President Barack Hussein Obama and his cadre of progressive socialist democrats, in effect the neo-communist party, is waging a war on America, and by extension all Americans, with his unilateral policies to destroy and/or degrade American institutions, using our own laws against us to bring about his transformative socialist agenda.
Strong words, you bet. But how else can you explain the measures President Obama has taken to neuter and nullify Congress in order to use executive letters, memoranda, and order to implement draconian public policies that would never survive an up or down vote in Congress.
Even worse, some Justices on the Supreme Court, for their own reasons, have sanctioned Obama’s actions using tortured logic and language that proves that when it comes to politics the commonsense interpretations of words do not matter as much as the promotion of ideology.
So let’s examine one of Obama’s weapons of socialist/communist ideological war …
Contrary to the rule of law and the presumption of innocence; demanding that the elements of a crime, including intent, be proven with specific allegations against a specific individual or corporation, President Obama and his socialist/communist acolytes have come up with a new interpretation of the law. Called “disparate Impact,” this concept turns conventional American justice upside down; where the accused needs to prove his innocence instead of the state proving the accused guilt – including intent.
In United States anti-discrimination law, the theory of disparate impact holds that practices in employment, housing, or other areas may be considered discriminatory and illegal if they have a disproportionate "adverse impact" on persons in a protected class. Although the protected classes vary by statute, most federal civil rights laws protect based on race, color, religion, national origin, and gender as protected traits, and some laws include disability status and other traits as well. <Source>
Catch-22: even though the accused may not have intended to cause harm to an individual class of individuals, even by applying identical criteria to all individuals in an “equal under the law” manner, adverse impact can occur when those equal standards disadvantage a protected class. And, the basis of the discrimination is the theory that all actions should occur in the same proportionality as the proportionality observed in the general population.
To illustrate how crazy this might seem, one need only consider mortgage loans. Traditional criteria for lending consists of the 5 C’s – character (the borrower’s credit reputation), capacity (the borrower’s ability to repay the loan), capital (the borrower’s downpayment), collateral (the borrower’s security for the loan), and conditions (the prevailing economic conditions, and the adjustment of interest rates to compensate with potential risk).
Under this adverse impact scenario, the number of loan denials for women, minorities, and the poor should be manifestly similar to the number of loan denials for the unprotected class (whites, middle-class, etc.). Which is manifestly absurd since the protected classes including women, minority, and the poor have less ability to satisfy loan debt or may live in areas where specific properties may represent compromised collateral.
Thus, President Obama and his cadre of socialist bully boys demand that financial institutions lower their lending standards – putting the institution's solvency and the interests of the depositors and shareholders at risk – in order to pursue a socially-engineered agenda for political reasons. Imagine using nothing but statistical analysis, based on incomplete data and no knowledge of individual situations to prove the probable existence of a crime?
Like most failed socialist experiments, Greece comes to mind, this type of social-engineering ends in chaos, confusion, corruption, and collapse. One need only witness the recent mortgage meltdown and near economic failure of the financial sector of our economy. All brought about by lower lending standards that provided individuals with housing that they could ill afford. Magnified to near-catastrophic proportions by the Wall Street Wizards as they greedily sold mortgage-backed securities based on dodgy borrowers and over-inflated collateral.
If not for the government’s bailout and the Federal Reserve’s ZIRP (Zero Interest Rate Policy) to recapitalize insolvent financial institutions (at the expense of taxpayers, depositors, and investors), the United States would be Greece.
And, we are seeing the very same cycle repeat as Obama’s bully boys are forcing employers to hire incumbent workers based on their color, sex, or other protected characteristic as well as forcing banks to, once again, lower their lending standards to avoid running afoul of the poverty pimps and racial agitators who use statistics to coerce large financial institutions to pay penalties and employ their organizations as “monitors.” Think Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton magnified a million times over.
How can this be happening if we saw the near collapse of our economy?
Obama collecting personal data for a secret race database
A key part of President Obama’s legacy will be the fed’s unprecedented collection of sensitive data on Americans by race. The government is prying into our most personal information at the most local levels, all for the purpose of “racial and economic justice.”
Unbeknown to most Americans, Obama’s racial bean counters are furiously mining data on their health, home loans, credit cards, places of work, neighborhoods, even how their kids are disciplined in school — all to document “inequalities” between minorities and whites.
