs declaration. The seeds appeared harmless, but soon, experts and authorities began to raise alarm. Most of these packets were postmarked from China, although the precise origin and purpose remained unclear.

While some seeds were easily identifiable, others were of unknown species, including invasive plants, fruits, and vegetables. However, the genuine concern wasn’t about receiving unusual plant seeds in the mail but about the potential risks these seeds could introduce into local ecosystems. Seeds that were not toxic to humans could cripple food-stock animals, which then impacts humans.

Why Are These Seed Shipments Dangerous?

  1. Invasive Species: One of the biggest threats these unsolicited seed packets pose is the potential for invasive plant species. These foreign plants can harm local ecosystems by outcompeting native species for resources such as sunlight, water, and nutrients. This can lead to the decline of native flora and fauna, disrupting the balance of local habitats. Invasive plants can also affect agriculture by spreading disease or attracting pests that may damage crops.

  2. Pathogens and Pests: Another danger associated with these mystery seeds is the possibility that they may carry harmful pathogens, viruses, or pests that could devastate local agriculture and natural plant life. Seedborne diseases, transmitted through infected seeds, can spread quickly if introduced into an area without proper quarantine measures.

  3. Contamination and Cross-Contamination: Foreign seeds could inadvertently lead to cross-contamination between local plant species and new, potentially harmful organisms. Even seeds that appear to be benign may contain harmful bacteria, fungi, or viruses capable of infecting plants, animals, or even humans under certain circumstances.

  4. Public Health Risks: Some plants carry toxins or allergens that may pose serious human and/or animal health risks. For example, certain seeds might contain chemicals that can be dangerous if consumed or touched. Without knowing the specific nature of the seeds, it’s hard to determine whether they could be harmful to children, pets, or farm animals.

The Government’s Response

In response to this growing issue, authorities like the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), and local agricultural agencies have warned about these unsolicited seed packets. In many countries, receiving such packages has been considered a potential biosecurity concern, with authorities urging recipients not to plant seeds or discard them improperly.

In some cases, the USDA has coordinated with customs officials to track and intercept suspicious shipments. They also encourage recipients to report the arrival of mystery seed packets immediately to avoid further complications.

What Should You Do If You Receive an Unknown Seed Packet?

If you’ve received an unsolicited seed packet, here’s what you should do:

  1. Do Not Open or Plant the Seeds: Avoid handling or planting the seeds. Even seemingly harmless seeds can have consequences when introduced into new environments.

  2. Report It to Authorities: Contact your local agricultural agency or the USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS). They will guide you on correctly disposing of the seeds and ensure no environmental risk.

  3. Dispose of the Seeds Safely: Do not throw the seeds away in your regular trash or garden. Follow any guidelines provided by authorities for safe disposal to prevent the seeds from potentially spreading.

  4. Follow Local Regulations: Comply with your county’s regulations regarding foreign plant materials to avoid legal issues and protect agriculture and the environment.

The Bigger Picture: Biosecurity and International Trade

These seed shipments highlight an increasing concern over biosecurity in global trade. In today’s interconnected world, international shipments can carry risks far beyond the goods we’re familiar with. Both consumers and governments must take necessary precautions to prevent the spread of invasive species and protect local environments from the unintended consequences of foreign imports.

With increasing awareness, international collaborations to ensure the safety of plant shipments are becoming more critical. Countries are enhancing regulations on importing seeds with stricter border controls and biosecurity measures to prevent potential threats to biodiversity.

Bottom line…

While the mystery of the unsolicited seed packets may seem like an isolated incident, it serves as a stark reminder of the interconnectedness of global trade and the potential dangers that can arise from unforeseen circumstances. Consumers must remain vigilant when receiving unsolicited packages and cooperate with authorities to mitigate possible risks. With stronger biosecurity measures in place, we can help protect our ecosystems, agriculture, and public health from emerging threats in the future.

Stay informed, stay safe, and be cautious with your mail and unsolicited or disguised packages—they could contain more than just a surprise! And never approach anything dropped from a balloon.

We are so screwed.

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


EXPEL & DEPORT PALESTINIAN ANTI-SEMITIC TROUBLEMAKERS

Our colleges and universities located in dense population areas have become hotbeds of radical ideological warfare, made more dangerous because of their research laboratories that non-vetted students and faculty members can access.

Ucla-royce

l

Ucla-dox

Pro-Palestinian protestors slapped bloody handprints on the home of a powerful Hollywood agent during a protest outside his Los Angeles home.

Jonathan 'Jay' Sures, the 58-year-old vice chairman and managing director of the United Talent Agency, saw his Brentwood home targeted by at least 50 UCLA demonstrators early Wednesday morning, Deadline reported.

Sures, who is Jewish, represents superstar clients that include Ryan Seacrest. He is a member of the University of California Board of Regents, which voted to ban political statements from university homepages.

At around 6.15am Wednesday morning, officers from the LAPD were called to Sures' residence in response 'to a large group, blocking the street and driveway.'

Along with 'bloody' handprints smeared across his garage door, protestors put up caution tape throughout the front yard.

Dozens of demonstrators held up massive signs at the front gate of his home while chanting 'intifada revolution,' Daily Bruin reported.

One sign read 'disclose, divest - we will not stop, we will not rest' while another said 'Jonathan Sures you will pay until you see your final day.'

An additional sign that was lying in the street soaked from the rain, read: 'divest now or you will pay.'

Nearly 50 pro-Palestinian protestors targeted the Los Angeles home of Hollywood agent Jay Sures

Sures, who is Jewish, represents superstar clients that include Ryan Seacrest

'It's one thing to peacefully protest, but to go to an administrator or a Regent's house to violate the hundred foot rule, which is what it is in Los Angeles, to disturb the entire neighborhood by pounding on drums, to surround my wife's car and prevent her from free movement and to put up signs, threatening my family and my life and vandalize the house - that is a big escalation,' Sures told Deadline.

A neighbor, who was granted anonymity for safety reasons, told the Daily Bruin that they were pushed by a protestor while attempting to film the demonstration before roughly 20 police officers responded to the scene.

When officers arrived at the home, they were met with nearly 50 masked protestors 'banging on drums, making loud noises and causing disturbance.'

'Our job was to keep the peace,' an LAPD officer told Deadline. 'There were no arrests.'

Due to the size of the crowd, UCLA police officers were also requested to the scene.

After police successfully dispersed the protestors at around 8am, three police cars remained outside the home, Daily Bruin reported.

Sures said that the early-morning protests 'scared the living s***' out of his wife, adding how the 'whole situation is unfortunate' and that 'threatening my family is so disappointing,' The Daily Beast reported.

The protest was organized by the Graduate Students for Justice in Palestine group at the University of California.

The 15 months of conflict between Palestine and Israel, which has left at least 46,000 Palestinians dead and displaced more than a million, ended with a ceasefire deal last month.  <Source>

Bottom line...

It is time for the University to expel and request deportation for disruptive international students and to seek administrative separations for staff members engaging in similar nonpeaceful protest activities.

We are so screwed.

 -- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


LEGACY PROGRESSIVE MEDIA LOSES ITS COLLECTIVE MIND OVER DOGE AUDITS OF GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTS

Commie-jounalist

In the recent 17 days from when President Donald Trump signed his first executive order, the legacy progressive communist democrat media outlets have found themselves in a state of collective disarray as government audits have revealed uncomfortable truths.

Long-held progressive communist democrat narratives are being dismantled, and widespread corruption exposed, with some of the biggest names in the progressive media sphere struggling to reconcile their long-standing political reporting with the harsh realities exposed by these audits.

The audit results have stirred confusion and frustration among the American public, from financial mismanagement to inefficiencies in government programs. Commentators who once presented these institutions as infallible or above reproach have been proven to be liars or dupes.

Instead of embracing a reform-minded approach, many dishonest media actors have opted for knee-jerk reactions, clinging to discredited talking points and calling for a halt to the continuing disclosures of financial corruption and false narratives.

What’s most striking, however, is how quickly these media giants have retreated into their progressive communist democrat echo chambers, either dismissing the findings or attempting to reframe them as partisan attacks. The result? There is a dramatic polarization in how government performance is discussed in the media, where the truth becomes a casualty in pursuing ideological purity.

USAID is about funding anti-America interests and providing aid and comfort to our enemies…

Even a cursory glance at USAID has revealed troubling evidence that taxpayer funds are being used to advance the agenda of progressive, left-wing organizations—both foreign and domestic—that align with the broader goals of the progressive communist democratic movement.

Instead of focusing on humanitarian aid and development, USAID is increasingly channeling resources to organizations that support ideologies that aim to undermine traditional American values and institutions.

This perceived misuse of taxpayer money has sparked outrage, with accusations that USAID is effectively acting as a conduit for funding groups that promote policies and ideologies, which many now realize are efforts to subvert the United States from within. The growing concern is that the agency is nothing more than a tool for advancing a specific political agenda rather than fulfilling any legitimate mission of providing funds and advice for global aid and development to allies of America.

Bottom line…

As these Doge (Department of Government Efficiency) audits continue to reveal more profound flaws within government programs, legacy media must adapt and engage with the facts or double down on increasingly disconnected narratives.

One thing is clear—what once seemed like a tightly controlled discourse is now crumbling under the weight of uncomfortable truths.

We are so screwed.

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


ACCOUNTABILITY FOR ADAM SCHIFF: JUSTICE ON THE HORIZON?

The Senate has confirmed President Donald Trump’s nominee, Pam Bondi, as Attorney General in a 54-46 vote. Notable is the display of Republican unity, with just one Democrat, Senator John Fetterman (D-PA), joining the Republicans.

Bondi

This is bad news for newly elected Senator Adam Schiff, as the Senate confirmed President Donald Trump’s nominee, Pam Bondi, as Attorney General in a 54-46 vote.

Schiff-for-brains
Adam Schiff, best known for his role in the impeachment proceedings of President Donald Trump, where his role in lying, leaking, subornation of perjury, evidence tampering, and manufacturing outright false information resulted in House Resolution 521 - Censuring Adam Schiff, Representative of the 30th Congressional District of California for misleading the American public and for conduct unbecoming of an elected Member of the House of Representatives.

Senator Adam Schiff questions Attorney General nominee Pam Bondi in Senate confirmation hearing...

An excerpt demonstrating how Schiff mischaracterizes situations, casts aspersions, and badgers a witness…

[Adam Schiff]  Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Ms. Bondi, as you know, the Supreme Court in Trump versus United States held the president has absolute immunity to commit crimes in certain core areas of the president's responsibility. One of those core areas is the justice department.

So in a breathtakingly dangerous and irresponsible decision, Justice Roberts and the majority held the president could commit crimes using the department of justice and be immune from prosecution. Justice Sotomayor correctly said this new immunity lies about like a loaded weapon. So the fear and the concern we have is that the incoming president will use that loaded weapon, that immunity to commit crimes through the Department of Justice, and for that reason, it is all the more important that we have an attorney general who has the, the independence, the strength, the intestinal fortitude to say no to the president when it is necessary. So my first set of questions has to do whether you have the, the independence to say no, when you must say no, and you can say this is hypothetical, but it is not hypothetical.

So let me start with one very specific non hypothetical. The president has said, Jack Smith should go to jail. Will you investigate Jack Smith?

[Pam Bondi]  Senator, I haven't seen the file. I haven't seen the investigation. I haven't looked at anything. It would be irresponsible of me to make a commitment regarding anything without--you're, you're, you're a long practicing attorney--without looking at a file.

[Adam Schiff]  So you would need a factual, you would need a factual predicate to open an investigation of Jack Smith.

[Pam Bondi]   Is that not a summary by you sitting here? Yes, sir.

[Adam Schiff]  And not a summary by the president either. Right?

[Pam Bondi] Absolutely.

[Adam Schiff]  So a summary by the president or his desire to investigate Jack Smith would not be enough for you to open an investigation of Jack Smith. Is that right?

[Pam Bondi] I will look at the facts and evidence in any case.

Note that Schiff’s style of questioning frequently involves aggressive, persistent, rapid-fire confrontational inquiries designed to press witnesses into providing specific answers that support Schiff’s often false political narrative or are designed to embarrass those questioned.

Bottom line…

In granting a presidential pardon to Adam Schiff, President Biden limited Schiff’s ability to use his Fifth Amendment constitutional rights in any criminal investigation or congressional hearing to protect him against self-incrimination.

Since his testimony cannot be used against him in legal proceedings, he is compelled to tell the truth or rely on the “poor memory, I cannot recall” dodge.

However, if Schiff lies, he can be held responsible for lying to a federal law enforcement officer or referred for prosecution by the Attorney General for perjury.

