From recent studies, there is no doubt that the mainstream media has given Barack Obama a pass and that they have done everything in their power to portray the current Bush Administration and our nation in a negative light.
But hiding or omitting critical facts from a story is unconscionable … even when the media is located in the far-left liberal democrat city of San Francisco.
According to Newsbusters.org, audio of Barack Obama claiming that he will implement a stringent carbon cap and trade system that will severely effect one of the largest energy sources in America is front-page news.
So why did the San Francisco Chronicle omit the story?
From Newsbusters.org …
Hidden Audio: Obama Tells SF Chronicle He Will Bankrupt Coal Industry
“Imagine if John McCain had whispered somewhere that he was willing to bankrupt a major industry? Would this declaration not immediately be front page news? Well, Barack Obama actually flat out told the San Francisco Chronicle (SF Gate) that he was willing to see the coal industry go bankrupt in a January 17, 2008 interview. The result? Nothing.”
In his own words …
Why this is dangerous?
Removing any major source of energy without a workable, sustainable and cost-effect alternative in place will severely cripple the United States militarily and economically.
Perhaps that’s why almost all of the enemies of the United States, both foreign and domestic, endorse Barack Obama either tacitly or explicitly.
The transcript of Obama’s words …
“Let me sort of describe my overall policy.”
“What I've said is that we would put a cap and trade system in place that is as aggressive, if not more aggressive, than anybody else's out there.”
“I was the first to call for a 100% auction on the cap and trade system, which means that every unit of carbon or greenhouse gases emitted would be charged to the polluter. That will create a market in which whatever technologies are out there that are being presented, whatever power plants that are being built, that they would have to meet the rigors of that market and the ratcheted down caps that are being placed, imposed every year.”
“So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can; it's just that it will bankrupt them because they're going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that's being emitted.”
“That will also generate billions of dollars that we can invest in solar, wind, biodiesel and other alternative energy approaches.”
“The only thing I've said with respect to coal, I haven't been some coal booster. What I have said is that for us to take coal off the table as a (sic) ideological matter as opposed to saying if technology allows us to use coal in a clean way, we should pursue it.”
“So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can.”
“It's just that it will bankrupt them.”
“Amazing that this statement by Obama about bankrupting the coal industry has been kept under wraps until this time.”
“UPDATE: NewsBusters' Tom Blumer has found out that the San Francisco Chronicle story published on January 18 based upon this January 17 interview did not include any mention of Obama's willingness to bankrupt the coal industry which you can hear on the audio. You can read the story here when you scroll down to the "In His Own Words" section. Way to cover up for The One, SF Chronicle!”
I am not for global warming …
I am not an advocate for the current liberal religion called “global warming” as I believe the science is still unsettled as to the description of the global climate change phenomenon, the accuracy of the computerized climate change models, the inability to measure any man-made climate changes for hundreds of years – and, most of all, the susceptibility of the proposed remedy to political manipulation in such a manner as to severely restrict our liberties, enlarge the government bureaucracies, increase taxation on each and every citizen, share political control over critical U.S. corporations with foreign institutions outside the United States (e.g. United Nations, International Commissions) and cede an enormous amount of power to those who have proven in the past that they would become tyrants with unfettered restraint. No wonder that they need to curb the First Amendment rights of citizens by adopting regulations of the Internet and talk radio as well as curb our Second Amendment rights which lead to a means to forcefully redress the tyranny of governments and protect ourselves from foreign invasions.
Is there now any wonder why Barack Obama has proposed a massive internal police force in the guide of a Civilian National Security Force?
"We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."
What can YOU do?
Playing on the racial sensitivities of the liberal democrat voter, Barack Obama has managed to squeeze through the political cracks left by the 50% of the population that hates Hillary Clinton and the 50% of the population who hates the media-demonized Bush Administration.
Make no mistake about it: it looks like a duck, sounds like a duck, walks like a duck – Barack Obama is much, much more than a far-left liberal democrat: he is an outright Marxist/Socialist! A term that the mainstream media and others are reluctant to use for fear of breaching some unwritten law on “political correctness.”
Look at Barack Obama’s long-term relationships with leftist radicals, hate mongers, racists like Louis Farrakahn and Reverend Wright, foreign terrorists such as Rashid Khalidi, domestic terrorists such as William Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn and others of their ilk. This is not merely guilt by association … because he has had a long-term social and business relationship with most of these miscreants.
An Obama presidency, coupled with a far-left liberal democrat Congress, would be the turning point of America towards a political posture that would not only encourage waste, fraud, corruption and increase crime – it would severely cripple the United States – perhaps to the point of becoming a European-style socialist republic.
Do not vote for any candidate or current politician who is willing to subvert the safety, security, sovereignty and economic strength of the United States or limit an individual's right of self-defense for their personal philosophy, power, prestige or profits.
VOTE [X] NO ON OBAMA OR BE PREPARED FOR THE UNPRECEDENTED ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL CRASH THAT WILL SURELY BE THE RESULT OF A TOXIC GOVERNMENT RUN BY CORRUPT IDEOLOGUES SUCH AS OBAMA, HARRY REID, NANCY PELOSI AND OTHERS.
A reminder from OneCitizenSpeaking.com: a large improvement can result from a small change…
The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. -- Marcus Aurelius