Is obtaining high office and control over the United States so important to the democrats that they are willing to sell out our country to our enemies and those who do no believe in the American dream of freedom?
- How else can you explain the democrat support for Muslims whose religion does not separate the difference between church and state? Where the state is controlled by the religion?
- How else can you explain the democrat support for Muslims whose religion does not regard women as equals and makes them virtually slaves to their husbands and subservient to all men?
- How else can you explain the democrat support for Muslims whose system of laws, Sharia, is barbaric and leaves crucial decisions up to the whims of bitter old men?
- How else can you explain the democrat support for Muslims whose sexual repression is legendary and who tend to produce bellicose individuals?
- How else can you explain the democrat support for Muslims who have sworn to change the America and the United States Constitution into a Caliphate run under Sharia law?
- How else can you explain the democrat support for Muslims who have openly attacked America and pretend that radicals are not present and fomenting revolution?
Can the democrats be persuaded to overlook historic Muslim actions in order to secure their campaign funding (possibly from illegal foreign sources) and voter support?
What does this story tell us …
Muslims Try to Rewrite Themselves Into America’s History
The Jumah at the DNC event went off Friday without a hitch, but the Democratic leadership and liberal media are still trying to squirm out of acknowledging that the DNC ever sanctioned the program, which featured a number of Islamist extremists.
Although there is a lot of spin surrounding the event, the fact remains that the leaders of the Bureau of Indigenous Muslim Affairs claim the DNC reached out to them and invited their group to host the two-hour opening event Friday, as well as the officially sanctioned Islamic Regal Dinner that night.
The event appeared on the official Charlotte in 2012 website until it was removed after the radical nature of BIMA got out. The event was attended by hundreds, rather than the 20,000 predicted.
Among the speakers at the event were a retired Muslim Army chaplain who was charged with sedition but not prosecuted, and an unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. <Source>
- Is this the same democrat party who believes the attack on Fort Hood by an obvious Jihadist who sought advice from a radical Imam should be classified as “workplace violence?”
- Is this the same democrat party that is lead by a man who was trained as a Muslim and who has bent over backwards to support Muslim causes?
- Is this the same democrat party that has provided aid and comfort to our Muslim enemies by announcing military plans which would allow our enemies to simply wait for our withdrawal in the region before killing our regional allies and confiscating the tons of war materials we have left in-country?
- Is this the same democrat party that negotiated and negotiated with North Korea until they actually built a nuclear device with the help from Muslims in Pakistan?
- Is this the same democrat party that continues to dither and negotiate while Muslim Iran obtains a nuclear device and threatens the entire region as well as the United States?
- Is this the same democrat party who treats those in Saudi Arabia who financed and supported the attack on the World Trade Center as friends?
- Is this the same democrat party who continues to use our laws against us to prevent the United States from gaining energy independence from Muslim nations?
What can we make of the story of Muslims founding a portion of the United States and having the right to calling themselves indigenous Americans?
But the issue that really rankles many people is BIMA’s support of theories about the Muslim influence on American history, including the notion that a Muslim crew of explorers sailed up the Mississippi River in the 12th century and established a colony that entitles Muslims to call themselves indigenous Americans.
Real Native Americans are not pleased.
During his remarks at the Jumah event, BIMA spokesman Jibril Hough said not only did Muslims visit America first, but it was a Muslim who led Columbus on his famous voyage of discovery.
The claim is based on a Chinese artifact known as the “Sung Document” that purportedly reports on the voyage of a Muslim crew from T’o-Pan-ti to Mu-Lan-pi, which took 100 days. The main problem with the theory is that no one knows with any certainty where either of those lands is. BIMA claims Mu-Lan-pi is America, but many scholars believe it to be Spain. Also, the document mentions pomegranates being found, but they were not introduced to the Americas until the 18th century by the Spanish.
When Columbus set sail to find the Indies, he had high hopes of reaching Asia, but his travel plan was based on maps by the ancient Greek scientist Ptolemy, who had miscalculated that the Earth was a much smaller circumference than in reality.
BIMA, however, seems to be one of those historical revisionist groups that is trying to write Islam into parts of history where it never existed and exaggerate its influence where it did. <Source>
Muslims; pirates and the slave trade?
If Muslims truly want credit for the role they played in the opening of America to Europe, then they just need to look at the historic record.
Continued Muslim aggression in the Mideast and southern Mediterranean in the 15th century made trade with Asia via the normal land routes difficult. This inspired people like Prince Henry the Navigator to begin looking for new trade routes that would allow them to circumvent Muslim bandits and pirates.
In 1453, the fall of Constantinople to Muslim aggressors ended the last vestiges of the Roman Empire and blocked major trade routes to India and Asia. In 1492, less than 40 years later, Columbus set sail to find a route to the Indies, during which he literally bumped into the Americas.
If Muslims weren’t historically such a violent people, Columbus might not have ever set sail.
So it’s safe to say that the land of the free is indirectly the result of Muslim barbarity. BIMA and their DNC collaborators can own that. <Source>
To this day, there are Muslims that advocate slavery – in fact, the entire religion is based on the idea that unbelievers should be killed or enslaved as workers for the Muslim cause.
Bottom line …
The democrats have embraced a culture which is anti-American, anti-woman and anti-freedom. How can we let these people lead America? How can we allow socialists, communists and those who support our enemies gain and maintain control over America?
How can we let these corrupt democrats who will do or say anything to pursue their toxic agenda remain in power?
What happened to the democrat party that they were able to be purchased so cheaply and converted into the corrupt, subversive party that has become a clear and present danger to America?
Any ideas, just drop me an e-mail.