Justice for Adam Schiff’s despicable behavior may finally be addressed by the American public, who were harmed by his actions.

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


DOLLAR DIPLOMACY: THE ROLE OF USAID FUNDS TO PURCHASE FOREIGN INFLUENCE

Bb

Dollar diplomacy, a term historically linked to U.S. foreign policy strategies, refers to using financial power to exert influence over foreign governments and political outcomes.

One of the most notable mechanisms of dollar diplomacy is the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).

While USAID officially channels funds for humanitarian aid, infrastructure projects, and economic development, its reach goes beyond traditional development work.

In reality, USAID funds often serve as a tool for the CIA and other branches of the U.S. government, which strategically allocate resources to secure favorable outcomes from foreign actors. These financial incentives are used to sway political leaders, influence elections, and support regimes that align with U.S. interests.

Are these funding items grossly wasteful political projects involving NGOs and their leftist agenda, or something more akin to “black budget” operations and political bribes?

  • $1.5 million to "advance diversity equity and inclusion in Serbia's workplaces and business communities"
  • $70,000 for production of a "DEI musical" in Ireland
  • $2.5 million for electric vehicles for Vietnam
  • $47,000 for a "transgender opera" in Colombia
  • $32,000 for a "transgender comic book" in Peru
  • $2 million for sex changes and "LGBT activism" in Guatemala
  • $6 million to fund tourism in Egypt
  • Hundreds of thousands of dollars for a non-profit linked to designated terrorist organizations — even AFTER an inspector general launched an investigation
  • Millions to EcoHealth Alliance — which was involved in research at the Wuhan lab 
  • "Hundreds of thousands of meals that went to al Qaeda-affiliated fighters in Syria"
  • Funding to print "personalized" contraceptives birth control devices in developing countries
  • Hundreds of millions of dollars to fund "irrigation canals, farming equipment, and even fertilizer used to support the unprecedented poppy cultivation and heroin production in Afghanistan," benefiting the Taliban
  • EcoHealth Alliance, a global health organization that brought you the Communist Chinese Pandemic, focuses on infectious disease research and has been at the center of controversy due to its funding ties and partnerships. Critics have raised concerns about the organization's role as a potential cut-out for CIA operations, particularly concerning its research in China. EcoHealth has studied bat coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, leading some to question whether its activities served as a front for gathering intelligence on Chinese bioweapons research. While EcoHealth’s mission focuses on disease prevention, its connections to U.S. government funding and its engagement in high-stakes biosecurity research in China have led to suspicions that the organization may have been used as a channel for intelligence gathering under the guise of scientific collaboration. Though there is no conclusive proof of espionage, the murky intersection of health, diplomacy, and defense raises troubling questions about using non-governmental organizations as covert actors in geopolitical conflicts.

  • The CIA's alleged involvement in drug trafficking to fund covert operations, often referred to as "the dark side of the war on drugs," has been a subject of intense debate and conspiracy theories. Over the years, numerous reports and whistleblower accounts have suggested that the CIA turned a blind eye—or actively facilitated—the smuggling of drugs, particularly during the Cold War. These operations reportedly helped fund clandestine operations, such as those in Latin America and Afghanistan, without the need for Congressional approval or oversight.

    One of the most widely cited examples is the "Iran-Contra Affair" of the 1980s, where the CIA is accused of using profits from drug trafficking to fund Nicaraguan Contras, a rebel group fighting the Sandinista government. The operation allegedly included the trafficking of cocaine into U.S. cities, mainly targeting African American communities, in what many view as a deliberate manipulation of the drug trade to support U.S. geopolitical goals.

    Though much of this remains speculative, reports and declassified documents continue to show a pattern of the CIA's involvement in operations that indirectly or directly supported drug smuggling to fund covert activities. The practice highlights the blurred lines between state-sponsored operations and criminal activities, raising serious ethical questions about the extent of U.S. involvement in fueling the global drug trade for strategic purposes.

  • In some covert diplomatic operations, securing access to a foreign leader or gaining a favorable photo opportunity can involve more than just negotiation or promises of political support. In certain instances, technical equipment such as cameras, surveillance gear, or other high-tech devices are used as part of the payment or barter for access. This method allows the U.S. or other foreign powers to establish a presence or gain strategic intelligence in a way that is hidden behind the guise of diplomacy.