This Orwellian-style stockpile of statistics includes a vast and permanent network of discrimination databases, which Obama already is using to make “disparate impact” cases against: banks that don’t make enough prime loans to minorities; schools that suspend too many blacks; cities that don’t offer enough Section 8 and other low-income housing for minorities; and employers who turn down African-Americans for jobs due to criminal backgrounds.
Big Brother Barack wants the databases operational before he leaves office, and much of the data in them will be posted online.
So civil-rights attorneys and urban activist groups will be able to exploit them to show patterns of “racial disparities” and “segregation,” even if no other evidence of discrimination exists.
Obama is presiding over the largest consolidation of personal data in US history.
More details can be found at: Obama collecting personal data for a secret race database
And if you think our more conventional enemies will not have access to this information …
US: More Than 21 Million Affected by Government Data Breach
Hackers stole Social Security numbers, health histories and other highly sensitive data from more than 21 million people, the Obama administration said Thursday, acknowledging that the breach of U.S. government computer systems was far more severe than previously disclosed.
The scope of the data breach — believed to be the biggest in U.S. history — has grown dramatically since the government first disclosed earlier this year that hackers had gotten into the Office of Personnel Management's personnel database and stolen records for about 4.2 million people. Since then, the Obama administration has acknowledged a second, related breach of the systems housing private data that individuals submit during background investigations to obtain security clearances.
That second attack affected more than 19 million people who applied for clearances, as well as nearly 2 million of their spouses, housemates and others who never applied for security clearances, the administration said. Among the data the hackers stole: criminal, financial, health, employment and residency histories, as well as information about their families and acquaintances.
More details can be found at: More Than 21 Million Affected by Government Data Breach
If you think this is not by design …
Senator Elizabeth Warren, the (faux American Indian) radical socialist to the left of Bernie Sanders, was the architect of the CFPB (Consumer Financial Protection Board). The Board was designed to be a “super agency” and assume many of the consumer-related regulatory responsibilities of the Federal Reserve, the FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation), the Office of Thrift Supervision, Office of the Comptroller of Currency, and others.
Congressional control over the CFPB was thwarted by having a private institution, the Federal Reserve, fund the CFPB and their activities. Thus the agency functions without effective congressional oversight and control. And, who want to access on a near-real-time basis all of a consumer’s financial transactions for the purposes of “research?” You guessed it: the CFPB.
And ironically, Elizabeth Warren was too radical for the United States Senate to confirm as the CFPB’s first director.
President Obama's decision to avoid a confirmation battle and name Elizabeth Warren to an interim position to launch the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was cheered Thursday by her supporters as a bold step to allow her to shape the powerful but controversial agency she conceived.
"It's a very creative way to put Elizabeth where she ought to be — running the agency," said House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank (D-Mass.) Warren was not interested in being appointed to the five-year term as director, he said.
Still, some senators criticized the decision to bypass the traditional nomination process, a move that could harm the new agency's image. <Source>
Even worse, President Obama once again ignored the Senate for an illegal recess appointment of the first CFPB director …
Yesterday President Obama named Richard Cordray director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) with what is called a "recess appointment" -- one made while Congress is in recess. He did this because Republican senators had blocked confirmation of Cordray, also a Republican and former attorney general of Ohio. They do not object to Cordray but to how the CFPB is organized. Its financing, for example, comes from the Federal Reserve, which means Congress can't exert pressure on the agency by controlling its budget.
While this type of recess appointment is a common action for presidents, this one is fuelling a lot of argument because the Senate was technically still in session. <Source>
Bottom line …
What we have seen in President Obama is a pattern and practice of illegality; in ignoring the Constitution of the United States, in obstructing justice with his nonsensical assertions of presidential privilege, and his directions to federal agencies to ignore or thwart existing law.
We have seen the creation of massive databases containing nearly every American’s financial, medical, employment, and location records – all of which can be subverted for political purposes because there are no specific laws that adequately criminalize the access to this information for personal, political, or profit-making purposes. Like our financial systems that are defective by design so hundreds of millions of taxpayer funds can escape detection and deterrence before they are siphoned-off by politicians and their special interests.
We are at war and apparently facing a fifth column of socialist and communist infiltrators that want to destroy America from within on behalf of our enemies, both foreign and domestic.
If we do not turn this around in 2016 and elect a conservative, we are doomed to Obama Plus under a corrupt, lying Marxist like Hillary Clinton. You will notice that the democrat party is not afraid to embrace radical socialists like Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Hillary Clinton, and Barack Obama. It is not your father’s democrat party, it is the neo-Communist Party in the United States.
We are so screwed.
"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius