There is little doubt in my mind that many people close to Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation may have been bought and paid for by Muslim extremists seeking access and favor from the Clinton State Department.
Possibly why Hillary Clinton, with full knowledge of the Clinton’s ongoing criminal enterprise , did everything in her power to keep the Clinton’s activities hidden from the State Department, Congress, the President of the United States, and the American people. Even to the extent of using text messaging and other schemes to avoid disclosure. Risking the destruction of the infamous email server rather than produce incriminating emails that could send the Clintons and their cronies to jail. Cover-up and obstruction of justice.
Emails Show Blumenthal Pushed Son’s Anti-Israel Activism On Hillary
The State Department’s August email dump of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton included numerous communications with close confidante Sid Blumenthal, who often passed along his son Max’s anti-Israel articles.
The older Blumenthal, who served in the Clinton White House as a close political aide to the president and first lady, sent Clinton, in December 2010, an article his son wrote about “Islamophobia” in the Republican Party, the tea party, and the “Islamophobic crusade” from the “pro-Israel lobby.” (Email 1 , Email 2)
Max attacked a number of individuals and groups for their financial or political support of Israel as well as excoriated them for their criticism of radical Islamic terrorism.
In response to a tweet from The Daily Caller’s Jamie Weinstein asking the younger Blumenthal if he was an “informal adviser” to Clinton, Blumenthal responded, “I warned her about the danger of #JSIL. She didn’t listen.”
The JSIL (The Jewish State of Israel in the Levant) hashtag on Twitter is the creation of Max and fellow anti-Israel writer, Rania Khalek. The hashtag is meant to compare Israel to the terrorist organization ISIL.
Sid Blumenthal’s Israel Michegas
But what’s most revealing about Blumenthal’s giddy hopes for a potential Libyan-Israeli rapprochement is how much it differs from other sentiments he had expressed about the Jewish state. For it wasn’t so long ago that Sidney Blumenthal was hawking the vitriolic anti-Israel book published by his son, Max, and attacking those who had criticized it.
In the course of a short career, the younger Blumenthal gradually exiled himself from respectable journalistic outlets, and so several years ago decided to reinvent himself as Israel’s most outspoken and extreme Jewish antagonist, at one point writing for a Beirut-based newspaper aligned with the Assad regime in Syria, before deciding that the blood-drenched regime in Damascus was no longer to his liking. His 2013 book Goliath is so venomous in its denunciations of Israel, and so strident in its defense of terrorism against it, that Eric Alterman, himself a harsh critic of Israel and a columnist for the far-left Nation magazine, concluded that it “could have been published by the Hamas Book-of-the-Month Club (if it existed) without a single word change once it’s translated into Arabic.”
“[W]hat’s most revealing about Blumenthal’s giddy hopes for a potential Libyan-Israeli rapprochement is how much it differs from other sentiments he had expressed about the Jewish state.”
The book is replete with comparisons of Israeli Jews to Nazis, and calls for the ethnic cleansing of Jews from the Middle East. The book’s last chapter, “Exodus,” a riff on Jewish biblical history and the Leon Uris tome of the same name, envisions the reverse Exodus of the Jews out of their homeland. Asked at a 2013 event about what he believes should happen to Israel’s Jews, Blumenthal fils responded, “There should be a choice placed to the settler-colonial population” (that is, the Jewish population): “Become indigenized…you have to be part of the Arab world.” Those who don’t? “The maintenance and engineering of a non-indigenous demographic majority is non-negotiable.” In other words, leave or suffer. <Source>
How could Hillary Clinton continue to allow Bluementhal access given his anti-Semitic, anti-Israel, and backdoor connections? But, then again, she probably owed him for his public attacks on individuals, organizations, and media on behalf of the Clintons.
Affidavit seems to dispute Blumenthal's sworn testimony
Capitol Hill sources have provided CNN with a document they say indicates White House aide Sidney Blumenthal may have lied to the Senate during his sworn deposition earlier this week.
The document is a sworn affidavit from free-lance journalist Christopher Hitchens in which he appears to dispute Blumenthal's assertion that he was not a source for negative comments about Monica Lewinsky, including the assertion that she was a "stalker."
In his deposition Wednesday, Blumenthal testified that he had no knowledge or involvement in spreading derogatory information about Lewinsky to the media.
"I have no idea how anything came to be attributed to a White House source," he said.
In the affidavit, dated February 5, Hitchens described a March 19 lunch with Blumenthal and Hitchens' associate, Carol Blue.
"Mr. Blumenthal stated that Monica Lewinsky had been a 'stalker' and that the president was 'the victim' of a predatory and unstable sexually demanding young woman," Hitchens statement reads. "Referring to Ms. Lewinsky, Mr. Blumenthal used the word 'stalker' several times." <Source>
One wonders why so many Jews associated with the progressive socialist democrats pay lip service to Jewish organizations, but seek to undermine the State of Israel at every turn?
Could it be that a majority of progressive Jews simply want to assimilate into the progressive society, that they have no feelings for the plight of the Jewish people or the State of Israel? Or, something more sinister, they are willing to be bought with bribes and favors to turn a blind eye to the only democracy in the Middle East that offers freedom from oppression – including women’s rights?
How could billionaires like David Geffen, Steven Spielberg, and other prominent Jews support a corrupt, lying, Marxist like Hillary Clinton – unless they were bought and paid for?
Bottom line …
The destruction of State Department property and classified documents now permits prosecutors to add a jury instruction saying that the destruction of evidence amounts to a presumption of guilty knowledge and misdeeds.
It appears that the only thing that can save Hillary Clinton, the Foundation, and their accumulated wealth is to continue the cover-up as the President of the United States or Obama issuing a presidential pardon for the former President and First Lady to “spare the nation” the embarrassment of national leaders being put on trial for public corruption as common thieves.
We are so screwed.
"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius