United Nations: Corruption leading to Copenhagen?

In my opinion the United Nations is a corrupt and evil institution. They are about securing their own political and financial future above all else. Their mission to serve as an adjudicator of the world’s conflicts, dispense humanitarian aid and to serve as an honest broker among nations and peoples of this Earth has been hopelessly compromised in favor of human venality.

Therefore, I have no respect for the United Nations, its corrupt leadership and the bureaucrats who are attempting to use the unscientific findings of the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Control) to suit their own ends – conspiring with financial, industrial and medical interests to assist in controlling the world’s resources on the back of an almost laughable scientific theory based on nothing more than sulfurous fumes and carbon dioxide that was found on Venus and Mars.

Had they been an honest broker for the peoples of the world, perhaps they would have stopped the genocide and plunder of those wretches who were so unfortunate to be born in Africa and other impoverished areas.

Where is their call for abundant nuclear energy to drive industrialization and the development of clean water and wholesome foods?

Had they been an honest broker for the peoples of the world, perhaps they would have noted that much of the world’s terrorism is funded by a few nations run by religious fanatics and that this cancer is being spread throughout the world as they hold meetings to condemn democratic institutions and promote countries whose human rights violations and intolerance for the religion of others continues to grow on a daily basis.

Where is their call for personal freedoms, including the right of free speech, freedom of religion and right of assembly?

Where is their call to stop rogue nations from obtaining nuclear weapons and holding their neighbors hostage?

I see their perpetual use of celebrities and other publicity seekers used as media shills, soliciting money for causes which appear to be good and just – but which are subverted by the corruption of those in the United Nations, the Non-Governmental Organizations and the very governments whose people they purport to assist.

Where is their transparency and accountability?

By what right do they interfere in the affairs of sovereign nations, if not to do good? By what right do they make deals with the devil, loudly proclaiming “at least some aid is getting to the people?”

It is time for the world to look at the United Nations for what it appears to be – just another multi-national organization that channels the interests of the corporate community into political action.

It is time for the world’s media, having been corrupted by corporate interests and somewhat devoid of journalistic ethics, to honestly report on the United Nations and the corrupt actions of those who have participated in the IPCC scam.

Thanks to a whistleblower who released numerous e-mails, data and program snippets from the Climate Research Unit of East Anglia University, we can see how a relatively few so-called scientists have seemingly corrupted the “peer review process” and have manipulated the raw temperature data to prove a point – their point, a political point not supported by anything more than computer models. And not just any computer models, but computer models used to create climate scenarios worthy of a science fiction thriller.

Politicians, lawyers, lobbyists, media consultants and other non-productive middlemen have taken over the process and insinuated themselves as necessary controllers and partners in all of the world’s enterprises. They produce nothing and feed off of fear and chaos. Perhaps fearing most the world’s discovery that they are petty little people who really are not needed in the overall scheme of things. That their complex rules, regulations and laws are self-serving to convey advantages to the special interests and to insure that their services are a continuing necessity.

Whereas the people involved could probably find some measure of common ground and conciliatory behavior, it seems that it is in the best interests of these people to create confusion, chaos and corruption – so they and they alone can provide for the safety and security of man in order to keep their power.

It appears that the time has come and we must stand up against political corruption, first by removing those presently in office and beginning to pare down a bureaucracy which does little more than swap reports and PowerPoint presentations among themselves –sometimes at exotic locales such as Copenhagen, but always on the public’s dime.

We need to reject any and all attempts to create any panel, commission, board or tribunal which will have extrajudicial powers to enforce their rules and regulations over those of a sovereign nation.  We need to fight against the type of science which is hyped by the mainstream media into a social phenomenon bordering on a religious cult. We need to take back our government and remind our politicians that they work for us, we the people, not for themselves and not for the special interests.

Think about what I have said – and take action. Don’t become one of the sheeple who simply follow the celebrity flavor of the day. Think for yourself. And start with the replacement of the very politicians who have brought us to the brink of economic disaster and who are now heading for social chaos. Starting in 2010 and continuing through 2014 to remove the last of the sitting Senators, we need a clean sweep of our political structure. Perhaps also sanctioning those political parties which promoted the corrupt, the ignorant and the self-centered ego maniacs as honest politicians who were willing and able to do the people’s business as honest brokers.

Do it, if not for your country, for yourself and your children. The future of the world is about to be decided by those in power – apparently not caring for the Constitutional checks and balances provided by our Founding Fathers. But you must take action or, as the saying goes, forever hold your peace.

-- steve

Comments

[Joram Arentved]

Money still means that my fate hangs by a 'sought' thread, one, I
don't know, don't think, if I can fail to mention to you, for the same reason welcome, please to receive a few more mails of mine, e.g. that my labor situation still
deserves to be controlled by myself, so that I can of course tell & e.g. help us both etc. find & as soon as possible, whoever is who, our best answers to, what's our just as good future, all about & forever to be,
why & when, greetings, 'J.A.:'
===========================================
Before one dismisses this comment out of hand, please remember this is likely to be an international reader, a fellow freedom seeker, from India and one whose first language is not likely to be English. -- steve

[crow]

Well, if WE don't do something about global warming it will not matter what you have said because WE will not be here on this little planet earth, since we have continued to destroy every living thing on this little planet WE live on.
===========================================
Hysteria aside, you need to consider the tremendous time scales involved in climate cycles. Both of us will be long dead as will most of our children's children. It seems that the rise in carbon dioxide levels lags the rise in temperature by 600 - 1000 years. Therefore, even if we reduced our man-made carbon dioxide to zero, there will be absolutely no effect on climate for at least 600 - 1000 years. A more likely scenario is that the rise in carbon dioxide levels is caused by warming oceans which in turn are warming due to a number of factors: solar output, Earth's orbit, Earth's rotational dynamics and precession, oceanic currents, volcanic activity and plate tectonics -- all of which are beyond man's control.

The greatest amount of heat is stored in our oceans, as is dissolved carbon dioxide. As oceans warm, the carbon dioxide comes out of solution and enters the atmosphere. Which is a more likely scenario than that proposed by those with a political agenda. The Earth has been a lot hotter and a lot colder, with carbon dioxide concentrations being much lower and much higher. To cherry-pick an infinitesimally small time frame and use selective observations to pursue a political agenda is dishonest.

I am afraid that climate science is being used to push a political agenda that will adversely affect life on Earth. If you wish, drop me an e-mail using the link under my picture and I will send you a peer-reviewed article that considers the physics behind atmospheric carbon dioxide and the so-called greenhouse. It's an eye-opener.

Bottom line, life has been here a long, long time and our biosphere seems to be a self-regulating mechanism. I wouldn't get too concerned about the dire predictions.

Thanks very much for taking the time to comment. -- steve