    For example, a diplomatic mission might involve leaving behind sophisticated communication equipment or cameras as a form of "payment" for exclusive access to a foreign leader. In some cases, this can be part of a more significant deal, where the equipment is ostensibly given as a gesture of goodwill or as part of a technical exchange. However, the true intent often includes the surveillance capabilities built into these devices, allowing for ongoing intelligence gathering in the future.

    While these actions may seem unusual or controversial, they underscore the complexity of international relations, where even small gestures like a photo op or a public meeting can be negotiated in exchange for more technical or clandestine assets. These operations reflect the reality that nothing is genuinely given without a deeper purpose or potential payoff in the world of diplomacy and intelligence.

Are these individuals trustworthy?

EmdBottom line…

I cannot help but wonder if we are exposing secret black ops that keep America safe in favor of cheap political headlines.

Shadow diplomacy, which involves the covert use of taxpayer money to support political movements, fund opposition groups, or shore up regimes friendly to American goals, is rarely discussed publicly. However, it should serve as a powerful reminder of how economic assistance can be wielded as a tool of statecraft—a crucial and necessary tool to maintain geopolitical influence in a complex world.

Before celebrating these successes in curbing waste, fraud, and abuse, let us hope that those ferreting out details have security clearances and the knowledgeable leadership to know when to keep their mouths shut and press releases in check.

We are so screwed.

-- Steve


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS


DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE DUMPS ON AMERICANS WHO WANT TO PROTECT THEMSELVES AGAINST TYRANNY, CRIMINALS, CRAZIES, AND TERRORISTS

“Mediocrity knows nothing higher than itself, but talent instantly recognizes genius.” —Arthur Conan Doyle (1859–1930)

David Hogg wins election as vice chair of DNC

Once again, the progressive communist democrats who run the Democratic National Committee demonstrate the depths to which they can sink.

Hogg

The Idiocy of Demagoguery

Demagoguery is the art of manipulating people’s emotions, fears, and prejudices to gain power or influence. It’s a dangerous and often destructive force in politics and society. At its core, demagoguery preys on ignorance and division, pushing people to act based on irrational impulses rather than reason.

What makes demagoguery so damaging is its reliance on oversimplified solutions to complex issues. Demagogues thrive by scapegoating groups, spreading misinformation, and presenting themselves as the only solution to society’s problems. They don’t encourage thoughtful discourse or healthy debate—instead, they thrive in chaos, where emotion reigns supreme.

The idiocy of demagoguery lies in its disregard for truth and critical thinking. It reduces nuanced issues to black-and-white narratives without room for compromise or understanding. Instead of promoting unity or progress, demagogues sow discord and polarization.

The truth about gun control…

  • A weapon is like any other implement; its use depends on the intent of its user.
  • No matter how hard you try, criminals, crazies, and terrorists do not obey the law and are willing to use any implement at hand to intimidate, injure, or kill the object of their ire.
  • No matter how scary-looking a semi-automatic weapon may appear, it functions like any other semi-automatic weapon: It fires once per trigger pull.
  • Restricting the number of rounds in a high-capacity magazine only disadvantages an ordinary individual facing multiple or well-concealed assailants.
  • A weapon is a force multiplier that allows the weak, the aged, and the infirm to avoid becoming unwilling victims.

HOGG-WILD

Bottom line…

As citizens, we must recognize the tactics of demagoguery and resist the allure of easy answers. Democracy depends on informed, thoughtful participation, not manipulating fear or hate. The antidote to demagoguery is clear: critical thinking, empathy, and a commitment to truth.

And the willingness to stand up to fools like David Hogg, a media creation who never held a job, and call bullshit!

We are so screwed.

-- Steve

NRA-BENEFACTOR-1


“Nullius in verba”-- take nobody's word for it!
"Acta non verba" -- actions not words

“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”-- George Bernard Shaw

“Progressive, liberal, Socialist, Marxist, Democratic Socialist -- they are all COMMUNISTS.”

“The key to fighting the craziness of the progressives is to hold them responsible for their actions, not their intentions.” – OCS

"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

“A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims... but accomplices” -- George Orwell

“Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt." (The people gladly believe what they wish to.) ~Julius Caesar

“Describing the problem is quite different from knowing the solution. Except in politics." ~ OCS